12.07.2015 Views

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3: The politics of wasteBox 9: Toxic giftsThe pesticide industry, from its origins in <strong>the</strong> 1930s, was part of <strong>the</strong> explosivegrowth in manufacturing and marketing of chemicals after World War II. Theprovision of pesticides and o<strong>the</strong>r agricultural chemicals became standard practicein development programmes throughout <strong>the</strong> world, as exemplified in <strong>the</strong> GreenRevolution in Asia. This has made agriculture <strong>the</strong> largest diffuse source of pollution.In addition to this, unused and obsolete pesticides become toxic waste. The global‘stockpile’ of obsolete pesticides, scattered in storerooms and sheds, is estimated atsome 500,000 tonnes with 200,000 tonnes in Eastern Europe and at least 50,000tonnes abandoned in Africa.In <strong>the</strong> 1980s <strong>the</strong> UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) began inventoryingobsolete pesticides in Africa. After discovering its extent, FAO raised funds for aclean-up. The Africa Stockpiles Programme (ASP) was initiated in 2000 by nongovernmentorganisations (NGOs) including <strong>the</strong> Pesticide Action Network (PAN)and <strong>the</strong> World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). It is now a multi-stakeholderpartnership involving African country governments, regional bodies, internationalagencies and <strong>the</strong> private sector as well as NGOs. The ASP aims to clean up pesticidewastes and dispose of <strong>the</strong>m in an environmentally sound manner. At around $3,500per tonne, <strong>the</strong> cost will be in <strong>the</strong> order of $175-200 million. In addition, informationand prevention programmes are estimated at around $50-75 million, bringing <strong>the</strong>total cost to over $250 million. 42Following <strong>the</strong> exposure of Danida’s plan, disposal of <strong>the</strong> obsolete pesticides remainscontroversial. The ASP encourages non-burn disposal technologies but, in 2005,incinerator vendors were present at ASP meetings and NGOs fear that governmentsand business want to upgrade existing incinerators or use cement kilns in Africa.Currently, collected pesticides are incinerated in Europe. It seems that <strong>the</strong> operatorsof non-burn facilities did not bid for <strong>the</strong> disposal because <strong>the</strong>y could not meet<strong>the</strong> difficult requirements for international transport whereas <strong>the</strong> better resourcedincinerator operators could.NGOs support disposal in Europe partly because it is better able to managehazardous wastes but also because <strong>the</strong> problem originates in European and o<strong>the</strong>rNor<strong>the</strong>rn countries.42 see www.africastockpiles.org<strong>Wasting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nation</strong> - groundWork - 61 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!