02.12.2012 Views

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Let us define the sum operator A + B by<br />

(A + B)x = Ax + Bx, x ∈ D(A + B) = D(A) ∩ D(B).<br />

If 0 ∈ ρ(A+B), which in particular means that A+B is closed, equation (2.9) is solvable<br />

in the strict sense for all y ∈ X, and the closed graph theorem shows (2.10) <strong>with</strong> some<br />

C > 0. For the latter it suffices to know only that A+B is injective and closed. If A+B<br />

is merely closable but not closed, and 0 ∈ ρ(A + B), then (2.9) only admits generalized<br />

solutions in the sense that there exist sequences (xn) ⊂ D(A) ∩ D(B), xn → x, and<br />

yn → y satisfying<br />

Axn + Bxn = yn, n ∈ N.<br />

In general, nothing can be said on A + B. It may even happen that it is not closable.<br />

In order to prove positive results in this direction, further assumptions on A and B have<br />

to be imposed.<br />

In 1975 Da Prato and Grisvard ([26]) were able to show that if A and B are commuting<br />

sectorial operators satisfying the <strong>parabolic</strong>ity condition φA + φB < π then A + B<br />

is closable, and the closure L := A + B is a sectorial operator <strong>with</strong> φL ≤ max{φA, φB},<br />

see also [16], [63, Section 8]. Recall that two closed linear operators are said to commute<br />

(in the resolvent sense) if there are λ ∈ ρ(A), µ ∈ ρ(B) such that<br />

(λ − A) −1 (µ − A) −1 = (µ − A) −1 (λ − A) −1 .<br />

By strengthening the assumptions on A, B and X Dore and Venni [31], [32] succeeded<br />

in proving closedness of A + B. Prüss and Sohr [69] improved their result by removing<br />

some extra assumptions. Before we repeat a version of the Dore-Venni theorem we have<br />

to recall what it means for a Banach space X to belong to the class HT .<br />

A Banach space X is said to be of class HT , if the Hilbert transform is bounded<br />

on Lp(R, X) for some (and then all) p ∈ (1, ∞). Here the Hilbert transform Hf of a<br />

function f ∈ S(R; X), the Schwartz space of rapidly decreasing X-valued functions, is<br />

defined by<br />

(Hf)(t) = 1<br />

π lim<br />

�<br />

ɛ→0 ɛ ≤|s|≤ 1/ɛ<br />

f(t − s) ds<br />

, t ∈ R,<br />

s<br />

where the limit is to be understood in the Lp-sense. There is a well known theorem<br />

which says that the set of Banach spaces of class HT coincides <strong>with</strong> the class of UMD<br />

spaces, where UMD stands for unconditional martingale difference property. It is further<br />

known that HT -spaces are reflexive. Every Hilbert space belongs to the class HT , and<br />

if (Ω, Σ, µ) is a measure space, 1 < p < ∞, then Lp(Ω, Σ, µ; X) is an HT -space. For all<br />

these results see the survey article by Burkholder [10].<br />

We state now a variant of the Dore-Venni theorem, cf. [31], [65], [69].<br />

Theorem 2.3.1 Suppose X is a Banach space of class HT , and assume A, B ∈ BIP(X)<br />

commute in the resolvent sense and satisfy the strong <strong>parabolic</strong>ity condition θA+θB < π.<br />

Let further µ > 0. Then<br />

(i) A + µB is closed and sectorial;<br />

(ii) A + µB ∈ BIP(X) <strong>with</strong> θA+µB ≤ max{θA, θB};<br />

(iii) there exists a constant C > 0, independent of µ > 0, such that<br />

|Ax| + µ|Bx| ≤ C|Ax + µBx|, x ∈ D(A) ∩ D(B). (2.11)<br />

In particular, if A or B is invertible, then A + µB is invertible as well.<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!