12.07.2015 Views

Homosexuality: Legally Permissible or Spiritually Misguided?1

Homosexuality: Legally Permissible or Spiritually Misguided?1

Homosexuality: Legally Permissible or Spiritually Misguided?1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lockard, <strong>Homosexuality</strong>However, Valenstein (1998:126-128) argues that experiences <strong>or</strong> behaviourscan indeed modify the brain:A person’s mental state and experience can alter the brain. . . .Various experiences can cause structural and functioningchanges in the brain. . . . Genes are responsible f<strong>or</strong> establishingscaffolding of the brain, but a large amount of neuronal growththat leads to the establishment of connections has been shownto be influenced by experience.Thus, we learn that it is through the biological model f<strong>or</strong> homosexuality thatthe issue causes intense debate and concern f<strong>or</strong> Christians. If one espousesthis model, one is in agreement that homosexuality is an illness f<strong>or</strong> which theperson is helpless to control. Thus, society and the church must fully accepthomosexuals into complete fellowship.Environmental the<strong>or</strong>ists, such as Matheson (2007), posit that socialexperiences such as an unhealthy parent-child interaction and <strong>or</strong> sexual abusecontribute to same sex behaviour and, theref<strong>or</strong>e, the behaviour is primarilylearned.Abbott (1995), however, brings another compelling component into the debatewhen he proposes that an interactional model f<strong>or</strong> homosexuality, whichaddresses biological, environmental and psychological issues, fails to considerthe aspect of freedom of choice in shaping sexual <strong>or</strong>ientation and behaviour.As in all human behaviour, there is the element of personal choice which is astrong component in shaping behaviour. Following is a careful analysis of thefree agency aspect of persons when discussing contribut<strong>or</strong>y causal fact<strong>or</strong>s ofhomosexuality.3.2. Free m<strong>or</strong>al agency of human beingsIt is imperative to assess the individual’s own active participation (choice) insexual preference, that is, a person’s freedom to choose a homosexuallifestyle. Diamond (1998) addresses this salient issue when he contends thatwhile biology may bias a person’s sexual <strong>or</strong>ientation, individual behaviour isflexible when responding to environmental influences, and theref<strong>or</strong>e free145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!