Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
270 Excitability50 mV300 msFigure 7.47: Slow subthreshold oscillation of membrane potential of cat thalamocorticalneuron evoked by slow hyperpolarization (modified from Roy et al. 1984).7.3.3 Slow Subthreshold oscillationInteractions between fast and slow conductances can result in low-frequency subthresholdoscillation of membrane potential, such as the one in Fig. 7.47, even when the fastsubsystem is near a saddle-node bifurcation, acts as an integrator, and cannot havesubthreshold oscillations. The oscillation in Fig. 7.47 is caused by the interplay betweenactivation and inactivation of the slow Ca 2+ T-current and inward h-current,and it is a precursor of bursting activity, which we consider in detail in Chap. 9.There exist three different mechanisms of slow subthreshold oscillations of membranepotential of a neuron.• The fast subsystem responsible for spiking has a small-amplitude subthresholdlimit cycle attractor. The period of the limit cycle may be much larger than thetime scale of the slowest variable of the fast subsystem when the cycle is nearsaddle-node on invariant circle, saddle homoclinic orbit bifurcation, or Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation considered in Chap. 6. In this case, no slow currents or conductancesmodulating the fast subsystem are needed. However, such a cycle mustbe near the bifurcation, hence the low-frequency subthreshold oscillation existsin a narrow parameter range and it is difficult to be seen experimentally.• The I-V relation of the fast subsystem has N-shape in the subthreshold voltagerange, so that there are two stable equilibria corresponding to two resting states,as e.g., in Fig. 7.36. A slow resonant variable switches the fast subsystem betweenthose two states via a hysteresis loop resulting in a subthreshold slow relaxationoscillation.• If the fast subsystem has a monotonic I-V relation, then a stable subthresholdoscillation can result from the interplay between slow variables.The first cases does not need any slow variables, the second case needs only one slowvariable, whereas the third case needs at least two. Indeed, one slow variable is notenough because the entire system can be reduced to a one-dimensional slow equation.7.3.4 Rebound response and voltage sagA slow resonant current can cause a neuron to fire a rebound spike or a burst in responseto a sufficiently long hyperpolarizing current, even when the spike-generating mecha-
Excitability 271Figure 7.48: Rebound responses to long inhibitory pulses in (a) pyramidal neuron ofsensorimotor cortex of juvenile rat (modified from Hutcheon et al. 1996) and (b) ratauditory thalamic neurons (modified from Tennigkeit et al. 1997).(a)(b)-50 mV25 mV100 mssubthresholdsuperthreshold100 pA0 pA 0 pAFigure 7.49: Post-inhibitory facilitation (a) and post-excitatory depression (b) in alayer 5 pyramidal neuron (IB type) of rat visual cortex recorded in vitro in responseto a long hyperpolarizing pulse.nism of the neuron is near a saddle-node bifurcation and hence has neuro-computationalproperties of an integrator. For example, the cortical pyramidal neuron in Fig. 7.48ahas a slow resonant current I h , which opens by hyperpolarization. A short pulse ofcurrent does not open enough of I h and results only in a small subthreshold reboundpotential. In contrast, a long pulse of current opens enough I h , resulting in a stronginward current that produces the voltage sag and, upon termination of stimulation,drives the membrane potential over the threshold.Similarly, the thalamocortical neuron in Fig. 7.48b has a low-threshold Ca 2+ T-current I Ca(T) that is partially activated but completely inactivated at rest. A negativepulse of current hyperpolarizes the neuron and deinactivates the T-current, therebymaking it available to generate a spike. Notice that there is no voltage sag in Fig. 7.48bbecause the T-current is deactivated at low membrane potentials. Upon termination ofthe long pulse of current, the membrane potential returns to the resting state around−68 mV, the Ca 2+ T-current activates and drives the neuron over the threshold. Adistinctive feature of thalamocortical neurons is that they fire a rebound burst of spikesin response to strong negative currents.Even when the rebound depolarization is not strong enough to elicit a spike, it
- Page 230 and 231: 220 BifurcationsExercises1. (Transc
- Page 232 and 233: 222 Bifurcationsv 2v 11a-11-1Figure
- Page 234 and 235: 224 Bifurcations19. [M.S.] A leaky
- Page 236 and 237: 226 Excitabilityspike?spikerestrest
- Page 238 and 239: 228 ExcitabilityAlternatively, the
- Page 240 and 241: 230 Excitability50 ms 20 mV 1 ms100
- Page 242 and 243: 232 ExcitabilityClass 3 excitable n
- Page 244 and 245: 234 Excitability0.20.150.10.05I 1I
- Page 246 and 247: 236 Excitabilitysaddle-node bifurca
- Page 248 and 249: 238 Excitability(a) resting spiking
- Page 250 and 251: 240 Excitabilityproperties integrat
- Page 252 and 253: 242 ExcitabilityThe existence of fa
- Page 254 and 255: 244 Excitability1coincidencedetecti
- Page 256 and 257: 246 Excitabilityspikeexcitatory pul
- Page 258 and 259: 248 Excitability(g)9 ms(f)(e)(d)(c)
- Page 260 and 261: 250 Excitabilitysquid axonmodel0 mV
- Page 262 and 263: 252 Excitability(a) integrator(b) r
- Page 264 and 265: 254 Excitability(a) integrator(b) r
- Page 266 and 267: 256 Excitabilitymembrane potential,
- Page 268 and 269: 258 Excitability0.1saddle-node bifu
- Page 270 and 271: 260 Excitability100 ms10 mVoscillat
- Page 272 and 273: 262 ExcitabilityBogdanov-Takens bif
- Page 274 and 275: 264 Excitabilitya pulse of current.
- Page 276 and 277: 266 Excitabilitymembrane potential
- Page 278 and 279: 268 Excitability(a)150100I K(M)(b)3
- Page 282 and 283: 272 Excitability20 mVADP100 msAHP-6
- Page 284 and 285: 274 ExcitabilityK + activation gate
- Page 286 and 287: 276 ExcitabilityBibliographical Not
- Page 288 and 289: 278 Excitability7. Show that the re
- Page 290 and 291: 280 Simple Modelsspikemembrane pote
- Page 292 and 293: 282 Simple Models1thresholdyz reset
- Page 294 and 295: 284 Simple Models1v reset =|b| 1/2b
- Page 296 and 297: 286 Simple Modelsbe an integrator o
- Page 298 and 299: 288 Simple Modelsintegrate-and-fire
- Page 300 and 301: 290 Simple Models(A) tonic spiking(
- Page 302 and 303: 292 Simple Modelsgeneral algorithm
- Page 304 and 305: 294 Simple Modelscha, cha — real
- Page 306 and 307: 296 Simple Modelslayer 5 neuronsimp
- Page 308 and 309: 298 Simple Modelsb=-240200saddle-no
- Page 310 and 311: 300 Simple Models(a)simple modellay
- Page 312 and 313: 302 Simple Models(a)burstingspiking
- Page 314 and 315: 304 Simple Models(a)dendriticspike2
- Page 316 and 317: 306 Simple Models(a)74 5 6 3210(b)C
- Page 318 and 319: 308 Simple Modelschattering neuron
- Page 320 and 321: 310 Simple ModelsLTS neuron (in vit
- Page 322 and 323: 312 Simple ModelsFS neuron (in vitr
- Page 324 and 325: 314 Simple Models(1) fast oscillati
- Page 326 and 327: 316 Simple Modelsthrough an appropr
- Page 328 and 329: 318 Simple Modelsthey are able to g
270 Excitability50 mV300 msFigure 7.47: Slow subthreshold oscillation of membrane potential of cat thalamocorticalneuron evoked by slow hyperpolarization (modified from Roy et al. 1984).7.3.3 Slow Subthreshold oscillationInteractions between fast and slow conductances can result <strong>in</strong> low-frequency subthresholdoscillation of membrane potential, such as the one <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.47, even when the fastsubsystem is near a saddle-node bifurcation, acts as an <strong>in</strong>tegrator, and cannot havesubthreshold oscillations. The oscillation <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.47 is caused by the <strong>in</strong>terplay betweenactivation and <strong>in</strong>activation of the slow Ca 2+ T-current and <strong>in</strong>ward h-current,and it is a precursor of burst<strong>in</strong>g activity, which we consider <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Chap. 9.There exist three different mechanisms of slow subthreshold oscillations of membranepotential of a neuron.• The fast subsystem responsible for spik<strong>in</strong>g has a small-amplitude subthresholdlimit cycle attractor. The period of the limit cycle may be much larger than thetime scale of the slowest variable of the fast subsystem when the cycle is nearsaddle-node on <strong>in</strong>variant circle, saddle homocl<strong>in</strong>ic orbit bifurcation, or Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation considered <strong>in</strong> Chap. 6. In this case, no slow currents or conductancesmodulat<strong>in</strong>g the fast subsystem are needed. However, such a cycle mustbe near the bifurcation, hence the low-frequency subthreshold oscillation exists<strong>in</strong> a narrow parameter range and it is difficult to be seen experimentally.• The I-V relation of the fast subsystem has N-shape <strong>in</strong> the subthreshold voltagerange, so that there are two stable equilibria correspond<strong>in</strong>g to two rest<strong>in</strong>g states,as e.g., <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.36. A slow resonant variable switches the fast subsystem betweenthose two states via a hysteresis loop result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a subthreshold slow relaxationoscillation.• If the fast subsystem has a monotonic I-V relation, then a stable subthresholdoscillation can result from the <strong>in</strong>terplay between slow variables.The first cases does not need any slow variables, the second case needs only one slowvariable, whereas the third case needs at least two. Indeed, one slow variable is notenough because the entire system can be reduced to a one-dimensional slow equation.7.3.4 Rebound response and voltage sagA slow resonant current can cause a neuron to fire a rebound spike or a burst <strong>in</strong> responseto a sufficiently long hyperpolariz<strong>in</strong>g current, even when the spike-generat<strong>in</strong>g mecha-