Haiti – Dominican Republic - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Haiti – Dominican Republic - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP Haiti – Dominican Republic - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

postconflict.unep.ch
from postconflict.unep.ch More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Executive summaryThis report presents the findings, conclusions andrecommendations of an 18 month long assessmentof the border between the two countries thatshare the Caribbean island of Hispaniola Haiti,the poorest country in the Western Hemisphereand the Dominican Republic, a middle-incomecountry. It is along this 380 km border that there isthe most contact between the two populations,and the highest likelihood of tension and conflictbetween them. It is here too that there is the greatestopportunity to have a positive impact on thecomplex relationship between the two countries.Paradoxically the challenges in the border zoneare driven both by the interdependencies of thetwo countries and by the stark contrasts in theeconomic, social and environmental conditions.These differences manifest themselves in thechronic poverty and severe environmentaldegradation seen in many areas on the Haitianside of the border, as well as illegal transboundaryexploitation of natural resources.The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)and the United Nations Development Programme(UNDP) accompanied the Governments of Haitiand the Dominican Republic, through theirMinistries of Environment, in undertaking a detailedassessment of the border area. The assessmentcovered both countries, however, emphasis wasput on the Haitian side where the information isscarce and the environmental problems are morepressing.This assessment has three complementaryobjectives:• Firstly, it sets out to assess how the use of naturalresources and environmental degradation inthe border zone are contributing to disastervulnerability, conflict risk, poverty and unsustainablepractices. This also includes assessing howresource dependent livelihoods are respondingto these challenges.• Secondly, it presents an analysis of issues andtrends, as well as of underlying driving forces,that affect the situation in the border zone.• Finally, it provides practical recommendationsfor the two governments and their internationalpartners on how to mitigate the identifiedrisks, capitalize on the opportunities, increasetransboundary environmental cooperation,and build resilience to identified areas ofvulnerability.The assessment team found that the key issuesof concern identified in the border zone can beconnected to four interlinked driving forces:• Haitian poverty, food insecurity and underdevelopmentaffect virtually all parts of theborder zone.• Environmental degradation manifests itselfmainly in soil erosion, deforestation, and adegraded marine environment.• Weak governance, especially on the Haitianside of the border, affects all facets of theeconomy and society.• Finally, the economic and resource inequalitiesbetween the two countries are the cause ofmany of the transboundary problems identifiedin the border zone.Examples of some of the key issues in the borderzone include the illegal extraction and tradeof natural resources (mainly charcoal, but alsofirewood and marine resources), agriculture, andlarge numbers of people crossing illegally fromrural areas in Haiti into the Dominican Republic insearch of livelihoods due to the degradation ofland and a surplus of labour on the Haitian side.Several of the noted problems, such as deforestationand soil erosion, are very large scale and havebeen developing for generations. Environmentaldegradation in the worst affected parts of theHaitian border zone is almost completely irreversible,due to a near total loss of vegetation coverand productive topsoil across wide areas.Several of the identified issues related to theenvironment and the use of natural resourcesalso present a short term but high instability andconflict risk to the relations between the two6 Haiti Dominican Republic: Environmental challenges in the border zone

countries. These issues include the uncontrolledtransboundary charcoal trade; illegal farmingand tree cutting on Dominican land in generaland inside Dominican Republic protected areasin particular; unclear marine territorial delimitationand illegal transboundary fishing; and the floodingof land and infrastructure due to the rapid rise ofLake Azuei and Lake Enriquillo. The uncontrolledtransboundary charcoal trade and tree fellinghas, for example, already triggered conflict thathas led to violence.At present the overall situation is gradually deteriorating.If current trends continue in the border zone,including practices similar to those which havealready caused much of the degradation in Haiti,soil erosion and a reduction in land productivity willworsen significantly on the Dominican side of theborder zone as well. This scenario could changedramatically as a result of shocks or suddenchanges, such as natural disasters. Such a shockmight accelerate the decline and further degradethe stability and development of the border zone.Climate change is also expected to have anegative impact on the Caribbean in the longterm: the average temperature, the variability ofrainfall, and the frequency and average intensityof hurricanes are all expected to increase. All ofthese effects will have serious consequences forthe area in question: an adjustment in precipitationrates alone would have a negative impact on rainfed agriculture, which is the mainstay of the borderzone economy.Most of the driving forces identified are national inscale, which means that it would not be viable toonly develop stand alone environmental or localsolutions. An integrated and larger scale approachis needed. For example rural food insecurity andextreme poverty are in part driving the unsustainableslash and burn agricultural practices onthe Haitian side and triggering the associatedextensive soil erosion and deforestation. Similarly,charcoal demand in the border area is low, butin Port-au-Prince it is high, thus driving the nationalcharcoal economy. A national scale solution onenergy is needed to resolve this matter. Finally, landtenure and tenant farming are major obstacles farmers understandably are prepared to invest onlyin land they either own or can confidently controlfor longer periods.On a more positive note the international relationshipbetween Haiti and the Dominican Republicis quite good, with meetings up to the highestpolitical levels taking place on a regular basis.Important progress has also been achieved bylocal and national initiatives, such as the financingof binational tree planting brigades within theframework of the Frontera Verde programme,commune level bi-national cooperation, andcooperation between local organizations andassociations on both sides of the border. Sustainableagricultural programmes, such as onesthat promote agroforestry, and the associatedtrade represent a major opportunity for povertyreduction in the border region. Such initiativescould provide a critical foundation for largerscale corrective action and investments in crisisprevention.It is with this more positive outlook in mind that thereport concludes with 14 detailed recommendationsthat should be developed and implementedby the two governments and their internationalpartners. If implemented, the recommendationsare expected to reduce chronic poverty andhunger in the border zone, while promoting moresustainable livelihood practices and enhancingthe resilience of the population to shocks andstresses. They also set out to preserve peaceful relationsbetween the two countries through increasednational and local level bilateral cooperation thatwill reduce tensions over border zone issues.The recommendations are divided into tenbi-national border zone recommendations andfour Haitian national scale recommendations.Most solutions will need to be bi-national or atleast bi-nationally agreed, due to the very highinter-connectivity of populations and issues acrossthe border.Bi-national border zonerecommendations1. Protecting and increasing the vegetationcover Continue to financially and politicallysupport the bi-national reforestationand agroforestry efforts. Increase technicalassistance to improve the quality, consistencyand sustainability of the re-forestation effortsand implement a more strategic program.Haiti Dominican Republic: Environmental challenges in the border zone7

countries. These issues include the uncontrolledtransboundary charcoal trade; illegal farming<strong>and</strong> tree cutting on <strong>Dominican</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in general<strong>and</strong> inside <strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong> protected areasin particular; unclear marine territorial delimitation<strong>and</strong> illegal transboundary fishing; <strong>and</strong> the floodingof l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> infrastructure due to the rapid rise ofLake Azuei <strong>and</strong> Lake Enriquillo. The uncontrolledtransboundary charcoal trade <strong>and</strong> tree fellinghas, for example, already triggered conflict thathas led to violence.At present the overall situation is gradually deteriorating.If current trends continue in the border zone,including practices similar to those which havealready caused much of the degradation in <strong>Haiti</strong>,soil erosion <strong>and</strong> a reduction in l<strong>and</strong> productivity willworsen significantly on the <strong>Dominican</strong> side of theborder zone as well. This scenario could changedramatically as a result of shocks or suddenchanges, such as natural disasters. Such a shockmight accelerate the decline <strong>and</strong> further degradethe stability <strong>and</strong> development of the border zone.Climate change is also expected to have anegative impact on the Caribbean in the longterm: the average temperature, the variability ofrainfall, <strong>and</strong> the frequency <strong>and</strong> average intensityof hurricanes are all expected to increase. All ofthese effects will have serious consequences forthe area in question: an adjustment in precipitationrates alone would have a negative impact on rainfed agriculture, which is the mainstay of the borderzone economy.Most of the driving forces identified are national inscale, which means that it would not be viable toonly develop st<strong>and</strong> alone environmental or localsolutions. An integrated <strong>and</strong> larger scale approachis needed. For example rural food insecurity <strong>and</strong>extreme poverty are in part driving the unsustainableslash <strong>and</strong> burn agricultural practices onthe <strong>Haiti</strong>an side <strong>and</strong> triggering the associatedextensive soil erosion <strong>and</strong> deforestation. Similarly,charcoal dem<strong>and</strong> in the border area is low, butin Port-au-Prince it is high, thus driving the nationalcharcoal economy. A national scale solution onenergy is needed to resolve this matter. Finally, l<strong>and</strong>tenure <strong>and</strong> tenant farming are major obstacles <strong>–</strong>farmers underst<strong>and</strong>ably are prepared to invest onlyin l<strong>and</strong> they either own or can confidently controlfor longer periods.On a more positive note the international relationshipbetween <strong>Haiti</strong> <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong>is quite good, with meetings up to the highestpolitical levels taking place on a regular basis.Important progress has also been achieved bylocal <strong>and</strong> national initiatives, such as the financingof binational tree planting brigades within theframework of the Frontera Verde programme,commune level bi-national cooperation, <strong>and</strong>cooperation between local organizations <strong>and</strong>associations on both sides of the border. Sustainableagricultural programmes, such as onesthat promote agroforestry, <strong>and</strong> the associatedtrade represent a major opportunity for povertyreduction in the border region. Such initiativescould provide a critical foundation for largerscale corrective action <strong>and</strong> investments in crisisprevention.It is with this more positive outlook in mind that thereport concludes with 14 detailed recommendationsthat should be developed <strong>and</strong> implementedby the two governments <strong>and</strong> their internationalpartners. If implemented, the recommendationsare expected to reduce chronic poverty <strong>and</strong>hunger in the border zone, while promoting moresustainable livelihood practices <strong>and</strong> enhancingthe resilience of the population to shocks <strong>and</strong>stresses. They also set out to preserve peaceful relationsbetween the two countries through increasednational <strong>and</strong> local level bilateral cooperation thatwill reduce tensions over border zone issues.The recommendations are divided into tenbi-national border zone recommendations <strong>and</strong>four <strong>Haiti</strong>an national scale recommendations.Most solutions will need to be bi-national or atleast bi-nationally agreed, due to the very highinter-connectivity of populations <strong>and</strong> issues acrossthe border.Bi-national border zonerecommendations1. Protecting <strong>and</strong> increasing the vegetationcover <strong>–</strong> Continue to financially <strong>and</strong> politicallysupport the bi-national reforestation<strong>and</strong> agroforestry efforts. Increase technicalassistance to improve the quality, consistency<strong>and</strong> sustainability of the re-forestation efforts<strong>and</strong> implement a more strategic program.<strong>Haiti</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong>: Environmental challenges in the border zone7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!