12.07.2015 Views

Travelers' Philanthropy Handbook - Center for Responsible Travel

Travelers' Philanthropy Handbook - Center for Responsible Travel

Travelers' Philanthropy Handbook - Center for Responsible Travel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chart 7. How do you in<strong>for</strong>m your guests about the possibilityof donating through your company and while travelling withyou?WebsiteBrochures /…Partner7%44%85%41%Project visitsNewsletter / MailingsPublications / Press …Other11%30%41%52%• Observations and IssuesSurvey respondents recognize that there have been numerous positive tourism-generatedphilanthropic activities in the Northern Safari Circuit in Tanzania. They believe that tourists andtour operators feel a sense of responsibility <strong>for</strong> the well-being of both the local people andnature. In general, the businesses and their clients see tourism and travelers’ philanthropy asmechanisms <strong>for</strong> improving residents’ quality of life. Individuals interviewed said things like:“A lot of very good work is going on but it’s mostly unrecognized.”“There’s been a growth of both philanthropic activities and ecotourism in this area.”“There’s high potential in Tanzania as there are many different types of tourists. The luxurytravelers tend to donate while the backpackers volunteer.”“There have been a number of good projects implemented from generous donations bytravelers and these have made a difference to the local recipients.”On the other hand, the survey participants pointed out a number of problems associated withtravelers’ philanthropy activities in the Arusha area. Many perceive that there are too manyorganizations, projects, and individuals involved in collecting and distributing money, materials,and manpower in the area. Everything is done in an ad hoc manner without guidance fromsurveys, analyses, or communication among the myriad of donors. Without any coordination, oreven organized dialogue, among the tour companies, there is no shared method <strong>for</strong> evaluatingbeneficiary organizations or projects. They described the present type of philanthropy as ratherpatronizing and not helping the communities to feel responsible or empowered.In addition, due in part to the lack of evaluation and systematic oversight, respondents believethat some donations may be mismanaged. Project leadership is often unsophisticated, withdisorganized (if any) records, meaning that donations are not properly tracked and may fail toreach their intended recipients, Even when the recipients get the full amount of the donation,people involved in implementing a project have been known to embezzle donated monies orchannel them into dishonest and corrupt local businesses.156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!