Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table C3 Comparison of SHB and WLC completers pre-treatment and pre-wait-list means using independent samples t tests Measure SHB at T1 M (SD) WLC at T1 M (SD) Equality of variances t df Sig. (1-tailed) p value F Sig. SHAI 35.17 (2.14) 29.00 (9.42) 4.20 .075 1.59 8 .076 MIHT Cognition 22.17 (3.49) 25.50 (2.38) 0.75 .412 -1.66 8 .068 Behaviour 31.17 (2.48) 30.00 (2.71) 0.03 .862 0.70 8 .251 Perception 33.83 (2.86) 37.75 (4.79) 0.74 .414 -1.64 8 .070 Affect 26.50 (1.97) 26.75 (1.50) 1.00 .347 -0.21 8 .413 CES-D 25.33 (10.19) 21.25 (10.43) 0.02 .885 0.62 8 .278 SF-36 PCS 51.32 (8.92) 50.45 (6.75) 0.47 .513 0.17 8 .437 MCS 34.97 (10.49) 50.00 (10.28) 3.29 .107 -2.76 8 .013* Note. SHB = self-help book group; WLC = wait-list control group; T = time; SHAI = Short Health Anxiety Inventory; MIHT = Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SF-36= Short Form 36 Health Survey; PCS = Physical Component Summary; MCS = Mental Component Summary. *p < .05. 113
Table C4 Comparison of SHB and WLC completers mid-treatment and mid-wait-list means using independent samples t tests SHB at T2 WLC at T2 Equality of variances Sig. (1-tailed) Measure M (SD) M(SD) F Sig. t df p value SHAI MIHT 30.33 (4.63) 34.75 (5.91) 0.26 .623 -1.33 8 .111 Cognition 21.17 (4.26) 25.25 (2.50) 0.52 .489 -1.71 8 .063 Note. SHB = self-help book group; WLC = wait-list control group; T = time; SHAI = Short Health Anxiety Inventory; MIHT = Multidimensional Inventory of Hypochondriacal Traits; CES-D = Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; SF-36= Short Form 36 Health Survey; PCS = Physical Component Summary; MCS = Mental Component Summary. U Unequal variance assumed. *p < .05. Behaviour 26.00 (7.01) 30.50 (3.87) 1.42 .267 -1.16 8 .141 Perception 29.33 (6.28) 37.50 (1.29) 5.29 .051 -2.52 8 .018* Affect 21.83 (5.64) 25.50 (2.38) 1.79 .217 -1.21 8 .130 CES-D 18.67 (3.44) 22.25 (6.24) 6.01 .040 u -1.05 4 .176 SF-36 PCS 48.23 (10.16) 45.65 (5.63) 0.46 .516 0.46 8 .330 MCS 32.96 (7.30) 35.90 (17.37) 4.61 .064 -0.38 8 .358 114
Page 1 and 2:
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED FEASIBILITY T
Page 3 and 4:
Abstract The purpose of this feasib
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgement This research was f
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Abstract………
Page 9 and 10:
3.2.1. Content analysis…………
Page 11 and 12:
List of figures Figure 1. The cogni
Page 13 and 14:
Table C7. Comparison of WLC pre- an
Page 15 and 16:
this study will inform a future, la
Page 17 and 18:
Disorders Draft (APA, 2010) propose
Page 19 and 20:
The cognitive symptoms of health an
Page 21 and 22:
somatosensory amplification have a
Page 23 and 24:
clients with health anxiety from cl
Page 25 and 26:
Interview Schedule [Robins, Helzer,
Page 27 and 28:
Today, effective clinically-support
Page 29 and 30:
decreased disease conviction, witho
Page 31 and 32:
identification and reattribution of
Page 33 and 34:
within treatment sessions and as ho
Page 35 and 36:
more efficacious than wait-list con
Page 37 and 38:
participants‘ functioning. The CB
Page 39 and 40:
at follow-up (e.g., Bouman, 2002, a
Page 41 and 42:
et al., 2003). Self-help treatments
Page 43 and 44:
1.2. Statement of purpose The purpo
Page 45 and 46:
an Internet format because it was m
Page 47 and 48:
� Do you carry things to use in t
Page 49 and 50:
dimensional scales: (a) affective s
Page 51 and 52:
severe (15 - 19), and extremely sev
Page 53 and 54:
86 indicate a poor alliance. The HA
Page 55 and 56:
included depression symptoms, gener
Page 57 and 58:
mailed Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 o
Page 59 and 60:
equests were honored. All randomize
Page 61 and 62:
literature; therefore, we had reaso
Page 63 and 64:
3. RESULTS 3.1. Quantitative data a
Page 65 and 66:
Table 2 Demographic statistics Mean
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3 Comparison of SHB pre- and
Page 69 and 70:
was no significant change (t = 1.28
Page 71 and 72:
subscale (n = 5); T1 M = 16.80 (SD
Page 73 and 74:
treatment participants would have o
Page 75 and 76: At T2 there were significant differ
Page 77 and 78: Table 7 SHB and WLC effect size and
Page 79 and 80: sample size or greater effect size
Page 81 and 82: 3.2.1. Content analysis 3.2. Qualit
Page 83 and 84: analysis resulted in the descriptio
Page 85 and 86: During the creating subcategories a
Page 87 and 88: coded the entire data set. There we
Page 89 and 90: anxiety. After ethical clearance wa
Page 91 and 92: SHB group symptoms when compared to
Page 93 and 94: pain, fatigue, and poor health, tha
Page 95 and 96: 3.4. Limitations The results of thi
Page 97 and 98: usy schedules, worry about reading
Page 99 and 100: attery of tests is not recommended
Page 101 and 102: ecommended that the program is exte
Page 103 and 104: 4. REFERENCES American Psychiatric
Page 105 and 106: Barsky, A. J., Geringer, E., & Wool
Page 107 and 108: Coull, G, & Morris, P. G. (2011). T
Page 109 and 110: Furer, P., Walker, J. R., & Freesto
Page 111 and 112: Lidbeck, J. (1997). Group therapy f
Page 113 and 114: Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., &
Page 115 and 116: Salkovskis, P. M., Rimes, K. A., Wa
Page 117 and 118: Taylor, S., Thordarson, D. S., Jang
Page 119 and 120: 5. APPENDICIES Appendix A Contents
Page 121 and 122: o Week 4 o Week 5 o Things to Remem
Page 123 and 124: Appendix B SELF-HELP PROGRAM FOR HE
Page 125: Table C2 Comparison of SHB complete
Page 129 and 130: Table C6 Comparison of WLC pre- and
Page 131 and 132: Appendix D Draft of unconstrained c
Page 133 and 134: Questionnaires the questionnaires T
show all

Contents of It's not All in Your Head by Asmundson and Taylor

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?