Monitoring Statement (1.4 MB PDF) Opens in a new ... - Angus Council

Monitoring Statement (1.4 MB PDF) Opens in a new ... - Angus Council Monitoring Statement (1.4 MB PDF) Opens in a new ... - Angus Council

12.07.2015 Views

Angus Local Plan ReviewMonitoring StatementDecember 2011

<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review<strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>December 2011


Translation ServicesThe content of this publication, or sections of it, can be made available <strong>in</strong> alternative formatsor translated <strong>in</strong>to other community languages. Please contact the <strong>Council</strong>'s ACCESSL<strong>in</strong>e on08452 777 778 for further <strong>in</strong>formation or email accessl<strong>in</strong>e@angus.gov.uk.


ContentsPage no1 Introduction 12. <strong>Angus</strong> Vision and Development Strategy 33. <strong>Angus</strong> Profile 7Physical context 7Demographic context 8Economic context 104. Performance of the Plan 14Build<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communities 14• Hous<strong>in</strong>g 14• Work<strong>in</strong>g 25• Town centres and retail<strong>in</strong>g 29• Sports and recreation 32• Community services 33• Transport and communications 35Environment and Resources 38• Natural environment 38• Built environment 40• Water resource management 41• Resources - agriculture and m<strong>in</strong>erals 44• Energy 45• Waste management 475. Towns and Villages – progress summary 49• Arbroath 49• Brech<strong>in</strong> 50• Carnoustie 51• Forfar 53• Kirriemuir 54• Monifieth 54• Montrose 55• Rural villages and other settlements 556. Conclusions - What has the plan achieved 58• Locational Strategy 58• Build<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communities 59• Environment and Resources 61


1. INTRODUCTION1.1 The Plann<strong>in</strong>g etc (Scotland) Act 2006 sets out a requirement for plann<strong>in</strong>g authoritiesto publish a monitor<strong>in</strong>g statement for their exist<strong>in</strong>g Local Plans alongside thepublication of a Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report. The monitor<strong>in</strong>g statement should focus on:-• Changes <strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal physical, economic, social and environmentalcharacteristics of the area; and• The impact of the policies and proposals of the exist<strong>in</strong>g plans.1.2 The <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review (ALPR) was adopted <strong>in</strong> February 2009. In support ofthe <strong>Council</strong>s Vision, it provides a land use policy framework to guide developmentand <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> a susta<strong>in</strong>able manner up to 2011. It replaced the first <strong>Angus</strong> LocalPlan which was adopted by <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>in</strong> November 2000. While much of thegeneral policy framework from the previous <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan (2000) rema<strong>in</strong>ed valid,it required to be reviewed and rolled forward to take account of the Dundee and<strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan approved by Scottish M<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>in</strong> October 2002 and updatedGovernment policy and advice.1.3 The ALPR was prepared to meet the requirements of the Town & Country Plann<strong>in</strong>g(Scotland) Act 1997, take account of national plann<strong>in</strong>g guidance published by theScottish Executive, and conform to the Dundee and <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan. The ALPRalso had regard to the vision set out <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> Community Plan and other <strong>Council</strong>Strategies and Plans <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g, the Local Agenda 21 Strategy for <strong>Angus</strong> and the<strong>Angus</strong> Local Transport Strategy.<strong>1.4</strong> The purpose of this monitor<strong>in</strong>g report is to analyse how far the development strategyand objectives of the ALPR have been achieved and to provide an evidence base forthe preparation of the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Development Plan. Given the short period of times<strong>in</strong>ce the ALPR was formally adopted, this report looks at what has happened <strong>in</strong> the10 year period 2000-2010 covered by both the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan (2000) and, theALPR (2009) as this provides a more realistic timescale to monitor performance.Such an approach is also considered appropriate as the vision, development strategyand objectives set out <strong>in</strong> both local plans rema<strong>in</strong>ed largely consistent.1.5 <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> the success of the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review (hereafter: the plan) not onlyrequires the identification of objectives (what the plan set out to achieve) but alsomean<strong>in</strong>gful methods of measur<strong>in</strong>g the outcomes (what the plan actually achieved).This task is largely dependant upon data sources and statistics suitable formonitor<strong>in</strong>g, therefore the report concentrates on gather<strong>in</strong>g and analys<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formationthat is readily available and measurable.The rema<strong>in</strong>der of this monitor<strong>in</strong>g report comprises five sections:Section 2 sets out the vision, development strategy and priorities of the planSection 3 provides a profile of <strong>Angus</strong> - the ma<strong>in</strong> physical, demographic andeconomic characteristics of the area which provide the context for assess<strong>in</strong>g theperformance of the plan.Section 4 looks at the performance of the plan <strong>in</strong> terms of development on theground and success of policies and the development strategy particularly <strong>in</strong> relationto hous<strong>in</strong>g and employment sites.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>1


2. ANGUS VISION AND DEVELOPMENT STRATEGYWhat did the Local Plan seek to do?Vision2.1 The Vision for <strong>Angus</strong> set out <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> Community Plan recognised andembraced the promotion of susta<strong>in</strong>able development as a means of improv<strong>in</strong>g thequality of life <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> whilst car<strong>in</strong>g for the environment.<strong>Angus</strong> will be a place where a first class quality of life for all can beenjoyed, <strong>in</strong> vibrant towns and pleasant villages, set <strong>in</strong> attractive andproductive countryside.Development Strategy2.2 In support of the Vision, the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review sets out the land use plann<strong>in</strong>gresponse <strong>in</strong> the form of a development strategy which seeks to:• Draw on the <strong>in</strong>herent strengths and synergy of the close network of <strong>Angus</strong>towns and villages, and consolidate the role of the seven towns as locallyaccessible centres serv<strong>in</strong>g a diverse rural h<strong>in</strong>terland;• Guide and encourage the majority of development, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g local hous<strong>in</strong>gand employment opportunities, to locations with<strong>in</strong> the larger settlementsthat have the capacity to accommodate <strong>new</strong> development well <strong>in</strong>tegratedwith transport <strong>in</strong>frastructure;• Provide opportunities for diversification of the rural economy;• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> and protect the diversity and quality of the rural area andencourage local development which supports the population and servicesof local communities;• Support the protection and enhancement of the countryside; and• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the quality of valued landscapes; the natural, built and historicenvironment; and biodiversity.Priorities2.3 The <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review identifies a range of priorities for deliver<strong>in</strong>g thedevelopment strategy under the themes BUILDING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIESand ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES as follows:Build<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communitieso Guid<strong>in</strong>g the majority of development such as hous<strong>in</strong>g, employment, retail andleisure to locations with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> towns and villages which can bestaccommodate development mak<strong>in</strong>g use of exist<strong>in</strong>g and planned transport andother <strong>in</strong>frastructure;<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>3


<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>4


o Locat<strong>in</strong>g residential, employment, leisure and shopp<strong>in</strong>g uses <strong>in</strong> proximity to oneanother <strong>in</strong> order to improve accessibility for all and m<strong>in</strong>imise the need to travel,especially by car;o Locat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>new</strong> developments, particularly those generat<strong>in</strong>g high levels of traffic, tosites where there is a choice of means of transport;o Provid<strong>in</strong>g a mix and range of hous<strong>in</strong>g developments to meet the needs andaspirations of all sectors of the community;o Provid<strong>in</strong>g a range of employment sites <strong>in</strong> key locations to meet demand andstimulate <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, and mak<strong>in</strong>g provision for rural diversificationprojects;o Support<strong>in</strong>g the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and improvement of the transport network to providesafe and efficient ways to travel, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g promot<strong>in</strong>g alternatives to the use of theprivate car;o Support<strong>in</strong>g the provision of a range of facilities such as shops, schools, hospitalsand other public facilities to serve local areas;o Ensur<strong>in</strong>g development makes a contribution towards protection of theenvironment, resource management, reduc<strong>in</strong>g pollution, and develop<strong>in</strong>g energyefficiency.Environment and Resourcesoooooooooprotect<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g wildlife habitats identified as be<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>in</strong>ternational,national or local importance;protect<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the biodiversity of <strong>Angus</strong>;conserv<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g important landscapes and landscape features andensur<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>new</strong> development is sympathetic to landscape character;protect<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the quality of the built and historic environment andensur<strong>in</strong>g that development proposals respect local characteristics;promot<strong>in</strong>g the susta<strong>in</strong>able use of water resources and ensur<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>new</strong>development does not exacerbate any flood risk;promot<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>tegrated management of the coastal area and m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>gunnecessary coastal development;guid<strong>in</strong>g proposals for re<strong>new</strong>able energy;safeguard<strong>in</strong>g good quality agricultural land from <strong>in</strong>appropriate and irreversibledevelopment;provid<strong>in</strong>g a framework for the selection of sites for m<strong>in</strong>eral extraction, landfill andland raise developments to m<strong>in</strong>imise environmental damage to landscape,heritage and environmental assets.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>5


Policies and Proposals2.4 The Plan sets out <strong>in</strong>dividual policies and proposals which would be applied to deliverthe strategy and priorities of the plan under the follow<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>gs:General PoliciesDevelopment BoundariesAccessible DevelopmentDesign QualityEnvironmental ProtectionSafeguard AreasDevelopment Pr<strong>in</strong>ciplesBuild<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able CommunitiesHous<strong>in</strong>gWork<strong>in</strong>gTown Centres and Retail<strong>in</strong>gSport and RecreationCommunity Facilities and ServicesTransport and CommunicationEnvironment and ResourcesNatural EnvironmentBuilt EnvironmentWater Resource ManagementResourcesEnergyWaste ManagementTowns and villages2.5 The Plan conta<strong>in</strong>s settlement statements with detailed policies and proposals for thefollow<strong>in</strong>g towns and rural settlements:TownsArbroathBrech<strong>in</strong>CarnoustieForfarKirriemuirMonifiethMontrose (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Hillside & Ferryden)Rural SettlementsAuchmithieBallumbie HouseEdzellFriockheimGlamisInverkeilorK<strong>in</strong>gsmuirLethamLetham GrangeLiffMonikieNewbigg<strong>in</strong>g (By Carnoustie)PiperdamStrathmart<strong>in</strong>e HospitalWoodville<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>6


3 ANGUS PROFILE3.1 Scottish Government Plann<strong>in</strong>g Circular 1/2009 expla<strong>in</strong>s that an early task of plann<strong>in</strong>gauthorities will be to monitor changes <strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal physical, economic, social andenvironmental characteristics of their area (paragraph 34 refers). It is important to setout the context <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review (ALPR) has operated and(where appropriate) to suggest how changes may have affected its delivery andobjectives. Key issues and trends need to be understood <strong>in</strong> the context of physical,demographic and economic data, and this context is set out below.PHYSICAL CONTEXT3.2 <strong>Angus</strong> is a diverse, attractive and generally prosperous part of Scotland,characterised by a network of <strong>in</strong>terrelated communities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g seven towns, alarge number of villages and smaller settlements set <strong>in</strong> a varied rural landscape.Each <strong>Angus</strong> town and village has its own identity, although there are clear and strong<strong>in</strong>ter-relationships between them. The l<strong>in</strong>kages between the constituent parts of<strong>Angus</strong> and with other areas, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Aberdeen and Dundee, relate particularly totransport, hous<strong>in</strong>g, employment opportunities and bus<strong>in</strong>ess/commercial l<strong>in</strong>ks. Thereare also important shopp<strong>in</strong>g and social movements both with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> and toadjacent areas. Geographically, the area is made up of the coastal pla<strong>in</strong>s, thelowland of Strathmore, the glens and the upland areas that form part of the GrampianMounta<strong>in</strong>s. These different areas each make a vital contribution to the overallcharacter and dist<strong>in</strong>ctiveness of <strong>Angus</strong>. They also vary markedly <strong>in</strong> their topography,geology, land-use and population base.The Coastal Pla<strong>in</strong>s• This area comprises a varied coastl<strong>in</strong>e of low-ly<strong>in</strong>g sandy beaches, sand dunes,<strong>in</strong>ter-tidal mud/sand flats, rocky shorel<strong>in</strong>es and cliffs. To the north of Victoria Park(Arbroath) and as far as north as Ferryden, the cliffs and rocky shores arepredom<strong>in</strong>antly Old Red Sandstone, or ancient lavas and tuffs. Large expanses ofsand dunes and l<strong>in</strong>ks are found between Monifieth and Carnoustie, and betweenMontrose and K<strong>in</strong>naber. There are smaller areas of sandy coastl<strong>in</strong>e at Elliot andLunan Bay.• The area is used as a major transport corridor, with both the A92 (partly dualcarriageway) and the east coast railway l<strong>in</strong>e pass<strong>in</strong>g through it. The commercialharbour at Montrose provides access to national and <strong>in</strong>ternational markets.• Approximately half of the <strong>Angus</strong> population live <strong>in</strong> the coastal towns of Arbroath,Carnoustie, Monifieth and Montrose (source: 2009 mid-year populationestimates, Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics).• Arbroath is the largest urban area <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> and has the largest residentpopulation of all the <strong>Angus</strong> towns.Strathmore Valley• This area is a broad and fertile agricultural valley, formed by glacial erosion. Thevalley is up to 10km wide and is approximately 30km long, with the dom<strong>in</strong>ant landuse be<strong>in</strong>g arable farm<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>7


• The valley is based on a broad band of Old Red Sandstone which has beeneroded by ice sheets and subsequent meltwater flows. Human <strong>in</strong>terventioncomb<strong>in</strong>ed with the naturally fertile soils and a favourable climate has created aproductive area for the cultivation of cereals, oil seed rape, soft fruit and potatoes(source: Tayside Landscape Character Assessment, 1999).• The A90 trunk road, which runs through Strathmore and close to the towns ofBrech<strong>in</strong> and Forfar, provides an important transport l<strong>in</strong>k between Aberdeen andDundee, and is also a major route to areas further south.• Approximately a quarter of the <strong>Angus</strong> population live <strong>in</strong> the towns of Brech<strong>in</strong>,Forfar and Kirriemuir, with a substantial number also liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the rural villages(e.g. Letham and Friockheim) (source: 2009 mid-year population estimates,Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics).• Forfar is the largest urban area <strong>in</strong> this part of <strong>Angus</strong> and has a larger residentpopulation than the other towns of Brech<strong>in</strong> and Kirriemuir.The <strong>Angus</strong> Glens & Upland Areas• This area comprises un<strong>in</strong>habited open moorlands, forestry plantations, U-shapedvalleys and other topographical features formed by past glaciations. There is avariety of different rock types <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g granites, limestones, quartzite and<strong>in</strong>trusive diorite.• The glens and upland areas cover almost one third of the total land area of<strong>Angus</strong>, with the southern and eastern extremities be<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>ed by the highlandboundary fault. There are five pr<strong>in</strong>cipal glens (Isla, Prosen, Clova, Lethnot andEsk) which conta<strong>in</strong> no major centres of population.• Part of upland <strong>Angus</strong> lies with<strong>in</strong> the Cairngorms National Park boundary, and wasexcluded from the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review. This part of <strong>Angus</strong> will not becovered by the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Development Plan.• Development <strong>in</strong> this area is often widely dispersed, with small groups of build<strong>in</strong>gsassociated with farms or estates. Agriculture is concentrated on the valley floorsand is generally pastoral.DEMOGRAPHIC CONTEXT3.3 The size and characteristics of the resident population affects the use of land byhelp<strong>in</strong>g to determ<strong>in</strong>e the demand for <strong>new</strong> development, particularly for hous<strong>in</strong>g andemployment purposes. Through the build<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>new</strong> homes and workplaces, thesechanges can also have an effect on the local built and natural environment. Thefollow<strong>in</strong>g bullet po<strong>in</strong>ts present the demographic context for the ALPR:Population• For the <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area, the 2010 mid-year resident population wasestimated as 110,570 persons (source: Mid-Year Population Estimates, GeneralRegistry Office for Scotland). S<strong>in</strong>ce the Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan wasapproved (October 2002), there have been fluctuations <strong>in</strong> the resident population;although s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004 there have been year-on-year <strong>in</strong>creases (source: Mid-YearPopulation Estimates, General Registry Office for Scotland).<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>8


• A comparison between population estimates for the <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area at 2001and 2010 shows that the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> resident population dur<strong>in</strong>g this period was+2,170 persons (see Table 1 below). This was due to <strong>in</strong>-migration from otherareas. Without this <strong>in</strong>-migration, natural changes (births and deaths) would haveled to a decrease <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> population.• The <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Need and Demand Assessment (February 2010; AppendixB) suggests that <strong>in</strong>-migrant home purchasers have ma<strong>in</strong>ly come from Dundee,except <strong>in</strong> Brech<strong>in</strong>, Montrose and the surround<strong>in</strong>g areas, where <strong>in</strong>-migrants havecome largely from Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire.• The population levels for each of the ma<strong>in</strong> settlement areas (populations over500) are shown below <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The 2010 figures were calculated us<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>formation from the GROS small population estimates data zones. The tableshows that some of the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> towns have seen a decrease <strong>in</strong> their overallresident population. In contrast, the ma<strong>in</strong> villages and the wider rural area appearto have witnessed a slight <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> population levels.Table 1: Population <strong>in</strong> towns, ma<strong>in</strong> villages and rural area 2001 - 2010<strong>Angus</strong> Town/ 2001 Census 2010 mid year Change (no) Change %RuralestimateArbroath 22785 22143 -642 -2.8%Brech<strong>in</strong> 7199 6043 -1156 -16.1%Carnoustie 10561 10653 +92 +0.9%Forfar 13206 13447 +241 +1.8%Kirriemuir 5963 5740 -223 -3.7%Monifieth 8098 8311 +213 +2.6%Montrose 10845 11408 +563 +5.2%Rural 29743 32825 +3082 +10.4%Total <strong>Angus</strong> 108400 110570 +2170 +2.0%Ma<strong>in</strong> villages2008 mid yearestimate*Birkhill/Muirhead 1936 2130 +194 +9.1%Edzell 783 900 +117 +13.0%Ferryden 929 1040 +111 +10.7%Friockheim 820 940 +120 +12.8%Hillside 1014 1140 +126 +11.1%Letham 1498 1520 +22 +<strong>1.4</strong>%Newtyle 722 770 +48 +6.2%Wellbank 584 650 +66 +10.2%Sub Total -villages8286 9090 +804Source: Small area population estimates, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> 2010 and GRO settlements/localities 2008. Based onScottish Governments Neighbourhood Statistics• The structure of the resident population has changed s<strong>in</strong>ce 2001, and <strong>in</strong> 2010there were more people over the age of 45 and fewer school children (5-16 yearsof age) In general, the older age groups (especially pensioners) now represent agreater proportion of the resident population than <strong>in</strong> 2001. (source: Mid-YearPopulation Estimates, General Registry Office for Scotland).<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>9


Households and Hous<strong>in</strong>g Stock• There has been a 7.7% <strong>in</strong>crease (+3,620) <strong>in</strong> the number of households across<strong>Angus</strong> from 2001 to 2010, which reflects the national trend over this period(source: Estimates of Households and Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Scotland 2010, GeneralRegistry Office for Scotland).• In terms of the hous<strong>in</strong>g stock, <strong>in</strong> 2010 there were 54,060 permanent dwell<strong>in</strong>gs.This is an <strong>in</strong>crease of 3,747 dwell<strong>in</strong>gs from 2001 (source: Estimates ofHouseholds and Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Scotland 2009, General Registry Office forScotland).• In 2010, there were 2,926 vacant dwell<strong>in</strong>gs and second homes <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. This issimilar to the number of vacant dwell<strong>in</strong>gs and second homes recorded <strong>in</strong> 2001(2,813 dwell<strong>in</strong>gs) (source: Estimates of Households and Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Scotland2010, Household Estimates for Scotland by Local Authority 1991 to 2004; bothGeneral Registry Office for Scotland).Reflections on the demographic context for the ALPR3.4 Increases to the resident population can put pressure on the exist<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g stock,which helps to generate a demand for <strong>new</strong> houses and flats. The population<strong>in</strong>creases that have resulted from <strong>in</strong>-migration, together with the growth <strong>in</strong> thenumber of households s<strong>in</strong>ce 2001, will have contributed to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> thenumber of dwell<strong>in</strong>gs (see above).3.5 In terms of the ALPR development strategy, the important matter is where themajority of the <strong>new</strong> homes have been built. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the rural populationsuggests an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pressure on the rural dwell<strong>in</strong>g stock, whilst the opposite canbe said of the urban areas because of the slight decreases <strong>in</strong> some of the <strong>Angus</strong>towns (see Table 1, page 9). The larger change <strong>in</strong> households from 2001 to 2010(i.e. relative to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> resident population) is likely to reflect a reduction <strong>in</strong>household size, which could have helped to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> demand for <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> theurban areas.3.6 For <strong>Angus</strong> as a whole, the population has only <strong>in</strong>creased to a small extent s<strong>in</strong>ce2001, so there is unlikely to have been much additional pressure for <strong>new</strong>employment-related development to cater for <strong>new</strong> employees resident <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.ECONOMIC CONTEXT3.7 Changes to the economy of an area can affect the pressure for <strong>new</strong> development, bycreat<strong>in</strong>g a need for <strong>new</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess premises or for <strong>new</strong> homes to accommodate<strong>in</strong>com<strong>in</strong>g workers. As well as hav<strong>in</strong>g wider social consequences, the economicperformance of an area affects the development of land and can therefore have aneffect on the local built and natural environment. Tak<strong>in</strong>g a wider view, the economicdownturn which followed the “credit crunch” of 2007/8 has affected access todevelopment and mortgage f<strong>in</strong>ance across Scotland and at an <strong>in</strong>ternational level.This has had a pronounced effect on the development of <strong>new</strong> homes s<strong>in</strong>ce the ALPRwas adopted (see the Hous<strong>in</strong>g section of this monitor<strong>in</strong>g report). The follow<strong>in</strong>g bulletpo<strong>in</strong>ts present the economic context for the ALPR:<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>10


Economic Performance• Between 2001 and 2008, there was a steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the value of economicoutputs (goods and services, measured <strong>in</strong> terms of Gross Value Added) for the<strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area (source: Regional Economic Activity (GVA) for NUTS3 areas,Office for National Statistics).• From 2008 to 2009, there was a slight decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> economic output (goods andservices) across Scotland as a whole (source: Regional Economic Activity (GVA)for NUTS2 areas, Office for National Statistics).• The construction sector has been one of the most volatile sectors of the economy<strong>in</strong> terms of its economic output s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008. The gross value added from thissector has fluctuated from be<strong>in</strong>g a negative contribution to the Scottish economyuntil 2010, to be<strong>in</strong>g a positive contribution from mid 2010 to early 2011 (source:Gross Domestic Product for Scotland Statistical Bullet<strong>in</strong> (1 st Quarter 2011),Scottish Government).Economic Activity• S<strong>in</strong>ce the adoption of the ALPR <strong>in</strong> 2009, trends <strong>in</strong> economic activity havefluctuated, although it appears that the drop <strong>in</strong> the proportion of residents <strong>in</strong> works<strong>in</strong>ce the economic downturn (approximately -2% of all persons s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008) hasnot yet recovered (source: Annual Population Survey, Office for NationalStatistics). Broadly speak<strong>in</strong>g, the proportion of economically active people <strong>in</strong><strong>Angus</strong> grew from 2004 to 2007, then rema<strong>in</strong>ed stable until 2009, beforedecreas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to 2010 (source: Annual Population Survey, Office for NationalStatistics).• The proportion of unemployed but economically active persons rema<strong>in</strong>ed fairlyconstant from 2004 to 2008, although there was a slight decrease overall bySeptember 2008. S<strong>in</strong>ce late 2008, there has been a steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> thisproportion, broadly reflect<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> unemployed persons at the Scottishand UK levels (source: Annual Population Survey, Office for National Statistics).Characteristics of local bus<strong>in</strong>esses• Small and medium sized enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> employ a significantly greaterproportion of all workers compared to Scotland as a whole. In 2006 and 2008,small bus<strong>in</strong>esses (i.e. those employ<strong>in</strong>g less than 50 employees throughout theUK) represented around 55% of the <strong>Angus</strong> workforce. In comparison, smallbus<strong>in</strong>ess only accounted for 35% of the workforce across Scotland <strong>in</strong> 2006 and2008 (source: <strong>Angus</strong> Economic Digest 2010, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>).• Figure 1 provides a comparison between the number of bus<strong>in</strong>ess sites ofregistered enterprises <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, for 2006 and 2009. This graph shows that whilstthere has been an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of bus<strong>in</strong>ess sites <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> sectors(e.g. construction, bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities, real estate and rent<strong>in</strong>g) there has been adecl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> others (e.g. primary <strong>in</strong>dustries, wholesale, retail<strong>in</strong>g and repair).Adjustments have generally been m<strong>in</strong>or, except <strong>in</strong> the ‘bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities, realestate and rent<strong>in</strong>g’ sector of the economy.• <strong>Angus</strong> was traditionally heavily dependent on farm<strong>in</strong>g, food production &process<strong>in</strong>g, and the textile <strong>in</strong>dustries. In March 2009, the <strong>Angus</strong> economy had a<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>11


greater concentration of registered bus<strong>in</strong>esses <strong>in</strong> the primary <strong>in</strong>dustries than forScotland as a whole; and a lower concentration <strong>in</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess activities, realestate and rent<strong>in</strong>g sector (source: <strong>Angus</strong> Economic Digest 2010, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>).• In 2008, employment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> was dependent on the service sector, whichaccounted for 71% of jobs. Many of these jobs are <strong>in</strong> the public sector. There wasa greater reliance on manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, agriculture, forestry and fish<strong>in</strong>g than forScotland as a whole (all <strong>in</strong>formation is taken from the <strong>Angus</strong> Economic Digest2010, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>).• The 2001 Census revealed that 18,600 people commuted outside <strong>Angus</strong> to workor study whilst 5,900 travelled <strong>in</strong> to <strong>Angus</strong> to work or study. Of the 5,900commuters com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> to <strong>Angus</strong>, 3,312 came from Dundee.Figure 1: No. of bus<strong>in</strong>ess sites by sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, <strong>in</strong> March 2006 and March 20091000Total Number of Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Sites of Registered Enterprises9008007006005004003002001000A, B, C, EPrimaryIndustriesDManufactur<strong>in</strong>gF ConstructionG Wholesale,retail andrepairsH Hotels andrestaurantsI Transport,storage andcommunicationSector of the EconomyJ F<strong>in</strong>ancial<strong>in</strong>termediationK Bus<strong>in</strong>essactivities, realestate, rent<strong>in</strong>gMarch 2006March 2009M, N Education,health andsocial w orkO Othercommunity,social andpersonalservicesSource: <strong>Angus</strong> Economic Digest 2006 (Executive Summary) & <strong>Angus</strong> Economic Digest 2010. Data orig<strong>in</strong>ally obta<strong>in</strong>ed from theInter-Departmental Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Register via the Office for National Statistics.Bus<strong>in</strong>ess births & deaths• From 2004 to 2007, there was a steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of <strong>new</strong>enterprises with<strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area. Over the same period, there was alsoa slow decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the number of bus<strong>in</strong>ess deaths (i.e. bus<strong>in</strong>esses which havebecome <strong>in</strong>active and are either known or presumed to have closed). S<strong>in</strong>ce 2008however, the number of <strong>new</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses has decl<strong>in</strong>ed and the number of<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>12


us<strong>in</strong>ess deaths has <strong>in</strong>creased (all <strong>in</strong>formation is taken from Bus<strong>in</strong>essDemography 2010, Office for National Statistics).• Survival rates for <strong>Angus</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses (i.e. the proportion of <strong>new</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses thathave survived for a number of years s<strong>in</strong>ce a particular date) compare favourablyto those for Dundee city. After five years, 49.2% of the <strong>new</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>essesstarted <strong>in</strong> 2005 were still active, which compares with only 39.9% of Dundeebus<strong>in</strong>esses started at the same time (source: Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Demography 2010, Officefor National Statistics).Reflections on the economic context for the ALPR3.8 The effects of the global economic downturn are clearly visible at the <strong>Angus</strong> level, <strong>in</strong>terms of changes <strong>in</strong> economic activity with<strong>in</strong> the resident population and <strong>in</strong> thecreation and failure of bus<strong>in</strong>esses. These changes suggest there would have been adecrease <strong>in</strong> the demand for <strong>new</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess premises s<strong>in</strong>ce the ALPR was adopted.3.9 Although the ALPR strategy is concerned with direct<strong>in</strong>g the majority of <strong>new</strong>employment-related development to the larger settlements, the small size of many<strong>Angus</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>esses means that their <strong>in</strong>dividual development needs are likely to havebeen small-scale. The period of economic prosperity until 2007/8 could havegenerated some demand for <strong>new</strong> premises.3.10 Changes have occurred to the economic profile of <strong>Angus</strong>, although <strong>in</strong> 2009 there wasstill a greater reliance on the traditional rural and manufactur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustries than forScotland as a whole. Broadly speak<strong>in</strong>g, the numbers and types of companies thatmay have been look<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>new</strong> premises do not appear to have changed much s<strong>in</strong>cethe publication of the f<strong>in</strong>alised ALPR <strong>in</strong> 2005. The exception to this appears to be thebus<strong>in</strong>ess service and real estate sectors of the economy, where a greater number ofbus<strong>in</strong>ess sites were recorded <strong>in</strong> 2009 relative to 2006 (see Figure 1, page 12). Manyof these bus<strong>in</strong>esses are likely to prefer town centre locations for ease of access fortheir customers.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>13


4 PERFORMANCE OF THE PLANThis part of the monitor<strong>in</strong>g report assesses the performance of the ALPR <strong>in</strong> terms ofdeliver<strong>in</strong>g the strategy and priorities for Build<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communities andEnvironment and Resources. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, the plan’s various policies and proposalshave been assessed to establish what has been achieved and whether land hasbeen developed as envisaged. The follow<strong>in</strong>g sections consider the priorities forBuild<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communities and Environment and Resources under thema<strong>in</strong> land use head<strong>in</strong>gs as set out <strong>in</strong> the ALPR.BUILDING SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIESHous<strong>in</strong>gThe location and accessibility of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g development4.1 The <strong>in</strong>tegration of land use and transport lies at the heart of deliver<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>abledevelopment and this is reflected <strong>in</strong> a number of the ALPR’s key priorities. The Planseeks to meet the hous<strong>in</strong>g requirements <strong>in</strong> a way that takes account of transportnetworks and accessibility to services and facilities; allocations were therefore largelyfocused with<strong>in</strong> the towns and larger villages. Land allocations were made on thebasis of an assessment of landscape capacity, <strong>in</strong>frastructural capacity, accessibility,proximity to services, environmental considerations and reasonable expectations ofwhere development might take place. These allocations were <strong>in</strong>tended to assist <strong>in</strong>the delivery of the hous<strong>in</strong>g land allowances of the Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan(2001-2016), as these relate to the <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> area.4.2 Progress <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g the sites allocated through the ALPR is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2below. This only <strong>in</strong>cludes hous<strong>in</strong>g sites that were allocated or cont<strong>in</strong>ued through theplan, and does not <strong>in</strong>clude others which have come forward on an unplanned basis(w<strong>in</strong>dfall sites):Table 2: Town and Village Allocated Hous<strong>in</strong>g SitesAllocated SitesNo. ofunitsCompletionss<strong>in</strong>ce JulyA1: Montrose Road(Arbroath)A2: James Street Hall(Arbroath)A3: Millgate Loan/EastMary Street (Arbroath)A4: Benedict Road(Arbroath)Status at 1 April 20112008? (Y/N)200 N Site is effective17 N Development has been completed20 N Development has been completed20 N Development has been completedA5: Cliffburn (Arbroath) 125 Y Site is effective and development hascommencedAm1: Kirkbank (Auchmithie) 15 N Site is effectiveFk1: Millgate 3 16 Y Development has been completedFk2: South of GardyneStreet (Friockheim)Lk1: Lunan Avenue(Inverkeilor)40 N Site is effective4 N Site is effective<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>14


Lk2: Kirkton Farm Stead<strong>in</strong>g 3 N Site is effectiveB1: Dubton Farm (Brech<strong>in</strong>) 100 N Site is effectiveB2: Andover School(Brech<strong>in</strong>)M1: Brech<strong>in</strong> Road(Montrose)M2: Dungmans Tack(Montrose)M3: Lochside DistilleryTower (Montrose)F2: Beechill Nursery(Forfar)20 N Site is effective200 Y Site is effective and development hascommenced18 N Site is effective40 N Development has been completed5 N Site is effectiveF3: Green Street (Forfar) 20 N Development has been completedF4: Wester Restenneth(Forfar)F5: Whitehills Nursery(Forfar)150 N Site is effective and has plann<strong>in</strong>gpermission.100 N Site is effectiveF6: Dundee Road (Forfar) 100 N Site is effective and has plann<strong>in</strong>gpermissionF7: Gowanbank (Forfar) 60 N Site is effectiveF8: Slatefield (Forfar) 5 N Site is effectiveK1: Shiellhill Road(Kirriemuir)10 Y Development has been completedK2: Hillhead (Kirriemuir) 80 Y Site is effective and development hascommencedK3: Sunnyside (Kirriemuir) 40 N Site is effective and has plann<strong>in</strong>gpermissionKi1: Bunkerhill (K<strong>in</strong>gsmuir) 12 Y Hous<strong>in</strong>g development complete on partof site.Ki2: K<strong>in</strong>gston Place(K<strong>in</strong>gsmuir)12 N Site is effectiveL2: Jubilee Park (Letham) 30 N Site is effectiveL3: East Hemm<strong>in</strong>g Street(Letham)C1: Newton Road 2(Carnoustie)C2: Former Malt<strong>in</strong>gs(Carnoustie)Mf1: Ashludie HospitalPhase 2 (Monifieth)Mk1: Granary Site(Monikie)Nb1: Pitairlie Road(Newbigg<strong>in</strong>g)30 Y Site is effective and development hascommenced158 N Development has been completed130 Y Site is effective and development hascommenced25 N Site is effective60 Y Site is effective and development hascommenced20 N Development has been completedSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audits 2005-2011, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong><strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>15


4.3 In terms of where the <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g has actually been built, the majority of <strong>new</strong>development has occurred <strong>in</strong> the seven towns across the four hous<strong>in</strong>g market areas(HMAs). However, with<strong>in</strong> the South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA, only 52% of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g on largesites (sites of 5+ units; 2001-2010) was built with<strong>in</strong> Carnoustie or Monifieth. This issubstantially less than the proportion built with<strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> towns of the other hous<strong>in</strong>gmarket areas, which is typically around 80%. Outwith the ma<strong>in</strong> towns, almost all ofthe hous<strong>in</strong>g on large sites (5+ units) has been developed with<strong>in</strong> one of the villages <strong>in</strong>each hous<strong>in</strong>g market area, except the South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA. With<strong>in</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong>,slightly more than a quarter of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g development on these larger sitesoccurred <strong>in</strong> the rural area. This <strong>in</strong>cludes general hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the countryside, but alsothe <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g which supported the development of leisure and recreationalfacilities at Piperdam, Ballumbie and K<strong>in</strong>gennie Fish<strong>in</strong>gs.Figure 2: Proportion of house completions with<strong>in</strong> the seven towns, by Hous<strong>in</strong>g MarketArea (2001-2010) and for all sites of 5 or more units10090% of hous<strong>in</strong>g completions (sites of 5+ units)80706050403020100North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong> West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit 2010 (background data tables), <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.4 Several policies of the ALPR provide opportunities for hous<strong>in</strong>g to support the growthof rural communities. Over the last ten years (2000-2010), a substantial number of<strong>new</strong> homes have been built <strong>in</strong> the rural areas of <strong>Angus</strong> (887 units); (Source: Dundee& <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit data, 2010). In particular, s<strong>in</strong>ce the ALPR was adoptedas the local plan for <strong>Angus</strong> (exclud<strong>in</strong>g that part with<strong>in</strong> the Cairngorms National Park)(February 2009), consent has been granted for 187 <strong>new</strong> homes <strong>in</strong> the opencountryside (Source: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Uniform database, December 2010). This levelof development has been <strong>in</strong> accordance with the strategy of the ALPR and theprevious <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan (2000-2006), because overall, fewer homes have beenbuilt <strong>in</strong> the rural area than <strong>in</strong> the towns and larger villages. (source: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit data, 2010). This is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 3, page 17.4.5 Figure 3 shows the number of <strong>new</strong> homes that have been developed <strong>in</strong> towns andvillages, the number that have been developed <strong>in</strong> the open countryside and thenumber which have come forward to enable other forms of development, on siteswhich are also located <strong>in</strong> the rural area. It is once aga<strong>in</strong> noticeable that South <strong>Angus</strong><strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>16


is anomalous to other areas, with a greater proportion of all hous<strong>in</strong>g development (onboth large and small sites) occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the open countryside or <strong>in</strong> support of leisureand recreational facilities at Piperdam and Ballumbie House. This discrepancy islikely to reflect the greater need and demand for <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the rural areas ofSouth <strong>Angus</strong>, due to the proximity of Dundee.Figure 3: Total house completions with<strong>in</strong> and outwith settlements, by Hous<strong>in</strong>g MarketArea (2000-2010)2000Number of hous<strong>in</strong>g units180016001400120010008006004008387011819973741931337145993Total hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment toenable leisurefacilities <strong>in</strong> ruralareasTotal hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment <strong>in</strong> theopen countrysideTotal hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment w ith<strong>in</strong>tow ns & villages2000North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong> West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit 2010 (background data tables), <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.6 All <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the open countryside has the potential to support exist<strong>in</strong>g ruralcommunities; <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g alone is generally <strong>in</strong>sufficient to create viablecommunities, because of difficulties <strong>in</strong> access<strong>in</strong>g public transport and key services. Inrural <strong>Angus</strong>, accessibility to transport networks and key services limits the ability todeliver susta<strong>in</strong>able development and to reduce the need to travel. The approach torural development and the need to reconcile the Government’s various economic,social and environmental policies and priorities is a key issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. The Ma<strong>in</strong>Issues Report should seek to explore whether the current policy approach rema<strong>in</strong>sappropriate and generally how we can plan for susta<strong>in</strong>able rural development.Meet<strong>in</strong>g the hous<strong>in</strong>g needs of all sectors of the community4.7 The policies of the ALPR also seek to provide a range of hous<strong>in</strong>g opportunitiesacross <strong>Angus</strong>, to meet the hous<strong>in</strong>g needs of all sectors of the community. Hous<strong>in</strong>gPolicy SC1 sets out how the general hous<strong>in</strong>g needs for each hous<strong>in</strong>g market areashould be met over the period 2004-2011, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account what has beendelivered <strong>in</strong> the period 2001-2004, <strong>in</strong> order to satisfy the requirements of the Dundee& <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan (2001-2016). It should be noted that structure plan hous<strong>in</strong>gland requirements only relate to sites of five or more units (i.e. large sites).4.8 In terms of what has been delivered between 2001 and 2010, the level of <strong>new</strong> buildhous<strong>in</strong>g across the four hous<strong>in</strong>g market areas (HMAs) has been variable, and a<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>17


different quantity of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g has been built <strong>in</strong> each area (source: Dundee &<strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audits, 2002-2010). This is shown <strong>in</strong> Figures 4 & 5 below. Areduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>new</strong> house completions is noticeable after 2008, when the effects of theeconomic downturn first became apparent <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. Levels of <strong>new</strong> build havegenerally been higher than expected <strong>in</strong> the South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA (2001-2010), but lowerthan expected elsewhere (see Figure 4 below).Figure 4: No of completions (on sites of 5 or more units) compared with the hous<strong>in</strong>gland allowances for 2001-2011160014001392No. of hous<strong>in</strong>g units12001000800600400200835 850665 65810457101085TotalcompletionsHous<strong>in</strong>gLandAllow ances0North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong> West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit 2010 & Table 2.1 ALPR, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.9 Relative to the general hous<strong>in</strong>g needs allowances of the development plan, theoverall level of completions has exceeded what was planned <strong>in</strong> the South <strong>Angus</strong>HMA, (see Figure 4 above). In other hous<strong>in</strong>g market areas, part of the allowance to2011 rema<strong>in</strong>s undeveloped; particularly <strong>in</strong> the West <strong>Angus</strong> HMA, where around 35%(380 units) of the development plan allowance rema<strong>in</strong>s. Unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, a review ofthe effective hous<strong>in</strong>g land supply also shows that the West <strong>Angus</strong> HMA has thelargest quantity of land that is currently available for development, with manyallocated sites <strong>in</strong> Forfar yet to be built on and completed. (Source: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit, 2010).<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>18


Figure 5: Annual level of completions on all hous<strong>in</strong>g sites, by hous<strong>in</strong>g market area(2002-2010)300250200No. of hous<strong>in</strong>g units150100North <strong>Angus</strong>East <strong>Angus</strong>South <strong>Angus</strong>West <strong>Angus</strong>5002002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Audit YearSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit 2010 (background data tables), <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.10 Us<strong>in</strong>g the 2010 Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit assumptions for what may come forward until theLDP is adopted (2014); it appears that the West <strong>Angus</strong> HMA will have the greatestquantity of exist<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g land at 2014, followed by the East <strong>Angus</strong> HMA. This isshown <strong>in</strong> Figure 6, page 20.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>19


Figure 6: Potential effective hous<strong>in</strong>g land supply at 2014 by hous<strong>in</strong>g market areasbased on exist<strong>in</strong>g audit sites only (sites of 5 or more units)350300No. of hous<strong>in</strong>g units equivalent250200150100500North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong> West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit 2010, <strong>Angus</strong>4.11 It appears likely that the South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA would have the smallest quantity ofhous<strong>in</strong>g land at 2014. However, Figure 6 does not take <strong>in</strong>to account the proposeddevelopment of a golf course, hotel and <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g at K<strong>in</strong>gennie, Wellbank, whichthe <strong>Council</strong> resolved to approve <strong>in</strong> November 2010 and which would provide land fora further 160 <strong>new</strong> homes.4.12 The amount of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g land that should be identified by the <strong>Angus</strong> LocalDevelopment Plan will be determ<strong>in</strong>ed us<strong>in</strong>g the TAYplan Hous<strong>in</strong>g LandRequirements, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the exist<strong>in</strong>g effective supply. In the currenteconomic climate, it is likely that there will rema<strong>in</strong> a substantial effective supply <strong>in</strong> theWest <strong>Angus</strong> and East <strong>Angus</strong> HMAs at 2014. A ma<strong>in</strong> issue for the <strong>Angus</strong> LDP is whatrole (if any) this plan could have <strong>in</strong> stimulat<strong>in</strong>g the development of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>order to meet the TAYplan hous<strong>in</strong>g land requirements.4.13 The private hous<strong>in</strong>g market does not meet the hous<strong>in</strong>g needs of everyone <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>,and <strong>in</strong> order to meet the requirements of people on modest <strong>in</strong>comes, the ALPR alsotakes <strong>in</strong>to account the results of the 2003 Local Hous<strong>in</strong>g Needs Assessment. Tables2.2 & 2.3 of the ALPR show the extent of hous<strong>in</strong>g need <strong>in</strong> each hous<strong>in</strong>g market areaand the potential number of affordable units that could come forward on allocatedsites, over the period 2004-2011. In addition, Policy SC9: Affordable Hous<strong>in</strong>g alsoseeks the delivery of affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g on opportunity and w<strong>in</strong>dfall sites. This policyseeks the provision of affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>in</strong> accordance withthe follow<strong>in</strong>g requirements (except where material considerations <strong>in</strong>dicate otherwise):<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>20


Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market Area Affordable Hous<strong>in</strong>g Contribution (% of total units)*North <strong>Angus</strong> HMA 25%East <strong>Angus</strong> HMA 20%South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA 40%West <strong>Angus</strong> HMA 15%*The requirement for affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g is for low cost affordable home ownership (LCHO) hous<strong>in</strong>g,except <strong>in</strong> the South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA, where a need for social rented and LCHO hous<strong>in</strong>g was identified. Assuch the percentages refer to LCHO hous<strong>in</strong>g except for South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA, where the 40% figure refersto LCHO and/or social rented hous<strong>in</strong>g.Figure 7: Number of <strong>new</strong> affordable homes (2004-2008) <strong>in</strong> comparison with identifiedhous<strong>in</strong>g requirements (2004 2008)400350345300No. of hous<strong>in</strong>g units2502001501005011012695 95837939AffordableHous<strong>in</strong>gOutput (2004-2008)Additional unitsrequired (2004-2008; ALPRTable 2.2)0North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong> West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: Affordable Hous<strong>in</strong>g Database, Hous<strong>in</strong>g Division, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.14 In terms of what has been built or refurbished, it is noteworthy that only <strong>in</strong> the South<strong>Angus</strong> HMA has the number of <strong>new</strong> affordable homes (2004-2008) failed to deliverapproximately the number of required additional units for the period 2004-2008. Itshould however be noted that s<strong>in</strong>ce 2008 and by 2011, a large number of <strong>new</strong>affordable units (72 <strong>new</strong> homes) had been brought forward <strong>in</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong>, to helpalleviate some of the shortfall (source: Affordable Hous<strong>in</strong>g Database, Hous<strong>in</strong>gDivision, <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>).4.15 Figure 6 would seem to imply that there was a substantial backlog of unmet hous<strong>in</strong>gneed <strong>in</strong> just one of the four hous<strong>in</strong>g market areas (South <strong>Angus</strong>) <strong>in</strong> 2009. However,on the basis of up-to-date survey f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and us<strong>in</strong>g a comprehensive approach toanalys<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g need and demand, the <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Need and DemandAssessment (HNDA, February 2010) provides clear <strong>in</strong>dications that there was <strong>in</strong> facta significant unmet need <strong>in</strong> all four market areas, as shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 8, page 22. The<strong>Angus</strong> LDP will need to take the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the HNDA <strong>in</strong>to account, to assist the<strong>Angus</strong> Local Hous<strong>in</strong>g Strategy <strong>in</strong> deal<strong>in</strong>g with any shortfalls <strong>in</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g need thatcannot be met by the exist<strong>in</strong>g stock of affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g. The backlog of affordable<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>21


hous<strong>in</strong>g need and the extent to which this could be met over time are importantissues that should be considered as part of the Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report.Figure 8: <strong>Angus</strong> HNDA net hous<strong>in</strong>g need (no. of affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g solutionsrequired) by hous<strong>in</strong>g market area, at 2009 high scenario and low scenario estimates1000No. of hous<strong>in</strong>g solutions required9008007006005004003002001000946515542286305North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong>South <strong>Angus</strong>906522492Net hous<strong>in</strong>gneed (highscenario)Net hous<strong>in</strong>gneed (lowscenario)Net hous<strong>in</strong>g need (low scenario)Net hous<strong>in</strong>g need (high scenario)West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: <strong>Angus</strong> HNDA (February 2010), <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.16 The ALPR also aims to meet the need for specialised forms of hous<strong>in</strong>g, by means ofsupport<strong>in</strong>g relevant development proposals. Policies SC10: Special Needs Hous<strong>in</strong>gand SC11: Residential Homes provide the necessary guidance for plann<strong>in</strong>gapplications. The <strong>Angus</strong> HNDA (February 2010) provides an estimated range ofneeds for wheelchair accommodation; accommodation without stairs; shelteredhous<strong>in</strong>g; and hous<strong>in</strong>g with support, by hous<strong>in</strong>g market area. This assessmentsuggests that there is a backlog of need for these forms of hous<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> eachhous<strong>in</strong>g market area, at 2009 (Figure 8 above).4.17 The South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA has the largest outstand<strong>in</strong>g requirement for special needshous<strong>in</strong>g (at 2008/9), with an unmet need <strong>in</strong> the range of 582-607 hous<strong>in</strong>g units(source: <strong>Angus</strong> HNDA, February 2010). Some of this need, equat<strong>in</strong>g to a total of 47hous<strong>in</strong>g units and a <strong>new</strong> care home with space for 28 residents and day-care visitors,is likely to be met by developments at Carnoustie and Newtyle (plann<strong>in</strong>g applications10/00008/FULL & 10/00411/FULL refer). The <strong>Angus</strong> LDP will need to assist <strong>in</strong>meet<strong>in</strong>g any shortfalls <strong>in</strong> special needs hous<strong>in</strong>g, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account the <strong>Council</strong>’sBest Value Review of Older People’s Services (Social Work and Health CommitteeReport 9/09 refers). The unmet requirement for special needs hous<strong>in</strong>g and how thiscould be met overtime will need to be considered <strong>in</strong> the Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report, <strong>in</strong>relation to the overall hous<strong>in</strong>g land supply.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>22


Figure 9: <strong>Angus</strong> HNDA requirements for special needs hous<strong>in</strong>g – high scenario andlow scenario estimatesNo. of hous<strong>in</strong>g solutions required700600500400300200100324307175164607582343324Net specialneedsrequirement(high scenario)Net specialneedsrequirement (lowscenario)0North <strong>Angus</strong>East <strong>Angus</strong>South <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaWest <strong>Angus</strong>Net special needs requirement (lowscenario)Net special needs requirement (highscenario)Source: <strong>Angus</strong> HNDA (February 2010), <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.18 The plann<strong>in</strong>g system also has a role to play <strong>in</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>g the hous<strong>in</strong>g needs of gypsiesand travellers (see Scottish Plann<strong>in</strong>g Policy, paragraph 89). Policy SC13: Sites forGypsies/Travellers aims to support appropriate development, <strong>in</strong> order to meet theseneeds. The <strong>Angus</strong> Local Hous<strong>in</strong>g Strategy (LHS) (2004-2009) identified a need toimprove the services at St Christopher’s site (Tayock, Montrose), which is the onlysite <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> that is run by <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>. Renovation of this site, to provide largerstances with <strong>in</strong>dividual ablution units, was undertaken <strong>in</strong> 2007 follow<strong>in</strong>g the approvalof the associated plann<strong>in</strong>g application. In this respect, Policy SC13 has helped tosupport the needs of the settled gypsy/traveller population with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.4.19 Currently with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, sites for gypsies/travellers are located at St Christopher’s,(Montrose) and Balmuir Woods (Teal<strong>in</strong>g), with the latter be<strong>in</strong>g operated by DundeeCity <strong>Council</strong>. A private site (Thrums Caravan Site) at Maryton no longer features <strong>in</strong>the national list of privately operated sites at July 2009 and is no longer <strong>in</strong> operation.(source: Twice Yearly Count No.16: Gypsies/Travellers <strong>in</strong> Scotland, ScottishGovernment). In addition to this provision, the <strong>Angus</strong> LHS (2004-2009) identified ashortfall <strong>in</strong> “transit sites”, i.e. sites suitable for gypsies/travellers who come to <strong>Angus</strong>for short periods, often for a variety of reasons.4.20 The LHS review of 2005-2006 noted that a work<strong>in</strong>g group of different agencies hadbeen set up, <strong>in</strong> order to tackle issues such as whether a <strong>new</strong> transit site could beestablished with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. Whilst no consensus on the way forward was reported <strong>in</strong>the LHS review of 2006-2007, the statistics still <strong>in</strong>dicate a need for the <strong>new</strong> site. InJuly 2009, St Christopher’s site had a relatively large wait<strong>in</strong>g list for pitches,equivalent to 17 households or 94% of the current provision; there were however nopitches available to satisfy this demand (source: Twice Yearly Count No.16:Gypsies/Travellers <strong>in</strong> Scotland, Scottish Government). In addition, it was reported<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>23


that with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, six locations have been used as unauthorised encampments, andthat these were occupied on a total of 11 occasions dur<strong>in</strong>g a six month period(January 2009-July 2009; same source as previous <strong>in</strong>formation). In terms of meet<strong>in</strong>gthe future needs of gypsies/travellers, it will be important that the Local DevelopmentPlan is consistent with the forthcom<strong>in</strong>g LHS (2011-2016).Ensur<strong>in</strong>g that hous<strong>in</strong>g development contributes to environmental objectives4.21 A key theme for the ALPR hous<strong>in</strong>g policies has been to deliver high quality liv<strong>in</strong>gplaces and to identify the criteria required to achieve this, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>abledesign; hous<strong>in</strong>g mix; open space; connectivity; and amenity standards. Developmentbriefs have been prepared for a number of sites (Dubton Farm, Brech<strong>in</strong>; Hillhead,Kirriemuir; Gardyne Street, Friockheim) and design statements or conservation planshave been requested <strong>in</strong> support of <strong>in</strong>dividual development proposals, <strong>in</strong> accordancewith Policy S6: Development Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples. However, proposals submitted for <strong>new</strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>consistent <strong>in</strong> terms of their approach to provid<strong>in</strong>g a high quality ofbuild<strong>in</strong>g design and layout. The theme of quality places is high on the ScottishGovernment agenda and cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be relevant through the TAYplan ProposedPlan (June 2011). Whilst the current ALPR policies highlight a range of criteria whichare relevant to achiev<strong>in</strong>g high quality developments, more detail is required to ensurethat developers are fully aware of what is expected <strong>in</strong> terms of design. The <strong>Angus</strong>LDP will need to <strong>in</strong>clude a stronger focus on deliver<strong>in</strong>g better design, perhapssupported by the production of detailed guidance <strong>in</strong> Supplementary Plann<strong>in</strong>gGuidance.4.22 The ALPR has also sought to ensure that <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g development makes acontribution towards the protection of the environment and to resource management,which is embodied <strong>in</strong> the plan’s support for brownfield redevelopment through PolicySC3: W<strong>in</strong>dfall Sites. In terms of how far these objectives have been realised s<strong>in</strong>ce2006 (when the majority of the policies and proposals of the ALPR became amaterial consideration for plann<strong>in</strong>g applications), it is relevant to note that s<strong>in</strong>ce 2007,the majority of development <strong>in</strong> each hous<strong>in</strong>g market area has occurred on brownfieldland.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>24


Figure 10: Proportion of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g on brownfield and greenfield sites, by hous<strong>in</strong>gmarket area (2007-2010)100%790%25Percentage of development (all hous<strong>in</strong>g sites)80%70%60%50%40%30%20%425893495175% greenfield% brownfield10%0%North <strong>Angus</strong> East <strong>Angus</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong> West <strong>Angus</strong>Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market AreaSource: Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Land Audit 2010 (background data tables), <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>4.23 As can be seen from Figure 10 above, there are however substantial variationsbetween the levels of brownfield hous<strong>in</strong>g development <strong>in</strong> each of the hous<strong>in</strong>g marketareas, with 93% of all <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the East <strong>Angus</strong> HMA be<strong>in</strong>g developed onbrownfield land; whilst <strong>in</strong> the South <strong>Angus</strong> HMA, this proportion is only 51% of all<strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g. In accordance with the emerg<strong>in</strong>g strategy of the TAYplan, a ma<strong>in</strong> issuefor the <strong>Angus</strong> LDP is how brownfield redevelopment will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be prioritised,especially given current difficulties <strong>in</strong> access<strong>in</strong>g development f<strong>in</strong>ance, which makethese sites less economically viable for house builders.Work<strong>in</strong>g4.24 Provid<strong>in</strong>g a range of sites <strong>in</strong> key locations to meet demand and stimulate <strong>in</strong>vestmentis a key priority of the ALPR. In l<strong>in</strong>e with the Plan’s priority to guide development toaccessible locations, employment land allocations are focussed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> townsas the most susta<strong>in</strong>able locations <strong>in</strong> terms of accessibility to bus<strong>in</strong>esses and thework<strong>in</strong>g population. With the exception of Monifieth which largely functions as aresidential centre, exist<strong>in</strong>g employment sites and <strong>new</strong> land allocations are provided <strong>in</strong>each of the <strong>Angus</strong> towns. Land allocations were based on a range of factors<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g landscape capacity, accessibility to transport networks, <strong>in</strong>frastructurecapacity and marketability and are all greenfield sites. These allocations were<strong>in</strong>tended to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>imum five year land supply as required by the Dundee and<strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan (2002). The ALPR provides for employment land <strong>in</strong> thefollow<strong>in</strong>g locations:<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>25


Exist<strong>in</strong>g SitesArbroath - Kirkton and ElliotMontrose - Broomfield and Forties RoadBrech<strong>in</strong> - Brech<strong>in</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Park and Montrose RoadCarnoustie - PanmureForfar - Orchardbank, and Orchardbank GatewayKirriemuir – North Ma<strong>in</strong>s of LogieNew Allocated SitesArbroath – Elliot West (21Ha)Forfar- Carseview Road (4Ha)Montrose – Former Airfield (10 Ha)Carnoustie – Carlogie Road (15 Ha)Kirriemuir – East Muirhead of Logie (4 Ha)Land Supply and Availability4.25 In terms of land supply and availability, the amount of land available for employment<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> at June 2010 was 107.8 hectares compared to 47.64 hectares <strong>in</strong> 2000. Inother words the land supply has <strong>in</strong>creased significantly over this 10 year period. Asummary of the supply and distribution of employment land at June 2010 is shown <strong>in</strong>Figure 11, page 26. Nearly 50% (53.8 hectares) of the total land supply is recordedas be<strong>in</strong>g immediately available. This varies considerably <strong>in</strong> each of the towns withonly limited land be<strong>in</strong>g currently available <strong>in</strong> Carnoustie (0.38 hectares) andKirriemuir (0.33 hectares) compared to the other towns. It is also noticeable that noland is available to meet medium to longer term needs <strong>in</strong> Brech<strong>in</strong>.4.26 The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 54 hectares expected to be available by 2015 comprises the <strong>new</strong> sitesallocated by the ALPR. With the exception of Elliot West Arbroath, these sites are tobe serviced and delivered by the private sector. Development progress on these sitesis set out below:Arbroath - Elliot West: Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission for the formation of a bus<strong>in</strong>ess park(14.2 hectares) was granted <strong>in</strong> August 2011.Montrose – Former Airfield and Forfar - Carseview Road: There are nooutstand<strong>in</strong>g constra<strong>in</strong>ts associated with these sites however no plann<strong>in</strong>g applicationshave been submitted, possibly reflect<strong>in</strong>g market conditions and the availability ofemployment land at other locations <strong>in</strong> these towns.Kirriemuir – East Muirhead of Logie: Previous outl<strong>in</strong>e plann<strong>in</strong>g permission for“mixed <strong>in</strong>dustrial development” granted <strong>in</strong> 2006 has lapsed and there are doubts overthe ability of the private sector to br<strong>in</strong>g this site forward.Carnoustie - Carlogie Road: Outl<strong>in</strong>e plann<strong>in</strong>g application to develop the site hasbeen approved subject to a Section 75 (relat<strong>in</strong>g to realignment and upgrad<strong>in</strong>g ofA930 road); however the viability of deliver<strong>in</strong>g this project is uncerta<strong>in</strong>.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>26


Figure 11: Employment land availability by location2520hectares 15NOW1 to 5 years5 years +1050Arbroath Montrose Brech<strong>in</strong> Forfar Carnoustie Kirriemuir OtherSource: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Employment Land Survey 20104.27 The take up of employment land on established sites has been variable dur<strong>in</strong>g theperiod 2000-2010 (Figure 12 below). Dur<strong>in</strong>g this period a total of 22.3 hectares ofemployment land was taken up, the majority of which was on prime (greenfield)employment sites. Although take up <strong>in</strong>creased significantly between 2005-2006compared to previous years, this was largely as a result of <strong>new</strong> <strong>Council</strong> officedevelopments at the Orchardbank Gateway, Forfar. Take up rates have s<strong>in</strong>cecont<strong>in</strong>ued to decrease with only <strong>1.4</strong> hectares (2.6%) of the 53.8 hectares availablebe<strong>in</strong>g developed <strong>in</strong> 2009-2010. Whilst this may partly be attributable to the economicdownturn <strong>in</strong> 2008, experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> is such that take up of both prime and othergeneral employment sites has been sluggish over the past ten years.Figure 12: Take-up of employment land 2000-2010PRIME GENERALOTHER GENERAL65432102009/10 2008/09 2007/08 2006/07 2005/06 2004/05 2003/04 2002/03 2001/02 2000/01Source: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Employment Land Survey 20104.28 Whilst enough employment land has been allocated by the ALPR, deliverability of theland supply is fundamental. <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> of the land supply highlights a need to reviewthe provision which has not come forward as planned and the ability of the privatesector to deliver these sites. There is also a need to consider whether the sites<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>27


proposed are still appropriate and whether they are sufficient to meet the anticipateddemand over the ten year span of the <strong>new</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> LDP (2014-2024).4.29 In seek<strong>in</strong>g to provide opportunities for a range of employment uses <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, theALPR provides a choice of greenfield employment sites (exist<strong>in</strong>g sites as well as <strong>new</strong>land allocations) <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> towns. The plan also provides for employment uses tocome forward on other unallocated sites <strong>in</strong> towns and villages subject to<strong>in</strong>frastructure and amenity considerations (Policy SC17) and, promotes the reuse ofbrownfield sites <strong>in</strong> towns and villages for employment uses. In the rural area,employment proposals of an appropriate scale, nature and location are supportedthrough Policy SC19: Rural Employment. Analysis of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications forbus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>in</strong>dustrial proposals submitted dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000-2010 <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat 95% of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications determ<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g this period were approved. Thisapproval rate suggests that the current policy framework is effective <strong>in</strong> support<strong>in</strong>gemployment activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.4.30 Whilst there is adequate provision for employment <strong>in</strong> land supply terms, the ALPRpolicies focus on accommodat<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>stream employment use classes, namelyClass 4 (Bus<strong>in</strong>ess), 5 (General Industry) and 6 (Storage and Distribution) on bothallocated and other established employment sites. However there has been some<strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> these sites for uses outwith these categories such as car showrooms,storage and distribution with a large retail element, children’s nurseries and <strong>in</strong>doorplay areas and, recreational activities such as kart<strong>in</strong>g centres. Such uses maycontribute to the local economy and provide a service for which there are few othersuitable premises but <strong>in</strong> local plan policy terms would not be acceptable on identifiedemployment sites. In addition, brownfield sites, such as former mill build<strong>in</strong>gs andvacant commercial sites have <strong>in</strong> many cases been redeveloped for hous<strong>in</strong>g thereforereduc<strong>in</strong>g opportunities for non traditional bus<strong>in</strong>ess and recreational/commercial uses.Consideration of how to provide and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> opportunities for a range ofemployment uses requires to be addressed <strong>in</strong> the Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report.4.31 In terms of the rural area, the ALPR recognises that traditional activities such asagriculture, estate management, forestry and m<strong>in</strong>erals rema<strong>in</strong> important but havebeen affected by European and national changes to the subsidy payments (<strong>in</strong> thecase of agriculture) and also more generally from the downturn <strong>in</strong> the UK economy.In mak<strong>in</strong>g provision for rural employment, the ALPR seeks to strike a balancebetween protect<strong>in</strong>g the character of the rural area and allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>new</strong> developmentand diversification, to ensure that the countryside rema<strong>in</strong>s a susta<strong>in</strong>able resource forthe communities it serves.4.32 The ALPR supports and encourages diversification of the rural economy <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>ess, tourism development and holiday accommodation through Policies SC19:Rural Employment and SC20: Tourism Development. Whilst rural brownfield sites(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>g conversion) provide opportunities for rural employment uses,these sites have tended to be redeveloped for hous<strong>in</strong>g. Indeed the Hous<strong>in</strong>g sectionof this report <strong>in</strong>dicates that the majority of hous<strong>in</strong>g development <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> hasoccurred on brownfield land. A range of tourism related proposals have beensupported through plann<strong>in</strong>g applications <strong>in</strong> the rural area, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Edzell (visitorcentre), Piperdam (chalets and recreational facilities), K<strong>in</strong>gennie (golf course andhotel development), Murton Nature Reserve (tearoom/café), Belmont, Newtyle (<strong>new</strong>holiday village) and caravan parks at Foresterseat, Forfar and Nether Craig, Kilry.This reflects the chang<strong>in</strong>g economic climate and perhaps grow<strong>in</strong>g demand for <strong>new</strong>uses and activities <strong>in</strong> the countryside.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>28


4.33 In the case of Piperdam and K<strong>in</strong>gennie, enabl<strong>in</strong>g development <strong>in</strong> the form of hous<strong>in</strong>ghas been approved <strong>in</strong> rural areas to facilitate the delivery of the wider tourismdevelopment. The <strong>Angus</strong> Local Development Plan will require to clarify anappropriate approach to enabl<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>able economic development that protectsand enhances the <strong>Angus</strong> environment.4.34 Whilst the ALPR highlights scope for <strong>in</strong>tegrated liv<strong>in</strong>g/work<strong>in</strong>g accommodation <strong>in</strong> therural area, little emphasis is placed on this <strong>in</strong> policy terms. The role of rural brownfieldsites <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g opportunities for employment uses <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegratedliv<strong>in</strong>g/work<strong>in</strong>g accommodation and the potential for this form of development requiresto be reviewed.4.35 Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and improv<strong>in</strong>g the quality and range of visitor accommodation are vital todevelop<strong>in</strong>g tourism and extend<strong>in</strong>g the tourism season. Policy SC20 of the ALPRprovides support for <strong>new</strong> or improved tourist accommodation and recent proposals<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>new</strong> hotels have been approved on the basis that there is a shortage ofvisitor accommodation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. However the retention of exist<strong>in</strong>g visitoraccommodation is not currently addressed by plann<strong>in</strong>g policy and a number of hotelshave closed or been developed for other uses such as hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the RoyalHotel, Forfar; Viewfield and Cliffburn Hotels <strong>in</strong> Arbroath; Carlogie Hotel, Carnoustieand Castleton of Eassie Country House Hotel. Susta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and develop<strong>in</strong>g the tourismsector is a priority of the <strong>Council</strong> and its partners and is reflected <strong>in</strong> a range of councilplans and strategies <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Angus</strong> Corporate Plan (2011-2015), Community Planand S<strong>in</strong>gle Outcome Agreement (2011-2014) and, the <strong>Angus</strong> Tourism Strategy(2009-2012). The retention of visitor accommodation is seen as important <strong>in</strong> thisrespect. This issue will require to be considered <strong>in</strong> the Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report andsubsequent <strong>Angus</strong> Local Development Plan.Town Centres and Retail<strong>in</strong>g4.36 Access to a range of shops and other facilities contributes towards quality of life andthe attractiveness of <strong>Angus</strong> as a place to live. Consequently, support<strong>in</strong>g the needs oflocal communities <strong>in</strong> terms of shopp<strong>in</strong>g and related services is identified as a priority<strong>in</strong> the ALPR. Whilst the <strong>Angus</strong> town centres play a key role <strong>in</strong> this respect, access toshops and other services <strong>in</strong> local neighbourhoods and the rural area are alsoimportant <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g to susta<strong>in</strong> local communities.4.37 In seek<strong>in</strong>g to guide development to susta<strong>in</strong>able locations, plann<strong>in</strong>g policy directsretail development to town centres <strong>in</strong> accordance with their accessibility and range offunctions. The ALPR def<strong>in</strong>es town centre boundaries <strong>in</strong> each of the towns as thepreferred locations for <strong>new</strong> retail development and del<strong>in</strong>eates core retail areas <strong>in</strong>Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Forfar, Kirriemuir and Montrose with<strong>in</strong> which policy SC24 seeks toresist change to non retail uses except where properties have la<strong>in</strong> vacant for 12months and town centre vacancy levels exceed 5%. At 2010, the Town CentreHealth Checks for the <strong>Angus</strong> towns showed that only the Forfar core area had avacancy rate of less than 5%.4.38 The <strong>Angus</strong> Retail floorspace survey (2000-2010) <strong>in</strong>dicates that with the exception ofMonifieth, town centre retail floorspace decl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> all the towns dur<strong>in</strong>g this period,whilst out of centre retail floorspace <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Forfar andMontrose. In terms of vacancies, whilst the total number of vacant units with<strong>in</strong> towncentres <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> as a whole rema<strong>in</strong>ed fairly constant dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, vacancylevels varied across the towns with significant <strong>in</strong>creases occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Carnoustie andKirriemuir, a decrease <strong>in</strong> Brech<strong>in</strong> and little change <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Forfar, Monifieth andMontrose. This suggests that whilst overall there has been little change <strong>in</strong> the<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>29


number of vacant units <strong>in</strong> town centres, the contraction <strong>in</strong> retail floorspace <strong>in</strong> most ofthe <strong>Angus</strong> towns <strong>in</strong>dicates that the majority of centres are becom<strong>in</strong>g occupied by nonretail uses. The 2010 <strong>Angus</strong> Town Centre Health Checks provides further details onhow each town centre compared with the others <strong>in</strong> terms of the number of vacantunits and vacancy rates.4.39 The <strong>Angus</strong> towns are characterised by traditional street patterns and historic coreswhich restricts the potential to accommodate significant <strong>new</strong> retail developmentwith<strong>in</strong> town centre boundaries. Plann<strong>in</strong>g policy thus applies a sequential approach tosite selection whereby town centres require to be considered <strong>in</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>stance,followed by edge of centre sites, and thereafter out of centre sites which are currentlyor potentially accessible by a range of transport modes.4.40 The ALPR allocates sites for retail development <strong>in</strong> Arbroath at CairnieStreet/Stobcross and Westway, and identifies opportunity for retail development on abrownfield site at St James Road, Forfar. Development progress on these particularsites is set out below:Sites Allocated for Retail DevelopmentCairnie Street/ Stobcross, Arbroath: Supermarket (3,550 sqm) constructed.Westway, Dundee Road, Arbroath: Whilst the site is identified for leisure and retailwarehous<strong>in</strong>g, a supermarket (3,344 sqm) has recently been constructed on part ofthe site. The rema<strong>in</strong>der of the site has been developed for a mix of non food retailunits and fast food outlets.St James Road, Forfar: Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted for a supermarket andhous<strong>in</strong>g. Supermarket (4,474 sqm) has recently been constructed.4.41 In addition, <strong>in</strong> the period 2000 -2011, plann<strong>in</strong>g permission has been granted for otherlarge scale retail developments <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Forfar, Kirriemuir and Montrose.Whilst some of these <strong>in</strong>volved town centre sites, the majority of large scale proposals(over 1000sqm) have been approved outwith town centre boundaries. In each casethe applications were approved <strong>in</strong> accordance with the sequential approach. Table 3summarises the location of all large scale retail approvals <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000.Table 3: Large Scale Retail Applications Approved (2000-2011)Town Centre Type ProgressGravesend, ArbroathSupermarket1626 sqmNon Food2x500 sqm unitsLidl store completedNon-food units not startedNew Wynd /Baltic StreetMontroseNon Food1584 sqmEdge of Centre Type ProgressDevelopment completeSt James Road, ForfarGairie Works, KirriemuirSupermarket4474 sqmSupermarket3250 sqmAsda store completedNot started<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>30


Out of Centre Type ProgressCairnie Street, ArbroathWestway Retail Park, ArbroathCommerce Street, Brech<strong>in</strong>Craig o'Loch Road, ForfarMyre Road, ForfarBrech<strong>in</strong> Road, MontroseSupermarket3500 sqmNon Food934 sqmSupermarket3344 sqmSupermarket1358 sqmSupermarket1240 sqmNon Food2 x 500sqmSupermarket1626sqmTesco store completedCompleteAsda store completedLidl CompleteAldi CompleteNo ProgressLidl completeSupermarket3460 sqmSource: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g and TransportAwait<strong>in</strong>g completion of S75Agreement4.42 In terms of range, whilst consent has been granted for both convenience (food) andcomparison (non food) shopp<strong>in</strong>g outlets, comparison retail<strong>in</strong>g has proved harder toattract to <strong>Angus</strong>. Plann<strong>in</strong>g permissions for large comparison retail developments <strong>in</strong>Arbroath (Westway), Forfar (St. James Works), and Montrose (Brech<strong>in</strong> Road) havenot been implemented or subsequently superseded by convenience stores. Reasonsfor this may <strong>in</strong>clude the size of the <strong>Angus</strong> towns, site locations, or accessibility toother larger centres such as Dundee, Perth and Aberdeen. The 2002 <strong>Angus</strong> Retailstudy identified some capacity for development of the comparison goods sectorparticularly <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Forfar, and Montrose but adequate provision <strong>in</strong> terms ofconvenience floorspace <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. The trend of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g convenience floorspaceand limited comparison outlets com<strong>in</strong>g forward <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> thus contradicts the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsof the orig<strong>in</strong>al study.4.43 Outwith town centres, Policy SC27 supports the provision of local shops to meetcommunity needs <strong>in</strong> towns, villages and rural areas. However a review of plann<strong>in</strong>gapplications over the last ten years (2000–2010) <strong>in</strong>dicates that very few plann<strong>in</strong>gapplications have been submitted and approved for neighbourhood comparison orspeciality shops (3 applications) compared to proposals for change of use from ashop/Class 1 retail to other uses such as residential or office (23 applications).4.44 In terms of the rural area, whilst there has been some <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g farmshops and other specialist retail<strong>in</strong>g such as Charleton Farm; Milton Haugh Farm,Peel Farm and House of Farnell, few or no plann<strong>in</strong>g applications have beensubmitted for local convenience shops <strong>in</strong> the rural area. <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has operateda grant scheme to support and improve rural shops and post offices as part of anoverall strategy to susta<strong>in</strong> rural communities s<strong>in</strong>ce 1996. However, viability rema<strong>in</strong>san ongo<strong>in</strong>g issue and a number of shops have closed <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g at Inverkeilor, Barry,Newbigg<strong>in</strong>g, Glenisla and Ferryden. Increased mobility of the rural population andchanges <strong>in</strong> shopp<strong>in</strong>g patterns, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternet shopp<strong>in</strong>g, means that traditionalvillage shops have found it <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult to compete with larger retail storesand alternative forms of shopp<strong>in</strong>g.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>31


4.45 Regeneration and improvement of town centres to enhance their vitality and viabilityalso underlies several policies of the local plan. In this respect environmentalenhancement schemes have been completed <strong>in</strong> Montrose, Monifieth and Forfar,whilst the restoration and regeneration of historic build<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> the Arbroath andBrech<strong>in</strong> town centres have been delivered through the Townscape Heritage Initiative.Whilst these projects have been successful <strong>in</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g the environment and imageof town centres, it is difficult to assess at this stage whether they have had a tangiblelong term impact on activity and <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> central areas.4.46 The 2010 <strong>Angus</strong> Town Centre Health Checks also highlighted opportunities to furtherimprove the quality of the built environment <strong>in</strong> many of the <strong>Angus</strong> town centres,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Forfar and Arbroath. Although the ALPR <strong>in</strong>cludes a policy to helpconsolidate Monifieth’s retail and service function (Policy Mf3), the lack ofregeneration or redevelopment of the build<strong>in</strong>gs was thought to detract from the towncentre’s sense of place (see 2010 Town Centre Health Checks Report of F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs forfurther details).Sport and Recreation4.47 Access to good quality open space and opportunities for sport and recreation arerecognised as play<strong>in</strong>g a key role <strong>in</strong> promot<strong>in</strong>g healthy lifestyles, improv<strong>in</strong>g theenvironment and quality of life <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. Plann<strong>in</strong>g policy plays an important rolethrough protect<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g open space and recreational areas andsupport<strong>in</strong>g proposals for <strong>new</strong> and improved sport and recreational facilities.4.48 <strong>Angus</strong> benefits from an extensive range of green spaces <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g public parks, playareas, woodlands, path networks and amenity areas which are protected by ALPRPolicy SC32. This is a blanket policy which protects all open spaces <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.Development proposals affect<strong>in</strong>g these spaces require to undertake a review ofexist<strong>in</strong>g provision to demonstrate that any loss would not result <strong>in</strong> a deficit. Whilst theLocal Plan has successfully protected important and valued open spaces, a smallproportion of publicly owned open space has been lost to allow other forms ofdevelopment. This <strong>in</strong>cludes areas of parkland to allow <strong>new</strong> schools to be built <strong>in</strong>Carnoustie, and amenity areas given over to allow a factory extension (Brech<strong>in</strong>),residential development, or <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to garden ground.4.49 Path networks are important <strong>in</strong> terms of provid<strong>in</strong>g access as well as recreationalopportunities particularly <strong>in</strong> the countryside. The <strong>Angus</strong> Core Path Plan which wasadopted <strong>in</strong> November 2010 and <strong>in</strong>cludes 309 routes provid<strong>in</strong>g a total of 513 km ofcore paths. Core paths as well as other routes are protected by policies of the ALPRand are considered <strong>in</strong> land allocations and decisions on plann<strong>in</strong>g applications. Anumber of <strong>new</strong> paths have been created over the period 2000-2010 <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thecoastal path and paths around settlements <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g opportunitiesfor recreation and access <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.4.50 Sites identified <strong>in</strong> the ALPR for <strong>new</strong> recreational facilities at Brech<strong>in</strong> (Cookston),Carnoustie (Shanwell Road) and Letham (Jubilee Park) have not come forward asenvisaged due to restrictions on public expenditure. The provision and deliverabilityof these facilities will be reviewed and addressed by the <strong>Angus</strong> LDP.4.51 A range of <strong>new</strong> recreational facilities have been provided with<strong>in</strong> the plan period atAuchmithie (<strong>new</strong> park) and Carnoustie (seafront enhancement and play facilities). Anumber of other developments <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>new</strong> public swimm<strong>in</strong>g pool <strong>in</strong> Montrose,and golf related developments at Piperdam, K<strong>in</strong>gennie and Carnoustie have been<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>32


approved through the plann<strong>in</strong>g application process, to meet community needs and <strong>in</strong>support of tourism and economic growth.4.52 ALPR policy SC33 requires open space to be provided as part of <strong>new</strong> residentialdevelopment proposals. This can be achieved through on site or off site provision ora f<strong>in</strong>ancial contribution towards provid<strong>in</strong>g or improv<strong>in</strong>g open space <strong>in</strong> the local area.Whilst open space provision <strong>in</strong> association with residential development has beensecured through the development management process there is a need to provideclearer guidance <strong>in</strong> relation to the circumstances for which open space should beprovided; how much and the type of open space required and, the standards to bemet <strong>in</strong> terms of design and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance. This can be achieved through clearly statedrequirements <strong>in</strong> Site Development Briefs, Supplementary Plann<strong>in</strong>g Guidance, and/orAdvice Notes. There is currently no policy direction or guidance <strong>in</strong> relation to thepotential provision of open space <strong>in</strong> relation to other forms of development. Thisissue will require to be explored through the Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report.4.53 The current f<strong>in</strong>ancial climate is likely to have an impact on the future ma<strong>in</strong>tenanceand provision of open space and recreational facilities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g pathnetworks. This may require rationalisation to provide fewer but better quality andbetter ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed facilities. A Green Space Strategy based on an Open Space Auditis be<strong>in</strong>g prepared by Neighbourhood Services and will play a key role <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>gfuture <strong>in</strong>vestment priorities and shortfalls <strong>in</strong> open space provision. The <strong>new</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>Local Development Plan (LDP) must protect valuable areas, identify where <strong>new</strong> andimproved space is required and provide clear guidance on the requirement fordeveloper contributions. The Green Space Audit and Strategy will assist the LDP <strong>in</strong>identify<strong>in</strong>g future requirements <strong>in</strong> this respect.Community Services4.54 The provision of services such as schools, nurseries, hospitals, health centres andsocial facilities contribute to the quality of life and the attractiveness of an area as aplace to live. In seek<strong>in</strong>g to support the provision of community facilities to serve localareas, the ALPR allocates sites for <strong>new</strong> community facilities; identifies sites whichmay provide opportunities for community use and, seeks provision of communityfacilities as part of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g proposals to meet identified needs.Community Facilities4.55 While each of the <strong>Angus</strong> towns provides a fairly wide range of social, education andhealth services, it is becom<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult for service providers to susta<strong>in</strong>these services particularly <strong>in</strong> rural areas. In addition to the service they actuallyprovide, facilities such as schools, shops, hotels, pubs, library, churches and hallscan be particularly important to local communities <strong>in</strong> their social role as a focal po<strong>in</strong>tfor the community. Many facilities require a certa<strong>in</strong> population to be viable, but theyalso require these residents to use them. In seek<strong>in</strong>g to support the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance ofrural facilities, the development strategy and policies of the ALPR provideopportunities for <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g and associated population growth. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>gthis, monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates that s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004, some rural schools and libraries haveclosed as well as local shops, post offices, hotels/pubs and petrol outlets.Education4.56 Significant <strong>in</strong>vestment to improve the school estate <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> has been made over theperiod 2000-2010. The ALPR has played an important role <strong>in</strong> enabl<strong>in</strong>g the provisionand improvement of school facilities by allocat<strong>in</strong>g sites for <strong>new</strong> schools to meet<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>33


community needs <strong>in</strong> Carnoustie (Thomas Street and Queen Street) and Forfar(Whitehills Nursery). F<strong>in</strong>ancial contributions towards the improvement of school<strong>in</strong>frastructure (i.e. to support <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g developments) have also been soughtthrough the application of Policy Imp1: Developer Contributions. This has beenobta<strong>in</strong>ed by means of plann<strong>in</strong>g agreements secured through the developmentmanagement process. . Details of the school estate improvements can be found athttp://www.angus.gov.uk/ccmeet<strong>in</strong>gs/reports-committee2011/Education/541.pdf4.57 Successive local plans have supported the development and expansion of highereducation facilities located at <strong>Angus</strong> College, Arbroath. In the period 2000 -2010,plann<strong>in</strong>g permission was granted for a range of <strong>new</strong> build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the policyframework to support <strong>new</strong> development with<strong>in</strong> accessible locations.4.58 Policy SC38 seeks to encourage the reuse of surplus school facilities for othercommunity uses. Whilst some properties have been reused or redeveloped forcommunity related facilities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Panbride School (specialist tuition) and K<strong>in</strong>lochSchool (care home and supported hous<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong> Carnoustie, the majority of surplussites tend to be marketed and reused for hous<strong>in</strong>g.Healthcare4.59 In terms of health care facilities, the ALPR allocated a site <strong>in</strong> Carnoustie (Barry Road)for a replacement health centre. This has been completed and the former site atDundee Street has been redeveloped for affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, <strong>new</strong>facilities completed <strong>in</strong> the period 2000-2010 <strong>in</strong>clude a primary care centre at Mar<strong>in</strong>eAvenue, Montrose, a community resource centre at Whitehills, Forfar and a <strong>new</strong>health centre <strong>in</strong> Edzell. Tayside NHS is also complet<strong>in</strong>g major <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> a <strong>new</strong>mental health facility at Stracathro.Cemeteries4.60 The Plan identifies and safeguards sites for cemetery extensions to meet futurecommunity needs at Brech<strong>in</strong>, Carnoustie, Forfar, Kirriemuir, Montrose, Aberlemno,Dunnichen, Farnell, Kirkton of Auchterhouse, Panbride and Liff. No provision wasmade at Monifieth due to difficulties <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g a site that is not only technicallysuitable, but also acceptable to the local community. Consideration of how to makeburial provision to serve the population needs of <strong>Angus</strong> (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the requirement forland allocations) will be explored <strong>in</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>new</strong> LDP.Opportunities for New Community Facilities4.61 The Plan identifies the potential for community uses to be provided as part of <strong>new</strong>hous<strong>in</strong>g land allocations and on a number of brownfield opportunity sites, howeverfew of these have actually come forward for community related facilities.Development progress on these sites is as follows:Hous<strong>in</strong>g AllocationsDubton Farm, Brech<strong>in</strong>: Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted (subject to S75 Agreement) forresidential, open space and small scale retail to meet the needs of the <strong>new</strong>residential neighbourhood. No further progress.Queens Park, Brech<strong>in</strong>: Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted for private hous<strong>in</strong>g (nearlycomplete), social rented hous<strong>in</strong>g (complete) and children’s nursery (no progress).<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>34


South of Gardyne Street, Friockheim: Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted (subject toSection 75 Agreement) for residential development and site for a <strong>new</strong> health centre.No further progress.Granary Site, Monikie: Hous<strong>in</strong>g development under construction. Replacementscout hut and contribution towards extension to primary school secured to supporthous<strong>in</strong>g development.Opportunity SitesForfar Infirmary: Site developed for hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a number of affordablehous<strong>in</strong>g units.Former <strong>Council</strong> Offices, New Road, Forfar: Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted forsupermarket (complete) and hous<strong>in</strong>g (no progress).St James Road, Forfar: No development proposals as yet.Sunnyside Hospital Estate, Hillside: Market<strong>in</strong>g arrangements be<strong>in</strong>g progressed byNHS Tayside. No development proposals as yet.Former School, Church Street, Edzell: Converted to hous<strong>in</strong>g.Transport and Communications4.62 The ALPR recognises the role which transport and communications <strong>in</strong>frastructurecan play <strong>in</strong> support of economic growth; improv<strong>in</strong>g accessibility to jobs, services andfacilities; safeguard<strong>in</strong>g the environment and encourag<strong>in</strong>g healthier lifestyles. Guid<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment to accessible locations, encourag<strong>in</strong>g developments to locate <strong>in</strong>proximity to local facilities, improv<strong>in</strong>g the transport network, encourag<strong>in</strong>g susta<strong>in</strong>abletransport and reduc<strong>in</strong>g the need to travel are key priorities of the plan. Thesepriorities draw on and contribute towards a range of other council strategies andplans <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Local Transport Strategy.Reduc<strong>in</strong>g the Need to Travel4.63 The majority of land allocations have been made with<strong>in</strong> the towns and villages as themost accessible locations and where local services and facilities are available. TheALPR also supports <strong>new</strong> development on other sites with<strong>in</strong> towns and villages whichare well related to other land uses and where they are accessible by a range oftransport modes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g non-car users. <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicates that whilst the majorityof <strong>new</strong> development has taken place with<strong>in</strong> the towns and larger villages, asignificant number of <strong>new</strong> houses have been built or approved <strong>in</strong> the opencountryside where public transport and local service provision is not generallyavailable (see Figure 3, page 16). The <strong>Council</strong>’s approach to rural developmentwhilst seek<strong>in</strong>g to reduce the need to travel requires to be explored <strong>in</strong> the Ma<strong>in</strong> IssuesReport.4.64 Key elements of the transport network serv<strong>in</strong>g and l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude the majorA90(T) and A92 roads, the east coast rail l<strong>in</strong>e and railway stations and, MontrosePort. The area is also served by a network of walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>g routes and publictransport provision. A number of the policies and <strong>in</strong>frastructure proposals set out <strong>in</strong>the ALPR have been implemented as set out below.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>35


Improv<strong>in</strong>g the Transport Network4.65 In terms of the road network, the upgrad<strong>in</strong>g of the A92 Dundee to Arbroath road todual carriageway standard, improved junctions and l<strong>in</strong>kages to Carnoustie andMonifieth, route improvements on the A92 north of Arbroath and on the A935 Brech<strong>in</strong>to Montrose road have been completed. The realignment of the A930 at Carlogie,Carnoustie has not been delivered due to restrictions on public expenditure butcont<strong>in</strong>ues to be desirable to improve safety and l<strong>in</strong>kages to Carnoustie. The futureimplementation of this project requires to be considered by the <strong>Angus</strong> LocalDevelopment Plan.4.66 The provision of a <strong>new</strong> road l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g the A935 to the A90 (T) at Brech<strong>in</strong> to improveconnectivity between Montrose and the strategic road network is unlikely to beimplemented follow<strong>in</strong>g the outcome of a feasibility study by consultants <strong>in</strong> 2009.Options to improve accessibility <strong>in</strong> and around the south Montrose area are be<strong>in</strong>gconsidered through the South Montrose Study (see 4.68 below).4.67 In accordance with Proposal SC42, a package of measures to improve rail station<strong>in</strong>frastructure and <strong>in</strong>terchange facilities <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g improved cycle and car park<strong>in</strong>g andpassenger wait<strong>in</strong>g facilities have been completed at Arbroath, Carnoustie andMontrose railway stations.4.68 Montrose Port is a key part of the transport network and important economic asset.Policy M7 seeks to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the long term future of the Port for sea transport bysupport<strong>in</strong>g port related uses. Whilst the Montrose Port Authority has cont<strong>in</strong>ued to<strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong> port <strong>in</strong>frastructure, opportunities for regeneration, port development andimproved accessibility are be<strong>in</strong>g considered through the South Montrose Study. Theoutcome of the study and any subsequent masterplan will require to be taken <strong>in</strong>toaccount by the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Development Plan.Encourag<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Transport4.69 Policy S2 seeks to ensure that <strong>new</strong> development is accessible by a range ofsusta<strong>in</strong>able transport modes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g walk<strong>in</strong>g, cycl<strong>in</strong>g and public transport and, islocated where there is adequate local road network capacity. Specific requirementssuch as <strong>new</strong> and improved routes, bus access and <strong>in</strong>frastructure are identified <strong>in</strong> sitedevelopment briefs and pre-application discussions. Such requirements are generallya condition of plann<strong>in</strong>g permission and are secured through the developmentmanagement process. The ALPR also requires transport assessments and travelplans to be submitted for significant traffic-generat<strong>in</strong>g developments such aseducation and healthcare facilities, large scale hous<strong>in</strong>g, retail, <strong>in</strong>dustrial, commercialand leisure developments. In so do<strong>in</strong>g, the Plan ensures that the transport network isimproved to meet the travel demands of <strong>new</strong> proposals and that susta<strong>in</strong>able travelpatterns are promoted. Plann<strong>in</strong>g applications supported by transport assessmentsand travel plans <strong>in</strong> the period 2005 -2010 are shown <strong>in</strong> Table 4 over page.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>36


Table 4: Plann<strong>in</strong>g Applications Supported by Transport Assessments & Travel Plans(2005-10)PROPOSALSchool DevelopmentWhitehills Primary School, ForfarLanglands Primary School, ForfarWoodlands Primary School, CarnoustieKirkriggs Primary School, ForfarThomas Street Primary School, CarnoustieCarlogie Primary School, CarnoustieResidential DevelopmentCrudie Farm, ArbroathMilton Mill, MonifiethMontrose Road ArbroathTayock Bridge, MontroseDubton Farm, Brech<strong>in</strong>Cliffburn Road, ArbroathBaltic Mill, Dens road, ArbroathIndustrial DevelopmentEast Muirhead of Logie, KirriemuirRetail DevelopmentWestway Retail Park, ArbroathCommerce Street, Brech<strong>in</strong>Brech<strong>in</strong> Road, MontroseGairie Works, KirriemuirPathead Farm, KirriemuirMixed Use DevelopmentSt James House, Forfar ( retail/hous<strong>in</strong>g)Burnside of Duntrune (golf course/hous<strong>in</strong>g)East Muirhead of Logie, Kirriemuir (retail/<strong>in</strong>dustrial)Shank of Omachie, Wellbank (golf course/hotel/hous<strong>in</strong>g)TRAVEL PLAN (TP)PositionFull TP providedFull TP providedFull TP providedFull TP providedFull TP providedFull TP providedTP not requiredTP not requiredTP not requiredTP not requiredTP Framework providedTP not requiredTP not requiredTP to be developedTP Framework providedTP Framework providedTP Framework providedTP Framework providedTP not providedTP Framework providedTP Framework providedTP Framework providedTP not required4.70 Proposals SC40 and SC41 seek to provide <strong>new</strong> and improved walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>groutes and bus transport <strong>in</strong>frastructure. A number of actions and projects relat<strong>in</strong>g towalk<strong>in</strong>g, cycl<strong>in</strong>g and buses are conta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> other strategy documents <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gthe Local Transport Strategy and Countryside Access Strategy and have beensuccessfully delivered. In terms of walk<strong>in</strong>g and cycl<strong>in</strong>g, completed actions <strong>in</strong>cludeprovision of segregated cycle track along the A92 between Dundee and Arbroath, anumber of <strong>new</strong> and improved safe routes to schools, development of burgh pathnetworks around Brech<strong>in</strong> and Kirriemuir, development of the <strong>Angus</strong> Coastal Path,restoration of mounta<strong>in</strong> paths <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> Glens and adoption of the Core PathsPlan. These actions also contributed towards deliver<strong>in</strong>g the Plan’s priorities for sportand recreation and the environment. In terms of bus transport, actions delivered<strong>in</strong>clude <strong>new</strong> and improved passenger wait<strong>in</strong>g facilities such as bus laybys andshelters and real time <strong>in</strong>formation across <strong>Angus</strong>.4.71 The ALPR seeks to encourage the use of sea or rail for freight transport as analternative to road transport. Whilst Policy SC47 is generally supportive of rail andsea freight proposals, the plan safeguards two specific sites for rail related usesadjacent to the east coast railway <strong>in</strong> Arbroath and Montrose. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g thesesafeguards, exist<strong>in</strong>g capacity constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the rail network (s<strong>in</strong>gle track section at<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>37


Usan and Montrose Bridge) restrict the potential for transport<strong>in</strong>g freight by rail andneither site has been developed for rail freight use. Improvements to the rail networkbetween Aberdeen and the Central Belt, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g provision of double track at Usanand a <strong>new</strong> bridge over Montrose Bas<strong>in</strong>, are identified <strong>in</strong> the Scottish Government’sStrategic Transport Projects Review (2008) however, implementation of this project issubject to secur<strong>in</strong>g Scottish Government fund<strong>in</strong>g. Although the sites currentlysafeguarded <strong>in</strong> the Plan for rail freight are not designated by Network Rail asstrategic sites, Scottish Plann<strong>in</strong>g Policy (SPP) requires development plans tosafeguard suitable locations for <strong>new</strong> rail freight <strong>in</strong>terchanges <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g facilitiesallow<strong>in</strong>g road-to-rail or road-to-water transfer where appropriate. Future safeguard<strong>in</strong>gof these sites and their ability to facilitate <strong>in</strong>creased use of rail for freight <strong>in</strong> the longerterm requires to be explored by the <strong>Angus</strong> LDP process tak<strong>in</strong>g account of nationaland regional fund<strong>in</strong>g requirements and priorities.4.72 The Plan recognises the role of modern telecommunications <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g the need totravel by enabl<strong>in</strong>g access to a range of services and facilities and alternative work<strong>in</strong>gpatterns such as work<strong>in</strong>g from home. Telecommunications also makes an importantcontribution to economic growth <strong>in</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>Angus</strong> is competitive and wellconnected. ALPR Policy SC48 is supportive of telecommunications proposals butseeks to ensure that the visual impact is m<strong>in</strong>imised. This policy is supplemented by<strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Advice Note 26 which provides further guidance <strong>in</strong> relation to sit<strong>in</strong>gand design requirements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g preferred locations. Scottish Plann<strong>in</strong>g Policycont<strong>in</strong>ues to support the expansion of telecommunications <strong>in</strong>frastructure as anessential component of economic growth and susta<strong>in</strong>able development. The <strong>Angus</strong>Local Development Plan will need to consider the potential impact of <strong>in</strong>creasedtelecommunications equipment on the natural and built environment and how thiscan best be accommodated to meet and support future needs.ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCESNatural Environment4.73 <strong>Angus</strong> has a wide diversity of habitats and species and a variety of landscapes andfeatures with a high nature conservation value. These assets contribute towards thedist<strong>in</strong>ctiveness and attractiveness of <strong>Angus</strong> as a place to live, work and visit.4.74 The priority of protect<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the natural environment is reflected <strong>in</strong> thedevelopment strategy of the ALPR to direct development to towns and larger villagesand a range of plann<strong>in</strong>g policies. In terms of land allocations, sites selected wereassessed aga<strong>in</strong>st environmental considerations <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g statutory designations,flood risk and landscape character. In this respect none of the sites allocated fordevelopment impact on designated sites, and are generally located with<strong>in</strong> or on theedge of towns and villages. Specific requirements to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> or enhance particularlandscape features and/or biodiversity and how this can be achieved are alsospecified <strong>in</strong> the policies on <strong>new</strong> land allocations and <strong>in</strong> development briefs.4.75 The development strategy seeks to guide development to exist<strong>in</strong>g settlements whichare better able to accommodate and absorb the impact of <strong>new</strong> development.Between June 2000 and June 2010, whilst the majority of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g (4,197 units)has been built <strong>in</strong> towns and larger villages a number of houses have been built <strong>in</strong> theopen countryside (502 units) (see Figure 3, page 17 for details). Whilst this <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat the strategy is be<strong>in</strong>g met, it also highlights that the exist<strong>in</strong>g countryside hous<strong>in</strong>gpolicies have provided opportunity for a significant number of <strong>new</strong> houses to be built<strong>in</strong> the rural area.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>38


4.76 The ALPR area conta<strong>in</strong>s a number of sites designated and protected for their wildlifeand habitat value <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Special Areas of Conservation (4), Special ProtectionAreas (5), Ramsar Sites (4), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (36), and Local NatureReserves (1) (source: SNH Sitel<strong>in</strong>k). The policies of the plan largely seek to protectsuch sites from development that would adversely affect the conservation <strong>in</strong>terests ofthe various sites/designations. <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications between 2005 and2010 <strong>in</strong>dicates no significant development proposals affect<strong>in</strong>g designated sitesdur<strong>in</strong>g this period.4.77 <strong>Angus</strong> has a diverse landscape which <strong>in</strong>cludes mounta<strong>in</strong>s, lowland farmland andcoast each with particular characteristics and features (see Section 3, pages 7 – 8 fordetails). With the exception of a small area <strong>in</strong> the north west part of <strong>Angus</strong> (with<strong>in</strong> theCairngorm National Park Area) which is part of a National Scenic Area, there are nostatutory landscape designations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g this, the landscape of<strong>Angus</strong> is highly valued and is given a degree of protection by the policies of theALPR which seek to ensure that development proposals are sited and designed to fitthe landscape and that features such as trees, woodlands, hedgerows andwatercourses are reta<strong>in</strong>ed and enhanced. Policy ER29 also protects the landscapecharacter and natural heritage value of the <strong>Angus</strong> coastl<strong>in</strong>e by restrict<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment on the undeveloped coast.4.78 Whilst the majority of development proposals <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> can be satisfactorilyaccommodated with<strong>in</strong> the landscape, developments such as m<strong>in</strong>eral extraction, w<strong>in</strong>dturb<strong>in</strong>es and tourist facilities and accommodation can have significant environmentaleffects. Additional <strong>in</strong>formation such as landscape and visual impact assessments andenvironmental impact assessment are generally required to be submitted <strong>in</strong> supportof such proposals. Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) is a statutory consultee <strong>in</strong> respectof plann<strong>in</strong>g applications affect<strong>in</strong>g designated sites. This ensures that natural heritage<strong>in</strong>terests are addressed <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>g applications. Experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> issuch that no applications were called <strong>in</strong> for determ<strong>in</strong>ation by the Scottish M<strong>in</strong>istersdur<strong>in</strong>g the plan period. There has been grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terest for w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>and concerns regard<strong>in</strong>g their visual and landscape impact are beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to emerge.Increas<strong>in</strong>g emphasis on re<strong>new</strong>able energy development to help mitigate globalclimate change will have a significant affect on the landscape of <strong>Angus</strong>. The balancebetween facilitat<strong>in</strong>g re<strong>new</strong>able energy proposals and other social and economicdevelopment proposals aga<strong>in</strong>st landscape protection requires to be considered <strong>in</strong> theMa<strong>in</strong> Issues Report. The <strong>Council</strong>’s forthcom<strong>in</strong>g implementation guide for re<strong>new</strong>ableenergy development will assist <strong>in</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g the landscape and direct<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment to appropriate locations.4.79 Trees, woodlands, and hedgerows make a valuable contribution to the landscapecharacter, nature conservation and recreational activity across <strong>Angus</strong>. Individualtrees and groups of trees also contribute to the character, amenity and conservationvalue of settlements and their sett<strong>in</strong>g. The Plan conta<strong>in</strong>s policies which seek toprotect the removal of such features <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ancient Woodlands and promotes theuse of Tree Preservation Orders (TPOs) to protect trees which are under threat bydevelopment. The retention and/or enhancement of exist<strong>in</strong>g trees on proposeddevelopment sites is also promoted through Policy ER7 which requires a full treesurvey for proposals which will have an impact on the amenity value of exist<strong>in</strong>g trees.<strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications shows that where relevant, plann<strong>in</strong>g conditionshave been attached to plann<strong>in</strong>g permissions to ensure management and/orenhancement of tree cover.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>39


Built Environment4.80 Significant importance is placed on protect<strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the built environment ata national level and this is reflected <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Council</strong>s Community Plan and S<strong>in</strong>gleOutcome Agreement (SOA). The ALPR plays a key role by identify<strong>in</strong>g areas forenvironmental improvement and through the application of policies on design, openspace, landscap<strong>in</strong>g and amenity standards <strong>in</strong> respect of all <strong>new</strong> developmentproposals. In terms of the historic environment, plann<strong>in</strong>g policy focuses on protect<strong>in</strong>gConservation Areas, Listed Build<strong>in</strong>gs, Ancient Monuments and Historic Gardens andDesigned Landscapes. Policies seek to ensure that these assets are not adverselyaffected by development proposals.4.81 The ma<strong>in</strong> piece of legislation cover<strong>in</strong>g conservation areas and listed build<strong>in</strong>gs is thePlann<strong>in</strong>g (Listed Build<strong>in</strong>gs and Conservation Areas) (Scotland) Act 1997. In deal<strong>in</strong>gwith applications for listed build<strong>in</strong>g consent, the Act requires plann<strong>in</strong>g authorities tohave special regard to the desirability of preserv<strong>in</strong>g the build<strong>in</strong>g or its sett<strong>in</strong>g or anyfeatures of special architectural or historic <strong>in</strong>terest which it possesses. In assess<strong>in</strong>gproposals with<strong>in</strong> conservation areas, the 1997 Act requires plann<strong>in</strong>g authorities topay special attention to the desirability of preserv<strong>in</strong>g or enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the character orappearance of conservation areas. The policies and guidance set down <strong>in</strong> the ALPRare therefore important <strong>in</strong> carry<strong>in</strong>g out these responsibilities.4.82 The current suite of policies (n<strong>in</strong>e) relat<strong>in</strong>g to the historic environment are criteriabased policies used to guide and <strong>in</strong>form pre-application discussion and assessmentof proposals. They are based on the Memorandum of Guidance <strong>in</strong> Listed Build<strong>in</strong>gsand Conservation Areas (1998) although this has now been replaced by publicationof the Scottish Historic Environment Policy (SHEP) <strong>in</strong> July 2009. Until fairly recentlyplann<strong>in</strong>g authorities were required to notify Historic Scotland (on behalf of theScottish M<strong>in</strong>isters) where they <strong>in</strong>tend to grant listed build<strong>in</strong>g consent for applicationsto alter or demolish Category A or B listed build<strong>in</strong>gs and for the demolition ofCategory C(S) listed build<strong>in</strong>gs. In 2010 <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> and Historic Scotlandestablished a work<strong>in</strong>g agreement <strong>in</strong> relation to statutory casework and consultation.This will come <strong>in</strong>to force <strong>in</strong> 2011 and will mean a reduction <strong>in</strong> the requirement to refermatters to Historic Scotland. S<strong>in</strong>ce the ALPR was adopted (February 2009) theannual number of applications for listed build<strong>in</strong>g consent submitted to <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>has been around 100 of which 60 have required notification to Historic Scotland.Plann<strong>in</strong>g authorities are also required to notify Historic Scotland where they <strong>in</strong>tend togrant consent for the demolition of an unlisted build<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> a conservation area(Conservation Area Consent). Experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> is that none of the applicationsnotified to Historic Scotland dur<strong>in</strong>g this period, have been called <strong>in</strong> for determ<strong>in</strong>ationby the Scottish M<strong>in</strong>isters. <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> of listed build<strong>in</strong>g applications also reveals thatthe number of appeals aga<strong>in</strong>st refusals over the period 2000 – 2010 was fairly lowand <strong>in</strong> the majority of cases the appeal was dismissed. This suggests that theexist<strong>in</strong>g policy framework has been successful <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g important historicbuild<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.4.83 The Plan has sought to enhance the environment by encourag<strong>in</strong>g the regeneration ofvacant and underused sites. Some of these sites have been allocated forredevelopment and brought forward with the support of development plan policies.While many proposals for brownfield redevelopment have been given plann<strong>in</strong>gpermission (see Figure 10, page 25), a significant number of opportunity sites rema<strong>in</strong>vacant. The 2009 <strong>Angus</strong> Urban Capacity Study estimated that of the n<strong>in</strong>e rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gopportunity sites suitable for hous<strong>in</strong>g (more than 10 units), only two were likely to beredeveloped over the next five years.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>40


4.84 Investment <strong>in</strong> environmental improvement schemes with<strong>in</strong> Forfar, Montrose andMonifieth town centres, the Regenerate North Arbroath and THI projects demonstratethe <strong>Council</strong>’s commitment to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and enhanc<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g builtenvironment. Environmental improvements <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g repair and reuse of propertieswith<strong>in</strong> the Brech<strong>in</strong> town centre and Brech<strong>in</strong> conservation area are also be<strong>in</strong>gdelivered through the Townscape Heritage Initiative and Town Centre RegenerationFund. The current economic climate may impact on future priorities and opportunitiesto enhance the built environment. This issue <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the regeneration of brownfieldsites will require to be considered by the <strong>Angus</strong> LDP4.85 The priorities of the ALPR to protect and enhance the built and natural environmentare underp<strong>in</strong>ned by policies which seek to deliver quality design <strong>in</strong> <strong>new</strong>developments. In this respect Policies S3 and ER5 seek to ensure that all <strong>new</strong>development whether <strong>in</strong> urban or rural locations is well considered and designed <strong>in</strong>terms of location, site characteristics and surround<strong>in</strong>g context. The Plan alsoencourages the preparation of design statements for certa<strong>in</strong> types of development.However experience <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> is such that design statements often comprise adescription of the development proposal, rather than an explanation of how itrepresents an appropriate design solution based on site location and characteristics.In seek<strong>in</strong>g to achieve better design quality <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, development proposals whichare considered to be of a poor or <strong>in</strong>appropriate design have been refused by theDevelopment Standards Committee. <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has been successful <strong>in</strong>defend<strong>in</strong>g appeals aga<strong>in</strong>st the refusal of plann<strong>in</strong>g permission on design grounds <strong>in</strong> anumber of cases. Encourag<strong>in</strong>g developers to produce a design solution whichresponds well to the location and characteristics of the site rema<strong>in</strong>s a key challenge<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. Whilst standard house types and designs cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be submitted for themajority of medium and large scale hous<strong>in</strong>g developments, plann<strong>in</strong>g officers cont<strong>in</strong>ueto negotiate improvements to the form and layout of hous<strong>in</strong>g proposals dur<strong>in</strong>g preapplicationdiscussions to achieve better quality places. In some <strong>in</strong>stances this hasdelivered improvements to orig<strong>in</strong>al hous<strong>in</strong>g proposals <strong>in</strong> relation to matters such asscale, density, connections to exist<strong>in</strong>g streets and footpaths, location of public space,public/private <strong>in</strong>terface and boundary treatment.4.86 Supplementary Plann<strong>in</strong>g Guidance <strong>in</strong> the form of development briefs have beenprepared for a number of allocated hous<strong>in</strong>g sites. The guidance follows a standardformat cover<strong>in</strong>g issues <strong>in</strong> relation to development brief objectives; appropriate landuses, design and layout, landscap<strong>in</strong>g/open space; dra<strong>in</strong>age and waste management;access and circulation and phas<strong>in</strong>g. Whilst the briefs have been useful <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>grelevant policies and developer requirements for the development of a particular site,their success <strong>in</strong> achiev<strong>in</strong>g better quality design has been limited.4.87 In recent years the need to improve design quality and place-mak<strong>in</strong>g has ga<strong>in</strong>edprom<strong>in</strong>ence at a national level with the publication of the policy documents Design<strong>in</strong>gPlaces and Design<strong>in</strong>g Streets. A key message of SPP is that “the plann<strong>in</strong>g systemshould be outcome focused, support<strong>in</strong>g the creation of high quality, accessible andsusta<strong>in</strong>able places through <strong>new</strong> development, regeneration and the protection andenhancement of the built and natural environment”. In seek<strong>in</strong>g to produce betterquality outcomes, the Ma<strong>in</strong> Issues Report will require to consider how place-mak<strong>in</strong>gand better quality design can be addressed and taken forward <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Angus</strong> LocalDevelopment Plan.Water Resource Management4.88 Water resource management and flood risk are key considerations <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g for<strong>new</strong> development <strong>in</strong> terms of location and design. The ALPR seeks to promote the<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>41


susta<strong>in</strong>able use of water resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> by direct<strong>in</strong>g development to locationswhich made the best use of exist<strong>in</strong>g water supply and waste water <strong>in</strong>frastructure. ThePlan also seeks to ensure that the location, design and layout of <strong>new</strong> developmentma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s water quality and m<strong>in</strong>imises flood risk.Susta<strong>in</strong>able use of water resources4.89 Although water supply is generally not a problem <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, lack of capacity <strong>in</strong> wastewater <strong>in</strong>frastructure affects some of the towns and villages to a greater or lesserextent. Sites allocated for development <strong>in</strong> the plan were made on the basis thatdra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>in</strong>frastructure exists, is planned or, could realistically be resolved.Cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong>vestment by Scottish Water <strong>in</strong> strategic water and waste water<strong>in</strong>frastructure is crucial for enabl<strong>in</strong>g development <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the Plan, althoughdevelopers are also required to contribute towards the cost of local networkimprovements to accommodate <strong>new</strong> connections on both allocated and unallocatedsites. Whilst this adds to the overall development costs of a site, the costs <strong>in</strong>volvedwere not viewed as be<strong>in</strong>g abnormal and were not considered to act as adevelopment constra<strong>in</strong>t for the sites allocated <strong>in</strong> the ALPR.4.90 S<strong>in</strong>ce the publication of the ALPR <strong>in</strong> 2009, issues have emerged <strong>in</strong> relation to thecapacity of the local network to accommodate <strong>new</strong> development <strong>in</strong> the north east ofCarnoustie. This has implications for the employment land allocation at Carlogie <strong>in</strong>terms of additional servic<strong>in</strong>g costs and the deliverability of this site by the privatesector. S<strong>in</strong>ce 2009, no other unforeseen issues have arisen for sites allocated <strong>in</strong> theALPR, although on-go<strong>in</strong>g improvements to the waste water treatment plant atKirriemuir will need to be completed, <strong>in</strong> order to fully delver the plan-led supply ofhous<strong>in</strong>g land.4.91 In seek<strong>in</strong>g to protect water quality, the ALPR requires the use of susta<strong>in</strong>able urbandra<strong>in</strong>age systems (SUDS) for deal<strong>in</strong>g with surface water run off <strong>in</strong> <strong>new</strong> developmentensur<strong>in</strong>g that surface water is treated before be<strong>in</strong>g discharged to the waterenvironment. SUDS also functions as a flood alleviation tool and is discussed below<strong>in</strong> terms of reduc<strong>in</strong>g flood risk.M<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g flood risk through location and design4.92 The ALPR seeks to manage flood risk and ensure that <strong>new</strong> development does not<strong>in</strong>crease the possibility of flood<strong>in</strong>g. Sites allocated <strong>in</strong> the local plan avoid known floodrisk areas whilst specific measures to m<strong>in</strong>imise flood risk <strong>in</strong> terms of design andlayout are set out <strong>in</strong> development briefs. Improvements to the Carnoustie (BarryBurn) Flood Prevention Scheme were undertaken to protect the proposed <strong>new</strong>primary school allocated at Thomas Street, Carnoustie and exist<strong>in</strong>g residentialproperties <strong>in</strong> the surround<strong>in</strong>g area.4.93 Policy ER28 requires flood risk assessments to be submitted for development onland at risk from flood<strong>in</strong>g, whilst Policy ER24 requires the use of SUDS dra<strong>in</strong>ageschemes as a flood alleviation measure for all <strong>new</strong> development sites. Plann<strong>in</strong>gapplications and pre-application enquiries are exam<strong>in</strong>ed by plann<strong>in</strong>g officers us<strong>in</strong>gthe 1:200 year flood maps provided by SEPA and flood risk assessments soughtwhere appropriate. In terms of the coastal area, Policy ER29 seeks to protect theundeveloped coast (outwith development boundaries) from unnecessarydevelopment and seeks to resist any <strong>new</strong> development which would requiresignificant <strong>new</strong> coastal defences aga<strong>in</strong>st coastal erosion or coastal flood<strong>in</strong>g. In thisrespect, all proposals with<strong>in</strong> the coastal area are assessed aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>Angus</strong><strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>42


Shorel<strong>in</strong>e Management Plan (2004) which sets out the <strong>Council</strong>’s coastal defencepolicies for the coastl<strong>in</strong>e.4.94 Whilst there has been no formal monitor<strong>in</strong>g of these policies, consultation procedureswith SEPA and the <strong>Council</strong>’s Roads Division (as Flood Prevention Authority) ensurethat the implications of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications on flood risk, dra<strong>in</strong>age and coastalmanagement are carefully considered through the Development Managementprocess. Flood risk assessments are used to identify appropriate mitigationmeasures. Further flood prevention works are <strong>in</strong>tended <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, to furthermitigate the risk of flood<strong>in</strong>g from the Brothock Water.4.95 In terms of flood protection projects, the ALPR proposes the development of a FloodPrevention Scheme for the River South Esk at Brech<strong>in</strong>. Whilst design and statutoryapprovals for the scheme have been progressed, further work is required prior to theplann<strong>in</strong>g application stage. <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> have undertaken a number of coastal andfluvial flood projects over the plan period to protect development and assets at riskfrom flood<strong>in</strong>g. These are shown <strong>in</strong> the Table 5 below.Table 5: Fluvial and Coastal Flood Defence Projects 2000 -2010FLUVIAL PROJECTSArbroathBrothock Water - Improvement Works to Flood Prevention SchemeHercules Burn, St Vigeans – Flood Protection WorksSt. Vigeans Nature Trail – Dra<strong>in</strong>age ImprovementCarnoustieBarry Burn – Improvement Works to Flood Prevention SchemeBarry Burn – Sedimentation ManagementForfarDean Water - Sedimentation ManagementKirriemuirGairie Burn - Improvement Works to Flood Prevention SchemeOtherEast of Balgavies Loch, Lunan Water - Sedimentation ManagementCOASTAL PROJECTSArbroathInchcape Park Coastal Defence WorksDowrie Coastal Defence WorksVictoria Park & West L<strong>in</strong>ks Concrete RepairsCarnoustieCarnoustie Coastal ProtectionMonifiethTayview Caravan Park Rock Armour WorksMonifieth Groyne ReplacementMontroseMontrose Splash Concrete RepairsTayock Landfill - RemediationSource: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Roads Division<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>43


Resources – Agriculture and M<strong>in</strong>erals4.96 Prime agricultural land and m<strong>in</strong>eral deposits are important f<strong>in</strong>ite resourcescontribut<strong>in</strong>g towards the economy of <strong>Angus</strong>. The priorities of the ALPR are such thatsafeguard<strong>in</strong>g these assets requires to be balanced aga<strong>in</strong>st the need for developmentand economic growth.M<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g loss of prime quality land4.97 Agriculture rema<strong>in</strong>s one of the key resource-based <strong>in</strong>dustries with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.Approximately 9.6% of Scotland’s total prime agricultural land (land classes 1, 2 and3.1) and 40% of all Class 1 agricultural land is located <strong>in</strong> the council area (source:State of the Environment Report for <strong>Angus</strong> 2011). This is predom<strong>in</strong>antly found <strong>in</strong> theStrathmore lowland area and along the coast between Arbroath and Carnoustie.Consequently agriculture and food production is important to the <strong>Angus</strong> and nationaleconomy. In the upland areas sport<strong>in</strong>g estates also make a significant contribution tothe economy.4.98 The priority to safeguard prime quality agricultural land is reflected <strong>in</strong> thedevelopment strategy to direct development to towns and villages as the mostsusta<strong>in</strong>able locations. In identify<strong>in</strong>g sites to meet future hous<strong>in</strong>g and employmentneeds required by the Dundee and <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan, the ALPR focuses on thereuse of previously developed land and <strong>in</strong>fill sites <strong>in</strong> the first <strong>in</strong>stance. However <strong>in</strong>order to provide sufficient land to meet future development needs greenfield land onthe edge of settlements was also considered and allocated. Sites selected wereassessed aga<strong>in</strong>st a range of factors <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g visual and landscape impact,accessibility, <strong>in</strong>frastructure capacity and flood risk as well as agricultural land quality.As the majority of agricultural land surround<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g settlements <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> is primequality, the loss of such land has been unavoidable and some of this has beenallocated for future development and <strong>in</strong>corporated with<strong>in</strong> development boundaries.Table 6 below sets out the proportion of greenfield land allocated by the <strong>Angus</strong> LocalPlan Review affect<strong>in</strong>g prime quality agricultural land. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that either all orthe majority of greenfield land allocated <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Carnoustie andKirriemuir was prime quality agricultural land.Table 6: Proportion of Prime Quality Agricultural Land Allocated forDevelopmentTown Greenfield Allocations (Ha) Prime Quality Agricultural LandAllocated (%)Arbroath 40.9 83.6Brech<strong>in</strong> 29 100Carnoustie 23.5 100Forfar 76.6 35.1Kirriemuir 6.0 100Monifieth 0 0Montrose 40 1.74Total 216 56.14.99 In consider<strong>in</strong>g development proposals <strong>in</strong> the open countryside, plann<strong>in</strong>g policy onlyallows for <strong>new</strong> development affect<strong>in</strong>g prime quality agricultural land where it woulddeliver the development strategy of the Plan. In practice successive local plans havebeen successful <strong>in</strong> controll<strong>in</strong>g sporadic development outwith developmentboundaries; the majority of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000 has occurred with<strong>in</strong> the<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>44


development boundaries of the <strong>Angus</strong> towns and villages (see Figure 3 page 16).Whilst hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the countryside policies have allowed for hous<strong>in</strong>g on sites classedas brownfield, gap sites, self conta<strong>in</strong>ed or with<strong>in</strong> a build<strong>in</strong>g group, the nature andscale of these sites is such that the impact on the viability of farm<strong>in</strong>g has beenm<strong>in</strong>imal.4.100 Recent plann<strong>in</strong>g applications for major recreational developments at K<strong>in</strong>gennie andNewtyle have also affected prime quality agricultural land, however the economic andsocial benefits to be ga<strong>in</strong>ed by these proposals were considered to justify the loss ofthis land. In summary, the loss of prime quality agricultural land has been <strong>in</strong>accordance with the strategy and policies of the ALPR.M<strong>in</strong>erals4.101 M<strong>in</strong>eral deposits <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g hard rock and sand and gravel are an important resource<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> and essential for the construction <strong>in</strong>dustry. M<strong>in</strong>eral extraction also hasimplications <strong>in</strong> terms of environmental impact, transportation, compatibility withadjacent land uses and land restoration.4.102 While the ALPR does not identify specific sites for m<strong>in</strong>eral extraction, the policiesallow for land to be developed to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a 10 year supply provid<strong>in</strong>g theenvironmental, transport and amenity impacts are acceptable. This policy is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>ewith the requirements for m<strong>in</strong>eral resources set out <strong>in</strong> national plann<strong>in</strong>g policy andthe Dundee and <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan (2002). A number of proposals for m<strong>in</strong>eralextraction have been approved <strong>in</strong> the period 2000-2010 as follows:Hard RockBoysack – further extraction and m<strong>in</strong>or extension at operational quarryHenderston - reopen<strong>in</strong>g of former quarry us<strong>in</strong>g secondary material.Pitairlie - further extraction and m<strong>in</strong>or extension at operational quarry us<strong>in</strong>gsecondary material.Waulkmill - further extraction and m<strong>in</strong>or extension at operational quarrySand and GravelCotside - further extraction and m<strong>in</strong>or extension at operational quarryHatton Mill – extension to operational quarryPowmyre – <strong>new</strong> site4.103 These consents have contributed towards ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a m<strong>in</strong>imum 10 year landsupply of m<strong>in</strong>eral reserves <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. A review of m<strong>in</strong>eral operations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>undertaken <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong>dicates that as a result of the economic downturn, extractionrates have slowed <strong>in</strong> recent years. This has extended the life span of exist<strong>in</strong>g hardrock and sand and gravel work<strong>in</strong>gs to 12.2 years and 14.7 years respectively. In thecontext of the exist<strong>in</strong>g permitted reserves, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the landbank of constructionaggregates is unlikely to be a ma<strong>in</strong> issue for the <strong>Angus</strong> LDP.Energy4.104 Energy efficiency, reduced carbon footpr<strong>in</strong>t and re<strong>new</strong>able energy generation arehigh on the Government agenda as a way to tackle climate change. These issues are<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>45


also identified <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Council</strong>’s Corporate Plan (2011-2015) and Community Plan andS<strong>in</strong>gle Outcome Agreement (2011-2014) as priority areas <strong>in</strong> the context of deliver<strong>in</strong>g“Communities That Are Susta<strong>in</strong>able”.4.105 The plann<strong>in</strong>g system has a key role to play <strong>in</strong> mitigat<strong>in</strong>g the causes of climatechange. Indeed a priority of the ALPR is to ensure development makes a contributiontowards protect<strong>in</strong>g the environment, resource management, reduc<strong>in</strong>g pollution andenergy efficiency. There are clear l<strong>in</strong>kages between this aim and other priorities ofthe ALPR to guide development to accessible locations, prioritise the reuse ofbrownfield sites, encourage susta<strong>in</strong>able transport and reduce the need to traveldiscussed <strong>in</strong> other sections of this report.4.106 The Plan recognises the role that sit<strong>in</strong>g and design of <strong>new</strong> development can play <strong>in</strong>achiev<strong>in</strong>g improved energy efficiency and conservation of resources. In this respectPolicy ER33 promotes energy efficiency <strong>in</strong> <strong>new</strong> development and sets out how thiscan be achieved. Changes to the layout and design of development proposals tomake better use of local climate and m<strong>in</strong>imise energy use are often negotiated dur<strong>in</strong>gpre-application discussions. In practice however this policy has largely functioned asan advisory policy and is rarely used to justify approval or refusal of developmentproposals.4.107 In terms of re<strong>new</strong>able energy, the Plan supports all forms of re<strong>new</strong>able energydevelopment subject to acceptable landscape, visual, environmental and cumulativeimpact. Whilst some re<strong>new</strong>able energy proposals such as solar panels andphotovoltaics have ma<strong>in</strong>ly localised visual and amenity impacts, others such as w<strong>in</strong>dturb<strong>in</strong>es can have wider landscape, visual and environmental effects.4.108 Over the last few years, there have been a grow<strong>in</strong>g number of re<strong>new</strong>able energyenquiries and development proposals com<strong>in</strong>g forward with<strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>. In the ma<strong>in</strong>these are for on-shore w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es, although biomass boilers, solar panels, heatpumps and photovoltaics <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly form part of both public and private sectorprojects throughout <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g schools, residential, <strong>in</strong>dustrial development, andvillage halls. Analysis of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications for w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es submitted dur<strong>in</strong>g2004-2011 <strong>in</strong>dicates that 96 applications were determ<strong>in</strong>ed over this period and that80 applications were approved. Whilst the majority of approvals were for small scale(25m) <strong>in</strong>dividual w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es, a w<strong>in</strong>d farm proposal compris<strong>in</strong>g 8 turb<strong>in</strong>es (over50m) was approved at Ark Hill <strong>in</strong> 2004. Table 7 below summarises the position <strong>in</strong><strong>Angus</strong> at November 2011. Whilst refusals have largely been on the basis ofunacceptable landscape and visual impact, proposals with<strong>in</strong> the coastal areabetween Teal<strong>in</strong>g and Montrose have also generated objection by the M<strong>in</strong>istry ofDefence (MOD) <strong>in</strong> relation to affects on radar <strong>in</strong>stallations. It is noteworthy thatapplications that have been refused and gone through the plann<strong>in</strong>g appeal processhave all been dismissed.Table 7 Plann<strong>in</strong>g Applications for W<strong>in</strong>d Turb<strong>in</strong>es (Jan 2004 – Nov 2011)S<strong>in</strong>gle Turb<strong>in</strong>esMultiple Turb<strong>in</strong>es2 3-6 >6Year App Ref App Ref App Ref App Ref2004 1 1 12005 22006 92007 8 3 1<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>46


2008 92009 12 1 42010 17 2 4 12011 10 3 6 1Total 68 7 10 1 1 7 1 1App –approved; Ref –refusedSource: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g & Transport4.109 As consents for w<strong>in</strong>d turb<strong>in</strong>es of all sizes are implemented, their <strong>in</strong>dividual andcumulative visual and landscape impact is emerg<strong>in</strong>g and will <strong>in</strong>fluence theconsideration of future proposals. An Implementation Guide for Re<strong>new</strong>able Energy isunder preparation to assist <strong>in</strong> the development and assessment of futuredevelopment proposals.Waste Management4.110 Waste generation is an <strong>in</strong>tegral part of <strong>new</strong> development and the majority of land useactivities. Different land uses produce different types and levels of waste which needto be managed effectively and efficiently. Whilst there are design and storage spaceimplications associated with the waste generated by residential or commercialdevelopment, waste management facilities themselves also have particular land useimplications.4.111 A role of the ALPR is to help deliver the requirements for waste reduction andsusta<strong>in</strong>able waste management set out <strong>in</strong> the National Waste Strategy (1999)* andthe Tayside Area Waste Plan (2003). This is reflected <strong>in</strong> the priority of the Plan toensure that development contributes towards protection of the environment, resourcemanagement, reduc<strong>in</strong>g pollution and energy efficiency. To achieve this, the Planprovides a policy framework for assess<strong>in</strong>g proposals for <strong>new</strong> waste managementfacilities for municipal and non-municipal waste; identifies the need to develop furtherfacilities <strong>in</strong> Forfar (compost<strong>in</strong>g) and Carnoustie/Monifieth (recycl<strong>in</strong>g) and, seeksprovision for waste management facilities as part of <strong>new</strong> residential, retail,commercial and <strong>in</strong>dustrial developments.4.112 Whilst a <strong>new</strong> centralised compost<strong>in</strong>g facility has been developed at Restenneth <strong>in</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e with Policy ER38, the provision of a <strong>new</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g facility serv<strong>in</strong>g Carnoustie andMonifieth has not progressed as envisaged. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong>vestigations undertaken bythe <strong>Council</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2009 failed to identify a suitable site for a <strong>new</strong> recycl<strong>in</strong>g centre to serveboth Monifieth and Carnoustie. Notwithstand<strong>in</strong>g this, <strong>in</strong> seek<strong>in</strong>g to meet nationalwaste disposal targets, the number, type and range of waste management facilitiesfor the disposal of municipal solid waste <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> has <strong>in</strong>creased and <strong>in</strong>cludes:• Landfill Waste Disposal Site (Restenneth)• Compost Facility - ‘open w<strong>in</strong>drow’ (Restenneth)• Recycl<strong>in</strong>g Depot - ACROP (Arbroath)• Recycl<strong>in</strong>g Centres (all towns)• Neighbourhood recycl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts (all towns and 26 village/rural locations)4.113 In addition, there are a number of non-municipal waste management (<strong>in</strong>ert waste)sites operated by private companies handl<strong>in</strong>g a range of commercial, <strong>in</strong>dustrial,construction and demolition wastes.* Note: This has been superseded by Scotland’s Zero Waste Plan (2010)<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>47


4.114 At the time of prepar<strong>in</strong>g the ALPR there was no immediate requirement to extend oridentify additional landfill sites for the disposal of municipal waste due to availablecapacity of the exist<strong>in</strong>g landfill site at Restenneth. Table 8 below <strong>in</strong>dicates that whilethe total levels of waste have risen with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g households, the amount go<strong>in</strong>g tolandfill has decreased as more waste is be<strong>in</strong>g recycled or composted. This hasfurther extended the capacity and lifespan of the exist<strong>in</strong>g landfill site thereby avert<strong>in</strong>gthe need for additional sites.Table 8: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong>: Municipal Waste ManagementWaste Managed(Tonnes)Landfill%Recycled orComposted %Inc<strong>in</strong>erated/OtherRecovery %2005/06 71642 42.2 33.9 23.92009/10 76780 43.4 39.1 17.5Source: <strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Neighbourhood Services4.115 In seek<strong>in</strong>g to encourage and extend the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of waste reduction, recycl<strong>in</strong>g andreuse, Policy ER38 seeks the provision of waste recycl<strong>in</strong>g facilities as part of <strong>new</strong>development proposals. Policy monitor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicates there is however a need toprovide clearer guidance on what is required and how these facilities should bedelivered for different types and scales of development. S<strong>in</strong>ce 2009, the <strong>in</strong>troductionof a segregated household collection system has negated the requirement for m<strong>in</strong>irecycl<strong>in</strong>g centres <strong>in</strong> residential developments although these are still sought <strong>in</strong> <strong>new</strong>retail developments as appropriate.4.116 In terms of non-municipal waste, there have been a number of proposals for smallscale proposals (extensions as well as <strong>new</strong> sites) for recycl<strong>in</strong>g facilities. In additionthere is cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong>fill of residual waste l<strong>in</strong>ked to progressive site restoration atexist<strong>in</strong>g quarries. These have been approved <strong>in</strong> accordance with the policyframework set out <strong>in</strong> the ALPR, which places a high value on environmentalprotection and land restoration.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>48


5. TOWNS AND VILLAGES – PROGRESS SUMMARYTownsA key priority of the ALPR is to direct the majority of <strong>new</strong> development to the ma<strong>in</strong>settlements. The Plan establishes a development strategy for each of the towns of Arbroath,Brech<strong>in</strong>, Carnoustie, Forfar, Kirriemuir, Monifieth and Montrose and sets out specific landallocations, policies and proposals to address future needs up to 2011.In addition to town specific policies and proposals, wider policies and proposals of the Planset out under Build<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communities and Environment and Resources play a keyrole <strong>in</strong> deliver<strong>in</strong>g the development strategy for each of the towns.ARBROATHDevelopment Strategy• Prioritise regeneration of brownfield and opportunity sites and support Regenerate!North Arbroath <strong>in</strong>itiative <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g allocat<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g land at Cliffburn.• Identify land for hous<strong>in</strong>g development at Montrose Road.• Promote development opportunities which take advantage of improved A92 roadimprovements, and support Arbroath as a retail, service and employment centre.• Support the development and improvement of the town’s visitor potential based on theAbbey, High Street and Harbour, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the Abbey to Harbour Townscape HeritageInitiative (THI).• Reta<strong>in</strong> the open, undeveloped character of the beachfront and Victoria Park as a majorasset to the town.Policy/Proposal Progress Future ActionA1 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - MontroseRoadA2 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - James StreetHallA3 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - MillgateLoan/Chalmers StreetA4 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g – BenedictRoadA5 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - CliffburnA6 : Regenerate! NorthArbroathA7 : Opportunity Site - LittleCairnieA8 : Opportunity Site -Mar<strong>in</strong>e Ballroom, Hill StreetA9 : Opportunity Site - ErnestStreet/Palmer StreetA10 : Opportunity Site -Wardmill/Dens RoadDevelopment Brief preparedFull plann<strong>in</strong>g permissiongranted subject to Section 75AgreementDevelopment completeDevelopment completeDevelopment completeDevelopmentunderway/nearly completeProject complete.No progressHous<strong>in</strong>g developmentcompleteFull plann<strong>in</strong>g permissiongranted for hous<strong>in</strong>g subjectto completion of Section 75AgreementNo re<strong>new</strong>al scheme buthous<strong>in</strong>g application for BalticWorks and adjacent siteapproved subject tocompletion of Section 75AgreementMonitor progressDelete siteDelete siteDelete siteMonitor progressDelete policyReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processDelete siteMonitor progressReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>49


A11 : Work<strong>in</strong>g - West of ElliotIndustrial EstateA12 : Domestic Scale FishProcess<strong>in</strong>gA13 : Arbroath HarbourA14 : Improvement Of TouristL<strong>in</strong>kagesA15 : CairnieStreet/StobcrossA16 : Westway - DundeeRoadA17 : West Port Shopp<strong>in</strong>gFrontageA18 : Helen Street - GoodsYardA19 : Hospitalfield HouseFull plann<strong>in</strong>g permission forformation of bus<strong>in</strong>ess park(extend<strong>in</strong>g to 14.2 hectares)approved August 2011Development ManagementPolicy applied todevelopment proposals asappropriateNew visitor centre andaccess constructed.Improvements <strong>in</strong> and aroundthe harbour cont<strong>in</strong>ueRefurbishment of streetfurniture <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>new</strong>signpost<strong>in</strong>gSupermarket constructed onsiteSupermarket, non food retailand fast food unitsconstructed on siteDevelopment ManagementPolicy applied todevelopment proposals asappropriateNo progressDevelopment ManagementPolicy applied todevelopment proposals asappropriateMonitor progressReview purpose and function ofpolicy as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocessMonitor progressReview purpose and function ofpolicy as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocessDelete siteReview retail warehouse provisionas part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDP processReview purpose and function ofpolicy as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocessReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview purpose and function ofpolicy as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocessBRECHINDevelopment Strategy• Provide for a range of hous<strong>in</strong>g development• Support measures to regenerate and enhance the town centre, its historic core andgeneral environment• Improve the environment by encourag<strong>in</strong>g re<strong>new</strong>al of vacant and underused sites• Support potential for recreation and tourismPolicy/Proposal Progress Future ActionB1:Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Dubton Farm Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted Monitor progresssubject to Section 75Agreement for Phase 1(compris<strong>in</strong>g 99 residentialunits and 120sqm ofretail/commercial units)B2:Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Andover School No progress Review position as part ofB3: Regeneration - Queens Park Hous<strong>in</strong>g developmentunderway/nearly complete.No progress with children’snurseryB4: Opportunity Site - Albert Place Hous<strong>in</strong>g developmentB5: Opportunity Site - Scott StreetGoods YardcompleteNo progress<strong>Angus</strong> LDP processMonitor progressDelete siteReview position as part of<strong>Angus</strong> LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>50


B6: Opportunity Site - WitchdenRoad, Former Gas WorksNo progressReview position as part of<strong>Angus</strong> LDP processB7: Opportunity Site - Southesk Supermarket built on site Delete siteStreet/Commerce StreetB8: Town Centre Improvements Repair and reuse ofMonitor progressproperties together withenvironmental improvementsbe<strong>in</strong>g delivered throughTownscape Heritage Initiativeand Town CentreRegeneration FundB9: Community Woodland –CookstonNo progressReview position as part of<strong>Angus</strong> LDP processB10: Open Space Area – Cookston No progress Review position as part of<strong>Angus</strong> LDP processB11: Hotel/Travel LodgeDevelopment – Dubton FarmNo progressReview position as part of<strong>Angus</strong> LDP processB12: Cemetery Extension Site safeguarded Review future needs as partof <strong>Angus</strong> LDP processB13: Flood Prevention Scheme Flood Prevention Scheme Monitor progressbe<strong>in</strong>g developedB14: Brech<strong>in</strong> Flood Risk Areas Development ManagementPolicy applied to developmentproposals as appropriateReview position as part of<strong>Angus</strong> LDP processCARNOUSTIEDevelopment Strategy• Establish a site for employment use• Encourage the provision of affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g• Support the role of Carnoustie town centre• Support the development of golf<strong>in</strong>g facilities, where appropriate, to further strengthenthis <strong>in</strong>ternationally recognised asset• Encourage the redevelopment of underused brownfield sites with<strong>in</strong> the built up area• Cont<strong>in</strong>ue enhancement of the seafront area <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g foot and cycle pathsPolicy/Proposal Progress Future ActionC1: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Newton Road2C2: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – FormerMalt<strong>in</strong>gs, Victoria StreetDevelopment completeHous<strong>in</strong>g developmentcomplete on part of site.Plann<strong>in</strong>g applicationsubmitted for hous<strong>in</strong>g onanother part of the site. Thisapplication is pend<strong>in</strong>gconsideration subject to anapproved Masterplan and theprovision of affordablehous<strong>in</strong>gDelete siteReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>51


C3: Opportunity Site –Woodside/PitskellyC4: Opportunity Site – BarryRoadC5: Opportunity Site –Greenlaw HillC6: Opportunity Site – L<strong>in</strong>ksParade, Former DalhousieGolf ClubC7: Work<strong>in</strong>g – Land atCarlogieC8: Replacement HealthCentre, Barry RoadC9: Primary School Site –Thomas StreetC10: Primary School Site –Queen StreetC11: Shanwell CemeteryExtensionC12: Sports Ground,Shanwell RoadC13: Golf CourseDevelopmentPlann<strong>in</strong>g permissions forhous<strong>in</strong>g development havebeen granted on part of thesite, for a total of 58 <strong>new</strong>homes. Plann<strong>in</strong>g permissionhas also been granted for theimportation of <strong>in</strong>ert materialfor further phases of hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment. A total of 26<strong>new</strong> homes had beencompleted by 1 April 2011Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission hasbeen granted for theimportation of <strong>in</strong>ert materialfor future hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopmentNo progressHous<strong>in</strong>g developmentcompletePlann<strong>in</strong>g permission for class4, 5 & 6 uses and therealignment of Carlogie Roadis pend<strong>in</strong>g the conclusion aSection 75 Agreement.Concerns have been raisedabout f<strong>in</strong>ancial viability.Development completeDevelopment completeDevelopment completeSite safeguardedNo progressNo progressMonitor progressReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processDelete siteReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processDelete siteDelete siteDelete siteReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>52


FORFARDevelopment Strategy• Provide for a range of hous<strong>in</strong>g development and employment land• Improve the environment by encourag<strong>in</strong>g re<strong>new</strong>al of vacant, under used sites andprotection of important landscape features• Encourage a strong and lively town centre with shopp<strong>in</strong>g facilities to meet the area’srequirements• Support for a recreational networkPolicy/Proposal Progress Future ActionF1: Protection of Ground WaterResourcesDevelopmentManagement Policy usedas appropriateReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF2: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Beechill Nursery No progress Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF3: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Green Street Development complete Delete siteF4: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – WesterPlann<strong>in</strong>g permission Monitor progressRestennethgranted subject tocompletion of Section 75AgreementF5: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Whitehills Nursery No progress Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>F6: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Dundee Road Outl<strong>in</strong>e plann<strong>in</strong>gpermission granted <strong>in</strong>2007 and subsequentapplication to extendtimescale approved <strong>in</strong>2010LDP processMonitor progressF7: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Gowanbank No progress Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF8: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Slatefield Plann<strong>in</strong>g permissiongranted subject toSection 75 AgreementMonitor progressF9: Safeguarded Site – North ofTurfbegNo progressReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF10: Opportunity Site – SouthStreetNo progressReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF11: Opportunity Site – Forfar Hous<strong>in</strong>g development Delete siteInfirmarycompleteF12: Opportunity Site – NewRoadDevelopment of ASDAstore on site recentlyMonitor progress of hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopmentcompleted. Hous<strong>in</strong>g stillto progressF13: Opportunity Site – St JamesRoadNo progressReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF14: Work<strong>in</strong>g – Orchardbank Development complete Monitor progresson part of siteF15: Work<strong>in</strong>g – Carseview Road No progress Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processF16: Primary School – Whitehills Development complete Delete siteNurseryF17: Newmonthill CemeteryExtensionSite safeguarded Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>53


F18: Balmashanner DevelopmentManagement Policy usedas appropriateF19: Forfar Loch DevelopmentManagement Policy usedas appropriateReview purpose and function ofpolicy as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocess.Review purpose and function ofpolicy as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocess.KIRRIEMUIRDevelopment Strategy• Provide for a range of hous<strong>in</strong>g development and well located employment land• Improve the environment by encourag<strong>in</strong>g re<strong>new</strong>al of vacant, under used sites• Encourage a strong and lively town centre with shopp<strong>in</strong>g and service facilities to servethe wider area and visitors• Support the development of a replacement health centre *Policy/Proposal Progress Future ActionK1: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Shielhill Road Development complete Delete siteK2: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Hillhead Development underway Monitor progressK3: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Sunnyside Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission granted Monitor progressK4: Work<strong>in</strong>g – East Muirhead Outl<strong>in</strong>e plann<strong>in</strong>g permission Monitor progressof Logie, Forfar Road grantedK5: Kirriemuir CemeteryExtensionSite safeguardedReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process* Whilst the development strategy highlights support for the development of a replacement healthcentre, there have been no proposals for a <strong>new</strong> facility with<strong>in</strong> the period of the Local Plan Review.MONIFIETHDevelopment Strategy• Promote the reuse of suitable brownfield sites for hous<strong>in</strong>g and employment uses• Encourage a strong and lively town centre and shopp<strong>in</strong>g facilities to meet localrequirements• Encourage opportunities to enhance the environment and physical fabric of the town bysupport<strong>in</strong>g private sector <strong>in</strong>itiatives to regenerate Monifieth town centre• Support the extension of the coastal footpath and cycleway from Monifieth seafront toCarnoustie as part of an <strong>Angus</strong> coastal path network• Undertake a search for a <strong>new</strong> cemetery for <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> a future local plan review orearlier if required*Policy/Proposal Progress Future ActionMf1: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – AshludieHospital Phase 2Mf2: Opportunity Site –Milton MillMf3: Town CentreImprovementsNo progressPlann<strong>in</strong>g permission hasbeen granted for hous<strong>in</strong>g andsmall-scale retaildevelopment. Hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment underwayImprovements to the publicrealm were undertaken byReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processMonitor progressDevelopment Management Policy –review as part of <strong>Angus</strong> LDPprocessthe <strong>Council</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2010/11* Neighbourhood Services are undertak<strong>in</strong>g a review of cemetery provision for the South <strong>Angus</strong> area<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Monifieth.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>54


MONTROSEDevelopment Strategy• Safeguard and enhance important natural and built features• Promote the reuse of vacant and underused sites• Provide for future hous<strong>in</strong>g and economic growth• Encourage a strong and lively town centre• Provide a <strong>new</strong> and improved path networkPolicy/Proposal Progress Future ActionM1:Hous<strong>in</strong>g – Brech<strong>in</strong> RoadM2: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – DungmansTackM3:Hous<strong>in</strong>g – LochsideDistillery TowerM4:Opportunity Site –Sunnyside Hospital EstateM5:Work<strong>in</strong>g – MontroseAirfieldM6:Sleepyhillock CemeteryExtensionM7:Montrose PortM8:Railway Sid<strong>in</strong>gs –Montrose Rail StationPlann<strong>in</strong>g permission grantedfor Phase 1 (200 residentialunits). DevelopmentunderwayPlann<strong>in</strong>g permission grantedfor affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g (45units).Site developed for hous<strong>in</strong>gMarket<strong>in</strong>g arrangementsbe<strong>in</strong>g progressed by NHSTayside. No developmentproposals to dateNo progressSite safeguardedSite safeguarded for portrelated use. Opportunities forregeneration and portdevelopment be<strong>in</strong>gconsidered through SouthMontrose RegenerationProjectSite safeguarded for railrelated useMonitor progressMonitor progressDelete siteReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processRural Villages and SettlementsThe Local Plan Review allocates land for development <strong>in</strong> the larger villages which provide arange of services and facilities and are better able to accommodate and absorb the impact of<strong>new</strong> development. Land for hous<strong>in</strong>g is also allocated <strong>in</strong> Auchmithie to facilitate the provisionof a <strong>new</strong> play park and kick about area.Development boundaries have also been drawn around Ballumbie House and grounds,Letham Grange and Piperdam where plann<strong>in</strong>g permission has been approved for hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>association with leisure and recreational facilities with<strong>in</strong> the open countryside. The LocalPlan Review allows for hous<strong>in</strong>g and recreational development with<strong>in</strong> these estates <strong>in</strong>accordance with extant plann<strong>in</strong>g permissions.In addition the Plan allows for the regeneration of a large rural brownfield site atStrathmart<strong>in</strong>e Hospital for a range of uses.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>55


Policy/Proposal Progress Future ActionAuchmithieAm1 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g – KirkbankAm2 : Village EnvironmentalImprovementsEdzellE1: Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Edzell SchoolAnnexeE2: Opportunity Site - EdzellSchool, Church StreetFriockheimOutl<strong>in</strong>e plann<strong>in</strong>g permissiongranted for 15 houses April2006Range of environmentalimprovements completed<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>new</strong> play area, carpark and footpathenhancementSite redeveloped for hous<strong>in</strong>gSite redeveloped for hous<strong>in</strong>gMonitor progressDelete proposalDelete siteDelete siteFk1 Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Millgate 3 Complete Delete siteFk2 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - South of Application approved subject Monitor progressGardyne Streetto S75Fk4 : Lunan WaterRe<strong>in</strong>statement of formermillpond and improvedaccess completed <strong>in</strong>conjunction with hous<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment at MillgateDelete proposalGlamisG1 : Dundee Road East No progress Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processInverkeilorIk1 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Land to rearof Lunan AvenueIk2 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Kirkton FarmStead<strong>in</strong>gK<strong>in</strong>gsmuirKi1: Hous<strong>in</strong>g - BunkerhillKi2 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g – K<strong>in</strong>gstonPlaceLethamL1 : Unadopted Roads PolicyL2 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - Jubilee ParkL3 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - East Hemm<strong>in</strong>gStreetNo progressNo progressHous<strong>in</strong>g developmentcomplete on part of site.Outl<strong>in</strong>e plann<strong>in</strong>g permissiongrantedDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateDraft Development Briefprepared. No furtherprogressHous<strong>in</strong>g developmentcomplete on part ofsite/underwayDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processMonitor progressMonitor progressReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processMonitor progressL4 : Safeguard ofEmployment LandReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processLiffLi1 : Liff Cemetery Extension Site Safeguarded Review position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>56


MonikieMk1 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g – MonikieGranaryNewbigg<strong>in</strong>gNb1 : Hous<strong>in</strong>g - PitairlieRoad/Newbigg<strong>in</strong>g NorthBallumbie HouseBa1: Ballumbie HouseBa2: RecreationDevelopmentLetham GrangeLG1: Hous<strong>in</strong>g – LethamGrangeLG2: Tourism and RecreationDevelopmentLG3: Letham Grange HotelPiperdamPd1: ResidentialDevelopmentPd2: RecreationDevelopmentStrathmart<strong>in</strong>e HospitalSt1: Opportunity Site –Strathmart<strong>in</strong>e Hospital EstateHous<strong>in</strong>g developmentunderway (affordablehous<strong>in</strong>g is now complete).Replacement scout hut andextension to school securedto support hous<strong>in</strong>g proposal.Development completeDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateDevelopment ManagementPolicy used as appropriateLandowner <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment proposals andprepar<strong>in</strong>g a masterplanMonitor progressDelete siteReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP processReview position as part of <strong>Angus</strong>LDP process<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>57


6. CONCLUSIONS - WHAT HAS BEEN ACHIEVED?Locational Strategy6.1 In seek<strong>in</strong>g to meet the hous<strong>in</strong>g and employment land requirements of the Dundeeand <strong>Angus</strong> Structure Plan (2002), the development strategy of the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Planand the ALPR sought to guide development to the most susta<strong>in</strong>able locations andadopted a hierarchical approach to land allocations as follows:6.2 Towns - <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Carnoustie, Forfar, Kirriemuir, Monifieth andMontrose where most sites are allocated and where the majority of <strong>new</strong> developmenthas occurred. This outcome has been compatible with promot<strong>in</strong>g a pattern ofdevelopment which has reduced the need to travel and more efficient use of exist<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>frastructure and services.6.3 A number of brownfield sites with<strong>in</strong> towns have been developed contribut<strong>in</strong>g toefficient use of land and environmental improvements, whilst regeneration <strong>in</strong>itiatives<strong>in</strong> Arbroath and Brech<strong>in</strong> have improved residential amenity and delivered a mix ofhous<strong>in</strong>g type and tenure. Despite the policy of guid<strong>in</strong>g retail development to towncentres, there has been demand for large scale retail development on edge of centreand out of centre sites, which cannot be accommodated with<strong>in</strong> central areas.6.4 Villages - <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Auchmithie, Birkhill/Muirhead, Edzell, Friockheim, Glamis,Inverkeilor, K<strong>in</strong>gsmuir, Letham, Monikie and Newbigg<strong>in</strong>g - which have access toservices and facilities to support <strong>new</strong> development and where limited land allocationsare made, or where there was extant plann<strong>in</strong>g permission for large scale hous<strong>in</strong>g.Whilst few facilities exist at Auchmithie, land was allocated for hous<strong>in</strong>g to facilitateimproved recreational provision with<strong>in</strong> the village.6.5 With<strong>in</strong> villages, development has cont<strong>in</strong>ued to progress on exist<strong>in</strong>g hous<strong>in</strong>g sites,whilst a number of allocated hous<strong>in</strong>g sites have advanced to receiv<strong>in</strong>g plann<strong>in</strong>gpermission or are now complete. Exceptions <strong>in</strong>clude two small hous<strong>in</strong>g allocations <strong>in</strong>Inverkeilor and a mixed use opportunity site <strong>in</strong> Glamis, where there has been noprogress. Overall the ALPR has succeeded <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g development with<strong>in</strong> thedef<strong>in</strong>ed settlement boundary and protect<strong>in</strong>g the landscape sett<strong>in</strong>g of the villages.6.6 Other Settlements - with no or very few facilities for which development boundarieshave been drawn to reflect the extent of exist<strong>in</strong>g built development and to provideopportunity for <strong>in</strong>fill development or brownfield redevelopment only.6.7 Development boundaries have also been drawn around Ballumbie House, LethamGrange and Piperdam. Plann<strong>in</strong>g permission has been approved <strong>in</strong> these settlementsfor hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> association with leisure facilities with<strong>in</strong> the open countryside. Thepolicies of the ALPR have limited hous<strong>in</strong>g and recreational development with<strong>in</strong> theseestates to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the layout and design approved through the extant plann<strong>in</strong>gpermission.6.8 Open Countryside - <strong>in</strong>cludes land outwith development boundaries and is the leastsusta<strong>in</strong>able location for significant development <strong>in</strong> terms of landscape capacity, aswell as <strong>in</strong> terms of provid<strong>in</strong>g access to public transport and to services. Whilst thePlan’s policies have allowed for appropriate economic development and hous<strong>in</strong>g, thegreatest <strong>in</strong>terest has been for <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g development particularly <strong>in</strong> the South<strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market Area.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>58


6.9 <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> shows that over the past ten years the majority of development has takenplace <strong>in</strong> towns as the most susta<strong>in</strong>able locations. Whilst the hierarchical approachhas worked as <strong>in</strong>tended, <strong>in</strong> that less hous<strong>in</strong>g development has taken place <strong>in</strong> theopen countryside than with<strong>in</strong> villages and settlements with development boundaries itis evident that the demand for hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the countryside has been strong comparedto proposals for economic or social development. This is likely to result <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> car journeys. In a rural area like <strong>Angus</strong> it is difficult to balance the needs of therural population with the desire to reduce the need to travel and thereby <strong>in</strong>creasesusta<strong>in</strong>ability.6.10 Whilst the development strategy s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000 has sought to allow development <strong>in</strong> therural area to support population and local services, facilities <strong>in</strong> some villages<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g shops and libraries have nonetheless closed. <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicates that thesusta<strong>in</strong>ability of rural facilities such as shops is dependant upon a range of factorsand there is no evidence to suggest that allow<strong>in</strong>g further development <strong>in</strong> the ruralarea has resulted <strong>in</strong> rural services be<strong>in</strong>g improved or reta<strong>in</strong>ed.Build<strong>in</strong>g Susta<strong>in</strong>able Communities6.11 Hous<strong>in</strong>g completions over the last ten years re<strong>in</strong>forces the view that the local planshave provided a range of hous<strong>in</strong>g to meet needs <strong>in</strong> appropriate locations across<strong>Angus</strong>. However as a consequence of the economic downturn, construction rateshave slowed and Structure Plan hous<strong>in</strong>g land allowances have not been met with theexception of the South <strong>Angus</strong> area. Up until 2008, completion rates were broadly ontarget to reach or come close to the Structure Plan requirements; and there has beencapacity to exceed these requirements <strong>in</strong> each hous<strong>in</strong>g market area, given therema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g supply of effective hous<strong>in</strong>g land <strong>in</strong> 2012 (see Dundee & <strong>Angus</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>gLand Audit 2010 for details) This <strong>in</strong>dicates that the f<strong>in</strong>ancial climate has had asignificant impact on the ability to deliver <strong>new</strong> homes.6.12 Implementation of the affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g policy <strong>in</strong> the ALPR has contributed to<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the affordable hous<strong>in</strong>g stock <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> and a significant number ofaffordable homes have been provided <strong>in</strong> each of the Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market Areas through<strong>new</strong> build or refurbishment. However the policy has been less successful <strong>in</strong>deliver<strong>in</strong>g the large number of affordable <strong>new</strong> homes needed <strong>in</strong> South <strong>Angus</strong>,compared to other areas.6.13 In each of the Hous<strong>in</strong>g Market Areas the majority of hous<strong>in</strong>g development has beenon brownfield sites which have improved the quality of both the urban and ruralenvironment.6.14 The local plans have provided employment opportunities <strong>in</strong> appropriate locations byallocat<strong>in</strong>g greenfield sites and safeguard<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g employment areas <strong>in</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong>towns. Employment land take up has been variable over the last ten years despite anadequate supply be<strong>in</strong>g available.6.15 Allocated employment sites at Carnoustie, Kirriemuir and Montrose have not beenserviced or delivered by the private sector as expected. The amount of immediatelyavailable employment land <strong>in</strong> Carnoustie and Kirriemuir is now very limited.6.16 There has been <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g prime employment sites <strong>in</strong> Brech<strong>in</strong>, Forfar andMontrose for uses such as retail, commercial and recreational activities contrary toexist<strong>in</strong>g Local Plan policy to safeguard such employment land for ma<strong>in</strong>streamemployment uses. Whilst there has been pressure to allow such developments giventhe slow employment land take up rates, this will reduce the supply of prime<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>59


employment land and its future availability for ma<strong>in</strong>stream employment uses such asbus<strong>in</strong>ess, general <strong>in</strong>dustry and storage and distribution.6.17 The policies of the ALPR have allowed for employment uses on appropriatebrownfield and other unallocated sites across <strong>Angus</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g appropriate ruraldevelopment. Whilst some brownfield sites with<strong>in</strong> towns have been redeveloped forretail, the majority have been developed for hous<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong>dicates that brownfieldsites have proved more viable for hous<strong>in</strong>g than for employment uses due to astronger market demand for hous<strong>in</strong>g. The policy framework has provided support fora range of employment opportunities <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong> with 95% of plann<strong>in</strong>g applications forbus<strong>in</strong>ess and <strong>in</strong>dustry proposals be<strong>in</strong>g approved <strong>in</strong> the period 2000-2010.6.18 Whilst plann<strong>in</strong>g applications over the last ten years demonstrate the demand fortourism related development <strong>in</strong> the rural area, there has been limited <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong>agriculture or rural related developments. Some proposals such as Piperdam andK<strong>in</strong>gennie have <strong>in</strong>volved a significant number of <strong>new</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g to facilitate the deliveryof the projects. This outcome highlights the need to balance the economic benefit ofsuch proposals aga<strong>in</strong>st the pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of susta<strong>in</strong>able development and reduc<strong>in</strong>g theneed to travel.6.19 The ALPR has encouraged the vitality and viability of town centres by direct<strong>in</strong>g retaildevelopment to these centres and promot<strong>in</strong>g core retail areas for a range of towncentre activities. Whilst the ALPR identified a shortfall of comparison goodsfloorspace <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>, plann<strong>in</strong>g applications submitted s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000 demonstrate ahigher demand for supermarkets than comparison goods or retail warehous<strong>in</strong>g.Where it has been demonstrated that there will be no unacceptable impact on thevitality and viability of any centre, the Plan has applied a sequential approach to <strong>new</strong>retail development and some of this has been located on edge of centre and out ofcentre sites which were supported by appropriate transport measures. This hasimproved the quality and choice of retail provision <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Forfar andMontrose. Environmental improvement schemes and regeneration <strong>in</strong>itiatives havealso improved the town centre environment <strong>in</strong> Arbroath, Brech<strong>in</strong>, Forfar, Montroseand Monifieth. The 2010 <strong>Angus</strong> Town Centre Health Checks highlight opportunitiesfor further improvements.6.20 The ALPR has ensured that development has taken place where there is adequate<strong>in</strong>frastructure. Improvements to transport, schools, recreational provision anddra<strong>in</strong>age to support <strong>new</strong> development have also been obta<strong>in</strong>ed by means ofdeveloper contributions secured through the plann<strong>in</strong>g system.6.21 The ALPR and the <strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan (2000) have supported the Local TransportStrategy and contributed to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g accessibility and a wider choice of transportthrough the appropriate location of <strong>new</strong> development and by ensur<strong>in</strong>g thatsusta<strong>in</strong>able transport options are put <strong>in</strong> place to support <strong>new</strong> development. Byguid<strong>in</strong>g development to locations which are well served by public transport andwhere the majority of the population and services exist, the need to travel by car haspotentially been reduced.6.22 Several transport proposals have been implemented to improve the safety andefficiency of the transport network and enhance opportunities for walk<strong>in</strong>g, cycl<strong>in</strong>g andpublic transport.6.23 It is recognised that despite the ALPR’s attempt to direct development to susta<strong>in</strong>ablelocations and reduce the need to travel, demand for hous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the countryside has<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>60


een strong. Lack of accessibility and services <strong>in</strong> the rural area and the desire tosupport rural communities rema<strong>in</strong> important issues.Environment and Resources6.24 The majority of development which has taken place over the ten year period 2000-2010 has been with<strong>in</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g towns and the ALPR has been successful <strong>in</strong>m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g the loss of countryside. The Plan has contributed towards improv<strong>in</strong>g thequality and amenity of the built environment through the regeneration of brownfieldsites. A number of opportunity sites with<strong>in</strong> the urban areas have come forward fordevelopment.6.25 Higher quality design standards have been sought for all <strong>new</strong> development and<strong>Angus</strong> <strong>Council</strong> has successfully defended plann<strong>in</strong>g appeals aga<strong>in</strong>st the refusal ofplann<strong>in</strong>g permissions on the basis of poor design. Encourag<strong>in</strong>g developers toproduce a design solution which responds well to the location and characteristics of aparticular site rema<strong>in</strong>s a key challenge <strong>in</strong> <strong>Angus</strong>.6.26 Whilst the various statutory designations have been important <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g the builtand natural environment, the policies of the ALPR have helped to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> thediverse landscape character of <strong>Angus</strong> and important environmental resources.6.27 The ALPR has m<strong>in</strong>imised the risk of flood<strong>in</strong>g through development location,promot<strong>in</strong>g the use of Susta<strong>in</strong>able Urban Dra<strong>in</strong>age Systems and ensur<strong>in</strong>g thatappropriate mitigation measures are put <strong>in</strong> place to protect <strong>new</strong> development.6.28 The ALPR has encouraged energy efficiency <strong>in</strong> the design and location of <strong>new</strong>development and supported a number of re<strong>new</strong>able energy developments whilstprotect<strong>in</strong>g important features of the <strong>Angus</strong> environment.<strong>Angus</strong> Local Plan Review <strong>Monitor<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!