PDF - Wallace Online
PDF - Wallace Online PDF - Wallace Online
84 NATURAL SELECTION inonly obtained one answer from a gentleman in Cumberland,who gave me some interesting observations on the generaldislike and abhorrence of all birds to the "GooseberryCaterpillar," probably that of the Magpie moth (Abraxasgrossulariata). Neither young pheasants, partridges, nor wildducks could be induced to eat it, sparrows and finches nevertouched it,and all birds to whom he offered it rejected itwith evident dread and abhorrence. It will be seen that theseobservations are confirmed by those of two members of theEntomological Society, to whom we are indebted for moredetailed information.In March 1869 Mr. J. Jenner Weir communicated avaluable series of observations made during many years, butmore especially in the two preceding summers, in his aviary,containing the following birds of more or less insectivoroushabits :Kobin, Yellow - hammer, Eeed - bunting, Bullfinch,Chaffinch, Crossbill, Thrush, Tree-pipit, Siskin, and Redpoll.He found that hairy caterpillars were uniformly rejected ;five distinct species were quite unnoticed by all his birds, andwere allowed to crawl about the aviary for days with impunity.The spiny caterpillars of the Tortoiseshell and Peacock butterflieswere equally rejected ;but in both these cases Mr.Weir thinks it is the taste, not the hairs or spines, thatis disagreeable, because some very young caterpillars of ahairy species were rejected although no hairs were developed,and the smooth pupae of the above:-named butterflies wererefused as persistently as the spined larvse. In these cases,then, both hairs and spines would seem to be mere signs ofuneatableness.His next experiments were with those smooth gailycolouredcaterpillars which never conceal themselves, but onthe contrary appear to court observation. Such are those ofthe Magpie moth (Abraxas grossulariata), whose caterpillarisconspicuously white and black spotted the Diloba cseruleocephala,whose larva is pale yellow with a broad blue orgreen lateral band the Cucullia verbasci, whose larva isgreenish white with yellow bands and black spots, andAnthrocera filipendulae (the six spot Burnet moth), whosecaterpillar is yellow with black spots. These were given tothe birds at various times, sometimes mixed with other kinds
in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG ANIMALS 85of larvae which were greedily eaten, but they were in everycase rejected apparently unnoticed, and were left to crawlabout tillthey died.The next set of observations were on the dull-colouredand protected larvae, and the results of numerous experimentsare thus summarised by Mr. Weir. "All caterpillars whosehabits are nocturnal, which are dull -coloured, with fleshybodies and smooth skins, are eaten with the greatest avidity.Every species of green caterpillar is also much relished. AllGeometrae, whose larvae resemble twigs as they stand outfrom the plant on their anal prolegs, are invariably eaten."At the same meeting Mr. A. G-. Butler, of the BritishMuseum, communicated the results of his observations withlizards, frogs, and spiders, which strikingly corroborate thoseof Mr. Weir. Three green lizards (Lacerta viridis), which hekept for several years, were very voracious, eating all kindsof food, from a lemon cheesecake to a spider, and devouringflies, caterpillars, and humble bees; yet there were somecaterpillars and moths which they would seize only to dropimmediately. Among these the principal were the caterpillarof the Magpie moth (Abraxas grossulariata) and the perfectsix spot Burnet moth (Anthrocera filipendulae). These wouldbe first seized but invariably dropped in disgust, and afterwardsleft unmolested. Subsequently frogs were kept andfed with caterpillars from the garden, but two of these thatof the before-mentioned Magpie moth, and that of the V.moth (Halia wavaria), which is green with conspicuous whiteor yellow stripes and black spots were constantly rejected.When these species were first offered, the frogs sprang atthem eagerly and licked them into their mouths ;no sooner,however, had they done so than they seemed to be aware ofthe mistake that they had made, and sat with gaping mouths,rolling their tongues about until they had got quit of thenauseous morsels.With spiders the same thing occurred. These two caterpillarswere repeatedly put into the webs both of thegeometrical and hunting spiders (Epeira diadema and Lycosasp.), but in the former case they were cut out and allowed todrop in the; latter, after disappearing in the jaws of theircaptor down his dark silken funnel, they invariably reappeared,
- Page 49 and 50: ii ON THE TENDENCY OF VARIETIES, ET
- Page 51 and 52: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 53 and 54: PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG ANIMA
- Page 55 and 56: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 57 and 58: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 59 and 60: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 61 and 62: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 63 and 64: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 65 and 66: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 67 and 68: in PROTECTIVE EESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 69 and 70: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 71 and 72: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 73 and 74: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 75 and 76: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 77 and 78: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 79 and 80: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 81 and 82: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 83 and 84: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 85 and 86: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 87 and 88: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 89 and 90: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 91 and 92: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 93 and 94: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 95 and 96: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 97 and 98: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 99: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 103 and 104: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 105 and 106: in PROTECTIVE RESEMBLANCES AMONG AN
- Page 107 and 108: IVON INSTINCT INMAN AND ANIMALSTHE
- Page 109 and 110: ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALSconti
- Page 111 and 112: iv ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALS 9
- Page 113 and 114: iv ON INSTINCT IN MAN AND ANIMALS 9
- Page 115 and 116: THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTSDo Me
- Page 117 and 118: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 119 and 120: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 121 and 122: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 123 and 124: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 125 and 126: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 10
- Page 127 and 128: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 11
- Page 129 and 130: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 11
- Page 131 and 132: v THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS 11
- Page 133 and 134: thev THE PHILOSOPHY OF BIRDS' NESTS
- Page 135 and 136: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 119Chan
- Page 137 and 138: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 121thei
- Page 139 and 140: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 123whil
- Page 141 and 142: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 125the
- Page 143 and 144: 'vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 12720.
- Page 145 and 146: A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTSnatural phe
- Page 147 and 148: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 131most
- Page 149 and 150: vi A THEORY OF BIRDS' NESTS 133Real
84 NATURAL SELECTION inonly obtained one answer from a gentleman in Cumberland,who gave me some interesting observations on the generaldislike and abhorrence of all birds to the "GooseberryCaterpillar," probably that of the Magpie moth (Abraxasgrossulariata). Neither young pheasants, partridges, nor wildducks could be induced to eat it, sparrows and finches nevertouched it,and all birds to whom he offered it rejected itwith evident dread and abhorrence. It will be seen that theseobservations are confirmed by those of two members of theEntomological Society, to whom we are indebted for moredetailed information.In March 1869 Mr. J. Jenner Weir communicated avaluable series of observations made during many years, butmore especially in the two preceding summers, in his aviary,containing the following birds of more or less insectivoroushabits :Kobin, Yellow - hammer, Eeed - bunting, Bullfinch,Chaffinch, Crossbill, Thrush, Tree-pipit, Siskin, and Redpoll.He found that hairy caterpillars were uniformly rejected ;five distinct species were quite unnoticed by all his birds, andwere allowed to crawl about the aviary for days with impunity.The spiny caterpillars of the Tortoiseshell and Peacock butterflieswere equally rejected ;but in both these cases Mr.Weir thinks it is the taste, not the hairs or spines, thatis disagreeable, because some very young caterpillars of ahairy species were rejected although no hairs were developed,and the smooth pupae of the above:-named butterflies wererefused as persistently as the spined larvse. In these cases,then, both hairs and spines would seem to be mere signs ofuneatableness.His next experiments were with those smooth gailycolouredcaterpillars which never conceal themselves, but onthe contrary appear to court observation. Such are those ofthe Magpie moth (Abraxas grossulariata), whose caterpillarisconspicuously white and black spotted the Diloba cseruleocephala,whose larva is pale yellow with a broad blue orgreen lateral band the Cucullia verbasci, whose larva isgreenish white with yellow bands and black spots, andAnthrocera filipendulae (the six spot Burnet moth), whosecaterpillar is yellow with black spots. These were given tothe birds at various times, sometimes mixed with other kinds