12.07.2015 Views

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience:

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Introduction(a)spikes(b)spikes cutthreshold?-40 mVsubthreshold response1 ms<strong>in</strong>jected pulses of current20 mV<strong>in</strong>jected pulses of current15 msFigure 1.4: Where is the fir<strong>in</strong>g threshold? Shown are <strong>in</strong> vitro record<strong>in</strong>gs of two layer 5pyramidal neurons of rat. Notice the difference of voltage and time scales.(a)(b)20 mV20 mV5 ms100 ms-60 mVFigure 1.5: Where is the rheobase, i.e., the m<strong>in</strong>imal current that fires the cell? (a) <strong>in</strong>vitro record<strong>in</strong>gs of pyramidal neuron of layer 2/3 of rat’s visual cortex show <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glatencies as the amplitude of the <strong>in</strong>jected current decreases. (b) Simulation of theI Na,p +I K -model shows spikes of graded amplitude.Perhaps, we should measure current thresholds <strong>in</strong>stead of voltage thresholds? Thecurrent threshold, i.e., the m<strong>in</strong>imal amplitude of <strong>in</strong>jected current of <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite durationneeded to fire a neuron, is called rheobase. In Fig. 1.5 we decrease the amplitudesof <strong>in</strong>jected pulses of current to f<strong>in</strong>d the m<strong>in</strong>imal one that still elicits a spike or themaximal one that does not. In Fig. 1.5a, progressively weaker pulses result <strong>in</strong> longerlatencies to the first spike. Eventually the neuron does not fire because the latency islonger than the duration of the pulse, which is 1 second <strong>in</strong> the figure. Did we reallymeasure the neuronal rheobase? What if we waited a bit longer? How long is longenough? In Fig. 1.5b the latencies do not grow but the spike amplitudes decrease untilthe spikes do not look like spikes at all. To determ<strong>in</strong>e the current threshold, we needto draw the l<strong>in</strong>e and separate spike responses from “subthreshold” ones. How can wedo that if the spikes are not all-or-none? Is the response denoted by the dashed l<strong>in</strong>e aspike?Risk<strong>in</strong>g add<strong>in</strong>g more confusion to the notion of a threshold, consider the follow<strong>in</strong>g:If excitatory <strong>in</strong>puts depolarize the membrane potential, i.e., br<strong>in</strong>g it closer to the “fir<strong>in</strong>gthreshold”, and <strong>in</strong>hibitory <strong>in</strong>puts hyperpolarize the potential and move it away from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!