12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Excitability 2491ms10 mVthreshold ?Figure 7.25: F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g threshold <strong>in</strong> Hodgk<strong>in</strong>-Huxleymodel.and g are essentially the same as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.24c. The resonant burst with 7 ms period <strong>in</strong>Fig. 7.24f produced the most significant deviation from Fig. 7.24c marked by the blackarrow, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the neuron is most sensitive to the resonant <strong>in</strong>put. Typically,the resonant burst does not make the neuron fire extra spikes, but only changes thetim<strong>in</strong>g of “scheduled” spikes. Inject<strong>in</strong>g resonant bursts at different moments results<strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g phenomena, such as extra spikes or the omission of “scheduled”spikes, not shown here, or no effect at all. F<strong>in</strong>ally, there is a subtle but noticeableeffect of the resonant (7 ms) and nearly-resonant (6 ms) bursts even 100 ms after thestimulation (white arrows <strong>in</strong> the figure), for which we have no explanation.7.2.4 Thresholds and action potentialsA common misconception is that all neurons have fir<strong>in</strong>g thresholds. Moreover, greateffort has been made to determ<strong>in</strong>e such thresholds experimentally. Typically, a neuronis stimulated with brief current pulses of various amplitudes to elicit various degreesof depolarization of the membrane potential, as we illustrate <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.25 us<strong>in</strong>g theHodgk<strong>in</strong>-Huxley model. Small “subthreshold” depolarizations decay while large “superthreshold”or “suprathreshold” depolarizations result <strong>in</strong> action potentials. Themaximal value of the subthreshold depolarization is taken to be the fir<strong>in</strong>g thresholdvalue for that neuron. Indeed, the neuron will fire a spike if depolarized just abovethat value.The notion of a fir<strong>in</strong>g threshold is simple and attractive, especially when we teachneuroscience to undergraduates. Everybody, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the author of this book, usesit to describe neuronal properties. Unfortunately, it is wrong. First, the problem is<strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition of an action potential. Are the two dashed curves <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.26 actionpotentials? What about a curve <strong>in</strong>-between (not shown <strong>in</strong> the figure)? Suppose wedef<strong>in</strong>e an action potential to be any deviation from the rest<strong>in</strong>g potential, say by 20 mV.Is the concept of fir<strong>in</strong>g threshold well-def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> this case? Unfortunately, the answeris still NO.The membrane potential value that separates subthreshold depolarizations fromaction potentials (whatever the def<strong>in</strong>ition of an action potential is) depends on theprior activity of the neuron. For example, if a neuron hav<strong>in</strong>g transient Na + currentjust fired an action potential, the current is partially <strong>in</strong>activated, and a subsequentdepolarization above the fir<strong>in</strong>g threshold might not evoke another action potential.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!