12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conductance-Based Models 147br<strong>in</strong>gs the potential up aga<strong>in</strong>. Thus, the upstroke of the action potential is due exclusivelyto the <strong>in</strong>jected dc-current I, while the downstroke is due to the persistentoutward K + current.To perform the geometrical phase plane analysis of the model we take advantage ofthe same observation as before: The k<strong>in</strong>etics of the amplify<strong>in</strong>g current I Kir is relativelyfast, so that h = h ∞ (V ) can be used <strong>in</strong> the voltage equation to reduce the threedimensionalsystem above to the two-dimensional system<strong>in</strong>stantaneous I Kir IC ˙V{ }} { { }} K{= I − g Kir h ∞ (V )(V − E K ) − g K n(V − E K ) ,ṅ = (n ∞ (V ) − n)/τ n (V ) .It is an easy exercise to f<strong>in</strong>d the nullcl<strong>in</strong>esn = I/{g K (V − E K )} − g Kir h ∞ (V )/g K(V -nullcl<strong>in</strong>e)andn = n ∞ (V ) (n-nullcl<strong>in</strong>e) ,which we depict <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.12. There are two <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g cases correspond<strong>in</strong>g to highthreshold(Fig. 5.12a) and low-threshold (Fig. 5.12b) K + current I K .When the I K has low threshold, it is partially activated at rest<strong>in</strong>g potential. In thiscase, rest state corresponds to the balance of partially activated I K , partially <strong>in</strong>activatedI Kir , and a strong <strong>in</strong>jected dc-current I (without the dc-current the membrane voltagewould converge to E K = −80 mV and stay there forever). A small depolarizationpartially <strong>in</strong>activates fast I Kir but leaves slower I K relatively unchanged. This results<strong>in</strong> an imbalance of the <strong>in</strong>ward dc-current I and all outward currents, and the net<strong>in</strong>ward current further depolarizes the membrane voltage. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the size of thedepolarization, the model may generate a subthreshold response or an action potential,as one can see <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.12b, top. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the generation of the action potential, thepersistent K + current activates and causes after-hyperpolarization. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the afterhyperpolarization,the persistent K + current deactivates below the rest<strong>in</strong>g level. Thislets the <strong>in</strong>jected dc-current I depolarize the membrane potential aga<strong>in</strong>, provided thatI is strong enough, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.12b, bottom.In Fig. 5.12a we leave all parameters unchanged except that we <strong>in</strong>crease the halfvoltageactivation V 1/2 of I K by 15 mV and decrease I to compensate for the deficitof outward current. Now, the rest<strong>in</strong>g state corresponds to the balance of the I Kir andI, because the high-threshold persistent K + current is completely deactivated <strong>in</strong> thisvoltage range. The behavior near the rest state is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the <strong>in</strong>terplay between<strong>in</strong>stantaneous I Kir and I, and it was studied <strong>in</strong> Chap. 3 (see I Kir -model). There are twoequilibria: a stable node correspond<strong>in</strong>g to the rest<strong>in</strong>g state, and a saddle correspond<strong>in</strong>gto the threshold state. A sufficiently strong perturbation can push V beyond the saddleequilibrium, as <strong>in</strong> Fig. 5.12a, top, and can cause the m<strong>in</strong>imal model to fire an action

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!