Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table C5 Comparison of SHB and WLC completers post-treatment and post-wait-list means using independent samples t tests SHB at T3 WLC at T3 Equality of variance Sig. (1-tailed) Measure M (SD) M (SD) F Sig. t df p value SHAI MIHT 20.33 (6.74) 38.00 (6.00) 0.20 .667 -4.23 8 .002** Cognition 21.00 (3.03) 24.50 (1.29) 12.31 .008 u -2.51 7 .020* Note. SHB = self-help book group; WLC = wait-list control group; T = time; SHAI = Short Health Anxiety Inventory; MIHT = Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SF-36 = Short Form 36 Health Survey; PCS = Physical Component Summary; MCS = Mental Component Summary. U Unequal variance assumed. *p < .05. **p < .01. Behaviour 24.50 (4.59) 29.25 (1.89) 2.46 .155 -1.93 8 .029 Perception 25.83 (5.64) 37.00 (0.82) 18.33 .003 u -4.78 5 .002** Affect 23.83 (3.87) 26.25 (1.26) 2.60 .146 -1.19 8 .135 CES-D 10.00 (6.07) 23.25 (14.22) 2.73 .137 -2.07 8 .037 SF-36 PCS 50.14 (6.79) 48.60 (10.45) 0.54 .484 0.29 8 .391 MCS 30.59 (9.92) 26.55 (13.28) 0.15 .712 0.56 8 .298 115
Table C6 Comparison of WLC pre- and mid-wait-list means using paired samples t tests Pre-wait-list Mid-wait-list Paired Sig. (1-tailed) Measure M (SD) M(SD) correlation t df p value SHAI MIHT 29.00(9.42) 34.75 (5.91) .74 -1.80 3 .085 Cognition 25.50 (2.38) 25.25 (2.50) .25 0.17 3 .439 Behaviour 30.00 (2.71) 30.50 (3.87) .99 -0.78 3 .248 Perception 37.75 (4.79) 37.50 (1.29) .03 0.10 3 .463 Affect 26.75 (1.50) 25.50 (2.38) .42 1.13 3 .171 CES-D SF-36 21.25 (10.43) 22.25 (6.24) -.92 -0.12 3 .455 PCS 50.45 (6.75) 45.65 (5.63) .14 1.17 3 .163 MCS 50.00 (10.28) 35.90 (17.37) -.63 1.48 3 .118 Note. WLC = wait-list control group; SHAI = Short Health Anxiety Inventory; MIHT = Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SF-36 = Short Form 36 Health Survey; PCS = Physical Component Summary; MCS = Mental Component Summary. 116
Page 1 and 2:
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED FEASIBILITY T
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract The purpose of this feasib
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgement This research was f
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Abstract………
Page 9 and 10:
3.2.1. Content analysis…………
Page 11 and 12:
List of figures Figure 1. The cogni
Page 13 and 14:
Table C7. Comparison of WLC pre- an
Page 15 and 16:
this study will inform a future, la
Page 17 and 18:
Disorders Draft (APA, 2010) propose
Page 19 and 20:
The cognitive symptoms of health an
Page 21 and 22:
somatosensory amplification have a
Page 23 and 24:
clients with health anxiety from cl
Page 25 and 26:
Interview Schedule [Robins, Helzer,
Page 27 and 28:
Today, effective clinically-support
Page 29 and 30:
decreased disease conviction, witho
Page 31 and 32:
identification and reattribution of
Page 33 and 34:
within treatment sessions and as ho
Page 35 and 36:
more efficacious than wait-list con
Page 37 and 38:
participants‘ functioning. The CB
Page 39 and 40:
at follow-up (e.g., Bouman, 2002, a
Page 41 and 42:
et al., 2003). Self-help treatments
Page 43 and 44:
1.2. Statement of purpose The purpo
Page 45 and 46:
an Internet format because it was m
Page 47 and 48:
� Do you carry things to use in t
Page 49 and 50:
dimensional scales: (a) affective s
Page 51 and 52:
severe (15 - 19), and extremely sev
Page 53 and 54:
86 indicate a poor alliance. The HA
Page 55 and 56:
included depression symptoms, gener
Page 57 and 58:
mailed Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 o
Page 59 and 60:
equests were honored. All randomize
Page 61 and 62:
literature; therefore, we had reaso
Page 63 and 64:
3. RESULTS 3.1. Quantitative data a
Page 65 and 66:
Table 2 Demographic statistics Mean
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3 Comparison of SHB pre- and
Page 69 and 70:
was no significant change (t = 1.28
Page 71 and 72:
subscale (n = 5); T1 M = 16.80 (SD
Page 73 and 74:
treatment participants would have o
Page 75 and 76:
At T2 there were significant differ
Page 77 and 78: Table 7 SHB and WLC effect size and
Page 79 and 80: sample size or greater effect size
Page 81 and 82: 3.2.1. Content analysis 3.2. Qualit
Page 83 and 84: analysis resulted in the descriptio
Page 85 and 86: During the creating subcategories a
Page 87 and 88: coded the entire data set. There we
Page 89 and 90: anxiety. After ethical clearance wa
Page 91 and 92: SHB group symptoms when compared to
Page 93 and 94: pain, fatigue, and poor health, tha
Page 95 and 96: 3.4. Limitations The results of thi
Page 97 and 98: usy schedules, worry about reading
Page 99 and 100: attery of tests is not recommended
Page 101 and 102: ecommended that the program is exte
Page 103 and 104: 4. REFERENCES American Psychiatric
Page 105 and 106: Barsky, A. J., Geringer, E., & Wool
Page 107 and 108: Coull, G, & Morris, P. G. (2011). T
Page 109 and 110: Furer, P., Walker, J. R., & Freesto
Page 111 and 112: Lidbeck, J. (1997). Group therapy f
Page 113 and 114: Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., &
Page 115 and 116: Salkovskis, P. M., Rimes, K. A., Wa
Page 117 and 118: Taylor, S., Thordarson, D. S., Jang
Page 119 and 120: 5. APPENDICIES Appendix A Contents
Page 121 and 122: o Week 4 o Week 5 o Things to Remem
Page 123 and 124: Appendix B SELF-HELP PROGRAM FOR HE
Page 125 and 126: Table C2 Comparison of SHB complete
Page 127: Table C4 Comparison of SHB and WLC
Page 131 and 132: Appendix D Draft of unconstrained c
Page 133 and 134: Questionnaires the questionnaires T
show all

Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?