Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions Quasilinear parabolic problems with nonlinear boundary conditions

busch.felix24
from busch.felix24 More from this publisher
02.12.2012 Views

[29, Section 2.1]) we have gµ(A) = µ(µ + A α ) −1 ; the problem is to show that the family {gµ(A) : µ ∈ Σφα } ⊂ B(X) is R-bounded. To this purpose we consider first appropriate approximations of A. For ε > 0 set Aε = (ε + A)(1 + εA) −1 . Then Aε is bounded, sectorial and invertible, for each ε > 0, and φAε ≤ φA, see [29, Prop. 1.4]. Furthermore, Aε is also R-sectorial with R-angle φR Aε ≤ φR A , and the R-bounds RAε(φ) are uniformly with respect to ε > 0, for each fixed φ < π − αφR A . To see this verify that the subsequent relation is valid. λ(λ + Aε) −1 = λ λ + ε ϕε(λ)(ϕε(λ) + A) −1 + ελ 1 + ελ A(ϕε(λ) + A) −1 , λ ∈ Σφ, where ϕε(λ) = (ε + λ)/(1 + ελ). Here it is essential that the functions ϕε leave all sectors Σφ invariant. The claim follows then by the rule R(T1 + T2) ≤ R(T1) + R(T2) and Kahane’s contraction principle, cf. [29, Section 3.1]. We next show that RA α ε (φα) ≤ C < ∞ uniformly w.r.t. ε > 0. To this end we employ the following representation formula for the operators gµ(Aε), cf. the proof of Theorem 2.3 in [29]. gµ(Aε) = µ 2πi � ∞ e ( 0 iθα − ei(θ−2π)α (µ + rαeiα(θ−2π) )(µ + rαeiαθ ) )rαe iθ (re iθ − Aε) −1 dr n� + µ j=1 λ 1−α j (λj − Aε) −1 /α. (2.7) This formula is obtained by contracting the contour Γψ from the Dunford integral for gµ(Aε) to a suitable halfray Γα = [0, ∞)eiθ , with φR A < ψ < θ ≤ π, and using Cauchy’s theorem as well as residue calculus. The numbers λj = λj(µ), j = 1, . . . , n denote the zeros of µ + λα ; note that there are only finitely many of them, and n = 0 means that there are none. The angle θ = θ(µ) is chosen such that for some δ > 0, we have with ϕ = arg µ the inequalities |ϕ−αθ(µ)−(2k+1)π| ≥ δ and |ϕ+2απ−αθ(µ)−(2k+1)π| ≥ δ for all µ ∈ Σφα and k ∈ Z. From (2.7) we get with µ+λα j = 0 and the change of variables r = (|µ|s) 1/α � ∞ gµ(Aε) = 0 − e iϕ (e i(2π−θ)α − e −iθα )(1 + s) 2 2παi (e i(ϕ−αθ) + s)(e i(ϕ+2απ−αθ) + s) � �� � | · |≤C n� λj(λj − Aε) −1 /α. j=1 (|µ|s) 1 α e iθ ((|µ|s) 1 α e iθ −Aε) −1 ds (1 + s) 2 Hence gµ(Aε) ∈ C0aco ({λ(λ + Aε) −1 : λ ∈ Σπ−ψ}), where aco (T ) means the closure in the strong operator topology of the absolute convex hull of the family T . Proposition 3.8 in [29] and the above observation concerning the R-bounds RAε(φ) then yield RA α ε (φα) ≤ 2C0RAε(ψ) ≤ C < ∞, uniformly w.r.t. ε > 0. The assertion RA α(φα) < ∞ can now be established by the following approximation argument, which relies on gµ(Aε)x → gµ(A)x as ε → 0+ on D(A) ∩ R(A), which is a dense subset of X, see [29, Thm. 2.1]. Set T = {gµ(A) : µ ∈ Σφα } and Tε = {gµ(Aε) : 16

µ ∈ Σφα }. Let N ∈ N, Tj ∈ T , xj ∈ X and suppose that εj are independent, symmetric, {−1, 1}-valued random variables on a probability space (Ω, M, µ), j = 1, . . . , n. Let further Tε, j ∈ Tε be the approximation of Tj, that is, for Tj = gµj (A) we put Tε, j = gµj (Aε). Also, we choose for each xj a sequence {xj, k} ∞ k=1 ⊂ D(A) ∩ R(A) such that xj, k → xj as k → ∞. By uniform R-boundedness of Tε, we may then estimate N� N� N� | εjTjxj| Lp(Ω;X) ≤ | εjTε, j xj| Lp(Ω;X) + | εj(Tj − Tε, j)xj, k| Lp(Ω;X) j=1 j=1 + | ≤ C | j=1 N� εj(Tj − Tε, j)(xj − xj, k)| Lp(Ω;X) j=1 N� εjxj| Lp(Ω;X) + j=1 N� |(Tj − Tε, j)xj, k|X + 2C j=1 N� |xj − xj, k|X, j=1 (2.8) where C does not depend on ε, j, k. Now let ε → 0+ in (2.8) with k being fixed. This makes the second summand disappear. The third one vanishes if we then send k → ∞. It remains the desired inequality expressing R-boundedness of {gµ(A) : µ ∈ Σφα } for each φα < π − αφR A . � Connecting the concept of R-boundedness to the H ∞ -calculus, leads to the notion of operators with R-bounded functional calculus. Definition 2.2.5 Let X be a complex Banach space and suppose that A ∈ H ∞ (X). The operator A is said to admit an R-bounded H ∞ -calculus if the set {f(A) : f ∈ H ∞ (Σθ), |f| θ ∞ ≤ 1} is R-bounded for some θ > 0. We denote the class of such operators by RH∞ (X) and define the RH∞-angle φR∞ A of A as the infimum of such angles θ. One important application of such operators concerns the joint functional calculus of sectorial operators, see Section 2.4. 2.3 Sums of closed linear operators Let X be a Banach space, A, B closed linear operators in X, and consider the problem Ax + Bx = y. (2.9) Given y ∈ X one seeks a unique strict solution x of (2.9) in the sense that x ∈ D(A) ∩ D(B), that is x possesses the regularity induced by A as well as that coming from B. In this situation we say that the solution has maximal regularity. Furthermore it is desirable to have an a priori estimate of the form where C does not depend on x. |Ax| + |Bx| ≤ C|Ax + Bx| for all x ∈ D(A) ∩ D(B), (2.10) 17

µ ∈ Σφα }. Let N ∈ N, Tj ∈ T , xj ∈ X and suppose that εj are independent, symmetric,<br />

{−1, 1}-valued random variables on a probability space (Ω, M, µ), j = 1, . . . , n. Let<br />

further Tε, j ∈ Tε be the approximation of Tj, that is, for Tj = gµj (A) we put Tε, j =<br />

gµj (Aε). Also, we choose for each xj a sequence {xj, k} ∞ k=1 ⊂ D(A) ∩ R(A) such that<br />

xj, k → xj as k → ∞. By uniform R-boundedness of Tε, we may then estimate<br />

N�<br />

N�<br />

N�<br />

| εjTjxj| Lp(Ω;X) ≤ | εjTε, j xj| Lp(Ω;X) + | εj(Tj − Tε, j)xj, k| Lp(Ω;X)<br />

j=1<br />

j=1<br />

+ |<br />

≤ C |<br />

j=1<br />

N�<br />

εj(Tj − Tε, j)(xj − xj, k)| Lp(Ω;X)<br />

j=1<br />

N�<br />

εjxj| Lp(Ω;X) +<br />

j=1<br />

N�<br />

|(Tj − Tε, j)xj, k|X + 2C<br />

j=1<br />

N�<br />

|xj − xj, k|X,<br />

j=1<br />

(2.8)<br />

where C does not depend on ε, j, k. Now let ε → 0+ in (2.8) <strong>with</strong> k being fixed. This<br />

makes the second summand disappear. The third one vanishes if we then send k → ∞.<br />

It remains the desired inequality expressing R-boundedness of {gµ(A) : µ ∈ Σφα } for<br />

each φα < π − αφR A . �<br />

Connecting the concept of R-boundedness to the H ∞ -calculus, leads to the notion of<br />

operators <strong>with</strong> R-bounded functional calculus.<br />

Definition 2.2.5 Let X be a complex Banach space and suppose that A ∈ H ∞ (X). The<br />

operator A is said to admit an R-bounded H ∞ -calculus if the set<br />

{f(A) : f ∈ H ∞ (Σθ), |f| θ ∞ ≤ 1}<br />

is R-bounded for some θ > 0. We denote the class of such operators by RH∞ (X) and<br />

define the RH∞-angle φR∞ A of A as the infimum of such angles θ.<br />

One important application of such operators concerns the joint functional calculus of<br />

sectorial operators, see Section 2.4.<br />

2.3 Sums of closed linear operators<br />

Let X be a Banach space, A, B closed linear operators in X, and consider the problem<br />

Ax + Bx = y. (2.9)<br />

Given y ∈ X one seeks a unique strict solution x of (2.9) in the sense that x ∈ D(A) ∩<br />

D(B), that is x possesses the regularity induced by A as well as that coming from B.<br />

In this situation we say that the solution has maximal regularity. Furthermore it is<br />

desirable to have an a priori estimate of the form<br />

where C does not depend on x.<br />

|Ax| + |Bx| ≤ C|Ax + Bx| for all x ∈ D(A) ∩ D(B), (2.10)<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!