SOUL AND AFTERLIFE 369silk pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> identification seems firmly grounded. Fei-i 4Pmeans "mantle," "shroud," or "cover." Moreover, <strong>in</strong> ancientritual texts,fei and hu are <strong>in</strong>terchangeable <strong>in</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g. Accord<strong>in</strong>g toHan commentators, a hu was a cloth pa<strong>in</strong>ted red and used to coverthe corpse <strong>of</strong> the newly dead and, later, the c<strong>of</strong>f<strong>in</strong>." This descriptionagrees perfectly with the silk pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> current view that it wasa m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g AI1 or "funerary banner," is therefore questionable, tosay the least. For, literally, m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g means "<strong>in</strong>scribed funerarybanner." <strong>The</strong> basic purpose <strong>of</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g was "to identify thedeparted hun-soul" by means <strong>of</strong> a name <strong>in</strong>scribed on a banner. <strong>The</strong>use <strong>of</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g, widespread at the time <strong>of</strong> Hsu<strong>in</strong>-tzu (third centuryB.C.), cont<strong>in</strong>ued throughout the Han period.'2 In fact, none <strong>of</strong>the m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g excavated from Han tombs <strong>in</strong> recent decades lackssuch an <strong>in</strong>scription.'3 S<strong>in</strong>ce the names <strong>of</strong> either the mother or herson are not <strong>in</strong>scribed on the T-shaped pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs, they must not bem<strong>in</strong>g-cz<strong>in</strong>g.To conclude this section, it seems reasonable to assert that the T-shaped pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs not only take the ritual <strong>of</strong>fu as their ma<strong>in</strong> theme,but their function is also closely related to that same ritual. We maysay that these pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs provide archaeological confirmation <strong>of</strong> theritual <strong>of</strong>fu as recorded <strong>in</strong> the various Han writ<strong>in</strong>gs on ritual.THE HUN AND P'O SOULS<strong>The</strong> ritual <strong>of</strong>fu, as po<strong>in</strong>ted out earlier, is based on the belief <strong>of</strong>chao-hunfu-p 'o, to summon the hun-soul to reunite with the p 'o soul.In order to grasp the full mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this ritual practice, we must10For tomb no. 1, see Shang Chih-t'an, , "Ma-wang-tui i-hao Han-mu 'fei-i' shihshih" FTEV-14VASAM, WW 1972.9:43-47. For tomb no. 3, see also KK 1975.1:57." Forfti and hu as <strong>in</strong>terchangeable words <strong>in</strong> ancient ritual texts, see the views <strong>of</strong> T'angLan : and Yu Wei-ch'ao <strong>in</strong> WW 1972.9:59-60.12Sun 1-jang, Chou-li cheng-i 50.35-36.13An Chih-m<strong>in</strong>g, pp. 50-51; Ma Yung, Xj *W"Lun Ch'ang-sha Ma-wang-tui i-hao Hanmuch'u-t'u po-hua ti m<strong>in</strong>g-ch'eng ho tso-yung, 'fgfH, KK 1973.2:119-22; Hsii Chuang-shu U-:A, "Fu-p'o ch<strong>in</strong>g-chao k'ao" bWen-shih CS, 17 (Pek<strong>in</strong>g, June 1983): 261-63. It is somewhat puzzl<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> thefact that a m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g is by def<strong>in</strong>ition "<strong>in</strong>scribed" and that all the m<strong>in</strong>g-ch<strong>in</strong>g excavated fromHan tombs so far <strong>in</strong>variably bear the names <strong>of</strong> the dead, both An and Ma still <strong>in</strong>sist on identify<strong>in</strong>gthe two un<strong>in</strong>scribed T-shaped pa<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>gs as "<strong>in</strong>scribed funerary banners."
370 YING-SHIH YUproceed to trace the evolution <strong>of</strong> the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese concept <strong>of</strong> soul fromantiquity to the Han times.Before the dualistic conception <strong>of</strong> hun and p 'o began to ga<strong>in</strong> currency<strong>in</strong> the middle <strong>of</strong> the sixth century B.C., p 'o alone seems to havebeen used to denote the human soul. <strong>The</strong> character p'o M (or itsvariant pa i) means "white," "bright," or "bright light," deriv<strong>in</strong>gorig<strong>in</strong>ally from the grow<strong>in</strong>g light <strong>of</strong> the new moon. <strong>The</strong> earliestform <strong>of</strong> the character has recently been found on a Chou oraclebone <strong>in</strong>scription datable to the eleventh century B.C. It is used <strong>in</strong> theterm chi-p 'o a which, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Wang Kuo-wei, stood for theperiod from the eighth or n<strong>in</strong>th to the fourteenth or fifteenth <strong>of</strong> thelunar month. <strong>The</strong> term chi-ssu-p'o RERTh may also be found onanother piece <strong>of</strong> oracle bone <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the period from the twentythirdor twenty-fourth to the end <strong>of</strong> the month.'4 <strong>The</strong>se two termswere later used repeatedly <strong>in</strong> early Chou historical documents aswell as bronze <strong>in</strong>scriptions <strong>in</strong> the standard forms <strong>of</strong> chi-sheng pa a3td and chi-ssu pa which may be translated, respectively, as "after thebirth <strong>of</strong> the crescent" and "after the death <strong>of</strong> the crescent.''15S<strong>in</strong>ce the ancient Ch<strong>in</strong>ese took the chang<strong>in</strong>g phases <strong>of</strong> the moonas periodic birth and death <strong>of</strong> its p'o, its "white light" or soul, byanalogy they eventually came to associate, by the early sixth centuryB.C. if not earlier, the life or death <strong>of</strong> a man with the presenceor absence <strong>of</strong> his p'o."6 Two examples from the Tso chuan IE, the14See "Shensi Ch'i-shan Feng-ch'u ts'un fa-hsien Chou ch'u chia-ku wen," RNOOAXlt8;t8!,101t1 X