Homosexuality: Legally Permissible or Spiritually Misguided?1

Lockard, Homosexualityof Health and Human Services, USA, investigated Hamer for alleged fraud inthis study (eventually he was cleared of the charges). Significantly, the studycould never be reproduced. Although Hamer, as a behavioural scientist, waswell aware that you cannot verify the validity of research without innumerablesuch correlations.Two subsequent studies (Hamer et al. 1995; Bailey et al. 1999) of otherhomosexual brothers have concluded that there is no evidence that male sexualorientation is influenced by an X-linked gene (Austraico 2003). In July 1993,the Science research journal was quick to publish the study by Hamer whichposited that there might be a gene for homosexuality.Unfortunately, what was not disseminated and understood by the nonscientificcommunity was the fact that Hamer and his research team performeda common type of behavioural genetics investigation called a “linkage study”.This is a limited model of research whereby researchers identify a behaviouraltrait that appears to be prevalent in a family and then proceed with thefollowing:• They look for a chromosomal variant in the genetic material of thefamily.• They determine whether that variant is more frequent in familymembers who share the particular trait. 5Importantly, despite intensive scientific and medical research, there is nosound evidence that people are born homosexual. Rather, studies indicate thatbehaviour is acquired and not instinctive.3.4.4. The genetics of behaviourIt is erroneous to conclude that the correlation of a genetic structure with abehavioural trait implies that the trait is “genetic” or inherited. Hamer and hiscolleagues failed to relay to the non-scientific community that there cannot bea human trait without innumerable such correlations (NARTH 2004).5 For a complete study of Hamer’s research, see “Science 261” July 16, 1993:321.151