12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Excitability 25310 ms10 mV-45 mV0 pA-100 pAFigure 7.29: Rebound spikes <strong>in</strong> responseto a brief hyperpolariz<strong>in</strong>g pulse<strong>in</strong> a bra<strong>in</strong>stem mesV neuron hav<strong>in</strong>g fastsubthreshold oscillations of membranepotential.to I = 0 (white square <strong>in</strong> the figure) to a new location (black circle). Whether theneuron fires or not depends on the location of the old equilibrium relative to the stablemanifold to the saddle, which plays the role of the new threshold. In case A theneuron does not fire, <strong>in</strong> case B it fires even though the rest<strong>in</strong>g state is still stable. Theneuronal rheobase is the amplitude of the current I that puts the threshold exactlyon the location of the old equilibrium. Such a value of I always exists, and it oftencorresponds to the saddle-node bifurcation value. Notice that the rheobase currentresults <strong>in</strong> a spike with <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite latency, at least theoretically.A resonator neuron may not have well-def<strong>in</strong>ed rheobase simply because it may nothave well-def<strong>in</strong>ed threshold. Indeed, the dotted l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.28b may correspond toa subthreshold or superthreshold response depend<strong>in</strong>g on where it is <strong>in</strong> the thresholdset. Stimulat<strong>in</strong>g such a neuron with “rheobase” current produces spikes with f<strong>in</strong>itelatencies but partial amplitudes. A bistable resonator (near subcritical Andronov-Hopfbifurcation) may have a well-def<strong>in</strong>ed rheobase because it has a well-def<strong>in</strong>ed threshold— the small-amplitude unstable limit cycle.7.2.7 Post-<strong>in</strong>hibitory spikeProlonged <strong>in</strong>jection of a hyperpolariz<strong>in</strong>g current and then sudden release from hyperpolarizationcan produce a rebound post-<strong>in</strong>hibitory response <strong>in</strong> many neurons. Thehyperpolariz<strong>in</strong>g current is often called anodal current, release from the hyperpolarizationis called anodal break, so rebound spik<strong>in</strong>g is called anodal break excitation(FitzHugh 1976). Notice that fir<strong>in</strong>g of a neuron follows a sudden <strong>in</strong>crease of <strong>in</strong>jectedcurrent, whether it is a positive step or release from a negative step.Often, post-<strong>in</strong>hibitory responses are caused by the “hyperpolarization-activated” h-current, which slowly builds up and upon term<strong>in</strong>ation of the hyperpolarization drivesthe membrane potential over the threshold manifold (or threshold set). Alternatively,the rebound response can be caused by slow de-<strong>in</strong>activation of Na + or Ca 2+ currents,or slow de-activation of a K + current that is partially activated at rest and preventsfir<strong>in</strong>g. In any case, such a rebound response relies on slow currents and long or strong

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!