12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

254 Excitability(a) <strong>in</strong>tegrator(b) resonatorK + activation gate<strong>in</strong>hibitionexcitation-60 -40 -20membrane potential, mV<strong>in</strong>hibitionexcitation-60 -40 -20membrane potential, mVFigure 7.30: Direction of excitatory and <strong>in</strong>hibitory <strong>in</strong>put <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrators (a) and resonators(b).hyperpolariz<strong>in</strong>g steps, it does not depend on the bifurcation mechanism of excitability,and it can occur <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tegrators or resonators.Some neurons can exhibit rebound spikes after short and relatively weak hyperpolariz<strong>in</strong>gcurrents, as we illustrate <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.29. The negative pulse deactivates afast low-threshold resonant current, e.g., K + current, which is partially activated atrest. Upon release from the hyperpolarization, there is a deficit of the outward currentand the net membrane current results <strong>in</strong> rebound depolarization and possibly a spike.Such a response occurs on the fast time scale and it does depend on the bifurcationmechanism of excitability.In Fig. 7.30 we show why <strong>in</strong>tegrators cannot fire rebound spikes to short stimulation,while resonators typically can. A brief excitatory pulse of current depolarizes themembrane and br<strong>in</strong>gs it closer to the threshold manifold, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.30a. Consequently,an <strong>in</strong>hibitory pulse hyperpolarizes the membrane and <strong>in</strong>creases the distance to thethreshold manifold. The dynamics of such a neuron is consistent with our <strong>in</strong>tuitionthat excitation facilitates spik<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>hibition prevents it.Contrary to our <strong>in</strong>tuition, <strong>in</strong>hibition can also facilitate spik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> resonator neuronsbecause the threshold set may wrap around the rest<strong>in</strong>g state, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.30b. A sufficientlystrong <strong>in</strong>hibitory pulse can push the state of the neuron beyond the thresholdset thereby evok<strong>in</strong>g a rebound action potential. If the <strong>in</strong>hibitory pulse is not strong, itstill can have an excitatory effect, s<strong>in</strong>ce it br<strong>in</strong>gs the state of the system closer to thethreshold set. For example, it can enhance the effect of subsequent excitatory pulses,as we illustrate <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.31. The excitatory pulse here is subthreshold if applied alone.However, it becomes superthreshold if preceded by an <strong>in</strong>hibitory pulse. The tim<strong>in</strong>g ofpulses is important here, as we discussed <strong>in</strong> Sect. 7.2.2. John R<strong>in</strong>zel suggested to callthis phenomenon a post-<strong>in</strong>hibitory facilitation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!