Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Let us define the sum operator A + B by<br />
(A + B)x = Ax + Bx, x ∈ D(A + B) = D(A) ∩ D(B).<br />
If 0 ∈ ρ(A+B), which in particular means that A+B is closed, equation (2.9) is solvable<br />
in the strict sense for all y ∈ X, and the closed graph theorem shows (2.10) <strong>with</strong> some<br />
C > 0. For the latter it suffices to know only that A+B is injective and closed. If A+B<br />
is merely closable but not closed, and 0 ∈ ρ(A + B), then (2.9) only admits generalized<br />
solutions in the sense that there exist sequences (xn) ⊂ D(A) ∩ D(B), xn → x, and<br />
yn → y satisfying<br />
Axn + Bxn = yn, n ∈ N.<br />
In general, nothing can be said on A + B. It may even happen that it is not closable.<br />
In order to prove positive results in this direction, further assumptions on A and B have<br />
to be imposed.<br />
In 1975 Da Prato and Grisvard ([26]) were able to show that if A and B are commuting<br />
sectorial operators satisfying the <strong>parabolic</strong>ity condition φA + φB < π then A + B<br />
is closable, and the closure L := A + B is a sectorial operator <strong>with</strong> φL ≤ max{φA, φB},<br />
see also [16], [63, Section 8]. Recall that two closed linear operators are said to commute<br />
(in the resolvent sense) if there are λ ∈ ρ(A), µ ∈ ρ(B) such that<br />
(λ − A) −1 (µ − A) −1 = (µ − A) −1 (λ − A) −1 .<br />
By strengthening the assumptions on A, B and X Dore and Venni [31], [32] succeeded<br />
in proving closedness of A + B. Prüss and Sohr [69] improved their result by removing<br />
some extra assumptions. Before we repeat a version of the Dore-Venni theorem we have<br />
to recall what it means for a Banach space X to belong to the class HT .<br />
A Banach space X is said to be of class HT , if the Hilbert transform is bounded<br />
on Lp(R, X) for some (and then all) p ∈ (1, ∞). Here the Hilbert transform Hf of a<br />
function f ∈ S(R; X), the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing X-valued functions, is<br />
defined by<br />
(Hf)(t) = 1<br />
π lim<br />
�<br />
ɛ→0 ɛ ≤|s|≤ 1/ɛ<br />
f(t − s) ds<br />
, t ∈ R,<br />
s<br />
where the limit is to be understood in the Lp-sense. There is a well known theorem<br />
which says that the set of Banach spaces of class HT coincides <strong>with</strong> the class of UMD<br />
spaces, where UMD stands for unconditional martingale difference property. It is further<br />
known that HT -spaces are reflexive. Every Hilbert space belongs to the class HT , and<br />
if (Ω, Σ, µ) is a measure space, 1 < p < ∞, then Lp(Ω, Σ, µ; X) is an HT -space. For all<br />
these results see the survey article by Burkholder [10].<br />
We state now a variant of the Dore-Venni theorem, cf. [31], [65], [69].<br />
Theorem 2.3.1 Suppose X is a Banach space of class HT , and assume A, B ∈ BIP(X)<br />
commute in the resolvent sense and satisfy the strong <strong>parabolic</strong>ity condition θA+θB < π.<br />
Let further µ > 0. Then<br />
(i) A + µB is closed and sectorial;<br />
(ii) A + µB ∈ BIP(X) <strong>with</strong> θA+µB ≤ max{θA, θB};<br />
(iii) there exists a constant C > 0, independent of µ > 0, such that<br />
|Ax| + µ|Bx| ≤ C|Ax + µBx|, x ∈ D(A) ∩ D(B). (2.11)<br />
In particular, if A or B is invertible, then A + µB is invertible as well.<br />
18