12.07.2015 Views

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3: The politics of wasteIn South Africa, Thor promised to stop mercury-based production in 1995 but itresumed production of mercuric chloride for export to US transnational BordenChemicals in 1997 and was suspected of already having broken its promise a yearearlier. More workers showed symptoms of mercury poisoning in 1997 and a secondgroup of workers sued <strong>the</strong> corporation in Britain.O<strong>the</strong>r workers and affected people in <strong>the</strong> neighbouring community have notbeen compensated. Many ex-workers were hired as casuals and say <strong>the</strong>y were firedwhen <strong>the</strong>y showed symptoms of poisoning. Thereafter, no-one else would employ<strong>the</strong>m. Obtaining adequate compensation remains <strong>the</strong> priority for ex-workers butgovernment has offered “no meaningful response” to <strong>the</strong>ir demands. 17Meanwhile, over 3,500 tonnes of mercury-containing waste remained at Thor’s site,posing a continuing threat to workers and local communities. Most of it is still<strong>the</strong>re. The ground at <strong>the</strong> site remains heavily contaminated. Cattle are reportedto have died from drinking <strong>the</strong> water well downstream from Thor. Plants next to<strong>the</strong> stream are now absorbing <strong>the</strong> mercury. Considerably fur<strong>the</strong>r downstream on<strong>the</strong> Mgeni River, fish caught in <strong>the</strong> Inanda Dam have shown “dangerous levels ofmercury” poisoning 18 and <strong>the</strong> metal is showing in hair samples taken from localpeople by <strong>the</strong> Medical Research Council. It cannot be demonstrated with certaintythat Thor was <strong>the</strong> source or that it is <strong>the</strong> only source. Indeed, it seems that Thor maybe part of a larger mercury pollution crisis, possibly including mercury carried on<strong>the</strong> wind from Eskom’s Mpumalanga coal-fired power stations. 19The Davis Commission of enquiry recommended, in 1997, that <strong>the</strong> waste bedisposed by incineration on site. This was rejected by environmental groups andhealth experts because incineration was likely to compound <strong>the</strong> problem particularlyas <strong>the</strong> mercury was mixed with unknown o<strong>the</strong>r wastes. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> option ofburying <strong>the</strong> waste at Holfontein H:H site in Gauteng is opposed because, likeall o<strong>the</strong>r hazardous sites in <strong>the</strong> country, Holfontein has a history of leaks, spillsand fires. Never<strong>the</strong>less, it appears that contaminated concrete and soil was sent toHolfontein in 2006. The DEAT did not respond to groundWork’s enquiries on17 Rico Euripidou and Bobby Peek, Still nothing happening at Thor, groundWork Newsletter, September 2007.18 Alarming silence, The Mercury, June 21, 2007.19 Tony Carnie, Pollution raises more questions, The Mercury, October 27, 2008.<strong>Wasting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nation</strong> - groundWork - 37 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!