Haiti – Dominican Republic - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

Haiti – Dominican Republic - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP Haiti – Dominican Republic - Disasters and Conflicts - UNEP

postconflict.unep.ch
from postconflict.unep.ch More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Case study 1. Food insecurity in the border zoneSocio-economic surveys of the Haitian side of the two watersheds, Pedernales and Massacre, were undertaken by theEarth Institute of Columbia University and the Haitian State University. They found that food insecurity was the mainconcern of most households. The lack of sufficient food to cover the daily needs of the population drives much of thecross-border movement, and the expansion of detrimental practices, such as charcoal production, seen in these areas.In respect to household concerns, food insecurity was followed by lack of money, bad health and poor education.Figure 1 shows the level of food insecurity in the Massacre and Pedernales watersheds. It clearly shows that a largemajority of the population are experiencing a lack of sufficient food. ‘Severely food insecure’ is here defined as ahousehold that has experienced running out of food or going to bed hungry at some point over the past 30 days.‘Moderately food insecure’ is defined as a household that has cut back on quantity by reducing the size of meals ornumber of meals, rarely or sometimes, but not running out of food, or going to bed hungry.Figure 1. Food insecurity in the Massacre and Pedernales watersheds.Massacre (n=159)Pedernales(n=70)Food SecureSeverely Food InsecureModerately Food InsecureFood SecureSeverely Food InsecureModerately Food InsecureIn terms of demographics, having a higher number of children relates positively to higher food insecurity scores in theMassacre watershed, while gender seems to be independent from food insecurity levels. Interestingly there appear tobe significant differences in food security across eco-zones. There is a higher prevalence of people who are severelyfood insecure in the middle altitude and mountainous areas (Figure 2), which suggests important differences in thelivelihood possibilities and levels of vulnerability between areas and communities in the watershed.Figure 2. Differences in food insecurity within the Pedernales watershedFood security levels across eco-zones -Pedernales (n=70)Food SecureModerately Food SecureSeverely Food InsecureCostal area Middle altitude area Montainous areaLevels of food security also vary throughout the year, with two peaks of food insecurity for each watershed. The firstone occurs at the end of the dry season in March April in the Massacre area and slightly later, in May June, inthe Pedernales watershed. The second food insecurity peak is common to the two watersheds and takes place inOctober and November. It has a more powerful impact on the Massacre watershed (Figure 3).40 Haiti Dominican Republic: Environmental challenges in the border zone

Figure 3. Seasonality of food insecurityMonths with lack of foodacross watershedsTotal (n=224)Massacre(n=158)Pedernales(n=66)47%32%24%32%29%Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecThe household surveys also included information of livelihoods. Farming (defined as generating at least 40% of thetotal household income) and charcoal production, have a strong positive relationship with food insecurity. Familiesengaged in commerce were generally more food secure and not as poor.food insecurity on the Haitian side of the Massacreand Pedernales watersheds, a main concern formany Haitian households.The population on the Haitian side of the borderzone has increased much more quickly than it hasdone in the rest of the country. The populationsof the communities in the border zone for whichdata is available have grown by nearly 4% peryear, compared with 1.3% across the country asa whole. 152, 153, 154 The Haitian population in theborder zone is very young: 68% of people areunder 25 a much higher percentage than inthe rest of the country. 155 The relative youth ofthe border population shows the attraction ofthe border zone for young often unemployed Haitians.Dominican RepublicIn the Dominican Republic, the border provincesare Montecristi, Dajabón, Elías Piña, Independencia,Pedernales, Bahoruco and SantiagoRodríguez, and these seven provinces represent22% of the national territory. However, only 5.2%of the total Dominican Republic population livesthere, leaving the region with a relatively lowpopulation density. The Dominican population hasa long history of internal migration away from therural areas towards the cities. This is particularly truein border zone provinces, which are the poorestrural parts of the Dominican Republic.According to a UNDP study on the socio-economiccontext of the Dominican border region, 156 theborder provinces of Dominican Republic showlevels of poverty higher than the national average.Close to 28% of the Dominican border populationlive in extreme poverty, while 54% live in poverty.The incidence of extreme poverty in the borderzone is twice that of the rest of the country. Inthe Dajabon and Pedernales provinces, extremepoverty reaches 27.6% and 25.9% respectively,while poverty reaches 51.6% and 57.5%. 157 Anotherstudy shows similar results, highlighting the weakerand poorer states of provinces along the border.For example, malnutrition rates for children belowthe age of five are higher in the border provinces(ranging from 16 23%) than in the average of thecountry (10%). 158MigrationThe great majority of the migration by landbetween the two countries is Haitians travelling tothe Dominican Republic, both legally and illegally.The limited migration in the opposite direction ismainly Dominican businessmen and skilled labouron short term visits.Large scale short-term and long-term migrationfrom Haiti to the Dominican Republic occursall along the border zone. Some of the Haitianmigrants spread out throughout the DominicanRepublic, looking for work as unskilled labour inHaiti Dominican Republic: Environmental challenges in the border zone41

Case study 1. Food insecurity in the border zoneSocio-economic surveys of the <strong>Haiti</strong>an side of the two watersheds, Pedernales <strong>and</strong> Massacre, were undertaken by theEarth Institute of Columbia University <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Haiti</strong>an State University. They found that food insecurity was the mainconcern of most households. The lack of sufficient food to cover the daily needs of the population drives much of thecross-border movement, <strong>and</strong> the expansion of detrimental practices, such as charcoal production, seen in these areas.In respect to household concerns, food insecurity was followed by lack of money, bad health <strong>and</strong> poor education.Figure 1 shows the level of food insecurity in the Massacre <strong>and</strong> Pedernales watersheds. It clearly shows that a largemajority of the population are experiencing a lack of sufficient food. ‘Severely food insecure’ is here defined as ahousehold that has experienced running out of food or going to bed hungry at some point over the past 30 days.‘Moderately food insecure’ is defined as a household that has cut back on quantity by reducing the size of meals ornumber of meals, rarely or sometimes, but not running out of food, or going to bed hungry.Figure 1. Food insecurity in the Massacre <strong>and</strong> Pedernales watersheds.Massacre (n=159)Pedernales(n=70)Food SecureSeverely Food InsecureModerately Food InsecureFood SecureSeverely Food InsecureModerately Food InsecureIn terms of demographics, having a higher number of children relates positively to higher food insecurity scores in theMassacre watershed, while gender seems to be independent from food insecurity levels. Interestingly there appear tobe significant differences in food security across eco-zones. There is a higher prevalence of people who are severelyfood insecure in the middle altitude <strong>and</strong> mountainous areas (Figure 2), which suggests important differences in thelivelihood possibilities <strong>and</strong> levels of vulnerability between areas <strong>and</strong> communities in the watershed.Figure 2. Differences in food insecurity within the Pedernales watershedFood security levels across eco-zones -Pedernales (n=70)Food SecureModerately Food SecureSeverely Food InsecureCostal area Middle altitude area Montainous areaLevels of food security also vary throughout the year, with two peaks of food insecurity for each watershed. The firstone occurs at the end of the dry season in March <strong>–</strong> April in the Massacre area <strong>and</strong> slightly later, in May <strong>–</strong> June, inthe Pedernales watershed. The second food insecurity peak is common to the two watersheds <strong>and</strong> takes place inOctober <strong>and</strong> November. It has a more powerful impact on the Massacre watershed (Figure 3).40 <strong>Haiti</strong> <strong>–</strong> <strong>Dominican</strong> <strong>Republic</strong>: Environmental challenges in the border zone

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!