12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Conductance-Based Models 1615.2.4 Reduction to simple modelAll models discussed <strong>in</strong> this chapter can be reduced to two-dimensional systems hav<strong>in</strong>ga fast voltage variable, V , and a slower “recovery” variable, u, with N-shaped andsigmoidal nullcl<strong>in</strong>es, respectively. The decision to fire or not to fire is made at therest<strong>in</strong>g state, which is the <strong>in</strong>tersection of the nullcl<strong>in</strong>es near the left knee, as we illustrate<strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.23a. To model the subthreshold behavior of such neurons and the <strong>in</strong>itialsegment of the up-stroke of an action potential, we need to consider only a smallneighborhood of the left knee conf<strong>in</strong>ed to the shaded square <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.23. The rest ofthe phase space is needed only to model the peak and the down-stroke of the actionpotential. If the shape of the action potential is less important than the subthresholddynamics lead<strong>in</strong>g to this action potential, then we can reta<strong>in</strong> detailed <strong>in</strong>formationabout the left knee and its neighborhood and simplify the vector field outside theneighborhood. This approach results <strong>in</strong> a simple model capable to exhibit quite realisticdynamics, as we see <strong>in</strong> Chap. 8.Derivation via nullcl<strong>in</strong>esThe fast nullcl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.23b can be approximated by the quadratic parabolau = u m<strong>in</strong> + p(V − V m<strong>in</strong> ) 2 ,where (V m<strong>in</strong> , u m<strong>in</strong> ) is the location of the m<strong>in</strong>imum on the left knee, and p ≥ 0 is ascal<strong>in</strong>g coefficient. Similarly, the slow nullcl<strong>in</strong>e can be approximated by the straightl<strong>in</strong>eu = s(V − V 0 ) ,where s is the slope and V 0 is the V -<strong>in</strong>tercept. All these parameters can easily bedeterm<strong>in</strong>ed geometrically or analytically.Us<strong>in</strong>g these nullcl<strong>in</strong>es, we approximate the dynamics <strong>in</strong> the shaded region <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.23by the system˙V = τ f{p(V − Vm<strong>in</strong> ) 2 − (u − u m<strong>in</strong> ) } ,˙u = τ s {s(V − V 0 ) − u} ,where the parameters τ f and τ s describe the fast and slow time scales. Because ofthe term (V − V m<strong>in</strong> ) 2 , the variable V can escape to <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>ite time. Thiscorresponds to the fir<strong>in</strong>g of an action potential, more precisely, to its upstroke. Tomodel the downstroke, we assume that V max is the peak value of the action potential,and we reset the state of the system(V, u) ← (V reset , u + u reset ) , when V = V max ,as if the spik<strong>in</strong>g trajectory disappears at the right edge and appears at the left edge<strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.23b. Here V reset and u reset are parameters. Appropriate re-scal<strong>in</strong>g of variables

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!