02.12.2012 Views

Estrogen Receptor Null Mice - Endocrine Reviews

Estrogen Receptor Null Mice - Endocrine Reviews

Estrogen Receptor Null Mice - Endocrine Reviews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

June, 1999 ESTROGEN RECEPTOR NULL MICE 365<br />

et al. (88) have demonstrated colocalization of ER� and ER�<br />

to select regions of the rat forebrain.<br />

C. Generation of the ER null mice<br />

The field of estrogen action has been and continues to be<br />

a dynamic one with broadening scope. Although estradiol is<br />

often called the female sex steroid, the list of tissues and<br />

organs in which estrogen actions appear to be critical to<br />

physiological function continues to expand, in both sexes.<br />

The crucial actions of estradiol in the female reproductive<br />

tract, breast, and hypothalamic-pituitary axis have been well<br />

described. However, we now know of significant functions<br />

fulfilled by estrogens in male reproduction. Furthermore, the<br />

effects of estrogens in the physiology, maintenance, and<br />

overall health of the cardiovascular, central nervous, bone,<br />

immune, skin, and adipogenesis systems have been an area<br />

of continued research. And finally, the role that estrogen and<br />

normal and variant ERs may play in carcinogenesis, especially<br />

in the breast and female reproductive tract, continues<br />

to receive great attention.<br />

The rationale for generating mice that possess no functional<br />

ER is multifaceted, but in its most simple terms, was<br />

founded on the classical ablation experiments of the early<br />

part of this century. In 1900, Knauer (105) described the<br />

ability of ovarian grafts to prevent uterine atrophy in the<br />

castrated guinea pig. Five years later, Marshall and Jolly (106)<br />

described the capacity of ovarian extracts to induce estrus<br />

when administered to ovariectomized dogs. Similar protocols<br />

were later elegantly employed by Jost (107) to substantiate<br />

the endocrine function of the testis and the importance<br />

of testosterone in sex determination. These studies were critical<br />

to establishing the following basic criteria required to<br />

verify an endocrine role for a particular organ or tissue: 1)<br />

removal or destruction of the synthesizing organ should<br />

result in predictable symptoms presumed to be related to the<br />

absence of the hormone; 2) administration of material prepared<br />

from the removed organ should relieve these symptoms;<br />

and 3) the hormone should be present in and extractable<br />

from both the organ and blood (108). In the spirit of these<br />

earlier studies, the later part of this century has witnessed the<br />

marriage of two relatively new methodologies to introduce<br />

a modern version of the ablation experiment. The combination<br />

of in vitro culture of mouse embryonic stem cells and<br />

targeted homologous recombination has generated a tool<br />

that allows for the precise disruption or knockout of a particular<br />

gene of study and the passage of this mutation to<br />

offspring. Although one can debate whether this new technique<br />

is more or less invasive than the previous surgical<br />

methods, it is obvious that the classic “ablation” experiment<br />

has been elevated to a molecular level. The function of a<br />

specific hormone can now be studied rather than the function<br />

of a whole endocrine organ that may produce multiple secretions.<br />

Furthermore, this new technology allows for the<br />

study of a particular cellular component, such as a receptor,<br />

that is intrinsic to one or more tissues. Such studies were<br />

previously impossible or relied on the use of chemical antagonists,<br />

which introduced their own inherent limitations.<br />

Additionally, gene targeting provides for in vivo methods to<br />

study the roles of a particular receptor throughout the life of<br />

the animal, including the early development stages. The current<br />

tools that allow for the generation of transgenic mice<br />

have already made significant contributions to our knowledge<br />

of particular genes, especially those involved in development<br />

and reproduction (reviewed in Refs. 109 and 110).<br />

At the time the ERKO mouse was envisioned, the ER� was<br />

the only form of ER known to exist. Furthermore, there were<br />

no reports of ER mutations in normal tissue that resulted in<br />

estrogen insensitivity in humans or laboratory animals. This<br />

was in contrast to the descriptions of syndromes of receptorbased<br />

insensitivity to androgens (37, 38) and thyroid hormones<br />

(40). Therefore, investigators were inclined to conclude<br />

that mutations that resulted in insufficient estrogen<br />

synthesis or resistance to the hormone at the level of the<br />

target organ were lethal at the earliest developmental stages<br />

(111, 112). This view was strengthened by reports of the<br />

detection of ER� mRNA in both human (113) and mouse<br />

(114) oocytes as well as in mouse blastocysts (115). Accordingly,<br />

the concept of generating a mouse devoid of ER� was<br />

initially met with skepticism but was pursued as a collaborative<br />

effort between our laboratory and that of Dr. Oliver<br />

Smithies of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.<br />

If disruption of the mouse ER� gene did prove lethal, a model<br />

to study the precise time and locations of critical ER-mediated<br />

actions during early development would be available.<br />

However, providing the animal was viable, an in vivo model<br />

of estrogen insensitivity would now be accessible for continued<br />

study. Six years after the initial description of the<br />

�ERKO mouse, we now take for granted that disruption of<br />

the ER� gene proved not to be lethal, but rather the animal<br />

develops normally and exhibits a life span comparable to its<br />

wild-type litter mates (46). However, as will be elaborated in<br />

detail in this review, the adult �ERKO mice exhibit several<br />

abnormalities and deficiencies, most notable of which are the<br />

phenotypic syndromes that result in infertility in both sexes.<br />

Since this time, additional discoveries have been made to<br />

enhance the utility of the �ERKO model. Soon after the<br />

generation of the �ERKO mouse, Smith et al. (116) reported<br />

the first and only known case of clinical estrogen insensitivity<br />

due to an inactivating mutation of the ER� gene in a human<br />

patient. Later came multiple descriptions of aromatase and<br />

subsequent estradiol deficiency in humans (117–120). And<br />

finally, a second collaborative effort resulted in the successful<br />

generation of the �ERKO mice, which also survive to adulthood<br />

and exhibit phenotypes unique from those of the<br />

�ERKO (47). However, splicing variants of the disrupted<br />

genes that may encode for receptors with decreased functional<br />

activity have been detected in small amounts in each<br />

of the respective ERKO models (as discussed below) and<br />

therefore complicate the interpretation of the nonlethality of<br />

the gene targeting. Nonetheless, we now know that a loss of<br />

full function of any one of the two ERs is neither lethal nor<br />

detrimental to embryonic and fetal development in both<br />

mice and humans. Perhaps the survival of the ERKO mice,<br />

the aromatase-deficient humans, and the ER�-deficient male<br />

will prompt a renewed effort among clinicians to suspect and<br />

investigate the possibility of estrogen insufficiency or resistance<br />

in patients not responding to conventional therapies.<br />

The ERKO mice provide broad and multiple advantages<br />

to the research efforts toward understanding the function

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!