12.07.2015 Views

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

Wasting the Nation.indd - Groundwork

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5: Modernising municipal wasteA 1991 British analysis showed that putrescibles (food and garden waste) and paperwere <strong>the</strong> biggest categories, each at about 25%. A comparative European study in1995 showed putrescibles in Greece reaching nearly 50%, while paper was only half<strong>the</strong> British figure [Williams, 1998].Adding to <strong>the</strong> variability is <strong>the</strong> fact that municipal waste originates as much fromcommerce and industry as from households. In addition, industrial production wasteis frequently dumped with municipal waste. According to one estimate, <strong>the</strong> Sasolburgdump receives 50 tonnes a day of municipal waste plus 40 tonnes of industrial waste.Vanderbijlpark’s Boitshepi dump started as an informal industrial dump before beingturned into a municipal dump. It still receives industrial waste.Municipal waste is classified according to its origins, doubtful as <strong>the</strong>se are, and notaccording to whe<strong>the</strong>r it is hazardous or not. It contains appreciable quantities oftoxins. Again, South African information is not available. In <strong>the</strong> US, lead tops <strong>the</strong>list of heavy metals in municipal waste, followed by cadmium and mercury. Batteriesand e-waste are now <strong>the</strong> biggest sources of lead, after regulation forced leaded solderin steel cans and lead in paint out of production by <strong>the</strong> late 1980s. In <strong>the</strong> UK, leadconcentrations in waste from affluent households reached a level of 247 parts permillion in 1994. O<strong>the</strong>r important toxic elements include volatile organic compounds(VOCs) and dioxins.The creation of <strong>the</strong> consumption society by capital provoked resistance focused through<strong>the</strong> environmental movement but reflecting a more diffuse public unease. This unease isperhaps <strong>the</strong> more acute because people are aware of <strong>the</strong>ir complicity in <strong>the</strong> productionof waste. The managers of capital and state had to find a response and, as noted inChapter 4, <strong>the</strong> first move was to focus public anxiety precisely on post-consumer wastewhere this complicity was most visible while keeping production waste out of mind.What emerged from <strong>the</strong>se beginnings was <strong>the</strong> discourse of ‘ecological modernisation’which was consecrated by governmental negotiators at <strong>the</strong> 1992 Earth Summit in Rio.The discourse carries <strong>the</strong> purpose of representing capitalism – <strong>the</strong> whole system ofmaterials extraction, commodity production, consumption and waste – as compatiblewith <strong>the</strong> continued functioning of ecosystems. This is <strong>the</strong>n called ‘sustainability’.This discourse functions on several levels. First, it allows for state regulation tocompensate for ‘market failures’ but at <strong>the</strong> same time gives increasing prominenceto <strong>the</strong> use of market mechanisms which returns regulatory control to corporate- 128 - groundWork - <strong>Wasting</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nation</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!