12.07.2015 Views

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 4: The toxic cradle of productionBox 13: The most (post)modern wasteA growing and toxic electronic waste stream flows from <strong>the</strong> so called ‘post-industrial’and ‘resource light’ economies of <strong>the</strong> North. The major components of e-waste arediscarded personal and mainframe computers, printers, copiers, faxes, cell phones,telephones, televisions and high-end telephonic equipment. In Europe it is growing3 to 5 times faster than municipal waste as a whole. In <strong>the</strong> US, where around halfof all households own a personal computer, <strong>the</strong> Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) estimated in 2001 that e-waste in US landfills would grow fourfold.This rapid growth results from <strong>the</strong> purposeful design of inbuilt obsolescence. From<strong>the</strong> 1950s, as Annie Leonard observes, industrial design journals “actually discusshow fast [designers] can make stuff break and still leave <strong>the</strong> consumer with enoughfaith in <strong>the</strong> product to go buy ano<strong>the</strong>r one” [2008]. Electronics take obsolescenceto new heights. Rapid technology change is part of <strong>the</strong> arsenal. Old computersare made to become incompatible with evolving information and communicationtechnology (ICT) systems. They could be designed for upgrading but, says Leonard,<strong>the</strong> “piece that changes” is given a different shape so it won’t fit and “you gottachuck <strong>the</strong> whole thing and buy a new one” [2008]. With cell phones, it is not just<strong>the</strong> technology, but marketing contracts are structured to force ‘upgrading’ to newphones every two years.E-waste is toxic, yet most of it enters <strong>the</strong> municipal waste stream. In 2001, e-wastewas reported to be <strong>the</strong> source of 70% of <strong>the</strong> heavy metals in US landfills, includingmercury, cadmium and hexavalent chromium (<strong>the</strong> biologically absorbable formof chromium). Computer monitor screen glass contains lead to stop radio-activegamma rays from <strong>the</strong> display cathode from reaching user’s eyes. This contributes40% of <strong>the</strong> lead now in US landfills. Computers also contain polyvinyl chloride(PVC) which generates dioxins and furans during production and disposal byincineration, as well as PDBEs 59 which are endocrine disruptors.By 1999, only 11% of discarded computers in <strong>the</strong> US were recycled. The task ofrecycling is dangerous to workers’ health, especially in informal or semi-formalconditions. E-waste is moved to <strong>the</strong> South as ‘donations’, much as expired pesticidesare ‘donated’, where <strong>the</strong>y become toxic pollution sources.Sources: Pichtel 2005; Leonard 2008.59 Polybrominated diphenyle<strong>the</strong>rs- 84 - groundWork - <strong>Wasting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nation</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!