12.07.2015 Views

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2: Rubbish Figuresto 1.89 mt/y, <strong>the</strong> figure given in 1992 as hazardous waste. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> figure here forall hazard rated mining waste is precisely 3,000 out from 1992’s total mining wastefigure of 376,639,051 t/y – suggesting that a typo crept in along <strong>the</strong> way. 11 The finaltotal is <strong>the</strong>n copied from <strong>the</strong> source, ra<strong>the</strong>r than calculated, and is consequently 3,000out. In short, <strong>the</strong>re has been no update since 1992 but <strong>the</strong> figures have been turnedfrom cautious estimates to ‘facts’.The original hazard ratings covered all mining and industrial waste. If it is classifiedas non-hazardous, it goes into Group 5. CSIR 1997 apparently added 90 mt/y to <strong>the</strong>1992 mining waste figure, 12 but this is <strong>the</strong>n reported as additional to <strong>the</strong> hazard ratedwaste. Thus, according to <strong>the</strong> Environment Outlook, “The Department of Mineralsand Energy indicated in 1997 that mining was accountable for about 470 milliontonnes of waste, both general and hazardous” [261]. So <strong>the</strong> extra 90 mt/y is madeto appear as ‘general waste’ – a category that does not exist in <strong>the</strong> rating system. It isindeed likely that mining waste increased from 1992 to 1997. That <strong>the</strong> entire increasewas non-hazardous is improbable. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is apparent that <strong>the</strong> additional waste wasnot classified. Clearly <strong>the</strong> authorities, starting with <strong>the</strong> DME which has insisted onkeeping mining waste under its authority, do not know what is in <strong>the</strong> waste. Fur<strong>the</strong>r,it seems that <strong>the</strong> hazard rating system itself is no longer understood.This is perhaps a useful incomprehension in that <strong>the</strong> democratic transition has madeclassification itself hazardous. By avoiding it, <strong>the</strong> authorities can evade demands forpublic accountability and so shelter corporations from <strong>the</strong> “commercial risks” thatmight come from people knowing what is dumped in <strong>the</strong>ir locality.There is ano<strong>the</strong>r difference. The 1992 figures included waste matter in air and wastematter in waste water as well as solid and liquid waste. Thus, <strong>the</strong> 15,373,009 t/y totalfor manufacturing is divided as follows:- Waste in air: 323,358- Waste in waste water: 602,027- Solid and liquid waste: 14,447,62411 The typo is in mining waste hazard group 4, which reads 34,772,629 in CSIR 1992.12 The 1997 CSIR report seems unavailable so it was not possible to check how it arrived at its figures. It seems tobe one of three ‘baseline studies’ referred to in <strong>the</strong> DWAF’s 1998 edition of <strong>the</strong> ‘minimum requirements’. Noneare available.- 26 - groundWork - <strong>Wasting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nation</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!