SOIL SURVEY
SOIL SURVEY SOIL SURVEY
LANDFOR MMajor Iandformsgenerally have predictable kinds of materials, topography ,drainage, and stability . Hence, these separations forma logical framework whe npreparing a soils legend and map . The landforms found in Yoho National Park wer eclassified according to the outline presented in Table 3 . This landorm classificationis modified from Fulton et al .(1974) and has tentatively been adopted by the Canad aSoil Survey Committee . Testing by soil survey groups throughtout Canada has resulte din more recent versions (CSSC 1976b) .Accordingly, this landform classification mayappear with some modifications in other soil survey reports .A veneer surface form as used in this report (Table 3) and as shown on th esoil maps, indicate a surficial deposit which masks little of the configuration of th eunderlying bedrock or deposit . It is generally assumed to be less than 2 m deep an dunless otherwise indicated, occurs over bedrock .A blanket surface form as used in this report and on the soil maps, indicate sa surficial deposit which subdues, but doesn't entirely mask the configuration of th eunderlying bedrock or deposit . A blanket is generally estimated to be between 2and 15 m thick . Unless otherwise indicated, a blanket deposit is underlain b ybedrock .Because the materials associated with specific landformsact as one of th esoil-forming factors, when a significant landform change occurs there is a concomiran tsoil change . The combinations of landforms and soilscape groups are presented i nTable 4 .TOPOGRAPH YTopography plays a very important part in the soil formation process and i salso one of the major considerations when planning for the use of an area . ThePark is located entirely in the Rocky Mountains and as such has a land surface whic his extremely variable, ranging from relatively level floodplains and gently slopin galluvial fans to steeply sloping colluvial slopes and high rugged mountain peaks .
-37-Table 3 . An outline of the local (mineral) landform classification used in thi sreport and on the soil maps (exerpted from Fulton et at . 1974) .SURFACE FORMCOMPOSITION AND GENESI SPoorly sorted sediments Well sorted sands, silts Well sorted gravels Well to poorly sorted boulders Undifferentiated sediment sdeposited directly from or clays deposited in to clays deposited to clays deposited of the base where mode of depositio nglacial ice still, fresh-water by running water of slopes through gravity flow is complex or unknow n(Morainal) (Lacustrine) (Fluvial) (Colluvial) (Undifferentiated )Generally flat, even surface LI - level lacustrine Fl - level fluvia llacking irregularities . MI - level morainal G UI - level undifferentiatedSlopes less than 3% .L G- l level glaciolacustrine F - level glaciofluvialGenerally a smooth ,irregular surface withbroad, shallow topographic Mu - undulating morainallows and broad, low highs .Slopes usually from 2 to 5% .Lu - undulating lacustrine Fu - undulating fluvia lLG - undulatingF G - undulatin g° glaciolacustrine ° glaciofluvialUu - undulatingundifferentiatedGenerally a broken ,irregular surface wit hdistinct knobs or moundsand depressions . Slopesgenerally from 5 to 30%but may be lower .Mh - hummocky morainal LC}, - hummocky FG - hummocky Ch - hummocky colluvial Uh - hummockyglaciolacustrine glaciofluvial undifferentiatedGenerally a smooth ,regular surface with broodtopographic lows, long side Mm - rolling moraina lslopes and broad topographi chighs . Slopes from 5 to 30% .LG - rolling F G - rolling Um - rollingglaciolacustrinem glaciofluvial undifferentiatedGenerally linear, paralle lor intersecting pattern o fslopes, surfaces generally Mr - ridged morainal L G- ridged FG- ridged Cr - ridged colluvial Ur - ridge dsmooth . Slopes often from r glaciolacustrine r glaciofluvial undifferentiated5 to 30% but may be lower .Generally flat surfac ewith deep, well definedcircular depressions .Slopes on flats generall yless than 3% but 5 to30% in depressions .Mp - pitted morainal L G - pitted FG - pitted Lip - pittedP glaciolacustrine P glaciofluvial undifferentiatedGenerally longunidirectional slopeslacking forms char-act- MI - inclined morainal CI - inclined colluvial Ui - inclinederistic of other groups .undifferentiatedSlopes greater than 3% .Generally relatively flatsurfaces bounded by steepslopes on at least one side .Occur In valleys .It - terraced lacustrin eLG - terrace dglaciolacustrineFt - fluvial terrac eF G -glaciofluvia lt terraceUt - terracedundifferentiatedGenerally long, relativel ysmooth slopes extendin gfrom an apex in an arc of u pto 180° . Slopes may varyfrom 5 to 30% .Generally long, relativel ysmooth slopes extendingfrom a series of apron swith perimeters coalescingwith adjoining fans .Ff - fluvial fa nF fG- glaciofluvial fan Cf- colluvial fan Uf- undifferentiated fa nFa - fluvial apron Co - colluvial apron Uo - undifferentiatedapronSlopes characterized by thinsurface deposits which masklittle of the configurationof underlying bedrock ordeposit .My - morainal veneerLv - lacustrine veneerGL v -glaciolacustrineveneerFv - fluvial venee rGF v -glaciofluvial veneerCv -colluvial veneerUv - undifferentiatedveneerSlopes characterized byrelatively thin surfacedeposits which subduebut do not completel ymask the configurationof the underlyin gbedrock or deposit .Lb - lacustrine blanket Fb - fluvial blanke tMb - morainal blanket GL b - glaciolacustrineFGb -glaciofluvial Cb -colluvial blanket Ub - undifferentiate dblanketblanke tblanke t
- Page 7 and 8: (Contents - cont . . )PageFIGURES1
- Page 10 and 11: (Contents - cont . . . )TABLES (con
- Page 12 and 13: (Contents - cant . . . )TABLES (con
- Page 15 and 16: Gleysolic and Organic soils occur i
- Page 17 and 18: PREFAC EThe soil survey of Yoho Nat
- Page 19 and 20: How to use this repor tThis report
- Page 21 and 22: PARTIGENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE ARE
- Page 23 and 24: -3-The Kicking Horse River and Kick
- Page 25 and 26: -5-serves hikers in the Lake O'Hara
- Page 27 and 28: -7-mainly in the Cataract Brook - L
- Page 29 and 30: figure 3 . A cirque; typical of man
- Page 31 and 32: -11-Glacial processes are not howev
- Page 33 and 34: -13-Figure 6 . Drainage systems of
- Page 35 and 36: -15-_.iure 7 . Gentle gradients in
- Page 37 and 38: -17-The effect of altitude on clima
- Page 39 and 40: GOLDE NPR ECIP nTAT IO NRAIN + SNO
- Page 41 and 42: Table 2 . Comparison .' of mean mon
- Page 43 and 44: -23-VEGETATIO NGeneral Vegetation P
- Page 45 and 46: -25-The interaction of these soil-f
- Page 47 and 48: -27-profile development is frequent
- Page 49 and 50: -29-PART I IMETHODOLOGYMAPPINGA goo
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 13 . Oblique photo showing t
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 15 . Oblique photo showing t
- Page 55: -35-~ ♦ YOHO NATIONAL PAR K[D]Ami
- Page 59 and 60: -39-The topography of each mapping
- Page 61 and 62: -41 -must be treated as an independ
- Page 63 and 64: -43-FIELD TEST S1 . Bulk Density; b
- Page 65 and 66: -45-are calcareous, stratified, med
- Page 67 and 68: -47-Organic Landform sNorco (NA) is
- Page 69 and 70: -51 -LEGENDParent material.colluviu
- Page 71 and 72: -53-Table 7 . Key criteria differen
- Page 73 and 74: -55-BC2 Map Unit (Orthic and Rego G
- Page 75 and 76: -57-Table 10 . Brief description of
- Page 77 and 78: ure 24 . This photo shows the huge
- Page 79 and 80: igure 26 . Site of the pedon chosen
- Page 81 and 82: -63-Figure 28 . Site of the pedon c
- Page 83 and 84: - 65-CLI.Figui 30 . Site of the ped
- Page 85 and 86: -67-Table 15 . Brief description of
- Page 87 and 88: L-69-r_ -, _ 1 4Figure 35 . Site of
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 37 . Site of the pedon chose
- Page 91 and 92: -73-Landform and Parent Material sT
- Page 93 and 94: -75-The silty surface texture, slow
- Page 95 and 96: -77-material and/or shallowness (of
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 44 . Site of the pedon chose
- Page 99 and 100: -81-HR1 Map Unit (Degraded Eutric B
- Page 101 and 102: -83-in the solum, but may exceed 50
- Page 103 and 104: -85-KI - Kicking Horse Soilscape Gr
- Page 105 and 106: -87-Silty surficial textures provid
LANDFOR MMajor Iandformsgenerally have predictable kinds of materials, topography ,drainage, and stability . Hence, these separations forma logical framework whe npreparing a soils legend and map . The landforms found in Yoho National Park wer eclassified according to the outline presented in Table 3 . This landorm classificationis modified from Fulton et al .(1974) and has tentatively been adopted by the Canad aSoil Survey Committee . Testing by soil survey groups throughtout Canada has resulte din more recent versions (CSSC 1976b) .Accordingly, this landform classification mayappear with some modifications in other soil survey reports .A veneer surface form as used in this report (Table 3) and as shown on th esoil maps, indicate a surficial deposit which masks little of the configuration of th eunderlying bedrock or deposit . It is generally assumed to be less than 2 m deep an dunless otherwise indicated, occurs over bedrock .A blanket surface form as used in this report and on the soil maps, indicate sa surficial deposit which subdues, but doesn't entirely mask the configuration of th eunderlying bedrock or deposit . A blanket is generally estimated to be between 2and 15 m thick . Unless otherwise indicated, a blanket deposit is underlain b ybedrock .Because the materials associated with specific landformsact as one of th esoil-forming factors, when a significant landform change occurs there is a concomiran tsoil change . The combinations of landforms and soilscape groups are presented i nTable 4 .TOPOGRAPH YTopography plays a very important part in the soil formation process and i salso one of the major considerations when planning for the use of an area . ThePark is located entirely in the Rocky Mountains and as such has a land surface whic his extremely variable, ranging from relatively level floodplains and gently slopin galluvial fans to steeply sloping colluvial slopes and high rugged mountain peaks .