PDF - Wallace Online

PDF - Wallace Online PDF - Wallace Online

wallace.online.org
from wallace.online.org More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

432 TROPICAL NATUREadvance, man's intellectual and moral development reachedalmost its highest level in a very remote past. The lower,the more animal, but often the more energetic types have,however, always been far the more numerous ;hence suchestablished societies as have here and there arisen under theguidance of higher minds have always been liable to be sweptaway by the incursions of barbarians. Thus in almost everypart of the globe there may have been a long succession ofpartial civilisations, each in turn succeeded by a period ofbarbarism ;and this view seems supported by the occurrenceof degraded types of skull along with such " as might havebelonged to a philosopher," at a time when the mammoth andthe reindeer inhabited southern France.Nor need we fear that there is not time enough for therise and decay of so many successive civilisations as this viewwould imply, for the opinion is now gaining ground amonggeologists that palaeolithic man was really preglacial, and thatthe great gap (marked alike by a change of physical conditionsand of animal life)which in Europe always separateshim from his neolithic successor, was caused by the comingon and passing away of the great ice age.If the views now advanced are correct, many, perhapsmost, of our existing savages are the successors of higherraces ;and their arts, often showing a wonderful similarity indistant continents, may have been derived from a commonsource among more civilised peoples.

VIIITHE ANTIQUITY OF MAN IN NORTH AMERICA 1Ancient Shell Mounds Man Coeval with Extinct Mammalia Man in theGlacial Period Palaeolithic Implements in North America TheAuriferous Gravels of California Fossil Remains under the AncientLava Beds Works of Art in the Auriferous Gravels Human Remainsin the Auriferous Gravels Concluding Remarks on theAntiquity of Man.OVER a considerable portion of the northern hemisphere theremains of man, or his works, have been found inassociationwith bones of the extinct mammalia which characterised theGlacial epoch, and no evidence has been obtained that manat that time differed more from modern savages than theydo among themselves. The facts which prove this antiquitywere, when first put forth, doubted, neglected, or violentlyopposed, and it is now admitted that such opposition wasdue to prejudice alone, and in every case led to the rejectionof important scientific truths. Yet after nearly thirty years'experience we find that an exactly similar prejudice prevails,even among geologists, against all evidence which carries manone little step farther back into pre-Glacial or Pliocene times,although if there is any truth whatever in the doctrine ofevolution as applied to man, and if we are not to adopt theexploded idea that the Palaeolithic men were specially createdjust when the flood of ice was passing away, they must havehad ancestors who must have existed in the Pliocene period,if not earlier. Is it then so improbable that some trace ofman should be discovered at this period, that each particle ofevidence as it arises must be attacked with all the weapons of1This article appeared in the Nineteenth Century, Nov. 1887.2F

VIIITHE ANTIQUITY OF MAN IN NORTH AMERICA 1Ancient Shell Mounds Man Coeval with Extinct Mammalia Man in theGlacial Period Palaeolithic Implements in North America TheAuriferous Gravels of California Fossil Remains under the AncientLava Beds Works of Art in the Auriferous Gravels Human Remainsin the Auriferous Gravels Concluding Remarks on theAntiquity of Man.OVER a considerable portion of the northern hemisphere theremains of man, or his works, have been found inassociationwith bones of the extinct mammalia which characterised theGlacial epoch, and no evidence has been obtained that manat that time differed more from modern savages than theydo among themselves. The facts which prove this antiquitywere, when first put forth, doubted, neglected, or violentlyopposed, and it is now admitted that such opposition wasdue to prejudice alone, and in every case led to the rejectionof important scientific truths. Yet after nearly thirty years'experience we find that an exactly similar prejudice prevails,even among geologists, against all evidence which carries manone little step farther back into pre-Glacial or Pliocene times,although if there is any truth whatever in the doctrine ofevolution as applied to man, and if we are not to adopt theexploded idea that the Palaeolithic men were specially createdjust when the flood of ice was passing away, they must havehad ancestors who must have existed in the Pliocene period,if not earlier. Is it then so improbable that some trace ofman should be discovered at this period, that each particle ofevidence as it arises must be attacked with all the weapons of1This article appeared in the Nineteenth Century, Nov. 1887.2F

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!