PDF - Wallace Online
PDF - Wallace Online PDF - Wallace Online
NATURAL SELECTIONan advance in mind rather than by a change in body. If,therefore, we are of opinion that he was not really man tillthese higher faculties were fully developed, we may fairlyassert that there were many originally distinct races of men ;while, if we think that a being closely resembling us in formand structure, but with mental faculties scarcely raised abovethe brute, must still be considered to have been human, weare fully entitled to maintain the common origin of all mankind.The Bearing of theseViews on the Antiquity of ManThese considerations, it will be seen, enable us to place theorigin of man at a much more remote geological epoch thanhas yet been thought possible. He may even have lived inthe Miocene or Eocene period, when not a single othermammal was identical in form with any existing species.For, in the long series of ages during which these primevalanimals were being slowly changed into the species which nowinhabit the earth, the power which acted to modify themwould only affect the mental organisation of man. His brainalone would have increased in size and complexity, and hiscranium have undergone corresponding changes of form, whilethe whole structure of lower animals was being changed.This will enable us to understand how the fossil crania ofDenise and Engis agree so closely with existing forms, althoughthey undoubtedly existed in company with largemammalia now extinct. The Neanderthal skull may be aspecimen of one of the lowest races then existing, just as theAustralians are the lowest of our modern epoch. We haveno reason to suppose that mind and brain and skull modificationcould go on quicker than that of the other parts of theorganisation and;we must therefore look back very far inthe past to find man in that early condition in which hismind was not sufficiently developed, to remove his body fromthe modifying influence of external conditions and the cumulativeaction of natural selection. I believe, therefore, thatthere is no a priori reason against our finding the remains ofman or his works in the tertiary deposits. The absence ofall such remains in the European beds of this age has littleweight, because, as we go farther back in time, it is natural
vin .THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES 181to suppose that man's distribution over the surface of theearth was less universal than at present.Besides, Europe was in a great measure submerged duringthe tertiary epoch ;and thoughits scattered islands may havebeen uninhabited by man, it by no means follows that he didnot at the same time exist in warm or tropical continents. Ifgeologists can point out to us the most extensive land in thewarmer regions of the earth, which has not been submergedsince Eocene or Miocene times, it is there that we may expectto find some traces of the very early progenitors of man. Itis there that we may trace back the gradually decreasing.brain of former races, till we come to a time when the bodyalso begins materially to differ. Then we shall have reachedthe starting-point of the human family. Before that periodhe had not mind enough to preserve his body from change,and would, therefore, have been subject to the same comparativelyrapid modifications of form as the other mammalia.Their Bearing on the Dignity and Supremacy of ManIf the views I have here endeavoured to sustain have anyfoundation, they give us a new argument for placing manapart, as not only the head and culminating point of the grandseries of organic nature, but as in some degree a new and distinctorder of being.From those infinitely remote ages, whenthe first rudiments of organic life appeared upon the earth,every plant and every animal has been subject to one greatlaw of physical change. As the earth has gone through itsgrand cycles of geological, climatal, and organic progress,every form of life has been subject to its irresistible action,and has been continually but imperceptibly moulded intosuch new shapes as would preserve their harmony with theever-changing universe. No living thing could escape thislaw of its being none; (except, perhaps, the simplest and mostrudimentary organisms) could remain unchanged and live,amid the universal change around it.At length, however, there came into existence a being inwhom that subtle force we term mind, became of greaterimportance than his mere bodily structure. Though with anaked and unprotected body, this gave him clothing againstthe varying inclemencies of the seasons. Though unable to
- Page 145 and 146: A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTSnatural phe
- Page 147 and 148: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 131most
- Page 149 and 150: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 133Real
- Page 151 and 152: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 135form
- Page 153 and 154: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 137of c
- Page 155 and 156: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 139ence
- Page 157 and 158: VIICREATION BY LAW 1AMONG the vario
- Page 159 and 160: vii CREATION BY LAW 143the whole or
- Page 161 and 162: CREATION BY LAW 145occur to him as
- Page 163 and 164: CREATION BY LAW 147inches, and was
- Page 165 and 166: vii CREATION BY LAW 149the growth o
- Page 167 and 168: vii CREATION BY LAW 161navigable ri
- Page 169 and 170: vii CREATION BY LAW 153sifted, and
- Page 171 and 172: CREATION BY LAW 155ments of beauty
- Page 173 and 174: CREATION BY LAW 157met with. On thi
- Page 175 and 176: CREATION BY LAW 159determined at th
- Page 177 and 178: vii CREATION BY LAW 161cannot be fu
- Page 179 and 180: CREATION BY LAW 163into a gull with
- Page 181 and 182: CREATION BY LAW 165the Eocene Anopl
- Page 183 and 184: VIIITHE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACESN
- Page 185 and 186: vni THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 187 and 188: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 189 and 190: THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES 173D
- Page 191 and 192: via THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 193 and 194: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 195: viii THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 199 and 200: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 201 and 202: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 203 and 204: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 205 and 206: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 207 and 208: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 209 and 210: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 211 and 212: LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN MAN
- Page 213 and 214: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 215 and 216: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 217 and 218: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 219 and 220: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 221 and 222: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 223 and 224: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 225 and 226: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 227 and 228: LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN MAN
- Page 229 and 230: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 231: TROPICAL NATURE AND OTHER ESSAYS
- Page 234 and 235: 218 TROPICAL NATUREThe Three Climat
- Page 236 and 237: TROPICAL NATURE
- Page 238 and 239: 222 TROPICAL NATUREproduces any bur
- Page 240 and 241: 224 TROPICAL NATUREof humidity, as
- Page 242 and 243: TROPICAL NATUREIn the north tempera
- Page 244 and 245: 228 TROPICAL NATUREslight fall of t
NATURAL SELECTIONan advance in mind rather than by a change in body. If,therefore, we are of opinion that he was not really man tillthese higher faculties were fully developed, we may fairlyassert that there were many originally distinct races of men ;while, if we think that a being closely resembling us in formand structure, but with mental faculties scarcely raised abovethe brute, must still be considered to have been human, weare fully entitled to maintain the common origin of all mankind.The Bearing of theseViews on the Antiquity of ManThese considerations, it will be seen, enable us to place theorigin of man at a much more remote geological epoch thanhas yet been thought possible. He may even have lived inthe Miocene or Eocene period, when not a single othermammal was identical in form with any existing species.For, in the long series of ages during which these primevalanimals were being slowly changed into the species which nowinhabit the earth, the power which acted to modify themwould only affect the mental organisation of man. His brainalone would have increased in size and complexity, and hiscranium have undergone corresponding changes of form, whilethe whole structure of lower animals was being changed.This will enable us to understand how the fossil crania ofDenise and Engis agree so closely with existing forms, althoughthey undoubtedly existed in company with largemammalia now extinct. The Neanderthal skull may be aspecimen of one of the lowest races then existing, just as theAustralians are the lowest of our modern epoch. We haveno reason to suppose that mind and brain and skull modificationcould go on quicker than that of the other parts of theorganisation and;we must therefore look back very far inthe past to find man in that early condition in which hismind was not sufficiently developed, to remove his body fromthe modifying influence of external conditions and the cumulativeaction of natural selection. I believe, therefore, thatthere is no a priori reason against our finding the remains ofman or his works in the tertiary deposits. The absence ofall such remains in the European beds of this age has littleweight, because, as we go farther back in time, it is natural