12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Excitability 261<strong>in</strong>tegrator(saddle-node bifurcation)?resonator(Andronov-Hopf bifurcation)V-nullcl<strong>in</strong>en-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e?Figure 7.38: Is there an <strong>in</strong>termediate mode between <strong>in</strong>tegrators and resonators?7.2.11 Transition between <strong>in</strong>tegrators and resonatorsConsider the I Na +I K -model or any other m<strong>in</strong>imal model from Chap. 5 that can exhibitsaddle-node or Andronov-Hopf bifurcation, depend<strong>in</strong>g on the parameter values. Let usstart with the I Na +I K -model near saddle-node bifurcation, and hence <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegratormode. The <strong>in</strong>tersection of its nullcl<strong>in</strong>es at the left knee is similar to the one <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.38,left. Now, let us slowly change the parameters toward the values correspond<strong>in</strong>g to theAndronov-Hopf bifurcation with the nullcl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>tersect<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.38, right. Atsome po<strong>in</strong>t, the behavior of the model must change from <strong>in</strong>tegrator to a resonatormode. Is the change sudden, or is it gradual?Any qualitative change of the behavior of the system is a bifurcation. Such abifurcation should somehow comb<strong>in</strong>e the saddle-node and the Andronov-Hopf cases;That is, it should have a zero eigenvalue, and a pair of complex-conjugate eigenvalueswith zero real part. S<strong>in</strong>ce the I Na +I K -model is two-dimensional, the only way these twoconditions are satisfied is when the model undergoes the Bogdanov-Takens bifurcationconsidered <strong>in</strong> Sect. 6.3.3. This bifurcation has codimension 2, that is, it can be reliablyobserved when two parameters are changed, <strong>in</strong> our case E leak and the half-voltage, V 1/2 ,of n ∞ (V ).The top of Fig. 7.39 depicts the phase portrait of the I Na + I K -model at theBogdanov-Takens bifurcation. Notice that the nullcl<strong>in</strong>es are tangent near the left knee,but the tangency is degenerate. A small change of the parameter V 1/2 can result either<strong>in</strong> a saddle and a node (middle of the figure) or <strong>in</strong> a focus equilibrium (bottom of thefigure). The neuron acts as an <strong>in</strong>tegrator <strong>in</strong> the former case and as a resonator <strong>in</strong> thelatter case.Due to the proximity to a codimension-2 bifurcation, the behavior of the I Na +I K -model is quite degenerate. That is, it could exhibit features that are normallynot observed. For example, the <strong>in</strong>tegrator can exhibit post-<strong>in</strong>hibitory spik<strong>in</strong>g, as <strong>in</strong>Fig. 7.40. This occurs because the shaded region <strong>in</strong> the figure, bounded by the stablemanifold of the saddle, goes to the left of the rest<strong>in</strong>g state. An <strong>in</strong>hibitory pulse ofcurrent that hyperpolarizes the membrane potential to V < −65 mV and deactivates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!