Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor
Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor
Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
married (71%) <strong>and</strong> almost all participants were Caucasian (93%). <strong>All</strong> participants had<br />
completed high school <strong>and</strong> most had some post-secondary education (79%). The control<br />
group had an overrepresentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who were unmarried (50%), students<br />
(75%), hav<strong>in</strong>g more than a high school education (100%), <strong>and</strong> <strong>not</strong> tak<strong>in</strong>g psychotropic<br />
medication (25%). Analyses (χ 2 ) failed to show statistically significant group differences;<br />
However, the assumptions <strong>of</strong> χ 2 were violated (because <strong>of</strong> the small sample size) mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the analyses <strong>in</strong>valid.<br />
3.1.3. SHB results <strong>and</strong> with<strong>in</strong>-group comparisons<br />
ITT analyses <strong>and</strong> results for the SHB <strong>and</strong> WLC groups are reported below.<br />
Analyses were also conducted for participants who completed the entire study, exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
those who dropped out. Those results were very similar to the ITT analyses <strong>and</strong> they are<br />
reported <strong>in</strong> Appendix C.<br />
SHB participants experienced significant reductions <strong>in</strong> health anxiety symptoms<br />
based on their SHAI <strong>and</strong> MIHT primary outcome measure scores (see Table 3). SHB<br />
scores on the SHAI were compared to the healthy normative mean reported <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Salkovskis et al., (2002) validation study (Table 3). The SHAI T1 scores were above<br />
average but they were reduced <strong>by</strong> T3; a statistically significant improvement (t = 3.68, df<br />
= 9, p = .003; power = .91 [high power]; see Table 3). A large effect size was detected (d<br />
= 1.75). These results are cl<strong>in</strong>ically significant because the SHAI scores were outside the<br />
healthy normative range at T1 (range M = 0.20 - 24.60) but they were with<strong>in</strong> that range<br />
53