12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bifurcations 195stable manifoldout<strong>in</strong>?saddleunstable manifoldFigure 6.27: Saddle homocl<strong>in</strong>ic orbit bifurcationoccurs when the stable and unstable submanifolds ofthe saddle make a loop.A useful way to look at the bifurcation is to note that the saddle has one stableand one unstable direction on a phase plane. There are two orbits associated withthese directions, called the stable and unstable submanifolds, depicted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6.27.Typically, the submanifolds miss each other, that is, the unstable submanifold goeseither <strong>in</strong>side or outside the stable one. This could happen for two different values ofthe bifurcation parameter. One can image that as the bifurcation parameter changescont<strong>in</strong>uously from one value to the other, the submanifolds jo<strong>in</strong> at some po<strong>in</strong>t and forma s<strong>in</strong>gle homocl<strong>in</strong>ic trajectory that starts and ends at the saddle.The saddle homocl<strong>in</strong>ic orbit bifurcation is ubiquitous <strong>in</strong> neuronal models, and it caneasily be observed <strong>in</strong> the I Na,p +I K -model with fast K + conductance, as we illustrate<strong>in</strong> Fig. 6.28. Let us start with I = 7 (top of Fig. 6.28) and decrease the bifurcationparameter I. First, there is only a stable limit cycle correspond<strong>in</strong>g to periodic spik<strong>in</strong>gactivity. When I decreases, a stable and an unstable equilibrium appear via saddlenodebifurcation (not shown <strong>in</strong> the figure), but the state of the model is still on thelimit cycle attractor. Further decrease of I moves the saddle equilibrium closer tothe limit cycle (case I = 4 <strong>in</strong> the figure), until the cycle becomes an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite periodhomocl<strong>in</strong>ic orbit to the saddle (case I ≈ 3.08), and then disappears (case I = 1). Atthis moment, the state of the system approaches the stable equilibrium, and the tonicspik<strong>in</strong>g stops.Similarly to the fold limit cycle bifurcation, the saddle homocl<strong>in</strong>ic orbit bifurcationexpla<strong>in</strong>s how the limit cycle attractor correspond<strong>in</strong>g to periodic spik<strong>in</strong>g behavior appearsand disappears. However, it does not expla<strong>in</strong> the transition to periodic spik<strong>in</strong>gbehavior. Indeed, when I = 4 <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6.28, the limit cycle attractor exists, yet theneuron may still be quiescent because its state may be at the stable node. The periodicspik<strong>in</strong>g behavior appears only after external perturbations push the state of thesystem <strong>in</strong>to the attraction doma<strong>in</strong> of the limit cycle attractor, or I <strong>in</strong>creases furtherand the stable node disappears via a saddle-node bifurcation.We can use l<strong>in</strong>ear theory to estimate the frequency of the limit cycle attractornear saddle homocl<strong>in</strong>ic orbit bifurcation. Because the vector field is small near theequilibrium, the periodic trajectory slowly passes through a small neighborhood of theequilibrium, then quickly makes a rotation and returns to the neighborhood, as weillustrate <strong>in</strong> Fig. 6.29. Let T 1 denote the time required to make one rotation (dashed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!