02.12.2012 Views

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Apply now V#, i+1 := I + k ∗ A#(·, x, Dx) to QH, i+1(g, gb); by (4.36) this gives<br />

whence<br />

Nb+N �<br />

V#, i+1QH, i+1(g, gb) =<br />

Similarly,<br />

j=0<br />

ψj(ϕjg+k ∗ Cj(·, x, Dx)QH, i+1(g, gb))+K (1)<br />

H, i+1 (g, gb)<br />

= g − k ∗ AR(·, x, Dx)QH, i+1(g, gb)) + K (1)<br />

H, i+1 (g, gb),<br />

Vi+1QH, i+1(g, gb) = g + K (1)<br />

H, i+1 (g, gb) = f.<br />

γyB#(t, x ′ Nb �<br />

, Dx)QH, i+1(g, gb) = ψj(ϕjgb+γyCH, j(t, x)QH, i+1(g, gb))+K (2)<br />

H, i+1 (g, gb)<br />

j=0<br />

= gb − b0γyQH, i+1(g, gb) + K (2)<br />

H, i+1 (g, gb),<br />

which entails<br />

γyB(t, x ′ , Dx)QH, i+1(g, gb) = gb + K (2)<br />

H, i+1 (g, gb) = h.<br />

This proves surjectivity of VH, i+1, provided δ is sufficiently small.<br />

All in all, we have shown that there exists a unique solution v of (4.30) in the space<br />

Z. �<br />

4.3 Problems in domains<br />

In this section let Ω ⊂ R n+1 be a domain <strong>with</strong> compact C 2 -<strong>boundary</strong> Γ which decomposes<br />

according to Γ = ΓD ∪ ΓN and dist(ΓD, ΓN) > 0. Let further 1 < p < ∞ and J = [0, T ].<br />

We consider the problem<br />

⎧<br />

⎨<br />

⎩<br />

v + k ∗ A(·, x, Dx)v = f, t ∈ J, x ∈ Ω,<br />

v = g, t ∈ J, x ∈ ΓD,<br />

B(t, x, Dx)v = h, t ∈ J, x ∈ ΓN.<br />

Here the differential operators A(t, x, Dx) and B(t, x, Dx) are of the form<br />

respectively<br />

(4.40)<br />

A(t, x, Dx) = −a(t, x) : ∇ 2 x + a1(t, x) · ∇x + a0(t, x), t ∈ J, x ∈ Ω, (4.41)<br />

B(t, x, Dx) = b(t, x) · ∇x + b0(t, x), t ∈ J, x ∈ ΓN.<br />

Put Y = Bs1 pp(J; Lp(ΓN)) ∩ Lp(J; Bs2 pp(ΓN)) <strong>with</strong> s1 = α( 1 1<br />

2 − 2p ), s2 = 1 − 1<br />

p , as well as<br />

M = �<br />

ri> si Cr1 (J; C(ΓN)) ∩ C(J; Cr2 (ΓN)). Let further ν(x) denote the outer unit<br />

normal of Ω at x ∈ Γ. Then our assumptions read as follows.<br />

(H1) (kernel): k ∈ K1 �<br />

1<br />

(α, θ) <strong>with</strong> θ < π and α ∈ (0, 2)\ p , 2<br />

2p−1 , �<br />

2 1 3<br />

p−1 , 1 + p , 1 + 2p−1 ;<br />

(H2) (smoothness of coefficients): a ∈ Cul(J×Ω, Sym{n+1}), a1 ∈ L∞(J×Ω, Rn+1 ), a0 ∈<br />

L∞(J × Ω), as well as (b, b0) ∈ Y n+2 in case p > n + 1 + 2/α, and (b, b0) ∈ M n+2 , otherwise;<br />

(H3) (uniform ellipticity): ∃c0 > 0 s.t. a(t, x)ξ · ξ ≥ c0|ξ| 2 , t ∈ J, x ∈ Ω, ξ ∈ Rn+1 ;<br />

(H4) (normality): b(t, x) · ν(x) �= 0, t ∈ J, x ∈ ΓN.<br />

The aim of this section is to prove the subsequent result.<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!