PDF - Wallace Online
PDF - Wallace Online PDF - Wallace Online
54 NATURAL SELECTION innow merely necessary to show that concealment by obscureor imitative tints is only one out of very many ways by whichanimals maintain their existence ;and having done this weare prepared to consider the phenomena of what has beentermed "mimicry." It is to be particularly observed, however,that the word is not here used in the sense of voluntaryimitation, but to imply a particular kind of resemblancea resemblance not in internal structure but in externalappearance a resemblance in those parts only that catchthe eye a resemblance that deceives. As this kind ofresemblance has the same effect as voluntary imitation ormimicry, and as we have no word that expresses the requiredmeaning, " mimicry " was adopted by Mr. Bates (who was thefirst to explain the facts),and has led to some misunderstanding;but there need be none, if it is rememberedthat both " mimicry " and " imitation " are used in a metaphoricalsense, as implying that close external likeness whichcauses things unlike in structure to be mistaken for eachother.MimicryIt has been long known to entomologists that certaininsects bear a strange external resemblance to others belongingto distinct genera, families, or even orders, and withwhich they have no real affinity whatever. The fact, however,appears to have been generally considered as dependentupon some unknown law of "analogy" some "system ofnature," or " general plan," which had guided the Creator indesigning the myriads of insect forms, and which we couldnever hope to understand. In only one case does it appearthat the resemblance was thought to be useful, and to havebeen designed as a means to a definite and intelligible purpose.The flies of the genus Volucella enter the nests of beesto deposit their eggs, so that their larvae may feed upon thelarvae of the bees, and these flies are each wonderfully likethe bee on which it is parasitic. Kirby and Spence believedthat this resemblance or " mimicry " was for the express purposeof protecting the flies from the attacks of the bees, andthe connection is so evident that it was hardly possible toavoid this conclusion. The resemblance, however, of moths
in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG ANIMALS 55to butterflies or to bees, of beetles to wasps, and of locusts tobeetles, has been many times noticed by eminent writers ;but scarcely ever till within the last few years does it appearto have been considered that these resemblances had anyspecial purpose, or were of any direct benefit to the insectsthemselves. In this respect they were looked upon asaccidental, as instances of the " "curious analogies in naturewhich must be wondered at but which could not be explained.Recently, however, these instances have been greatly multipliedthe nature of the resemblances has been more;carefullystudied, and it has been found that they are often carried outinto such details as almost to imply a purpose of deceivingthe observer. The phenomena, moreover, have been shownto follow certain definite laws, which again all indicate theirdependence on the more general law of the " survival of the" fittest," or, the preservation of favoured races in the strugglefor life." It will, perhaps, be as well here to state what theselaws or general conclusions are, and then to give some accountof the facts which support them.The first law is, that in an overwhelming majority of casesof mimicry, the animals (or the groups) which resemble eachother inhabit the same country, the same district, and inmost cases are to be found together on the very same spot.The second law is,that these resemblances are not indiscriminate,but are limited to certain groups, which in everycase are abundant in species and individuals, and can oftenbe ascertained to have some special protection.The third law is, that the species which resemble or" mimic " these dominant groups are comparatively lessabundant in individuals, and are often very rare.These laws will be found to hold good in all the cases oftrue mimicry among various classes of animals to which wehave now to call the attention of our readers.Mimicry among LepidopteraAs it isamong butterflies that instances of mimicry aremost numerous and most striking, an account of some of themore prominent examples in this group will first be given.There is in South America an extensive family of theseinsects, the Heliconidae, which are in many respects very
- Page 19 and 20: ON THE LAW WHICH HAS REGULATED THE
- Page 21 and 22: THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIESexpl
- Page 23 and 24: THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIEScomm
- Page 25 and 26: THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIEShave
- Page 27 and 28: THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIESread
- Page 29 and 30: i THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIES 1
- Page 31 and 32: i THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIES 1
- Page 33 and 34: i THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIES 1
- Page 35 and 36: i THE INTRODUCTION OF NEW SPECIES 1
- Page 37 and 38: 'INTRODUCTORY NOTE TO CHAPTER II 21
- Page 39 and 40: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 41 and 42: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 43 and 44: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 45 and 46: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 47 and 48: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 49 and 50: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 51 and 52: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 53 and 54: PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG ANIMA
- Page 55 and 56: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 57 and 58: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 59 and 60: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 61 and 62: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 63 and 64: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 65 and 66: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 67 and 68: in PROTECTIVE EESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 69: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 73 and 74: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 75 and 76: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 77 and 78: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 79 and 80: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 81 and 82: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 83 and 84: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 85 and 86: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 87 and 88: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 89 and 90: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 91 and 92: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 93 and 94: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 95 and 96: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 97 and 98: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 99 and 100: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 101 and 102: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 103 and 104: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 105 and 106: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 107 and 108: IVON INSTINCT INMAN AND ANIMALSTHE
- Page 109 and 110: ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALSconti
- Page 111 and 112: iv ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALS 9
- Page 113 and 114: iv ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALS 9
- Page 115 and 116: THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTSDo Me
- Page 117 and 118: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 119 and 120: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG ANIMALS 55to butterflies or to bees, of beetles to wasps, and of locusts tobeetles, has been many times noticed by eminent writers ;but scarcely ever till within the last few years does it appearto have been considered that these resemblances had anyspecial purpose, or were of any direct benefit to the insectsthemselves. In this respect they were looked upon asaccidental, as instances of the " "curious analogies in naturewhich must be wondered at but which could not be explained.Recently, however, these instances have been greatly multipliedthe nature of the resemblances has been more;carefullystudied, and it has been found that they are often carried outinto such details as almost to imply a purpose of deceivingthe observer. The phenomena, moreover, have been shownto follow certain definite laws, which again all indicate theirdependence on the more general law of the " survival of the" fittest," or, the preservation of favoured races in the strugglefor life." It will, perhaps, be as well here to state what theselaws or general conclusions are, and then to give some accountof the facts which support them.The first law is, that in an overwhelming majority of casesof mimicry, the animals (or the groups) which resemble eachother inhabit the same country, the same district, and inmost cases are to be found together on the very same spot.The second law is,that these resemblances are not indiscriminate,but are limited to certain groups, which in everycase are abundant in species and individuals, and can oftenbe ascertained to have some special protection.The third law is, that the species which resemble or" mimic " these dominant groups are comparatively lessabundant in individuals, and are often very rare.These laws will be found to hold good in all the cases oftrue mimicry among various classes of animals to which wehave now to call the attention of our readers.Mimicry among LepidopteraAs it isamong butterflies that instances of mimicry aremost numerous and most striking, an account of some of themore prominent examples in this group will first be given.There is in South America an extensive family of theseinsects, the Heliconidae, which are in many respects very