12.07.2015 Views

Salvation in the Old Testament - Online Christian Library

Salvation in the Old Testament - Online Christian Library

Salvation in the Old Testament - Online Christian Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

John S. Fe<strong>in</strong>berg, “<strong>Salvation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong>” Tradition and <strong>Testament</strong>. Essays <strong>in</strong> Honor of Charles LeeFe<strong>in</strong>berg. Chicago: Moody Press, 1981. Hbk. ISBN: 0802425445. pp.39-77.Messiah, would have to die for <strong>the</strong> s<strong>in</strong>s of His people (cf. Dan. 9:24-26―commentators generallyagree that <strong>in</strong> order for <strong>the</strong> th<strong>in</strong>gs mentioned <strong>in</strong> verse 24 to be accomplished, Messiah <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>cewould be cut off, as mentioned <strong>in</strong> verse 26).In addition to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of sacrifice, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of promises. Some promises concernsalvation from s<strong>in</strong> and thus overlap <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me of sacrifice. O<strong>the</strong>rs are of a national, political, andsocial nature. Walter Kaiser has argued that <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ological center of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> canon is<strong>the</strong> notion of promise. 19 One can hardly read Kaiser’s work and not be conv<strong>in</strong>ced that <strong>the</strong> conceptof promise is crucially important for <strong>the</strong> whole of <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> life.Thus we see that <strong>in</strong> each period of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> economy, <strong>the</strong> specific content revealed formen to believe <strong>in</strong>volved truths about sacrifices and promises. The change of dispensations did notabrogate exist<strong>in</strong>g promises but ra<strong>the</strong>r supplemented and amplified <strong>the</strong>m. Passages such asGenesis 3:15-16, Genesis 9 (Noahic covenant), Genesis 12 and 15 (Abrahamic covenant),Deuteronomy 28-30 (Palest<strong>in</strong>ian covenant), 2 Samuel 7 (Davidic covenant), and Jeremiah 31(New Covenant) show that even though dispensations changed, God did not abrogate Hispromises. He amplified and clarified <strong>the</strong>m.Promises were not only important <strong>in</strong> terms of believ<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future God would do what Hepromised. They were also important from <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of past fulfillment. The ways God haddemonstrated His faithfulness <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past formed a basis for trust <strong>in</strong> Him for salvation and forfulfillment of promises <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future. Paul states very clearly that <strong>the</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> law did notnullify <strong>the</strong> promises made to Abraham (Gal. 3:16-17). God’s revelation concern<strong>in</strong>g His promisesis cumulative.The specific content to be believed, <strong>the</strong>n, was cumulative, and it was composed of two majorcomponents: sacrifice and promise. 20 The believ<strong>in</strong>g Jew, <strong>the</strong>refore, whe<strong>the</strong>r he understood wha<strong>the</strong> was do<strong>in</strong>g or not, was committ<strong>in</strong>g himself to <strong>the</strong> God of <strong>the</strong> promises, <strong>the</strong> God who hadfaithfully formed <strong>the</strong> nation of Israel and brought her out of Egypt and <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> land, and <strong>the</strong> Godwho had revealed all along that s<strong>in</strong> could be atoned for by means of blood sacrifice. This is whatit means to say that <strong>the</strong> content of faith <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> is cumulative. The person whocommitted himself <strong>in</strong> faith to that God, and all that He had revealed about His sav<strong>in</strong>g and keep<strong>in</strong>gpower, was saved.But only s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> time of Jesus Christ has <strong>the</strong> revealed content to be believed co<strong>in</strong>cided entirelywith <strong>the</strong> basis, or ground, of faith. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> age of grace, God has revealed <strong>the</strong> fulness ofsalvation through <strong>the</strong> shed[p.61]blood of Jesus Christ (<strong>the</strong> basis of salvation <strong>in</strong> any age). Nei<strong>the</strong>r God’s acts <strong>in</strong> history nor Hisrevelation concern<strong>in</strong>g His acts had given man <strong>the</strong> complete content about Christ. We must becareful not to th<strong>in</strong>k that dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> economy it was necessary to accept <strong>the</strong> contentover and over aga<strong>in</strong> to be saved. For example, one might th<strong>in</strong>k that s<strong>in</strong>ce dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong>times a sacrifice was required for each s<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> person was be<strong>in</strong>g saved with each sacrifice. As weshall see, such a view is a misunderstand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> function of <strong>Old</strong> <strong>Testament</strong> sacrifices as well as

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!