PDF - Wallace Online
PDF - Wallace Online PDF - Wallace Online
NATURAL SELECTIONledge of the internal constitution of bodies analogous to thatwhich we obtain by the spectroscope and that;their visualorgans do possess some powers which ours do not, is indicatedby the extraordinary crystalline rods radiating from the opticganglion to the facets of the compound eye, which rods varyin form and thickness in different parts of their length, andpossess distinctive characters in each group of insects. Thiscomplex apparatus, so different from anything in the eyes ofvertebrates, may subserve some function quite inconceivableby us, as well as that which we know as vision. There isreason to believe that insects appreciate sounds of extremedelicacy, and it is supposed that certain minute organs, plentifullysupplied with nerves, and situated in the subcostal veinof the wing in most insects, are the organs of hearing. Butbesides these, the Orthoptera (such as grasshoppers, etc.) havewhat are supposed to be ears on their fore legs, and Mr.Lowne believes that the little stalked balls, which are thesole remnants of the hind wings in flies, are also organs ofhearing or of some analogous sense. In flies, too, the thirdjoint of the antennae contains thousands of nerve-fibres, whichterminate in small open cells, and this Mr. Lowne believes tobe the organ of smell, or of some other, perhaps new, sense.It is quite evident, therefore, that insects may possess senseswhich give them a knowledge of that which we can neverperceive, and enable them to perform acts which to us areincomprehensible. In the midst of this complete ignoranceof their faculties and inner nature, is it wise for us to judgeso boldly of their powers by a comparison with our own ?How can we pretend to fathom the profound mystery of theirmental nature, and decide what, and how much, they canperceive or remember, reason or reflect ! To leap at onebound from our own consciousness to that of an insect's is asunreasonable and absurd as if,with a pretty good knowledgeof the multiplication table, we were to go straight to thestudy of the calculus of functions, or as if our comparativeanatomists should pass from the study of man's bony structureto that of the fish, and, without any knowledge of thenumerous intermediate forms, were to attempt to determinethe homologies between these distant types of vertebrata.In such a case would not error be inevitable, and would not
ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALScontinued study in the same direction only render theerroneous conclusions more ingrained and more irremovable.Definition of InstinctBefore going further into this subject we must determinewhat we mean by the term instinct. It has been variously"defined as disposition operating without the aid of instruc-"tion or experience," a mental power totally independent oforganisation," or "a power enabling an animal to do thatwhich, in those things man can do, results from a chain ofreasoning, and in things which man cannot do, is not to beexplained by any efforts of the intellectual faculties." Wefind, too, that the word instinct is very frequently applied toacts which are evidently the result either of organisation orof habit. The colt or calf is said to walk instinctively, almostas soon as it is born ;but this is solely due to its organisation,which renders walking both possible and pleasurable to it.So we are said instinctively to hold out our hands to saveourselves from falling, but this is an acquired habit, whichthe infant does not possess. It appears to me that instinctshould be defined as "the performance by an animal ofcomplex acts, absolutely without instruction or previouslyacquired knowledge." Thus, acts are said to be performedby birds in building their nests, by bees in constructing theircells, and by many insects in providing for the future wantsof themselves or their progeny, without ever having seen suchacts performed by others, and without any knowledge of whythey perform them themselves. This is expressed by thevery common term "blind instinct." But we have here anumber of assertions of matters of fact, which, strange to say,have never been proved to be facts at all.They are thoughtto be so self-evident that they may be taken for granted.No one has ever yet obtained the eggs of some bird whichbuilds an elaborate nest, hatched these eggs by steam orunder a quite distinct parent, placed them afterwards in anextensive aviary or covered garden, where the situation andthe materials of a nest similar to that of the parent birds maybe found, and then seen what kind of nest these birds wouldbuild. If under these rigorous conditions they choose thesame materials, the same situation, and construct the nest in
- Page 57 and 58: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 59 and 60: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 61 and 62: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 63 and 64: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 65 and 66: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 67 and 68: in PROTECTIVE EESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 69 and 70: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 71 and 72: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 73 and 74: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 75 and 76: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 77 and 78: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 79 and 80: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 81 and 82: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 83 and 84: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 85 and 86: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 87 and 88: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 89 and 90: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 91 and 92: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 93 and 94: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 95 and 96: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 97 and 98: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 99 and 100: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 101 and 102: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 103 and 104: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 105 and 106: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 107: IVON INSTINCT INMAN AND ANIMALSTHE
- Page 111 and 112: iv ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALS 9
- Page 113 and 114: iv ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALS 9
- Page 115 and 116: THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTSDo Me
- Page 117 and 118: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 119 and 120: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 121 and 122: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 123 and 124: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 125 and 126: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 127 and 128: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 11
- Page 129 and 130: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 11
- Page 131 and 132: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 11
- Page 133 and 134: thev THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS
- Page 135 and 136: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 119Chan
- Page 137 and 138: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 121thei
- Page 139 and 140: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 123whil
- Page 141 and 142: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 125the
- Page 143 and 144: 'vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 12720.
- Page 145 and 146: A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTSnatural phe
- Page 147 and 148: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 131most
- Page 149 and 150: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 133Real
- Page 151 and 152: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 135form
- Page 153 and 154: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 137of c
- Page 155 and 156: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 139ence
- Page 157 and 158: VIICREATION BY LAW 1AMONG the vario
ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALScontinued study in the same direction only render theerroneous conclusions more ingrained and more irremovable.Definition of InstinctBefore going further into this subject we must determinewhat we mean by the term instinct. It has been variously"defined as disposition operating without the aid of instruc-"tion or experience," a mental power totally independent oforganisation," or "a power enabling an animal to do thatwhich, in those things man can do, results from a chain ofreasoning, and in things which man cannot do, is not to beexplained by any efforts of the intellectual faculties." Wefind, too, that the word instinct is very frequently applied toacts which are evidently the result either of organisation orof habit. The colt or calf is said to walk instinctively, almostas soon as it is born ;but this is solely due to its organisation,which renders walking both possible and pleasurable to it.So we are said instinctively to hold out our hands to saveourselves from falling, but this is an acquired habit, whichthe infant does not possess. It appears to me that instinctshould be defined as "the performance by an animal ofcomplex acts, absolutely without instruction or previouslyacquired knowledge." Thus, acts are said to be performedby birds in building their nests, by bees in constructing theircells, and by many insects in providing for the future wantsof themselves or their progeny, without ever having seen suchacts performed by others, and without any knowledge of whythey perform them themselves. This is expressed by thevery common term "blind instinct." But we have here anumber of assertions of matters of fact, which, strange to say,have never been proved to be facts at all.They are thoughtto be so self-evident that they may be taken for granted.No one has ever yet obtained the eggs of some bird whichbuilds an elaborate nest, hatched these eggs by steam orunder a quite distinct parent, placed them afterwards in anextensive aviary or covered garden, where the situation andthe materials of a nest similar to that of the parent birds maybe found, and then seen what kind of nest these birds wouldbuild. If under these rigorous conditions they choose thesame materials, the same situation, and construct the nest in