Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Theorem 3.4.2 Suppose X is a Banach space of class HT , p ∈ (1, ∞). Let F ∈<br />
BIP(X) be invertible <strong>with</strong> power angle θF < π/2, and let D j<br />
F denote the domain D(F j )<br />
of F j equipped <strong>with</strong> its graph norm, j = 1, 2.<br />
Then (3.25) has a unique solution u in Z := H2 p(R+; X) ∩ Lp(R+; D2 F ) if and only if<br />
the following two <strong>conditions</strong> are satisfied.<br />
(i) f ∈ Lp(R+; X); (ii) φ ∈ DF (2 − 1<br />
p , p).<br />
If this is the case we have in addition u ∈ H 1 p(R+; D 1 F ).<br />
This result has been obtained by Prüss, cf. [65, Theorem 3]. Recall that DF (2−1/p, p) =<br />
{g ∈ D(F ) : F g ∈ DF (1 − 1/p, p)}.<br />
There is a corresponding result for the abstract second order problem <strong>with</strong> abstract<br />
Robin condition �<br />
−u ′′ (y) + F 2u(y) = f(y), y > 0,<br />
−u ′ (3.26)<br />
(0) + Du(0) = ψ,<br />
in Lp(R+; X). For D = 0, the Robin condition becomes the Neumann condition.<br />
Theorem 3.4.3 Suppose X is a Banach space of class HT , p ∈ (1, ∞). Let F ∈<br />
BIP(X) be invertible <strong>with</strong> power angle θF < π/2, and let D j<br />
F denote the domain D(F j )<br />
of F j equipped <strong>with</strong> its graph norm, j = 1, 2. Suppose that D is pseudo-sectorial in X,<br />
belongs to BIP(R(D)), commutes <strong>with</strong> F , and is such that θF + θD < π.<br />
Then (3.26) has a unique solution u in Z := H2 p(R+; X) ∩ Lp(R+; D2 F ) <strong>with</strong> u(0) ∈<br />
D(D) and Du(0) ∈ DF (1−1/p, p) if and only if the following two <strong>conditions</strong> are satisfied.<br />
(i) f ∈ Lp(R+; X); (ii) ψ ∈ DF (1 − 1<br />
p , p).<br />
If this is the case we have in addition u ∈ H 1 p(R+; D 1 F ).<br />
This result is also due to Prüss, see [65, Theorem 4].<br />
3.5 Parabolic Volterra equations on an infinite strip<br />
We now study the vector-valued problem<br />
� u − a ∗ ∂ 2 yu + a ∗ Au = f, t ∈ J, y > 0,<br />
u(t, 0) = φ(t), t ∈ J,<br />
(3.27)<br />
in Lp(J; Lp(R+; X)). Here X is a Banach space which belongs to the class HT , J = [0, T ]<br />
is a compact time-interval, A is a sectorial operator in X and the kernel a belongs to the<br />
class K 1 (α, θa) <strong>with</strong> α ∈ (0, 2). The data f and φ are given. Our aim is to characterize<br />
unique existence of a solution u in the maximal regularity class of type Lp, i.e.<br />
u ∈ Z := H α p (J; Lp(R+; X)) ∩ Lp(J; H 2 p(R+; X)) ∩ Lp(J; Lp(R+; DA))<br />
in terms of regularity classes for the data. Recall that DA denotes the space D(A)<br />
equipped <strong>with</strong> the graph norm of A. The main result reads as follows.<br />
48