PDF - Wallace Online
PDF - Wallace Online PDF - Wallace Online
168 NATURAL SELECTION ^vnrfresh evidence to clear up those points which all admit to befull of doubt, on other and not less obscure and difficultquestions a considerable amount of dogmatism is exhibited ;doctrines are put forward as established truths, no doubt orhesitation is admitted, and it seems to be supposed that nofurther evidence is required, or that any new facts canmodify our convictions. This is especially the case when weinquire, Are the various forms under which man nowexists primitive, or derived from pre-existing forms ;inother words, is man of one or many species ? To this questionwe immediately obtain distinct answers diametricallyopposed to each other the one party : positively maintainingthat man is a species and is essentially one that all differencesare but local and temporary variations, produced by thedifferent physical and moral conditions by which he issurrounded ;the other party maintaining with equal confidencethat man is a genus of many species, each of whichis practically unchangeable, and has ever been as distinct, oreven more distinct, than we now behold them. This differenceof opinion is somewhat remarkable, when we considerthat both parties are well acquainted with the subject ;bothuse the same vast accumulation of facts ;both reject thoseearly traditions of mankind which profess to give an accountof his origin ;and both declare that they are seeking fearlesslyafter truth alone ; yet each will persist in looking onlyat the portion of truth on his own side of the question, and atthe error which is mingled with his opponent's doctrine. Itis my wish to show how the two opposing views can be combined,so as to eliminate the error and retain the truth ineach, and it isby means of Mr. Darwin's celebrated theoryof Natural Selection that I hope to do this, and thus to harmonisethe conflicting theories of modern anthropologists.Let us first see what each party has to say for itself. Infavour of the unity of mankind it isargued that there areno races without transitions to others ;that every raceexhibits within itself variations of colour, of hair, of feature,and of form, to such a degree as to bridge over, to a largeextent, the gap that separates it from other races. It isasserted that no race ishomogeneous that there is a tendencyto vary; that climate, food, and habits produce,;and
vni THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES 169render permanent, physical peculiarities,which, though slightin the limited periods allowed to our observation, would, inthe long ages during which the human race has existed, havesufficed to produce all the differences that now appear. It isfurther asserted that the advocates of the opposite theory donot agree among themselves ;that some would make three,some five, some fifty or a hundred and fifty species of man ;some would have had each species created in pairs, whileothers require nations to have at once sprung into existence,and that there is no stability or consistency in any doctrinebut that of one primitive stock.The advocates of the original diversity of man, on theother hand, have much to say for themselves. They arguethat proofs of change in man have never been brought forwardexcept to the most trifling amount, while evidence ofhis permanence meets us everywhere. The Portuguese andSpaniards, settled for two or three centuries in SouthAmerica, retain their chief physical, mental, and moralcharacteristics ;the Dutch boers at the Cape, and the descendantsof the early Dutch settlers in the Moluccas, havenot lost the features or the colour of the Germanic races ;the Jews, scattered over the world in the most diverseclimates, retain the same characteristic lineaments everywherethe ; Egyptian sculptures and paintings show us that,for at least 4000 or 5000 years, the strongly contrastedfeatures of the Negro and the Semitic races have remainedaltogether unchanged; while more recent discoveries provethat the mound-builders of the Mississippi valley, and thedwellers on Brazilian mountains, had, even in the very infancyof the human race, some traces of the same peculiar andcharacteristic type of cranial formation that now distinguishesthem.If we endeavour to decide impartially on the merits ofthis difficult controversy, judging solely by the evidence thateach party has brought forward, it certainly seems that thebest of the isargument on the side of those who maintainthe primitive diversity of man. Their opponents have notbeen able to refute the permanence of existing races as farback as we can trace them, and have failed to show, in asingle case, that at any former epoch the well marked varie-
- Page 133 and 134: thev THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS
- Page 135 and 136: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 119Chan
- Page 137 and 138: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 121thei
- Page 139 and 140: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 123whil
- Page 141 and 142: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 125the
- Page 143 and 144: 'vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 12720.
- Page 145 and 146: A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTSnatural phe
- Page 147 and 148: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 131most
- Page 149 and 150: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 133Real
- Page 151 and 152: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 135form
- Page 153 and 154: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 137of c
- Page 155 and 156: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 139ence
- Page 157 and 158: VIICREATION BY LAW 1AMONG the vario
- Page 159 and 160: vii CREATION BY LAW 143the whole or
- Page 161 and 162: CREATION BY LAW 145occur to him as
- Page 163 and 164: CREATION BY LAW 147inches, and was
- Page 165 and 166: vii CREATION BY LAW 149the growth o
- Page 167 and 168: vii CREATION BY LAW 161navigable ri
- Page 169 and 170: vii CREATION BY LAW 153sifted, and
- Page 171 and 172: CREATION BY LAW 155ments of beauty
- Page 173 and 174: CREATION BY LAW 157met with. On thi
- Page 175 and 176: CREATION BY LAW 159determined at th
- Page 177 and 178: vii CREATION BY LAW 161cannot be fu
- Page 179 and 180: CREATION BY LAW 163into a gull with
- Page 181 and 182: CREATION BY LAW 165the Eocene Anopl
- Page 183: VIIITHE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACESN
- Page 187 and 188: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 189 and 190: THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES 173D
- Page 191 and 192: via THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 193 and 194: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 195 and 196: viii THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 197 and 198: vin .THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 199 and 200: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 201 and 202: vin THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN RACES
- Page 203 and 204: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 205 and 206: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 207 and 208: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 209 and 210: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 211 and 212: LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN MAN
- Page 213 and 214: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 215 and 216: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 217 and 218: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 219 and 220: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 221 and 222: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 223 and 224: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 225 and 226: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 227 and 228: LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN MAN
- Page 229 and 230: ix LIMITS OF NATURAL SELECTION IN M
- Page 231: TROPICAL NATURE AND OTHER ESSAYS
168 NATURAL SELECTION ^vnrfresh evidence to clear up those points which all admit to befull of doubt, on other and not less obscure and difficultquestions a considerable amount of dogmatism is exhibited ;doctrines are put forward as established truths, no doubt orhesitation is admitted, and it seems to be supposed that nofurther evidence is required, or that any new facts canmodify our convictions. This is especially the case when weinquire, Are the various forms under which man nowexists primitive, or derived from pre-existing forms ;inother words, is man of one or many species ? To this questionwe immediately obtain distinct answers diametricallyopposed to each other the one party : positively maintainingthat man is a species and is essentially one that all differencesare but local and temporary variations, produced by thedifferent physical and moral conditions by which he issurrounded ;the other party maintaining with equal confidencethat man is a genus of many species, each of whichis practically unchangeable, and has ever been as distinct, oreven more distinct, than we now behold them. This differenceof opinion is somewhat remarkable, when we considerthat both parties are well acquainted with the subject ;bothuse the same vast accumulation of facts ;both reject thoseearly traditions of mankind which profess to give an accountof his origin ;and both declare that they are seeking fearlesslyafter truth alone ; yet each will persist in looking onlyat the portion of truth on his own side of the question, and atthe error which is mingled with his opponent's doctrine. Itis my wish to show how the two opposing views can be combined,so as to eliminate the error and retain the truth ineach, and it isby means of Mr. Darwin's celebrated theoryof Natural Selection that I hope to do this, and thus to harmonisethe conflicting theories of modern anthropologists.Let us first see what each party has to say for itself. Infavour of the unity of mankind it isargued that there areno races without transitions to others ;that every raceexhibits within itself variations of colour, of hair, of feature,and of form, to such a degree as to bridge over, to a largeextent, the gap that separates it from other races. It isasserted that no race ishomogeneous that there is a tendencyto vary; that climate, food, and habits produce,;and