SOUL AND AFTERLIFE 389at which imperial sacrifices had been made to the supreme earthlydeity, the Lord <strong>of</strong> Earth (Ti chu J__A1).66 It was <strong>in</strong>deed only a smallstep to transform the Lord <strong>of</strong> Earth <strong>in</strong>to the Lord <strong>of</strong> the Underworld(ti-hsia chu JifF). <strong>The</strong> title Lord <strong>of</strong> Mount T'ai- T'ai-shan fuch/<strong>in</strong>-alsorequires a word <strong>of</strong> explanation. <strong>The</strong> term fu-chii mustnot be taken to mean "lord" <strong>in</strong> a general sense. In fact, it was apopular name referr<strong>in</strong>g specifically to prov<strong>in</strong>cial governors <strong>in</strong> Hantimes. Nor should "T'ai-shan" <strong>in</strong> this case be understood as thesacred mounta<strong>in</strong> itself. Instead it was a reference to the prov<strong>in</strong>cenamed after the sacred mounta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> which Liang-fu was alsolocated.67 In other words, call<strong>in</strong>g the supreme ruler <strong>of</strong> the underworldT'ai-shan fu-chu<strong>in</strong> was to <strong>in</strong>dicate both the location <strong>of</strong> hisresidence and the bureaucratic rank <strong>of</strong> his <strong>of</strong>fice. S<strong>in</strong>ce he was <strong>in</strong>charge <strong>of</strong> the dead, he was therefore assigned an <strong>of</strong>ficial positionlower than the supreme ruler <strong>of</strong> the human world, the emperor, byone rank. This fits perfectly well with some other popular names bywhich he was also known. For example, stone <strong>in</strong>scriptions found <strong>in</strong>Han tombs <strong>of</strong>ten refer to him either as "Lord <strong>of</strong> Mount T'ai" oras "the prov<strong>in</strong>cial governor <strong>in</strong> the underworld.""' Moreover, apopular Han religious tract says that he is the "grandson <strong>of</strong> theHeavenly God. X6 <strong>The</strong> last <strong>in</strong>stance is particularly reveal<strong>in</strong>g. Clear-66Due to limitations <strong>of</strong> space the follow<strong>in</strong>g discussion is highly condensed. For a detailedstudy see my Ch<strong>in</strong>ese article, "Chung-kuo ku-tai ssu-hou shih-chieh kuan ti yen-pien" rp-NN;EWLFAMIn, 0 Yen-yuan lun-hsueh chi ?rRX (Pek<strong>in</strong>g, Pek<strong>in</strong>g University Press,1984), pp. 177-96. Shih-chi 28.1367; Burton Watson, tr., Records <strong>of</strong> the Grand Historian <strong>of</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a2 vols. (New York, Columbia University Press, 1961), 2:24.67 This is rightly po<strong>in</strong>ted out <strong>in</strong> Hu San-hs<strong>in</strong>g's M t commentary on Tzu-chih t 'ung-chienWM& (Pek<strong>in</strong>g: Chung-hua shu-chii, 1956), 20.678.68 Quoted <strong>in</strong> Fang Shih-m<strong>in</strong>g , "Tsai-lun ti-chuan ti chien-pieh,"WW 1979.8: 84. For more details <strong>of</strong> the transformation <strong>of</strong> the Lord <strong>of</strong> Mount T'ai, seeOkamoto Saburo 1Q14 913, "Taizan fukun no yurai ni tsuite," Ftl*8C7)- '1C,Toyogaku kenkyut V9*4JM, 1 (November 1943): 63-98.69 We owe this <strong>in</strong>formation to a fragment <strong>of</strong> the Hsiao-ch<strong>in</strong>g yiuan-shen ch'i :ipreserved <strong>in</strong> Chang Hua's T (A.D. 232-300) Po-wu chih, see Fan N<strong>in</strong>g ;*, ed., Po-wu chihchiao-chu tt$J I (Pek<strong>in</strong>g: Chung-hua shu-chiu, 1980), p. 12. This perhaps also expla<strong>in</strong>swhy, as recent archaeology amply shows, the Heavenly God <strong>of</strong>ten sent envoys to warn underworld<strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> all levels that they must not harass the souls under their jurisdictions. See-Hayashi M<strong>in</strong>ao ; "Kandai kij<strong>in</strong> no sekai" fflft4OtD , Tohogakuho46 (March 1974): 227-28 and note 14, pp. 297-98.) Obviously, Han Ch<strong>in</strong>ese believed thatthe souls <strong>in</strong> the underworld were subject to the taxes and labor services demanded by underworld<strong>of</strong>ficials. See the <strong>in</strong>scription from a Han tomb dated A.D. 173 <strong>in</strong> Kuo Mo-jo iNu-li chih shih-tai *Ijft, (Pek<strong>in</strong>g, 1972), p. 94.
390 YING-SHIH YUly, the idea <strong>of</strong> "grandson <strong>of</strong> the Heavenly God" was derivedanalogously from that <strong>of</strong> the "Son <strong>of</strong> Heaven," that is, theemperor.Second, like the supreme ruler <strong>of</strong> the human world, it was believedthat the Lord <strong>of</strong> Mount T'ai also had a bureaucracy to assisthim <strong>in</strong> govern<strong>in</strong>g the dead. Judg<strong>in</strong>g by the various <strong>of</strong>ficial titlesfound <strong>in</strong> Han tombs and other texts, the bureaucratic structure <strong>of</strong>the underworld was closely modeled on the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative system<strong>of</strong> the Han empire. <strong>The</strong> first th<strong>in</strong>g the newly dead had to do was togo to the capital <strong>of</strong> the underworld to register. <strong>The</strong>re is further evidencesuggest<strong>in</strong>g that the underworld government could send forthe souls <strong>of</strong> those whose alloted span on earth, accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Register<strong>of</strong> Death, was up. As time wore on, the idea <strong>of</strong> post-mortempunishment also found its way <strong>in</strong>to the Han belief about the afterlife.<strong>The</strong> T'ai-p'<strong>in</strong>g ch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the second century A.D. has the follow<strong>in</strong>gvivid description <strong>of</strong> the adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>of</strong> justice <strong>in</strong> the underworld.If a man commits evils unceas<strong>in</strong>gly, his name will then be entered <strong>in</strong>to the Register<strong>of</strong> Death. He will be summoned to the Underworld Government (t'u-fu ?Nf) wherehis body is to be kept. Alas! When can he ever get out? His soul will be imprisonedand his do<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> life will be questioned. If his words are found to be <strong>in</strong>consistent,he will be subject to further imprisonment and torture. His soul is surely go<strong>in</strong>g tosuffer a great deal. But who is to blame?70This new conception <strong>of</strong> the underworld may well have been afaithful reflection <strong>of</strong> the cruel realities <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>terrogation and torture <strong>in</strong>the imperial and prov<strong>in</strong>cial prisons, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g the secondcentury A.D.7DThird, we have reason to believe that as the supreme ruler <strong>of</strong> theunderworld, the authority <strong>of</strong> the Lord <strong>of</strong> Mount T'ai was orig<strong>in</strong>allyconceived to be exercised over the hun-souls. Several historical andliterary sources specifically l<strong>in</strong>k the hun, but not the p 'o, to MountT'ai, which itself calls to m<strong>in</strong>d the underworld <strong>in</strong> which the Lord70TPC, p. 615 and also pp. 598-99. In contrast to ancient Greece, the Ch<strong>in</strong>ese idea <strong>of</strong>post-mortem punishment is a much later development. See Emily Vermeule, Aspects <strong>of</strong> Death,p. 8, and E. R. Dodds, <strong>The</strong> Greeks and the Irrational (Berkeley: University <strong>of</strong> California Press,1951), pp. 137, 150-51.71 Lii Ssu-mien RO,, Ch'<strong>in</strong>-Han shih f 2 vols. (Shanghai: K'ai-m<strong>in</strong>g shu-tien,1947), 2:704-09.