Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 6 Comparison of SHB and WLC mid-treatment and mid-wait-list means using independent samples t tests SHB at T2 WLC at T2 Equality of variance. Sig. (1-tailed) Measure M (SD) n = 10 M (SD) n = 4 F Sig. t df p value SHAI MIHT 27.70 (6.99) 34.75 (5.91) 0.56 .471 -1.77 12 .051 Note. SHB = Self-help book group; WLC = wait-list control group; T = time; SHAI = Short Health Anxiety Inventory; MIHT = Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SF-36= Short Form 36 Health Survey; PCS = Physical Component Summary; MCS = Mental Component Summary. u Unequal variances assumed. **p < .01. . Cognition 21.50 (3.89) 25.25 (2.50) 1.01 .335 -1.76 12 .052 Behaviour 26.70 (6.09) 30.50 (3.87) 1.13 .308 -1.14 12 .138 Perception 30.40 (5.70) 37.50 (1.29) 4.77 .050 u -3.71 11 .002** Affect 22.00 (5.33) 25.50 (2.38) 3.12 .103 -1.24 12 .120 CES-D 16.80 (9.39) 22.25 (6.24) 0.26 .619 -1.06 12 .156 SF-36 PCS 47.86 (12.11) 45.65 (5.63) 1.20 .296 0.35 12 .368 MCS 32.83 (11.81) 35.90 (17.37) 1.14 .306 -0.39 12 .353 63
Table 7 SHB and WLC effect size and power estimates T1 - T2 Power T1 - T3 Power Measure Effect size d 1 - β Effect size d 1 - β SHAI 1.09 3 .78 2.43 3 MIHT .78 Cognition 1.14 3 .78 1.27 3 .78 Behaviour 0.74 2 .40 0.94 3 .40 Perception 1.72 3 1.00 u 2.02 3 1.00 Affect 0.90 3 .47 0.93 3 .47 CES-D 0.68 2 .35 0.95 3 .35 SF-36 PCS 0.23 1 .08 0.01 1 .08 MCS 0.21 1 .09 0.46 1 .09 Note. SHB = self-help book group; WLC = wait-list control group; T = time; MIHT = Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits; SHAI = Short Health Anxiety Inventory; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SF-36 = Short Form 36 Health Survey; PCS = Physical Component Summary; MCS = Mental Component Summary. u Unequal variances assumed. 1 small effect; 2 medium effect; 3 large effect. 64
Page 1 and 2:
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED FEASIBILITY T
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract The purpose of this feasib
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgement This research was f
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Abstract………
Page 9 and 10:
3.2.1. Content analysis…………
Page 11 and 12:
List of figures Figure 1. The cogni
Page 13 and 14:
Table C7. Comparison of WLC pre- an
Page 15 and 16:
this study will inform a future, la
Page 17 and 18:
Disorders Draft (APA, 2010) propose
Page 19 and 20:
The cognitive symptoms of health an
Page 21 and 22:
somatosensory amplification have a
Page 23 and 24:
clients with health anxiety from cl
Page 25 and 26: Interview Schedule [Robins, Helzer,
Page 27 and 28: Today, effective clinically-support
Page 29 and 30: decreased disease conviction, witho
Page 31 and 32: identification and reattribution of
Page 33 and 34: within treatment sessions and as ho
Page 35 and 36: more efficacious than wait-list con
Page 37 and 38: participants‘ functioning. The CB
Page 39 and 40: at follow-up (e.g., Bouman, 2002, a
Page 41 and 42: et al., 2003). Self-help treatments
Page 43 and 44: 1.2. Statement of purpose The purpo
Page 45 and 46: an Internet format because it was m
Page 47 and 48: � Do you carry things to use in t
Page 49 and 50: dimensional scales: (a) affective s
Page 51 and 52: severe (15 - 19), and extremely sev
Page 53 and 54: 86 indicate a poor alliance. The HA
Page 55 and 56: included depression symptoms, gener
Page 57 and 58: mailed Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 o
Page 59 and 60: equests were honored. All randomize
Page 61 and 62: literature; therefore, we had reaso
Page 63 and 64: 3. RESULTS 3.1. Quantitative data a
Page 65 and 66: Table 2 Demographic statistics Mean
Page 67 and 68: Table 3 Comparison of SHB pre- and
Page 69 and 70: was no significant change (t = 1.28
Page 71 and 72: subscale (n = 5); T1 M = 16.80 (SD
Page 73 and 74: treatment participants would have o
Page 75: At T2 there were significant differ
Page 79 and 80: sample size or greater effect size
Page 81 and 82: 3.2.1. Content analysis 3.2. Qualit
Page 83 and 84: analysis resulted in the descriptio
Page 85 and 86: During the creating subcategories a
Page 87 and 88: coded the entire data set. There we
Page 89 and 90: anxiety. After ethical clearance wa
Page 91 and 92: SHB group symptoms when compared to
Page 93 and 94: pain, fatigue, and poor health, tha
Page 95 and 96: 3.4. Limitations The results of thi
Page 97 and 98: usy schedules, worry about reading
Page 99 and 100: attery of tests is not recommended
Page 101 and 102: ecommended that the program is exte
Page 103 and 104: 4. REFERENCES American Psychiatric
Page 105 and 106: Barsky, A. J., Geringer, E., & Wool
Page 107 and 108: Coull, G, & Morris, P. G. (2011). T
Page 109 and 110: Furer, P., Walker, J. R., & Freesto
Page 111 and 112: Lidbeck, J. (1997). Group therapy f
Page 113 and 114: Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., &
Page 115 and 116: Salkovskis, P. M., Rimes, K. A., Wa
Page 117 and 118: Taylor, S., Thordarson, D. S., Jang
Page 119 and 120: 5. APPENDICIES Appendix A Contents
Page 121 and 122: o Week 4 o Week 5 o Things to Remem
Page 123 and 124: Appendix B SELF-HELP PROGRAM FOR HE
Page 125 and 126: Table C2 Comparison of SHB complete
Page 127 and 128:
Table C4 Comparison of SHB and WLC
Page 129 and 130:
Table C6 Comparison of WLC pre- and
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix D Draft of unconstrained c
Page 133 and 134:
Questionnaires the questionnaires T
show all

Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?