12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Excitability 2330.250.20.15w0.10.05w-nullcl<strong>in</strong>eI=0.03V-nullcl<strong>in</strong>eI=0I=00.060.0450.030.0150.0100.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8VFigure 7.8: Class 3 excitability <strong>in</strong> FitzHugh-Nagumo model (4.11, 4.12) with a =0.1, b = 0.01, c = 0. The model fires a s<strong>in</strong>gle spike for any pulse of current.Let us consider a neuron hav<strong>in</strong>g a transient Na + current with relatively fast <strong>in</strong>activation.If a sufficiently slow ramp of current is <strong>in</strong>jected, the current has enough timeto <strong>in</strong>activate and no action potentials could be generated. Such a neuron accommodatesto the slow ramp. In contrast, a quick membrane depolarization due to a strongstep of current does not give enough time for Na + <strong>in</strong>activation, thereby result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> aspike. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the spike, the current <strong>in</strong>activates quickly and precludes any further actionpotentials. Instead of <strong>in</strong>activat<strong>in</strong>g Na + current, we could have used low-thresholdpersistent K + current, or any other resonant current, to illustrate the phenomenon ofaccommodation.From the dynamical systems po<strong>in</strong>t of view, slow ramp results <strong>in</strong> quasi-static dynamicsso that all gat<strong>in</strong>g variables follow their steady-state values, x = x ∞ (V ), and themembrane potential follows its I-V curve. As long as the equilibrium correspond<strong>in</strong>g tothe rest<strong>in</strong>g state is stable, the neuron is at rest. Even global bifurcations result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>the appearance of stable limit cycles do not change that. Only when the equilibriumbifurcates (loses stability or disappears), the neuron changes its behavior, e.g., jumpsto a limit cycle attractor and starts to fire spikes. Class 3 excitable systems do not fire<strong>in</strong> response to slow ramps because the rest<strong>in</strong>g state does not bifurcate.In contrast, a pulse of current changes the phase portrait <strong>in</strong> a rather abrupt manner,as we illustrate <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.8 us<strong>in</strong>g the FitzHugh-Nagumo model with vertical slownullcl<strong>in</strong>e. Though no bifurcation can occur <strong>in</strong> the model, and the rest<strong>in</strong>g state is stablefor any value of I, its location suddenly shifts when I jumps. The trajectory fromthe old equilibrium, (0, 0), to the new one goes through the right branch of the cubicV -nullcl<strong>in</strong>e thereby result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle spike. S<strong>in</strong>ce the new equilibrium (0, 0.03) isa global attractor and no limit cycles exist, periodic spik<strong>in</strong>g cannot be generated. InEx. 7 we explore the relationship between Class 3 excitability and Andronov-Hopf bifurcation(notice the subthreshold oscillations of membrane potential of the pyramidalneuron <strong>in</strong> Fig. 7.5). We see that <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g ramps of current is not equivalent to <strong>in</strong>ject-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!