- Page 1 and 2: RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED FEASIBILITY T
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract The purpose of this feasib
- Page 5 and 6: Acknowledgement This research was f
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents Abstract………
- Page 9: 3.2.1. Content analysis…………
- Page 13 and 14: Table C7. Comparison of WLC pre- an
- Page 15 and 16: this study will inform a future, la
- Page 17 and 18: Disorders Draft (APA, 2010) propose
- Page 19 and 20: The cognitive symptoms of health an
- Page 21 and 22: somatosensory amplification have a
- Page 23 and 24: clients with health anxiety from cl
- Page 25 and 26: Interview Schedule [Robins, Helzer,
- Page 27 and 28: Today, effective clinically-support
- Page 29 and 30: decreased disease conviction, witho
- Page 31 and 32: identification and reattribution of
- Page 33 and 34: within treatment sessions and as ho
- Page 35 and 36: more efficacious than wait-list con
- Page 37 and 38: participants‘ functioning. The CB
- Page 39 and 40: at follow-up (e.g., Bouman, 2002, a
- Page 41 and 42: et al., 2003). Self-help treatments
- Page 43 and 44: 1.2. Statement of purpose The purpo
- Page 45 and 46: an Internet format because it was m
- Page 47 and 48: � Do you carry things to use in t
- Page 49 and 50: dimensional scales: (a) affective s
- Page 51 and 52: severe (15 - 19), and extremely sev
- Page 53 and 54: 86 indicate a poor alliance. The HA
- Page 55 and 56: included depression symptoms, gener
- Page 57 and 58: mailed Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 o
- Page 59 and 60: equests were honored. All randomize
- Page 61 and 62:
literature; therefore, we had reaso
- Page 63 and 64:
3. RESULTS 3.1. Quantitative data a
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 2 Demographic statistics Mean
- Page 67 and 68:
Table 3 Comparison of SHB pre- and
- Page 69 and 70:
was no significant change (t = 1.28
- Page 71 and 72:
subscale (n = 5); T1 M = 16.80 (SD
- Page 73 and 74:
treatment participants would have o
- Page 75 and 76:
At T2 there were significant differ
- Page 77 and 78:
Table 7 SHB and WLC effect size and
- Page 79 and 80:
sample size or greater effect size
- Page 81 and 82:
3.2.1. Content analysis 3.2. Qualit
- Page 83 and 84:
analysis resulted in the descriptio
- Page 85 and 86:
During the creating subcategories a
- Page 87 and 88:
coded the entire data set. There we
- Page 89 and 90:
anxiety. After ethical clearance wa
- Page 91 and 92:
SHB group symptoms when compared to
- Page 93 and 94:
pain, fatigue, and poor health, tha
- Page 95 and 96:
3.4. Limitations The results of thi
- Page 97 and 98:
usy schedules, worry about reading
- Page 99 and 100:
attery of tests is not recommended
- Page 101 and 102:
ecommended that the program is exte
- Page 103 and 104:
4. REFERENCES American Psychiatric
- Page 105 and 106:
Barsky, A. J., Geringer, E., & Wool
- Page 107 and 108:
Coull, G, & Morris, P. G. (2011). T
- Page 109 and 110:
Furer, P., Walker, J. R., & Freesto
- Page 111 and 112:
Lidbeck, J. (1997). Group therapy f
- Page 113 and 114:
Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., &
- Page 115 and 116:
Salkovskis, P. M., Rimes, K. A., Wa
- Page 117 and 118:
Taylor, S., Thordarson, D. S., Jang
- Page 119 and 120:
5. APPENDICIES Appendix A Contents
- Page 121 and 122:
o Week 4 o Week 5 o Things to Remem
- Page 123 and 124:
Appendix B SELF-HELP PROGRAM FOR HE
- Page 125 and 126:
Table C2 Comparison of SHB complete
- Page 127 and 128:
Table C4 Comparison of SHB and WLC
- Page 129 and 130:
Table C6 Comparison of WLC pre- and
- Page 131 and 132:
Appendix D Draft of unconstrained c
- Page 133 and 134:
Questionnaires the questionnaires T