02.12.2012 Views

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We remark that the constant C2 stems from finding an upper bound for the integral<br />

� T2<br />

T1 |t − τ|−β dt, τ ∈ [0, T2], where β < 1 is a fixed number. Thus if T1 and T2 vary<br />

<strong>with</strong>in the set [0, T ], C2 can be chosen to be independent of those numbers.<br />

Set<br />

and<br />

|m| M T 1 = |m| L∞([0,T1]×R n ) + [m] C r 1 ([0,T1]; C(R n )) + [m] C([0,T1]; C r 2 (R n ))<br />

[m] M T 1 , T 2 = [m] C r 1 ([T1,T2]; C(R n )) + [m] C([T1,T2]; C r 2 (R n )) .<br />

Then our observations can be summarized as follows.<br />

Lemma 4.2.2 Suppose that 1 < p < ∞, 0 < T , 0 ≤ T1 ≤ T2 ≤ T , and 0 <<br />

si < ri < 1 for i = 1, 2. Let Y T2 s1 = Bpp([0; T2]; Lp(Rn )) ∩ Lp([0, T2]; Bs2 pp(Rn )), and<br />

M T2 r1 = C ([0, T2]; C(Rn )) ∩ C([0, T2]; Cr2 (Rn )). Then there exists a constant C > 0 not<br />

depending on T1 and T2, such that<br />

�<br />

|mf| Y T2 ≤ C<br />

(4.27)<br />

for all m ∈ M T2 and f ∈ Y T2 .<br />

4.2.3 Variable coefficients<br />

�<br />

|m| M T 1 |f| Y T 1 + |m| L∞([T1,T2]×R n )(1 + [m] M T 1 , T 2 )|f| Y T 2<br />

The goal of this subparagraph is to extend the results proven in Subsection 4.2.1 to variable<br />

coefficients. Besides we no longer stick to differential operators consisting only of the<br />

principal part but consider general operators of second (Volterra equation) respectively<br />

first order (<strong>boundary</strong> condition).<br />

To start <strong>with</strong>, recall the notation R n+1<br />

+ = {(x′ , y) ∈ Rn+1 : x ′ ∈ Rn , y > 0}. Define<br />

the operators A(t, x, Dx) and B(t, x ′ , Dx) by<br />

and<br />

A(t, x, Dx) = −a(t, x) : ∇ 2 x + a1(t, x) · ∇x + a0(t, x), t ∈ J, x ∈ R n+1<br />

+ ,<br />

B(t, x ′ , Dx) = −∂y + b(t, x ′ ) · ∇x ′ + b0(t, x ′ ), t ∈ J, x ′ ∈ R n , (4.28)<br />

respectively. We are concerned <strong>with</strong> the two separate <strong>problems</strong><br />

� v + k ∗ A(·, x, Dx)v = f, t ∈ J, x ∈ R n+1<br />

+ ,<br />

v = g, t ∈ J, x ′ ∈ R n , y = 0<br />

� v + k ∗ A(·, x, Dx)v = f, t ∈ J, x ∈ R n+1<br />

+ ,<br />

B(t, x ′ , Dx)v = h, t ∈ J, x ′ ∈ R n , y = 0<br />

and seek, as in Subsection 4.2.1, unique solutions in the regularity class<br />

Z = H α p (J; Lp(R n+1<br />

+ )) ∩ Lp(J; H 2 p(R n+1<br />

+ )).<br />

Concerning (4.29), we have the following result.<br />

, (4.29)<br />

, (4.30)<br />

Theorem 4.2.3 Let 1 < p < ∞, J = [0, T ], n ∈ N, and k ∈ K 1 (α, θ), where θ < π, and<br />

α ∈ (0, 2) \<br />

� 1<br />

p , 2<br />

2p−1<br />

1 3<br />

, 1 + p , 1 + 2p−1<br />

�<br />

. Suppose a ∈ Cul(J × R n+1<br />

+ , Sym{n + 1}), a1 ∈<br />

L∞(J × R n+1<br />

+ , Rn+1 ), a0 ∈ L∞(J × R n+1<br />

+ ), and assume further that there exists c0 > 0<br />

such that a(t, x)ξ · ξ ≥ c0|ξ| 2 , t ∈ J, x ∈ Rn+1 , ξ ∈ Rn+1 .<br />

Then (4.29) has a unique solution in the space Z if and only if the data f and g are<br />

subject to the <strong>conditions</strong> (i)-(vi) stated in Theorem 4.2.1.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!