Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:
242 ExcitabilityThe existence of fast subthreshold oscillatory potentials is a distinguishable featureof neurons near Andronov-Hopf bifurcation. Indeed, the resting state of such a neuronis a stable focus. When stimulated by a brief synaptic input or an injected pulse ofcurrent, the state of the system deviates from the focus equilibrium, and then returnsto the equilibrium along a spiral trajectory, as depicted in Fig. 7.16, top, therebyproducing a damped oscillation. The frequency of such an oscillation is the imaginarypart of the complex-conjugate eigenvalues at the equilibrium (see Sect. 6.1.3), and itcan be as large as 200 Hz in mammalian neurons.In Ex. 3 we prove that noise can make such oscillations sustained. While the stateof the system is perturbed and returns to the focus equilibrium, another strong randomperturbation may push it away from the equilibrium, thereby starting a new dampedoscillation. As a result, persistent noisy perturbations create a random sequence ofdamped oscillations and do not let the neuron rest. The membrane potential of sucha neuron exhibits noisy sustained oscillations of small amplitude depicted in Fig. 7.16and discussed in Sect. 6.1.4.Injected dc-current or background synaptic noise increase the rest potential, changeits eigenvalues and, hence change the frequency and amplitude of noisy oscillations.Fig. 7.16 depicts typical cases when the frequency and the amplitude increase as theresting state becomes more depolarized.One should be careful to distinguish fast and slow subthreshold oscillations of membranepotential. Fast oscillations, as in Fig. 7.16, are those having period comparablewith the membrane time constant or with the period of repetitive spiking. In contrast,some neurons found in entorhinal cortex, inferior olive, hippocampus, thalamus, andmany other brain regions can exhibit slow subthreshold oscillations with the periodof 100 ms and more. These oscillations reflect the interplay between fast and slowmembrane currents, e.g., I h or I T , and may be irrelevant to the bifurcation mechanismof excitability. We will discuss this issue in detail in Sect. 7.3.3 and in Chap. 9. Amazingly,such neurons still possess many neuro-computational properties of resonators,such as frequency preference and rebound spiking, but exhibit these properties on aslower time scale.7.2.2 Frequency preference and resonanceA standard experimental procedure to test the propensity of a neuron to subthresholdoscillations is to stimulate it with a sinusoidal current having slowly increasing frequency,called a zap current, as in Fig. 7.17. The amplitude of the evoked oscillationsof the membrane potential, normalized by the amplitude of stimulating oscillatory current,is called the neuronal impedance — a frequency-domain extension of the conceptof resistance. The impedance profile of integrators is decreasing while that of resonatorshas a peak corresponding to the frequency of subthreshold oscillations, around140 Hz in the mesV neuron in the figure. Thus, integrators act as low-pass filters whileresonators act as band-pass filters to periodic signals.Instead of sinusoidal stimulation, consider more biological stimulation with pulses
Excitability 243membrane potential response, mV-40 mV10 Hz0 pA5 mV1 sec200 pA zap current, pA140 Hzspikes cut200 Hzamplitude of the responseintegratorsresonatorsresonancefrequency of stimulationFigure 7.17: Response of the mesV neuron to injected zap current sweeping through arange of frequencies. Integrators and resonators have different responses.-42integrators-42-42-42-42-42potential (mV)potential (mV)potential (mV)potential (mV)potential (mV)potential (mV)-525 ms-5210 ms-5215 ms0 10 20 30time (ms)0 10 20 30time (ms)0 10 20 30time (ms)resonators-525 ms-5210 ms-5215 ms0 10 20 30time (ms)0 10 20 30time (ms)0 10 20 30time (ms)Figure 7.18: Responses of integrators (top) and resonators (bottom) to input pulseshaving various inter-pulse periods.
- Page 202 and 203: 192 Bifurcationsamplitude (max-min)
- Page 204 and 205: 194 Bifurcationshomoclinic orbithom
- Page 206 and 207: 196 Bifurcations0.80.60.4stable lim
- Page 208 and 209: 198 Bifurcationsfrequency (Hz)40030
- Page 210 and 211: 200 BifurcationsSaddle-Focus Homocl
- Page 212 and 213: 202 Bifurcationsc 1c 2xFigure 6.34:
- Page 214 and 215: 204 BifurcationseigenvaluesHopffold
- Page 216 and 217: 206 Bifurcationsfast nullclineslow
- Page 218 and 219: 208 Bifurcationswith fast and slow
- Page 220 and 221: 210 BifurcationsSupercritical Andro
- Page 222 and 223: 212 BifurcationsK + conductance tim
- Page 224 and 225: 214 BifurcationsIn contrast, if the
- Page 226 and 227: 216 Bifurcationsinvariant circlesad
- Page 228 and 229: 218 Bifurcationsbifurcationssaddle-
- Page 230 and 231: 220 BifurcationsExercises1. (Transc
- Page 232 and 233: 222 Bifurcationsv 2v 11a-11-1Figure
- Page 234 and 235: 224 Bifurcations19. [M.S.] A leaky
- Page 236 and 237: 226 Excitabilityspike?spikerestrest
- Page 238 and 239: 228 ExcitabilityAlternatively, the
- Page 240 and 241: 230 Excitability50 ms 20 mV 1 ms100
- Page 242 and 243: 232 ExcitabilityClass 3 excitable n
- Page 244 and 245: 234 Excitability0.20.150.10.05I 1I
- Page 246 and 247: 236 Excitabilitysaddle-node bifurca
- Page 248 and 249: 238 Excitability(a) resting spiking
- Page 250 and 251: 240 Excitabilityproperties integrat
- Page 254 and 255: 244 Excitability1coincidencedetecti
- Page 256 and 257: 246 Excitabilityspikeexcitatory pul
- Page 258 and 259: 248 Excitability(g)9 ms(f)(e)(d)(c)
- Page 260 and 261: 250 Excitabilitysquid axonmodel0 mV
- Page 262 and 263: 252 Excitability(a) integrator(b) r
- Page 264 and 265: 254 Excitability(a) integrator(b) r
- Page 266 and 267: 256 Excitabilitymembrane potential,
- Page 268 and 269: 258 Excitability0.1saddle-node bifu
- Page 270 and 271: 260 Excitability100 ms10 mVoscillat
- Page 272 and 273: 262 ExcitabilityBogdanov-Takens bif
- Page 274 and 275: 264 Excitabilitya pulse of current.
- Page 276 and 277: 266 Excitabilitymembrane potential
- Page 278 and 279: 268 Excitability(a)150100I K(M)(b)3
- Page 280 and 281: 270 Excitability50 mV300 msFigure 7
- Page 282 and 283: 272 Excitability20 mVADP100 msAHP-6
- Page 284 and 285: 274 ExcitabilityK + activation gate
- Page 286 and 287: 276 ExcitabilityBibliographical Not
- Page 288 and 289: 278 Excitability7. Show that the re
- Page 290 and 291: 280 Simple Modelsspikemembrane pote
- Page 292 and 293: 282 Simple Models1thresholdyz reset
- Page 294 and 295: 284 Simple Models1v reset =|b| 1/2b
- Page 296 and 297: 286 Simple Modelsbe an integrator o
- Page 298 and 299: 288 Simple Modelsintegrate-and-fire
- Page 300 and 301: 290 Simple Models(A) tonic spiking(
242 ExcitabilityThe existence of fast subthreshold oscillatory potentials is a dist<strong>in</strong>guishable featureof neurons near Andronov-Hopf bifurcation. Indeed, the rest<strong>in</strong>g state of such a neuronis a stable focus. When stimulated by a brief synaptic <strong>in</strong>put or an <strong>in</strong>jected pulse ofcurrent, the state of the system deviates from the focus equilibrium, and then returnsto the equilibrium along a spiral trajectory, as depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.16, top, therebyproduc<strong>in</strong>g a damped oscillation. The frequency of such an oscillation is the imag<strong>in</strong>arypart of the complex-conjugate eigenvalues at the equilibrium (see Sect. 6.1.3), and itcan be as large as 200 Hz <strong>in</strong> mammalian neurons.In Ex. 3 we prove that noise can make such oscillations susta<strong>in</strong>ed. While the stateof the system is perturbed and returns to the focus equilibrium, another strong randomperturbation may push it away from the equilibrium, thereby start<strong>in</strong>g a new dampedoscillation. As a result, persistent noisy perturbations create a random sequence ofdamped oscillations and do not let the neuron rest. The membrane potential of sucha neuron exhibits noisy susta<strong>in</strong>ed oscillations of small amplitude depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.16and discussed <strong>in</strong> Sect. 6.1.4.Injected dc-current or background synaptic noise <strong>in</strong>crease the rest potential, changeits eigenvalues and, hence change the frequency and amplitude of noisy oscillations.Fig. 7.16 depicts typical cases when the frequency and the amplitude <strong>in</strong>crease as therest<strong>in</strong>g state becomes more depolarized.One should be careful to dist<strong>in</strong>guish fast and slow subthreshold oscillations of membranepotential. Fast oscillations, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.16, are those hav<strong>in</strong>g period comparablewith the membrane time constant or with the period of repetitive spik<strong>in</strong>g. In contrast,some neurons found <strong>in</strong> entorh<strong>in</strong>al cortex, <strong>in</strong>ferior olive, hippocampus, thalamus, andmany other bra<strong>in</strong> regions can exhibit slow subthreshold oscillations with the periodof 100 ms and more. These oscillations reflect the <strong>in</strong>terplay between fast and slowmembrane currents, e.g., I h or I T , and may be irrelevant to the bifurcation mechanismof excitability. We will discuss this issue <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> Sect. 7.3.3 and <strong>in</strong> Chap. 9. Amaz<strong>in</strong>gly,such neurons still possess many neuro-computational properties of resonators,such as frequency preference and rebound spik<strong>in</strong>g, but exhibit these properties on aslower time scale.7.2.2 Frequency preference and resonanceA standard experimental procedure to test the propensity of a neuron to subthresholdoscillations is to stimulate it with a s<strong>in</strong>usoidal current hav<strong>in</strong>g slowly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g frequency,called a zap current, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.17. The amplitude of the evoked oscillationsof the membrane potential, normalized by the amplitude of stimulat<strong>in</strong>g oscillatory current,is called the neuronal impedance — a frequency-doma<strong>in</strong> extension of the conceptof resistance. The impedance profile of <strong>in</strong>tegrators is decreas<strong>in</strong>g while that of resonatorshas a peak correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the frequency of subthreshold oscillations, around140 Hz <strong>in</strong> the mesV neuron <strong>in</strong> the figure. Thus, <strong>in</strong>tegrators act as low-pass filters whileresonators act as band-pass filters to periodic signals.Instead of s<strong>in</strong>usoidal stimulation, consider more biological stimulation with pulses