Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
254 Excitability(a) integrator(b) resonatorK + activation gateinhibitionexcitation-60 -40 -20membrane potential, mVinhibitionexcitation-60 -40 -20membrane potential, mVFigure 7.30: Direction of excitatory and inhibitory input in integrators (a) and resonators(b).hyperpolarizing steps, it does not depend on the bifurcation mechanism of excitability,and it can occur in integrators or resonators.Some neurons can exhibit rebound spikes after short and relatively weak hyperpolarizingcurrents, as we illustrate in Fig. 7.29. The negative pulse deactivates afast low-threshold resonant current, e.g., K + current, which is partially activated atrest. Upon release from the hyperpolarization, there is a deficit of the outward currentand the net membrane current results in rebound depolarization and possibly a spike.Such a response occurs on the fast time scale and it does depend on the bifurcationmechanism of excitability.In Fig. 7.30 we show why integrators cannot fire rebound spikes to short stimulation,while resonators typically can. A brief excitatory pulse of current depolarizes themembrane and brings it closer to the threshold manifold, as in Fig. 7.30a. Consequently,an inhibitory pulse hyperpolarizes the membrane and increases the distance to thethreshold manifold. The dynamics of such a neuron is consistent with our intuitionthat excitation facilitates spiking and inhibition prevents it.Contrary to our intuition, inhibition can also facilitate spiking in resonator neuronsbecause the threshold set may wrap around the resting state, as in Fig. 7.30b. A sufficientlystrong inhibitory pulse can push the state of the neuron beyond the thresholdset thereby evoking a rebound action potential. If the inhibitory pulse is not strong, itstill can have an excitatory effect, since it brings the state of the system closer to thethreshold set. For example, it can enhance the effect of subsequent excitatory pulses,as we illustrate in Fig. 7.31. The excitatory pulse here is subthreshold if applied alone.However, it becomes superthreshold if preceded by an inhibitory pulse. The timing ofpulses is important here, as we discussed in Sect. 7.2.2. John Rinzel suggested to callthis phenomenon a post-inhibitory facilitation.
Excitability 2557.2.8 Inhibition-induced spikingIn Fig. 7.32, top, we use the I Na,t -model introduced in Chap. 5 to illustrate an interestingproperty of some resonators — inhibition-induced spiking. Recall, that the modelconsists of an Ohmic leak current and a transient Na + current with instantaneous activationand relatively slow inactivation kinetics. It can generate action potentials dueto the interplay between the amplifying gate m and the resonant gate h.We widened the activation function h ∞ (V ) so that Na + current is largely inactivatedat the resting state; see the inset in Fig. 7.32. Indeed, h = 0.27 when I = 0. Eventhough such a system is excitable, it cannot fire repetitive action potentials when apositive step of current, e.g., I = 10, is injected. Depolarization produced by theinjected current inactivates Na + current so much that no repetitive spikes are possible.Such a system is Class 3 excitable.Remarkably, injection of a negative step of current, e.g., I = −15 in the figure,results in a periodic train of action potentials! How is it possible? Inhibition-inducedspiking or bursting are possible in neurons having slow h-current or T-current, such asthe thalamo-cortical relay neurons. (We discuss these and other examples in the nextchapter.) The I Na,t -model does not have such currents, yet it can fire in response toinhibition.Figure 7.33 summarizes the ionic mechanism of inhibition-induced spiking. Theresting state in the model corresponds to the balance of the outward leak current anda partially activated, partially inactivated inward Na + current. When the membranepotential is hyperpolarized by the negative injected current, two processes take place:Na + current deinactivates (variable h increases), and deactivates (variable m = m ∞ (V )decreases). Since m ∞ (V ) is flatter than h ∞ (V ), deinactivation is stronger than deacti-K + activation gate10 mV1 msinhibitorypulseexcitatorypulseinhibitorypulseexcitatorypulse-60 -40 -20membrane potential, mVFigure 7.31: Post-inhibitory facilitation: A subthreshold excitatory pulse can becomesuperthreshold if it is preceded by an inhibitory pulse.
- Page 214 and 215: 204 BifurcationseigenvaluesHopffold
- Page 216 and 217: 206 Bifurcationsfast nullclineslow
- Page 218 and 219: 208 Bifurcationswith fast and slow
- Page 220 and 221: 210 BifurcationsSupercritical Andro
- Page 222 and 223: 212 BifurcationsK + conductance tim
- Page 224 and 225: 214 BifurcationsIn contrast, if the
- Page 226 and 227: 216 Bifurcationsinvariant circlesad
- Page 228 and 229: 218 Bifurcationsbifurcationssaddle-
- Page 230 and 231: 220 BifurcationsExercises1. (Transc
- Page 232 and 233: 222 Bifurcationsv 2v 11a-11-1Figure
- Page 234 and 235: 224 Bifurcations19. [M.S.] A leaky
- Page 236 and 237: 226 Excitabilityspike?spikerestrest
- Page 238 and 239: 228 ExcitabilityAlternatively, the
- Page 240 and 241: 230 Excitability50 ms 20 mV 1 ms100
- Page 242 and 243: 232 ExcitabilityClass 3 excitable n
- Page 244 and 245: 234 Excitability0.20.150.10.05I 1I
- Page 246 and 247: 236 Excitabilitysaddle-node bifurca
- Page 248 and 249: 238 Excitability(a) resting spiking
- Page 250 and 251: 240 Excitabilityproperties integrat
- Page 252 and 253: 242 ExcitabilityThe existence of fa
- Page 254 and 255: 244 Excitability1coincidencedetecti
- Page 256 and 257: 246 Excitabilityspikeexcitatory pul
- Page 258 and 259: 248 Excitability(g)9 ms(f)(e)(d)(c)
- Page 260 and 261: 250 Excitabilitysquid axonmodel0 mV
- Page 262 and 263: 252 Excitability(a) integrator(b) r
- Page 266 and 267: 256 Excitabilitymembrane potential,
- Page 268 and 269: 258 Excitability0.1saddle-node bifu
- Page 270 and 271: 260 Excitability100 ms10 mVoscillat
- Page 272 and 273: 262 ExcitabilityBogdanov-Takens bif
- Page 274 and 275: 264 Excitabilitya pulse of current.
- Page 276 and 277: 266 Excitabilitymembrane potential
- Page 278 and 279: 268 Excitability(a)150100I K(M)(b)3
- Page 280 and 281: 270 Excitability50 mV300 msFigure 7
- Page 282 and 283: 272 Excitability20 mVADP100 msAHP-6
- Page 284 and 285: 274 ExcitabilityK + activation gate
- Page 286 and 287: 276 ExcitabilityBibliographical Not
- Page 288 and 289: 278 Excitability7. Show that the re
- Page 290 and 291: 280 Simple Modelsspikemembrane pote
- Page 292 and 293: 282 Simple Models1thresholdyz reset
- Page 294 and 295: 284 Simple Models1v reset =|b| 1/2b
- Page 296 and 297: 286 Simple Modelsbe an integrator o
- Page 298 and 299: 288 Simple Modelsintegrate-and-fire
- Page 300 and 301: 290 Simple Models(A) tonic spiking(
- Page 302 and 303: 292 Simple Modelsgeneral algorithm
- Page 304 and 305: 294 Simple Modelscha, cha — real
- Page 306 and 307: 296 Simple Modelslayer 5 neuronsimp
- Page 308 and 309: 298 Simple Modelsb=-240200saddle-no
- Page 310 and 311: 300 Simple Models(a)simple modellay
- Page 312 and 313: 302 Simple Models(a)burstingspiking
Excitability 2557.2.8 Inhibition-<strong>in</strong>duced spik<strong>in</strong>gIn Fig. 7.32, top, we use the I Na,t -model <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> Chap. 5 to illustrate an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gproperty of some resonators — <strong>in</strong>hibition-<strong>in</strong>duced spik<strong>in</strong>g. Recall, that the modelconsists of an Ohmic leak current and a transient Na + current with <strong>in</strong>stantaneous activationand relatively slow <strong>in</strong>activation k<strong>in</strong>etics. It can generate action potentials dueto the <strong>in</strong>terplay between the amplify<strong>in</strong>g gate m and the resonant gate h.We widened the activation function h ∞ (V ) so that Na + current is largely <strong>in</strong>activatedat the rest<strong>in</strong>g state; see the <strong>in</strong>set <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.32. Indeed, h = 0.27 when I = 0. Eventhough such a system is excitable, it cannot fire repetitive action potentials when apositive step of current, e.g., I = 10, is <strong>in</strong>jected. Depolarization produced by the<strong>in</strong>jected current <strong>in</strong>activates Na + current so much that no repetitive spikes are possible.Such a system is Class 3 excitable.Remarkably, <strong>in</strong>jection of a negative step of current, e.g., I = −15 <strong>in</strong> the figure,results <strong>in</strong> a periodic tra<strong>in</strong> of action potentials! How is it possible? Inhibition-<strong>in</strong>ducedspik<strong>in</strong>g or burst<strong>in</strong>g are possible <strong>in</strong> neurons hav<strong>in</strong>g slow h-current or T-current, such asthe thalamo-cortical relay neurons. (We discuss these and other examples <strong>in</strong> the nextchapter.) The I Na,t -model does not have such currents, yet it can fire <strong>in</strong> response to<strong>in</strong>hibition.Figure 7.33 summarizes the ionic mechanism of <strong>in</strong>hibition-<strong>in</strong>duced spik<strong>in</strong>g. Therest<strong>in</strong>g state <strong>in</strong> the model corresponds to the balance of the outward leak current anda partially activated, partially <strong>in</strong>activated <strong>in</strong>ward Na + current. When the membranepotential is hyperpolarized by the negative <strong>in</strong>jected current, two processes take place:Na + current de<strong>in</strong>activates (variable h <strong>in</strong>creases), and deactivates (variable m = m ∞ (V )decreases). S<strong>in</strong>ce m ∞ (V ) is flatter than h ∞ (V ), de<strong>in</strong>activation is stronger than deacti-K + activation gate10 mV1 ms<strong>in</strong>hibitorypulseexcitatorypulse<strong>in</strong>hibitorypulseexcitatorypulse-60 -40 -20membrane potential, mVFigure 7.31: Post-<strong>in</strong>hibitory facilitation: A subthreshold excitatory pulse can becomesuperthreshold if it is preceded by an <strong>in</strong>hibitory pulse.