12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 8Simple ModelsThe advantage of us<strong>in</strong>g conductance-based models, such as the I Na +I K -model, is thateach variable and parameter has a well-def<strong>in</strong>ed biophysical mean<strong>in</strong>g. In particular, theycould be measured experimentally. The drawback is that the measurement proceduresmay not be accurate, that the parameters are usually measured <strong>in</strong> different neurons,averaged, and then f<strong>in</strong>e-tuned (a fancy word mean<strong>in</strong>g “to make arbitrary choices”).As a result, the model does not have the same behavior as one sees <strong>in</strong> experiments.And even if it “looks” OK, there is no guarantee that the model is accurate from thedynamical systems po<strong>in</strong>t of view, i.e., that it exhibits the same k<strong>in</strong>d of bifurcations asthe type of neuron under consideration.Sometimes we do not need or cannot afford to have a biophysically detailed conductancebasedmodel. Instead, we want a simple model that faithfully reproduces all the neurocomputationalfeatures of the neuron. In this chapter we review salient features ofcortical, thalamic, and other neurons, and we present simple models that capture theessence of their behavior from the dynamical systems po<strong>in</strong>t of view.8.1 Simplest ModelsLet us start with review<strong>in</strong>g the simplest possible models of neurons. As one canguess from their names, the <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire and resonate-and-fire neurons capturethe essence of <strong>in</strong>tegrators and resonators. The models are similar <strong>in</strong> many respects:both are described by l<strong>in</strong>ear differential equations, both have a hard fir<strong>in</strong>g thresholdand a reset, both have a unique stable equilibrium at rest. The only difference is thatthe equilibrium is a node <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegrate-and-fire case, but it is a focus <strong>in</strong> the resonateand-firecase. One can model the former us<strong>in</strong>g only one equation, and the latter us<strong>in</strong>gonly two equations, though multi-dimensional extensions are straightforward. Bothmodels are useful from the analytical po<strong>in</strong>t of view, i.e., to prove theorems.Many scientists, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the author of this book, refer to these neural modelsas be<strong>in</strong>g “spik<strong>in</strong>g models”’. The models have a threshold, but they lack any spikegenerationmechanism, i.e., they cannot produce a brief regenerative depolarizationof membrane potential correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the spike up-stroke. Therefore, they are not279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!