12.07.2015 Views

Evidence-‐Based Management of An/coagulant Therapy - ICU

Evidence-‐Based Management of An/coagulant Therapy - ICU

Evidence-‐Based Management of An/coagulant Therapy - ICU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Evidence</strong>-­<strong>‐Based</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>An</strong>4<strong>coagulant</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> Preven4on <strong>of</strong> VTE in nonsurgical pa4ents Preven4on <strong>of</strong> VTE in nonorthopedic surgical pa4ents <strong>An</strong>4thrombo4c <strong>Therapy</strong> and Preven4on <strong>of</strong> Thrombosis, 9th ed: American college <strong>of</strong> chest physicians <strong>Evidence</strong>-­‐based clinical prac4ce guidelines Chest, february 2012 T Vandendriessche


Background and Methods • High-­‐quality an4coagula4on management needed • narrow therapeu4c index: effec4ve safe • Randomized controlled trials(RCT) • Many lower-­‐quality evidence (>50 pt per group)


Opdeling • <strong>An</strong>4<strong>coagulant</strong> <strong>Therapy</strong> • DVT pr<strong>of</strong>ylaxy in trauma pa4ents • DVT pr<strong>of</strong>ylaxy in cri4cally ill pa4ents (medical)


<strong>An</strong>4co: Specific for <strong>ICU</strong> • acute VTE: VKA therapy started on day 1 or 2 <strong>of</strong> LMWH or UFH therapy rather than wai4ng for several days to start – Meta-­‐analysis 4 RCT DVT, PE, LV mural thrombosis – No differences in recurrent VTE, bleeding, death – early ini4a4on 4 days fewer in hospital • Stable therapeu4c INRs with a single subtherapeu4c INR value: against rou4nely administering bridging with heparin


<strong>An</strong>4co: Specific for <strong>ICU</strong> • decisions during maintenance VKA therapy: validated decision support tools • When taking VKA’s, avoid NSAID’s and AB (cotrimoxazole, quinolones, cefalo, metronidazole, amoxicillin, amoxiclav, fluconazole) • When discon4nuing VKA: abrupt not gradual tapering


<strong>An</strong>4co: Specific for <strong>ICU</strong> • If star4ng IV UFH, ini4al bolus (70-­‐80U/kg) and Con4nu Infusion (15-­‐18U/kg), weight adjusted or fixed dose 5000U, 1000U/h – 3 RCT weight based or fixed dose nomogram – Similar therapeu4c aPTTs – No evidence that monitoring improves outcome • Therapeu4c LMWH renal insufficiency (CrCL


VKA’s and high INR • INR 4,5-­‐10 and no bleeding: no Vitamine K – 4 RCT’s compared vitamine K with placebo – Bleeding: Rates were similar, 2% vit K tg 0,8% placebo – TE 5/423 vit K, 4/441 placebo (not significant) – No evidence <strong>of</strong> benefit for outcome • INR > 10 and no bleeding: oral Vitamine K – No randomised trials – Retrospec4ve study 89 pt – vitamine K 2mg PO compared withdrawal VKA, INR>5 day 3: 11%-­‐46%


VKA’s and high INR • VKA-­‐associated bleeding: – Rapid reversal desirable – PPSB: first choice – NO FFP: prepara4on, volume, allergic – Vitamine K, 5-­‐10 mg IV or oral


Major trauma pa4ents • Inflamma4on, fractures, immobilisa4on, surgical interven4on -­‐> high risk <strong>of</strong> VTE • Consequences <strong>of</strong> bleeding complica4ons • Risk factors VTE: – Spinal trauma, acute spinal cord injury – Trauma4c brain injury – Older age, male, black, – Complete paraplegie – >3 days <strong>of</strong> mechanical ven4la4on


Major trauma pa4ents • Risk factors <strong>of</strong> bleeding (base line risks) – trauma4c brain injury – Non opera4vely liver or spleen injury – Renal failure – Spinal column fracture with epidural hematoma – Severe thrombocytopenie and coagulopathy


Major trauma pa4ents • average risk <strong>of</strong> VTE (~3%) and average risk major bleeding: – LMWH/LDUH prevent 4 4mes as many non fatal VTE events as nonfatal bleeding complica4ons – mechanical prophylaxis prevent 4 4mes as many nonfatal VTE events (skin complica4ons) • High risk <strong>of</strong> VTE (~6%) and average risk bleeding – LMWH/LDUH prevent 10 4mes non fatal VTE as nonfatal bleeding complica4ons, and prevent 4/1000 death <strong>of</strong> PE – mechanical prophylaxis prevent 15 nonfatal VTE/1000 pa4ents


Major trauma pa4ents • High risk <strong>of</strong> bleeding – Low quality evidence – LMWH/LDUH: number nonfatal VTE events prevented = number nonfatal bleeding complica4ons – Mechanical prophylaxis prevents nonfatal VTE events


Conclusion Major trauma pa5ent • LDUH/LMWH or mechanical prophylaxis beler than no prophylaxis • High risk for VTE: adding mechanical to pharmacologic prophylaxis • If CI for LMWH/LDUH, mechanical beler than no prophylaxis, adding LMWH when risk diminshes • IVC filter should not be used for primary preven4on • Periodic surveillance with VCU should not be performed


Medical pa4ents • Risk <strong>of</strong> VTE depends on (no validated) – Acute illness, chronic illnesses, prehospital diagnosis, <strong>ICU</strong> specific exposures (MV,CVC,…) • Risk <strong>of</strong> bleeding: – 80% 1 or more episodes <strong>of</strong> bleeding (minor)


Medical pa4ents: results • No ultrasound screening for DVT • LMWH or LDUH thromboprophylaxis or mechanical prophylaxis beler than no prophylaxis • Pt bleeding or at high risk for major bleeding, mechanical prophylaxis with GCS (graduated compression stockings) or IPC (intermilent pneuma4c compression) un4l the risk decreases

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!