Eating Out in the UK 2009 - McDonald's UK

Eating Out in the UK 2009 - McDonald's UK Eating Out in the UK 2009 - McDonald's UK

mcdonalds.co.uk
from mcdonalds.co.uk More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

EatingOut inthe UK2009A ComprehensiveAnalysis of the InformalEating Out Market

<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong><strong>2009</strong>A ComprehensiveAnalysis of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Market


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong><strong>2009</strong>CONTENTSForewordBy Steve Easterbrook, Chief Executive, McDonald’sExecutive SummaryIntroduction & BackgroundMarket Def<strong>in</strong>ition and SegmentationChapter 1The Scale of <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketChapter 2Market History and EvolutionChapter 3Consumer InsightChapter 4<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Mega TrendsChapter 5The Future of <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketBibliography13572131577388


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong><strong>2009</strong>A ComprehensiveAnalysis of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketForeword by Steve Easterbrook,Chief Executive, McDonald’s<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>,<strong>2009</strong> is a comprehensiveanalysis of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market. Thesector is one of <strong>the</strong> bigcontributors to <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>economy, but one of <strong>the</strong>least understood.From coffee shops to fast foodrestaurants, sandwich bars to pubs,<strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g out market employs 1 <strong>in</strong>20 of <strong>the</strong> country’s workforce and atop ten <strong>in</strong>dustry – but its impact onour lifestyles, economic activity, jobcreation and future growthprospects are rarely considered.McDonald’s sponsored this<strong>in</strong>dependent research from AllegraStrategies’ Food Strategy Forum todo just that, and better understandcurrent trends and trad<strong>in</strong>gconditions, as well as forecast futuremarket developments.The report is <strong>the</strong> first snapshot of<strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> recession on <strong>the</strong>market and consumer behaviour. Itreveals that <strong>the</strong> amount of spend<strong>in</strong>gon eat<strong>in</strong>g out under £15 a head hasfallen for <strong>the</strong> first time <strong>in</strong> 40 years –contrary to a popular view that <strong>the</strong>sector is boom<strong>in</strong>g as customerstrade down from more expensived<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g options.It also shows that <strong>the</strong> choices fac<strong>in</strong>gconsumers are wider than everbefore as <strong>the</strong> number of places toeat out cont<strong>in</strong>ues to grow despite<strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> footfall.The majorityof <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry leaders <strong>in</strong>terviewedfor <strong>the</strong> report predicted that <strong>the</strong>setoughen<strong>in</strong>g conditions will lead tocasualties, cut backs and closures,putt<strong>in</strong>g some of <strong>the</strong> 1.36m jobs <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> sector at risk.Through thousands of <strong>in</strong>terviewswith consumers, <strong>the</strong> report f<strong>in</strong>dsthat habits learnt <strong>in</strong> this recessionwill be long-last<strong>in</strong>g. Only bus<strong>in</strong>essesthat can meet <strong>the</strong> demand for valueand quality <strong>in</strong> both food and servicewill survive and prosper when <strong>the</strong>long-term growth <strong>in</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g outreturns. Excellent service,<strong>in</strong>novations that build loyalty, morechoice, lighter options, quality,provenance and an experience thatcannot be recreated at home – <strong>the</strong>seare all th<strong>in</strong>gs that customers willexpect and demand without pay<strong>in</strong>ga premium.The number of people employed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> sector will also cont<strong>in</strong>ue togrow. Customer service is set tobecome a more importantdifferentiator for operators and <strong>the</strong>quality of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g anddevelopment opportunities offeredto <strong>the</strong> workforce will be essential <strong>in</strong>underp<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g this.As <strong>the</strong> market expands and<strong>the</strong> number of attractive careeropportunities <strong>in</strong>crease, it islikely we’ll see a wider reappraisalof attitudes towards work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> sector.At McDonald’s, we’ve made massive<strong>in</strong>vestments over <strong>the</strong> last threeyears – <strong>in</strong> our restaurants, our foodand our people – and we’ll <strong>in</strong>vest afur<strong>the</strong>r £90 million <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong> toensure we cont<strong>in</strong>ue to meet <strong>the</strong>seevolv<strong>in</strong>g consumer demands.The report emphasises that eat<strong>in</strong>gout has become an <strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed partof life for people <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> and onethat Government and policymakersshould take notice of. Long thoughtof as recession resistant, this mythabout <strong>the</strong> sector is now exposed.But whilst <strong>the</strong> market is <strong>in</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e,<strong>the</strong> sector is not fall<strong>in</strong>g as fast aso<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>dustries and <strong>the</strong>re are somebrands do<strong>in</strong>g well despite currentconditions.With retail set to rema<strong>in</strong>under pressure, <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> sector will have an importantrole to play <strong>in</strong> help<strong>in</strong>g pull <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>out of <strong>the</strong> recession throughgrow<strong>in</strong>g employment and <strong>the</strong>revitalisation of <strong>the</strong> High Street, and<strong>the</strong> market will bounce back.However, only those bus<strong>in</strong>esses thatmeet <strong>the</strong> conditions of <strong>the</strong> recessionlegacy – quality, value and a greatexperience – will shape <strong>the</strong> futureof <strong>the</strong> sector.1 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


“Only bus<strong>in</strong>esses whichcan meet <strong>the</strong> demand forvalue and quality <strong>in</strong> bothfood and service willsurvive and prosper.”Steve Easterbrook


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong><strong>2009</strong>A ComprehensiveAnalysis of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketExecutive SummaryInformal eat<strong>in</strong>g out isworth <strong>in</strong> excess of £40bn• Informal eat<strong>in</strong>g out has become an<strong>in</strong>gra<strong>in</strong>ed part of life for <strong>UK</strong>consumers, who relish <strong>the</strong>opportunity to enjoy food anddr<strong>in</strong>k, and d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and socialexperiences, that cannot berecreated at home. This is reflected<strong>in</strong> estimated sales of £40.3bn <strong>in</strong><strong>2009</strong>, equivalent to averageannual spend<strong>in</strong>g per household of£1,665• Allegra’s consumer research showsthat on average, 1 <strong>in</strong> 9 meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> home every week,equivalent to an estimated 148million meals <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong>• £40.3bn equates to £2.1bn spentat breakfast (5% of <strong>the</strong> total),£17.1bn at lunch (42%), £16.7bn atd<strong>in</strong>ner (42%) and £1.4bn atsupper/late night d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (3%).Both mid-morn<strong>in</strong>g and afternoonsnacks account for £3.0bn (8% of<strong>the</strong> total)3 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>• Consumers will spend on average£12.75 per week or £663 per year on<strong>in</strong>formal eat<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong> – thiscompares with £4.44 per week or£230 per year <strong>in</strong> 1989• Over <strong>the</strong> last 40 years, <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market has taken an<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g share of <strong>the</strong> totalexpenditure by consumers on foodand beverages – reach<strong>in</strong>g 22% <strong>in</strong><strong>2009</strong>. This compares with a 14%share <strong>in</strong> 1969• The sector is <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>’s top 10 byGross Value Added, and is a majoremployer – account<strong>in</strong>g for asignificant share of <strong>the</strong> 1.36 millionfoodservice jobs across cafés,canteens, cater<strong>in</strong>g, pubs andrestaurants – equivalent to 5% oftotal <strong>UK</strong> employmentBut, for <strong>the</strong> first times<strong>in</strong>ce it was properlyestablished, <strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g outmarket has contracted• The current recession hasdampened consumers’ short-termappetite for eat<strong>in</strong>g out, and <strong>the</strong>market is forecast to decl<strong>in</strong>e by0.5% <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong>• This negative growth is l<strong>in</strong>keddirectly to <strong>the</strong> recession, which isaffect<strong>in</strong>g employment, jobprospects, household <strong>in</strong>come,consumer confidence and, <strong>in</strong> turn,spend<strong>in</strong>g on eat<strong>in</strong>g out• Last year, 1 <strong>in</strong> 8 meals were eatenout of <strong>the</strong> home.This year, it will be1 <strong>in</strong> 9• 35% of consumers are eat<strong>in</strong>g outless now than <strong>the</strong>y were a yearago, while 20% plan to cut backover <strong>the</strong> year ahead• Instead, 32% of people are cook<strong>in</strong>gat home more, assisted by a wealthof supermarket offers and d<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong>ranges, and driven by a grow<strong>in</strong>gdesire to specify <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>gredients<strong>the</strong>y use and eat more healthily• The hardest hit establishments arethose charg<strong>in</strong>g over £10 per headas consumers seek out greateraffordability.This has meant thatcasual d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concepts have seennegative growth while <strong>the</strong> fastfood segment has been morebuoyant


The sector will bounceback, and play a key role<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> economicrecovery• The market will see a modestrecovery <strong>in</strong> 2010 with growth of0.5% - 1.0%• Over <strong>the</strong> medium-long term, <strong>the</strong>established underly<strong>in</strong>g trends ofris<strong>in</strong>g affluence, grow<strong>in</strong>g mobilityand ‘more youthful’ olderconsumers will support strongergrowth <strong>in</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g out. Follow<strong>in</strong>g anOlympics boost <strong>in</strong> 2012, <strong>the</strong> marketis forecast to reach £47.5bn by 2014– a five year <strong>in</strong>crease of 18%• Over <strong>the</strong> next five years, anestimated 3% - 5% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>employment is predicted with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> sector as<strong>the</strong> market expands to cater forgrow<strong>in</strong>g demand – rais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>prospect of more favourableperceptions of foodservice careeropportunities• With retail set to rema<strong>in</strong> underpressure, foodservice operators willplay a greater role <strong>in</strong> pull<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>economy out of recession throughgrow<strong>in</strong>g employment. This willco<strong>in</strong>cide with <strong>the</strong> revitalisation of<strong>the</strong> High Street as a more leisureorienteddest<strong>in</strong>ation. The pace ofthis transition will, however, bedeterm<strong>in</strong>ed by landlords’ soften<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> rental expectationsBut <strong>the</strong> recession will leavea last<strong>in</strong>g legacy, and not allbus<strong>in</strong>esses will survive• This recession will mark a watershedperiod and lead to a last<strong>in</strong>g recessionlegacy <strong>in</strong> which consumers demandbetter value and an enhancedexperience – but <strong>the</strong>y won’t bewill<strong>in</strong>g to pay more for it• Operators will face greater challengesto improve profitability than has been<strong>the</strong> case over <strong>the</strong> past decade. It willbe harder to <strong>in</strong>crease prices, andimproved efficiency will be moreimportant.The marketplace willbecome more specialised andsegmented, with successful operatorsfocus<strong>in</strong>g more on what <strong>the</strong>y are goodat and key po<strong>in</strong>ts of difference• Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market w<strong>in</strong>nerswill be those operators and suppliersbetter equipped to tap <strong>in</strong>toconsumers’ ris<strong>in</strong>g demand for bettervalue, healthier eat<strong>in</strong>g, convenience,au<strong>the</strong>nticity, local sourc<strong>in</strong>g andadded-experience. The bestperform<strong>in</strong>g eat<strong>in</strong>g outestablishments are forecast to bethose that specialise <strong>in</strong> fast casual,healthier, British, Oriental and hotfood-to-go categories• Grow<strong>in</strong>g competition will <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>the</strong> importance of build<strong>in</strong>g customerloyalty and streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g consumerrelationships. Foodservice operatorswill learn more from grocery retailersabout develop<strong>in</strong>g sophisticatedloyalty schemes. However, <strong>the</strong> battlefor loyalty will be fought on severalfronts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g overall consumerexperience, customer recognition andalignment with <strong>the</strong>ir valuesThe future of <strong>in</strong>formaleat<strong>in</strong>g out will be drivenby key mega trends• Healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g is a hugelyimportant consumer trend.While taste will rema<strong>in</strong> ofparamount importance tocustomers when eat<strong>in</strong>g out, <strong>the</strong>yare only go<strong>in</strong>g to become morehealth conscious• ‘Buy<strong>in</strong>g British’, seasonality andau<strong>the</strong>nticity will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to bepopular trends with consumers –already, 58% of people prefer toeat food which is sourced from<strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>. Operators will respond tothis with more frequent changesto menus• Issues around susta<strong>in</strong>ability andenvironmental impact will alsorise up <strong>the</strong> consumer agenda.More bus<strong>in</strong>esses will conductenvironmental and ethical auditsand produce detailed reports on<strong>the</strong> progress be<strong>in</strong>g made aga<strong>in</strong>sta series of key performance<strong>in</strong>dicators and targets<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 4


Introduction & BackgroundMarket Def<strong>in</strong>itionand SegmentationThe Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> market comprisesa wide variety of eat<strong>in</strong>gout establishments andlocations from whichfood and beverages arebought and consumedout of <strong>the</strong> home.SUB-CATEGORIES AND DESCRIPTIONSWITHIN THE INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKETSUB CATEGORYINFORMALRESTAURANTSCATEGORYDESCRIPTIONRestaurant that offers asit-down meal <strong>in</strong> a casualenvironment, typicallywith waited serviceOPERATOREXAMPLESCarluccio’s, Nando’s,Pizza Hut,WagamamaThis <strong>in</strong>cludes <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurants; fast food andtakeaway outlets; coffee shopsand sandwich bars; retail grab &go and cafés; pubs; and cater<strong>in</strong>gfacilities at leisure venues; travelsites and workplaces.What this market does not<strong>in</strong>clude is food consumed athome, food prepared at homefor consumption out of home,low level snack<strong>in</strong>g and formald<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. There is clearly a blurrydef<strong>in</strong>ition between <strong>the</strong>boundary of <strong>in</strong>formal andformal d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g – and this borderhas been set at an expenditureper head of £15 and over.Consequently, <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market can bedef<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> terms of cover<strong>in</strong>g alleat<strong>in</strong>g out meal occasions<strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g a transaction with aspend per person of £15 or less.The major sub categories of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market aresummarised right:FAST FOOD &TAKEAWAYSCOFFEE SHOPS,SANDWICH BARSAND CAFÉSRETAIL GRAB &GO, CAFÉSPUBSWORKPLACELEISURE<strong>Out</strong>lets serv<strong>in</strong>g food thatcan be prepared andserved very quickly, andwithout waited serviceCoffee and food-focusedcafés and bars, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gbranded and<strong>in</strong>dependently managedestablishmentsComb<strong>in</strong>ation of cafés andgrab & go ranges atassorted retailers,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g c-stores,department stores, petrolretailers andsupermarketsPublic houses and barssell<strong>in</strong>g food, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gmanaged and leasedoutletsSit-down and grab & gofacilities <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>workplace, but exclud<strong>in</strong>gvend<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>esIncludes locations wherefood and beveragesupports <strong>the</strong> primaryreason to visit, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gshopp<strong>in</strong>g centres, <strong>the</strong>meparks, sports arenas,music festivals andconcertsBurger K<strong>in</strong>g, KFC,McDonald’s,WimpyCosta Coffee, Pret AManger, Starbucks,SubwayM&S Café, Sa<strong>in</strong>sbury’s,Spar,Tesco,Wild BeanCaféBeefeater, Harvester, JDWe<strong>the</strong>rspoon,TobyCarveryAssorted contractcaterers, brandedconcessions and <strong>in</strong>housecater<strong>in</strong>g solutionsAssorted contractcaterers, brandedand <strong>in</strong>dependentconcessionsTRAVELFoodservice facilities forconsumers <strong>in</strong> transit –<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g prior anddur<strong>in</strong>g travelLittle Chef, Roadchef,Upper Crust,WelcomeBreakSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>5 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


ResearchBackgroundSubstantial research has been conducted <strong>in</strong>prepar<strong>in</strong>g this study of <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market. This has comprised four ma<strong>in</strong> activities:SUMMARY OF CONSUMER, INDUSTRY EXECUTIVEAND MARKET RESEARCH ACTIVITIESACTIVITYNOTESCONSUMERRESEARCH• 2,000 household telephone <strong>in</strong>terviews,representative sample, qualitative andquantitative questions• 350 face-to-face <strong>in</strong>depth <strong>in</strong>terviews <strong>in</strong>-store <strong>in</strong>12 McDonald’s stores• 45 family eat<strong>in</strong>g out diaries, cover<strong>in</strong>g visitpurposes, occasions, venues, tim<strong>in</strong>gs, spend andlikes and dislikes. Diaries ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for a twoweek period, with <strong>the</strong> sample spread over a twomonth period runn<strong>in</strong>g between May – June<strong>2009</strong>DESKRESEARCH• Analysis and review of exist<strong>in</strong>g eat<strong>in</strong>g outmarket research• Reviews of news articles, trade press, <strong>in</strong>dustrywebsites and key operator reports and accounts• Syn<strong>the</strong>sis with exist<strong>in</strong>g Allegra databases andreportsFOODSERVICEINDUSTRYSENIOREXECUTIVERESEARCH• 30 <strong>in</strong>terviews with senior executives across <strong>the</strong>foodservice sector, conducted via telephone andface-to-face• Analysis supported with m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of previousAllegra data and <strong>in</strong>terview f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gsINDEPENDENTOPERATORRESEARCH• 100 <strong>in</strong>terviews with <strong>in</strong>dependentcafé/restaurant owners/managers conductedvia onl<strong>in</strong>e and telephone• Feedback captured on <strong>the</strong> specific issues andstrategic challenges fac<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sizeable <strong>UK</strong><strong>in</strong>dependent operator sectorSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 6


Chapter 1The Scale of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketIn This Chapter• The size of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market by value• The rise of <strong>the</strong>market• The make up of <strong>the</strong>market• The contribution of<strong>the</strong> market to GrossValue Added• Employment trends• The impact of <strong>the</strong>recession• The <strong>UK</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market is estimated to beworth a sizeable £40.3 billion<strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong>• £40.3bn equates to £2.1bnspent at breakfast (5% of <strong>the</strong>total), £17.1bn at lunch (42%),£16.7bn at d<strong>in</strong>ner (42%) and£1.4bn at supper/late nightd<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (3%). Both mid-morn<strong>in</strong>gand afternoon snacks accountfor £3.0bn (8% of <strong>the</strong> total)• Over <strong>the</strong> last 40 years, <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> markethas taken an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g shareof <strong>the</strong> total expenditure byconsumers on food andbeverages – reach<strong>in</strong>g 22% <strong>in</strong><strong>2009</strong>. This compares with just14% <strong>in</strong> 1969• Consumers will spend onaverage £12.75 per week or£663 per year on <strong>in</strong>formaleat<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong> – thiscompares with £4.44 per weekor £230 per year <strong>in</strong> 1989KEY POINTS• As of March <strong>2009</strong>, 1.36 millionpeople were employed across<strong>the</strong> restaurant & café, pub &bar and canteen and cater<strong>in</strong>gsector• In 2006, <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> market contributed 3% toGross Value Added – this ranksit as one of <strong>the</strong> Top 10<strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> terms ofcontribution to <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>economy• An estimated 7.7 billion mealsare eaten out of <strong>the</strong> home <strong>in</strong><strong>2009</strong> – equivalent to 148million meals a week• On average, 1 <strong>in</strong> 9 meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> home everyweek. In early 2008, <strong>the</strong> figurewas 1 <strong>in</strong> 8, reflect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>impact of <strong>the</strong> recession• The largest segments of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market <strong>in</strong>terms of value are <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurants (27%), pubs (23%),coffee shops/sandwich bars(17%) and fast food/takeaway(11%)7 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


The Size of <strong>the</strong>Market by ValueAllegra estimates <strong>the</strong>value of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market for <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong> to be £40.3 billion <strong>in</strong><strong>2009</strong>.This is equivalent to averageannual household spend<strong>in</strong>g of£1,665. This valuation assumes adecl<strong>in</strong>e of 0.5% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market over <strong>the</strong> period2008-<strong>2009</strong> – <strong>the</strong> first annualcontraction for over 40 years.This negative growth is l<strong>in</strong>keddirectly to <strong>the</strong> recession, which hasaffected consumer confidence,employment, household <strong>in</strong>comeand, <strong>in</strong> turn, household spend<strong>in</strong>gon eat<strong>in</strong>g out. Despite this recentdecl<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> compounded annualgrowth rate for <strong>the</strong> period 2004-<strong>2009</strong> stands at 3.8%.There has been positive, andconsiderable, growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> last 40 years. Although <strong>the</strong>rehas been a slight contraction <strong>in</strong><strong>2009</strong>, growth is expected toresume <strong>in</strong> 2010.Fig. 1.1 – THE VALUE AND ANNUAL GROWTH OF THE INFORMAL EATINGOUT MARKET AT CURRENT PRICES, 2000-<strong>2009</strong> - £ Million6.60% 5.80%6.80%5.40% 6.30% 3.80% 3.80%8.30%26,327 27,864 29,762 31,359 33,341 34,624 35,931 38,8964.00%2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Fig. 1.2 – THE VALUE OF THE INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET AT CURRENTPRICES, 1969-<strong>2009</strong> - £ Million-0.50%40,452 40,250<strong>2009</strong>Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong> Market Value Percentage change year on yearNote:The 0.5% market contraction is based on a number of sources, most notably quarterlyperformance <strong>in</strong>sights from Crest, ONS Consumer Trends and assorted company trad<strong>in</strong>g results,as well as from economic forecast data and surveys of outlook prospects from restaurant andcoffee shop bus<strong>in</strong>ess leaders.1,3082,3625,302 8,474 13,087 17,618 24,689 33,341 40,45219691974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 <strong>2009</strong>Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 8


The <strong>2009</strong> market value of £40.3billion equates to 22% ofconsumers’ estimated totalexpenditure on food and beverageproducts of £187 billion and willclaim just over 4% of totalconsumer expenditure (ONS, <strong>2009</strong>).Despite a slight dip <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong>, thisshare has steadily <strong>in</strong>creased over<strong>the</strong> past 40 years. Growth hasbeen driven by <strong>the</strong> physicalexpansion of foodservice operators,as well as an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number ofconsumers, as eat<strong>in</strong>g out becomesan <strong>in</strong>tegral part of people’slifestyles. The chang<strong>in</strong>g landscapeof <strong>the</strong> High Street, now laden withcoffee shops, sandwich bars and‘fast casual’ concepts,is testament to <strong>the</strong> level ofdemand by consumers for <strong>in</strong>formaleat<strong>in</strong>g and snack<strong>in</strong>g.Allegra’s consumer research showsthat 1 <strong>in</strong> every 9 meals is eaten outof <strong>the</strong> home, which translates to11% of all meals. In 2008,consumers ate 1 <strong>in</strong> every 8 meals(13%) out of <strong>the</strong> home each week.This average figure masks a widerange of eat<strong>in</strong>g out frequencies bydifferent consumer groups.Inevitably, it will have beenaffected by <strong>the</strong> recession. Manypeople are now opt<strong>in</strong>g to cookmore meals from scratch andenterta<strong>in</strong> guests from <strong>the</strong>ir home –and this trend is streng<strong>the</strong>ned by<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> ‘foodie’ culture aswell as <strong>the</strong> ever present celebritychefs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> media.Fig. 1.3 THE VALUE OF THE INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET AS APERCENTAGE SHARE OF TOTAL FOOD AND DRINK CONSUMED IN ANDOUT OF THE HOME14%196915% 16% 16% 17% 18% 20% 22% 22%1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 <strong>2009</strong>Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong>The Rise of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketExpenditure on food out of <strong>the</strong> home has <strong>in</strong>creasedconsistently, with particular acceleration s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>mid-1990s, when growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market began toovertake rises <strong>in</strong> disposable <strong>in</strong>come. This is clearly<strong>in</strong>dicated <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.4 and only serves to illustrate<strong>the</strong> important role that eat<strong>in</strong>g out now plays <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>modern lifestyle.Fig. 1.4 COMPARISON OF GROWTH IN INFORMAL EATING OUTEXPENDITURE AND DISPOSABLE INCOME - Index (100 = 1988)22127933926123317219614217216151972100 1327556100317251291976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 20042008Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong> Disposable <strong>in</strong>come Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Market Value9 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


The Make upof <strong>the</strong> MarketThe Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market comprises<strong>in</strong>formal restaurants,fast food and takeawayoutlets, coffee shops &sandwich bars, retailgrab & go and cafés,pubs, <strong>the</strong> workplace,leisure venues and travellocations.INFORMAL RESTAURANTS:• An <strong>in</strong>formal restaurant offers asit-down meal <strong>in</strong> a casualatmosphere with a spend perhead of £15 or under. Thepopularity of such restaurants ison <strong>the</strong> rise. There are numerous<strong>in</strong>formal concepts expand<strong>in</strong>gwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market, with brandssuch as Gourmet Burger Kitchen,Nando’s and YO! Sushi offer<strong>in</strong>gonly a part waited service; as wellas concepts such as Giraffe andWagamama, offer<strong>in</strong>g full servicebut which rema<strong>in</strong> fast,convenient and well priced.FAST FOOD AND TAKEAWAY:• The fast food segment offers nowaited service, but <strong>the</strong> ability tosit down with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>establishment. Fast food isusually a burger or a chickenoption. The price tag of a meal ata fast food restaurant is £3.69(NPD Group, CREST, <strong>2009</strong>) whichis considerably lower than <strong>in</strong> an<strong>in</strong>formal restaurant. Lead<strong>in</strong>g fastfood brands <strong>in</strong>clude McDonald’s,Burger K<strong>in</strong>g and KFC.• Takeaway, unlike fast food,typically does not provide seat<strong>in</strong>gwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment.The majority of takeaway food istaken home to eat or delivered to<strong>the</strong> home. Takeaway <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>,for <strong>the</strong> most part, is Ethnic food(Ch<strong>in</strong>ese/Indian/kebab) ortraditional fish and chips. In <strong>the</strong>vast majority of cases, takeawayoutlets are <strong>in</strong>dependently run.COFFEE SHOPS/SANDWICHBARS/CAFÉS:• The coffee shop market has seenconsiderable growth <strong>in</strong> recentyears and is a common feature ofany High Street <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>.Branded coffee shops such asStarbucks, Caffè Nero and CostaCoffee have become householdnames <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way that fastfood brands have. As well as <strong>the</strong>familiar brands, <strong>the</strong>re arenumerous <strong>in</strong>dependent outlets.The café culture which has swept<strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong> recent years <strong>in</strong>vitescustomers to dr<strong>in</strong>k coffee <strong>in</strong> awarm and <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g atmosphere.• Like coffee shops, <strong>the</strong>re areseveral established sandwichbars <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> – Subway andGreggs across <strong>the</strong> entirety of <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong>, and Pret A Manger and Eatwhich are commonplace <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>South East. Unlike coffee shops,<strong>the</strong> environment offered <strong>in</strong>sandwich bars is more gearedtowards grab & go and efficientorder transactions process<strong>in</strong>g.• Traditional ‘cafés’ are alongstand<strong>in</strong>g feature of <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market.Thought of by many as a place toget a ‘fry-up’ and a cup of tea, <strong>the</strong>‘café’ still has sentiment withmany older and more traditional<strong>UK</strong> consumers.RETAIL GRAB & GO ANDCAFÉS:• Supermarkets/conveniencestores/petrol stations offerconsumers ‘food-on-<strong>the</strong>-move’with sandwiches, dr<strong>in</strong>ks andsnacks to choose from. With avast number of outlets, <strong>the</strong>y are acommon choice for busyconsumers who want to eatquickly and cheaply. The grocerycha<strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong> largest number ofoutlets across <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> is Spar(3,174) with <strong>the</strong> Co-operative closebeh<strong>in</strong>d (3,142) (The Grocer, May<strong>2009</strong>).• Many supermarkets and petrolstations, as well as departmentstores, also offer cafés as a meansto <strong>in</strong>crease dwell time andcapture additional spend<strong>in</strong>g from<strong>the</strong>ir customers. A few examples<strong>in</strong>clude M&S Café, Debenhams’Style Café, House of Fraser’s CaféZest and BP’s Wild Bean Café.PUBS:• The total number of pubs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong> is estimated at 57,500 (BritishBeer and Pub Association). Agrow<strong>in</strong>g share of pubs offer food,someth<strong>in</strong>g which has become<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>troduction of <strong>the</strong> Smok<strong>in</strong>g B-an<strong>in</strong> 2007 and its impact on alcoholsales. Ongo<strong>in</strong>g closures of pubshave brought <strong>in</strong>to question <strong>the</strong>longevity of <strong>the</strong> pub <strong>in</strong> futureyears. However, <strong>in</strong> terms of outletnumbers, <strong>the</strong> pub rema<strong>in</strong>s one of<strong>the</strong> largest contributors to <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 10


THE WORKPLACE:• Many larger employers providecater<strong>in</strong>g services for <strong>the</strong>ir staff –frequently heavily subsidised,where <strong>the</strong> consumer pays anom<strong>in</strong>al amount for a sizeablemeal. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly with many largeorganisations, <strong>the</strong> provision offood will be by contract caterers.Four of <strong>the</strong> largest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> areCompass plc, Sodexo, Aramarkand Elior.LEISURE:• Leisure refers to locations wherefood is not <strong>the</strong> primary reason forvisit but where <strong>the</strong>re is foodavailable. Examples <strong>in</strong>cludeshopp<strong>in</strong>g centres, shopp<strong>in</strong>g parks,<strong>the</strong>me parks, sports arenas, musicfestivals and concerts. Depend<strong>in</strong>gupon <strong>the</strong> location, food can varyfrom branded outlets to<strong>in</strong>dependent kiosks.TRAVEL:• Motorway Service Areas providemotorists with fuel, foodserviceand retail outlets. The threelargest operators are Moto,Welcome Break and Roadchef.These providers have partneredwith lead<strong>in</strong>g High Street brands,such as McDonald’s, Costa andMarks and Spencer, but alsoprovide <strong>the</strong>ir own brand cater<strong>in</strong>goffer. O<strong>the</strong>r roadside restaurants<strong>in</strong>clude Little Chef as well asnumerous <strong>in</strong>dependents.• Foodservice is also present with<strong>in</strong>tra<strong>in</strong> stations and airports as wellas aboard tra<strong>in</strong>s and planes. Aga<strong>in</strong>,<strong>the</strong>re are a scatter<strong>in</strong>g of brandswith<strong>in</strong> such locations as well as<strong>in</strong>dependently ownedestablishments.Of <strong>the</strong>se market segments, <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurants (27%), pubs (23%) andcoffee shops/sandwich bars (17%)take <strong>the</strong> largest share of <strong>the</strong> marketby value.Fig. 1.5 SEGMENTAL SHARE OF THEINFORMAL EATING OUTMARKET BY VALUE, <strong>2009</strong>Leisure (£1.2bn) 3%Travel Related (£0.6bn) 1%Workplace (£3.0bn) 7%Retail Grab & Go and Cafés (£4.4bn) 11%fast food and Takeaway (<strong>Out</strong> of Home Only) (£4.3bn) 11%Coffee Shops/Sandwich Bars/Cafés (£6.7bn) 17%Pubs (£9.2bn) 23%Informal Restaurants (£10.9bn) 27%Source: Allegra Strategies Research and Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>The Size of <strong>the</strong> Market by TransactionsThe total number of<strong>in</strong>formal meals eaten outof <strong>the</strong> home <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong> isestimated at 7.7 billion.Fig. 1.6 SEGMENTAL SHARE OF THE INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET BYNUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS, <strong>2009</strong>Industry <strong>in</strong>terviews reveal thattransaction numbers have held upreasonably well <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> recession.Many operators have, <strong>in</strong> thisdownturn, fought to hold onto <strong>the</strong>irvolumes and market share, choos<strong>in</strong>gto sacrifice <strong>the</strong>ir marg<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>stead.The relative strength <strong>in</strong> volumenumbers will help to ensure <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> marketcont<strong>in</strong>ues to expand <strong>in</strong> future years.19% 17% 17% 16%Coffee/Shops/SandwichBars/CafésInformalRestaurantsSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>Fast FoodandTakeawayPubs14%Retail GrabGo andCafés12%Workplace5%Travel andLeisure‘Coffee shops/sandwich bars andcafés’ has <strong>the</strong> highest number oftransactions with 1.5 billion. This isfollowed by ‘fast food and takeaway’and ‘<strong>in</strong>formal restaurants’, each with1.3 billion transactions.Note:There is no double count<strong>in</strong>g here. The travel and leisure segment as well as <strong>the</strong> workplacehave a lower number of transactions largely because many of <strong>the</strong> foodservice operators with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>se sites are brands and have been counted with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir relevant segments.11 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


The Size of <strong>the</strong> Marketby <strong>Out</strong>let Numbers<strong>Out</strong>let numbers across<strong>the</strong> entire Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> marketplace stand atan estimated 250,500 <strong>in</strong>mid <strong>2009</strong>. While <strong>in</strong>overall terms this figureis little changed from2008, this masks amodest <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>numbers of coffee shops,sandwich bars & cafés,offsett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> numbers of pubs.Coffee shops have benefited fromgrow<strong>in</strong>g demand for specialitycoffee beverages and ris<strong>in</strong>gappreciation of café culture.Indeed, for many, <strong>the</strong> coffee shophas become a ‘third space’dest<strong>in</strong>ation (i.e. preferred placeoutside <strong>the</strong> home and <strong>the</strong>workplace), usurp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pub <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> process. Pubs cont<strong>in</strong>ue to bechallenged on several fronts – notleast decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g alcohol sales,stiffen<strong>in</strong>g off-trade competitionfrom <strong>the</strong> supermarkets, highlyleveraged parent bus<strong>in</strong>esses and<strong>the</strong> fallout from <strong>the</strong> Smok<strong>in</strong>g Ban.This is result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> significantclosures. Closures have beenestimated at 35 a week <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong>,with numbers down by over 4,000s<strong>in</strong>ce 2005, with smaller pubswith limited food offer<strong>in</strong>gs mos<strong>the</strong>avily impacted.The largest contribution to <strong>the</strong>total outlet count is derived from<strong>the</strong> number of workplace facilities,with <strong>the</strong> estimated total of 88,600equat<strong>in</strong>g to a 35% share. This<strong>in</strong>cludes workplace canteen andcafé units across bus<strong>in</strong>ess and<strong>in</strong>dustry, education and healthcaresites, many of which are heavilysubsidised and also cater to aconsumer base outside <strong>the</strong> scopeof this market def<strong>in</strong>ition, not leastschool children and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>firm.These po<strong>in</strong>ts help to expla<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>relatively low market share byvalue <strong>in</strong> comparison.A key feature of this market is <strong>the</strong>importance of lunchtime, and thishelps to account for significant‘grab & go’ purchas<strong>in</strong>g activity.Convenience-led retail outlets,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g convenience stores,petrol forecourts andsupermarkets, capture a significantshare of this expenditure,particularly <strong>in</strong> larger urban areaswith high white collar work<strong>in</strong>gpopulations. Several retailers, notleast Marks and Spencer and <strong>the</strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g supermarket cha<strong>in</strong>s, havealso blurred <strong>the</strong> retail/foodserviceboundaries by <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g cafésand hot food-to-go counters.Allegra estimates <strong>the</strong> number of<strong>in</strong>dependent outlets <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong> to be108,400 – 43% of <strong>the</strong> total numberof outlets. The mix betweenbranded formats and <strong>in</strong>dependentsvaries greatly with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> differentsegments of <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> market. For example, with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> workplace, <strong>the</strong> provision of foodand beverages is largely throughcontract caterers. As a result, <strong>the</strong>proportion of <strong>in</strong>dependents is onlya small percentage. With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>formal restaurant, café andtakeaway segments, however, <strong>the</strong>number of <strong>in</strong>dependents farexceeds <strong>the</strong> brands. Relatively lowcapital <strong>in</strong>vestment and limiteddedicated skill requirements result<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependents account<strong>in</strong>g forbroadly four-fifths of <strong>the</strong> fast foodand takeaway and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurant segments.Fig. 1.7 SEGMENTAL SHARE OF THEINFORMAL EATING OUTMARKET BY OUTLETNUMBERS, MID YEAR <strong>2009</strong>Travel Related (4,744) 2%Leisure (15,678) 6%Coffee Shops/Sandwich Bars/Cafés (23,338) 9%Retail Grab & Go and Cafés (27,276) 11%Informal Restaurants (26,656) 11%fast food and Takeaway (30,918) 12%Pubs (33,247) 13%Workplace (88,609) 35%Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 12


The Contribution of <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> Market to Gross Value Added (GVA)Gross Value Added,<strong>in</strong>troduced by <strong>the</strong> ONS<strong>in</strong> 2005, measures <strong>the</strong>contribution to <strong>the</strong>economy of each<strong>in</strong>dividual producer,<strong>in</strong>dustry or sector <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>United K<strong>in</strong>gdom, and isone of <strong>the</strong> key economic<strong>in</strong>dicators used formeasur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>performance of a sector.GVA is used <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>estimation of GrossDomestic Product (GDP).The last available data for total GVAfor <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> was <strong>in</strong> 2006 and was£1,177bn. The Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market as a proportion of GVA <strong>in</strong>2006 was 3.0% – one of <strong>the</strong> top 10contributors. Similar sized<strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong>clude RecreationalServices and Computer Services.The largest contributors to GVA <strong>in</strong>2006 were Lett<strong>in</strong>g of Dwell<strong>in</strong>gs,contribut<strong>in</strong>g 7.2%, Constructionwith 6.3% and Education with 5.9%.Table 1.1 TOP TEN CONTRIBUTORS TO GROSS VALUE ADDED, 2006RANKINDUSTRYGROSS VALUEADDED AT BASICPRICES (£BN)12345678910LETTING OF DWELLINGSCONSTRUCTIONEDUCATIONRETAIL DISTRIBUTIONPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND DEFENCEHEALTH AND VETERINARY SERVICESBANKING AND FINANCEWHOLESALE DISTRIBUTIONOTHER BUSINESS SERVICESTHE INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET84.874.069.365.263.062.160.245.942.135.9Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong>13 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


The Impact of <strong>the</strong>Recession“The recession will lead to a number ofcasualties and portfolio rationalisationby weaker operators, as well as toseveral who might survive <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shortterm,but for whom this is a mere stay ofexecution.”John HutsonManag<strong>in</strong>g Director, JD We<strong>the</strong>rspoon“The recession has elevatedconsciousness around value andconsumers are now much more savvyaround deals.”Damian DixonCommercial Manager, Marks and SpencerFig. 1.8 RESPONDENTS WHO ARE VISITING EATING OUT ESTABLISHMENTSLESS FREQUENTLY – SPLIT BY TYPICAL SPEND PER HEAD19% 16% 32% 41%Visit placescharg<strong>in</strong>g less than£5 per headVisit placescharg<strong>in</strong>g £5-£10per headSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Visit placescharg<strong>in</strong>g £10-£15per headVisit placescharg<strong>in</strong>g more than£15 per headUnlike previous periodsof economic decl<strong>in</strong>e, thisrecession has affected<strong>in</strong>dividuals across allsocioeconomic grades –most notable is <strong>the</strong>adverse affect it has hadon white collar workers.As a result, <strong>the</strong> sheer volume ofthose impacted by <strong>the</strong> recession isgreater than <strong>in</strong> previous recessions.Largely seen as discretionaryspend<strong>in</strong>g, eat<strong>in</strong>g out is one aspectwhere consumers are likely to cutback dur<strong>in</strong>g a recession as manyconsumers have reduceddisposable <strong>in</strong>come and/or concernsover <strong>the</strong>ir job security.Allegra’s consumer researchhighlights that people are eat<strong>in</strong>gout less across <strong>the</strong> board – whe<strong>the</strong>rsacrific<strong>in</strong>g a coffee <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> morn<strong>in</strong>gor visit<strong>in</strong>g restaurants lessfrequently. Allegra’s consumerresearch reveals that, althoughconsumers are eat<strong>in</strong>g out lessacross all establishment types, <strong>the</strong>hardest hit establishments havebeen those charg<strong>in</strong>g over £10, witha far larger percentage eat<strong>in</strong>g outless <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se establishments than<strong>in</strong> those charg<strong>in</strong>g less than £10.The <strong>in</strong>ference is that <strong>in</strong>formald<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is relatively well placed asestablishments are frequently ableto offer consumers good value for<strong>the</strong>ir money, at keen price po<strong>in</strong>ts –someth<strong>in</strong>g which is of primeimportance to consumers dur<strong>in</strong>g arecession when disposable moneyis limited.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 14


Look<strong>in</strong>g more closely at <strong>the</strong> impactof <strong>the</strong> recession on a quarterlybasis and by market segment, it is<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to see how Ethnic andCasual D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g categories have been<strong>the</strong> hardest hit. Both operate atrelative high overall transactionvalues, whereas more affordableprice po<strong>in</strong>ts exist with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fastfood Burger segment. In addition,<strong>the</strong>re is a strong brand presencehere and lead<strong>in</strong>g cha<strong>in</strong>s benefitfrom significant consumer trustand higher market<strong>in</strong>g budgets.The recession will also likely causea slight reduction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number ofoutlets, particularly amongst<strong>in</strong>dependents. Some established,weaker brands will also suffer andexit <strong>the</strong> market, whilst o<strong>the</strong>rs willprosper and cont<strong>in</strong>ue to add moreunits to <strong>the</strong> market. Brandsexpand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>clude We<strong>the</strong>rspoon’s,Costa Coffee, Subway andMcDonald’s. The closure ofunderperform<strong>in</strong>g outlets, however,may not all be bad news. Newspace on <strong>the</strong> High Street, as well asfall<strong>in</strong>g property prices, will provideopportunities for new entrants and<strong>the</strong> “fitter” to expand. Allegra’sexpectation <strong>the</strong>refore, is that <strong>the</strong>overall outlet count will not bepermanently reduced as aconsequence of <strong>the</strong> recession.An encourag<strong>in</strong>g message alsoemerges from Allegra’s restaurant<strong>in</strong>dustry executive research dur<strong>in</strong>gmid <strong>2009</strong>. The research <strong>in</strong>dicatesthat, whilst levels of concernamongst <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry over <strong>the</strong>economic environment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lasteight months are still relativelyhigh, <strong>the</strong>y are decreas<strong>in</strong>g. This ishighlighted <strong>in</strong> Figure 1.10 andsuggests <strong>the</strong> economy is mov<strong>in</strong>gbeyond <strong>the</strong> worst of <strong>the</strong> recession.Fig. 1.9 QUARTERLY YEAR ON YEAR GROWTH IN SPEND IN SELECTEDINFORMAL MARKET CATEGORIES, Q2 ‘07 – Q1 ‘096.4%6.2%3.4%2.3%8.6%4.7%0.0%1.1%Q2’07 Q2’08 Q3’07 Q3’08 Q4’07 Q4’08 Q1’08 Q4’09Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, NPD Group, CREST data, <strong>2009</strong>Burger Sandwich and Coffee Casual D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g EthnicNote: Values sourced from CREST data. There are specific def<strong>in</strong>itions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> market isassessed: ‘Burger’ refers to fast food hamburger and chicken; ‘Ethnic’ refers to takeaway ethnicfood (Ch<strong>in</strong>ese, Indian, etc.);‘Sandwich and Coffee’ refers to coffee shops, cafés and ice cream shops;and ‘Casual D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’ refers to a sit down but <strong>in</strong>formal meal.Fig. 1.10 LEVEL OF CONCERN WITH CURRENT ECONOMICCLIMATE, <strong>2009</strong> VS. 200815% 11% 51% 43% 31% 37% 3% 9%Highly Concerned Concerned Slightly Concerned Not ConcernedSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Industry Research, <strong>2009</strong>7.7%1.8%-1.4%-1.6%9.0%-4.1%-6.9%-8.3%Sept ‘08May ‘0915 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Employment Statistics<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>As of March <strong>2009</strong>, 1.36million people wereemployed across <strong>the</strong>restaurant & café, pub &bar and canteen &cater<strong>in</strong>g sectors, whichequates to 1 <strong>in</strong> 20 of <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong> workforce.With 29.1 million people employed<strong>in</strong> total <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong> March <strong>2009</strong>,<strong>the</strong> sector accounts for 4.7% of <strong>the</strong>workforce. This compares with <strong>the</strong>retail sector which accounts for10.8% of <strong>the</strong> workforce.Restaurants & cafés comprised <strong>the</strong>largest of <strong>the</strong>se segments,account<strong>in</strong>g for 46% of <strong>the</strong> totalnumbers employed. The impact of<strong>the</strong> current recession is evident <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>2009</strong> figures with <strong>the</strong>restaurant & café segment down1.3% and <strong>the</strong> pubs & bars subcategoryfall<strong>in</strong>g by 2.3%. However,<strong>the</strong> longer-term decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pubsector is also illustrated wi<strong>the</strong>mployment numbers hav<strong>in</strong>g fallenby 57,000 from <strong>the</strong>ir peak <strong>in</strong> 2005.Numbers employed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>restaurant and café marketsegment have <strong>in</strong>creased steadilys<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> mid 1990s, though growthhas slowed <strong>in</strong> recent years. The fall<strong>in</strong> employment from 2005 onwardscan be attributed to <strong>the</strong> fall <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>number of pubs which hasdw<strong>in</strong>dled <strong>in</strong> recent years.Employment <strong>in</strong> restaurants andcafés has only started to fall s<strong>in</strong>ce2008 and is a result of weakenedeconomic conditions.Fig. 1.11 TOTAL EMPLOYMENT IN THE RESTAURANT & CAFÉ, PUB & BAR AND CANTEEN & CATERING SECTORS,MAR. 2000 – MAR. <strong>2009</strong>233.8251257.9266.3?271259.1243.7226.6242.9243.7483.8534.7484.1509.7529.6521.3559.6523.4583.4548.3596.9550.9616.2543526.7622.2505.6626.2494.1616.320002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 <strong>2009</strong>Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong> Restaurants & Cafés Pubs & Bars Canteens & Cater<strong>in</strong>g<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 16


Fig. 1.12 SHARE OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT WITHIN RESTAURANTS & CAFÉS BYEMPLOYMENT SIZE BAND54% 22% 13% 8%1-4 5-9 10-19 20-49Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong>2%50-990%100-2490%250+Figure 1.12 illustrates that <strong>the</strong>majority of people employedwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> restaurant and cafésector falls with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> smallestestablishment sizes – those whichemploy 1-4 people. This serves tohighlight <strong>the</strong> importance of<strong>in</strong>dependents and smallerestablishments with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>marketplace.Looked at by gender split, andconcentrat<strong>in</strong>g purely on <strong>the</strong> largestsector – restaurants & cafés, it is<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note <strong>the</strong> balanc<strong>in</strong>gtrend that has occurred over <strong>the</strong>past decade or so. While <strong>the</strong>re arestill more females than menemployed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sector, <strong>the</strong>difference is by no means asmarked as was <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>mid-1990s. This reflects acomb<strong>in</strong>ation of factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gfemales tak<strong>in</strong>g on a wider varietyof job roles, relatively slowergrowth <strong>in</strong> part-time positionsthan full-time, and malesbecom<strong>in</strong>g more attracted to <strong>the</strong>career opportunities.17 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Fig. 1.13 GENDER SHARE OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT IN THE RESTAURANT AND CAFÉ SECTOR, MARCH 1996 – MARCH <strong>2009</strong>69.5%66.5%60.1%57.1% 57.4% 57.3%54.4%53.5% 54.4% 53.9% 52.4% 50.5% 52.8% 52.7%39.9%42.5%42.8% 42.7%45% 46.5% 45.6% 46.1% 47.6% 49.1% 47.2% 47.3%30.5%31.5%13,067 17,618 24,689 33,34140,25024,689 33,34140,25019961997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 200420052006 2007 2008<strong>2009</strong>Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong> Male FemaleFig. 1.14 PART-TIME AND FULL-TIME SHARE OF TOTAL EMPLOYMENT IN THE RESTAURANT AND CAFÉ SECTOR,MARCH 1996 – MARCH <strong>2009</strong>60.5%58.7%61.3%61.5% 63.6% 60.9%56.5%59.5% 59.9% 56.5% 55% 53.8% 53.6% 52.8%39.5%41.3% 38.7%38.5%36.4% 39.1%43.5% 40.5% 40.1% 43.2% 45.1% 48.1% 48.4% 47.2%13,067 17,618 24,689 33,34140,25024,689 33,34140,25019961997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 200420052006 2007 2008<strong>2009</strong>Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong> Part Time Full TimeIn a similar fashion to <strong>the</strong> gender split, <strong>the</strong>re has also been a process ofequalisation with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> part-time and full-time roles with<strong>in</strong> restaurants& cafés. This does not reflect a decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of part-time jobsover <strong>the</strong> 1996-<strong>2009</strong> period, merely that <strong>the</strong>y have not kept pace with <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> full-time positions. Part-time jobs have <strong>in</strong>creased by 82,000 toreach 326,000, whereas full-time positions have grown by 133,000 tostand at 292,000 <strong>in</strong> March <strong>2009</strong>.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 18


Staff Turnover and Retentionwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> IndustryBy <strong>in</strong>dustry sector, <strong>the</strong>hotel, cater<strong>in</strong>g and leisure<strong>in</strong>dustry has <strong>the</strong> highestturnover rate – 41% <strong>in</strong>2007 – though morerecent figures areexpected to show a slightlower<strong>in</strong>g (CIPD, 2008,Recruitment Retention andTurnover Report).High employee turnover with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>hospitality <strong>in</strong>dustry is partlyattributable to <strong>the</strong> constant flow ofstudents work<strong>in</strong>g part-time <strong>in</strong> pubs,bars and restaurants – frequently<strong>the</strong>se are first-time jobs. Two thirdsof workers with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospitality<strong>in</strong>dustry have been <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir job forless than two years (Survey, TheBuzz, 2008).In a 2008 survey (CIPD), commonreasons cited for leav<strong>in</strong>g a job<strong>in</strong>cluded: A change of career,promotion outside of <strong>the</strong>organisation, level of pay, and a lackof career developmentopportunities.The challenge for <strong>the</strong> foodservicesector is to devise a strategy fit toreta<strong>in</strong> staff on a longer-term basis.This is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly difficult ascareer paths, particularly amongyoung workers, are gett<strong>in</strong>g morefluid with <strong>the</strong> notion of long-termloyalty to a company at risk ofdy<strong>in</strong>g out.The recession, however, will havehad a positive impact on <strong>the</strong>recruitment and retention of staff.With a greater number of highcalibre candidates look<strong>in</strong>g for work,<strong>the</strong> foodservice <strong>in</strong>dustry will be ableto entice some of <strong>the</strong>se candidates<strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> sector. The necessity forcompanies with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry towork on tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and careerprogression will still rema<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> orderto reta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>dividuals beyond<strong>the</strong> economic downturn.19 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 20


Chapter 2Market Historyand EvolutionIn This Chapter• Market historyand evolution –1960s to today• Case study 1 –More mobileconsumers• Case study 2 –<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> outdevelopment focuson Coventry• Case study 3 –Timel<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>UK</strong>open<strong>in</strong>gs of selectedInformal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>brands• Towards <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 1900s,eat<strong>in</strong>g out becamesignificantly more affordableand accessible to all consumers• The emergence of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market is directlyl<strong>in</strong>ked to <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g affluence,ris<strong>in</strong>g mobility and foreigntravel, and <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong>branded restaurant concepts• The absence <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> of astrong <strong>in</strong>digenous food culture,allied with its multi-culturalsocietal fabric, has enabled arich diversity of cuis<strong>in</strong>e typesto flourish – and resulted <strong>in</strong> atruly multi-national Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market• A potted history...-1960s - New social freedomsand eat<strong>in</strong>g out concepts- 1970s - Tentative times forInformal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>- 1980s - New faster foodfashions- 1990s - The emergence of‘fast casual’ d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g- 2000s - Café culture takescentre stageKEY POINTS‘‘The eat<strong>in</strong>g outmarket haschanged. Whenwas <strong>the</strong> last timeyou put a suit onto eat out?’’Stephen CliffordMarket<strong>in</strong>g Controller, Brake Bros‘‘There is nowmuch greaterchoice and higherquality than everbefore. Brandshave becomemuch more evidentwith a strongeremphasis onfreshness and<strong>in</strong>novation. Andconsumers havebecome far moreselective anddemand<strong>in</strong>g.’’Ewan VentersFood and Cater<strong>in</strong>g Director,Selfridges21 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


1960s – New Freedomsand <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Concepts• A period of significantsocial change, with <strong>the</strong>formality and socialconstra<strong>in</strong>ts of previousdecades replaced bygreater acceptance andconfidence <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividualexpression• First open<strong>in</strong>gs ofPizzaExpress andKentucky Fried Chicken<strong>in</strong> 1965 signal <strong>the</strong>emergence of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market• Widen<strong>in</strong>g of British foodtastes boosted by <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>troduction of packageholidays and expansionof Indian restaurantsand takeaways with <strong>the</strong>growth <strong>in</strong> migrants from<strong>the</strong> Indian sub-cont<strong>in</strong>entIn one sense, <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>s of<strong>in</strong>formal eat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> arecenturies old and can be tracedback to <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> trade andcommerce that accompanied <strong>the</strong>establishment of many newsettlements and towns dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>Roman occupation of c.50-400AD!However, <strong>in</strong> its contemporarysense, <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market really began to take shape<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1960s. The ‘Sw<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g Sixties’was a decade of revolution aga<strong>in</strong>st<strong>the</strong> conservatism and socialconformity that characterised <strong>the</strong>austerity and ration<strong>in</strong>g of post-war1950s. The 1960s were far moreprosperous years and hostedseveral notable foodservicedevelopments as well assignificant cultural changes.Re-<strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g Italian <strong>in</strong>spiration,<strong>the</strong> pizzeria arrived complete with<strong>the</strong> first purpose-built pizza oven<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>, with <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>alPizzaExpress open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> London <strong>in</strong>1965. This year also saw Americanfast food <strong>in</strong>fluences tak<strong>in</strong>g root,with <strong>the</strong> establishment of <strong>the</strong> firstKentucky Fried Chicken. At thistime, Wimpy was <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vanguardof br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g burgers to Britons, orLondoners at least, with n<strong>in</strong>e barson Oxford Street by <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong>decade. Also <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>geat<strong>in</strong>g out more widely accessibleand, <strong>in</strong> contribut<strong>in</strong>g to it becom<strong>in</strong>gmore of a leisure activity, was <strong>the</strong>emergence of bistros. Theseeateries provided casualenvironments and offered anassortment of ma<strong>in</strong>ly Frenchcountry options, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g garlicmushrooms, ratatouille, moulesand pâté.The 1960s also saw Britons’ foodtastes be<strong>in</strong>g expanded by <strong>the</strong>growth <strong>in</strong> package holidays. Theserelatively cheap comb<strong>in</strong>ations offlights, transfers andaccommodation provided <strong>the</strong> firstchance for many people to haveaffordable travel abroad,particularly to Spa<strong>in</strong> and Greece.The grow<strong>in</strong>g British economy andan endur<strong>in</strong>g legacy of post-warreconstruction led to labourshortages and resulted <strong>in</strong>significant <strong>in</strong>-bound migration.The <strong>UK</strong>’s largest wave of Indianmigrants arrived <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late 1950sand 1960s, quickly <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>gspicier food items to consumers’eat<strong>in</strong>g repertoires. In <strong>the</strong> process,Indian takeaways and restaurantsbecame familiar fixtures on shopparades across many major townsand cities. They jo<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong>emerg<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>ese takeaway sectorand provided welcome newalternatives to <strong>the</strong> substantialnumbers of traditional fish & chipshops.Despite <strong>the</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>gliberalisation, pubs rema<strong>in</strong>ed abastion of mascul<strong>in</strong>ity – withattendance viewed by generationsof men as sacrosanct. Food wasvery much secondary to dr<strong>in</strong>k, withwives expected to have mealsready at home – particularly <strong>in</strong>more <strong>in</strong>dustrial, work<strong>in</strong>g classareas outside London.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 22


1970s – Tentative timesfor Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>• Major economic scarsfrom <strong>the</strong> fall-out of <strong>the</strong>Oil Crisis <strong>in</strong> 1973 withhigh unemploymentand <strong>in</strong>flation• Growth <strong>in</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g athome boosted by ris<strong>in</strong>ghousehold ownership ofdomestic appliances• Popularity ofsteakhouse pub cha<strong>in</strong>sIn many respects, growth <strong>in</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>gout activity was on hold dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>1970s. The first half of <strong>the</strong> decadewas a period of significanteconomic and political uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty,with oil price shocks, power cuts, amajor recession and substantialunemployment. However, whileconditions improved as <strong>the</strong> decadeprogressed, eat<strong>in</strong>g out appetiteswere also dampened by majoradvances <strong>in</strong> electrical appliancesthat improved <strong>the</strong> quality ofdomestic life. The penetration ofrefrigerators, freezers and colourTVs among <strong>UK</strong> households grewstrongly – by 1978, more than 90%of households owned a fridge andover 40% possessed a deep freezeor fridge freezer.Grow<strong>in</strong>g TV view<strong>in</strong>g madehousehold names of cooks RobertCarrier, Fanny Cradock and Graham(Gallop<strong>in</strong>g Gourmet) Kerr. Theyencouraged more consumers to bemore experimental and confident<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> kitchen, and provided a fillipto <strong>in</strong>-home enterta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Thelead<strong>in</strong>g grocery cha<strong>in</strong>s alsosupported improved d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>,with <strong>in</strong>itial moves towards open<strong>in</strong>glarger superstores and offer<strong>in</strong>g farmore varied assortments, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gnew, ready-prepared frozen foodssuch as lasagne, gateaux and boil<strong>in</strong>-<strong>the</strong>-bagfish.Pubs, <strong>in</strong> particular, benefited from<strong>the</strong> convenience advantages offrozen food and many <strong>in</strong>troduceda selection of chicken, sausages,burgers or scampi, served withchips <strong>in</strong> a ‘basket’. The solidtradition of <strong>the</strong> roast d<strong>in</strong>ner alsobecame part of <strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g outexperience. It became <strong>the</strong>centrepiece of carvery-styleoperations, with <strong>the</strong> roast meatcarved from <strong>the</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t at <strong>the</strong>customer’s request. Pub cha<strong>in</strong>steakhouses also emerged – suchas <strong>the</strong> Berni Inn and Beefeaterbrands – cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>traditional British fondnesstowards relatively pla<strong>in</strong>ly cookedmeat. Indeed, red meat wasdished up on a regular basis, with<strong>the</strong> average person consum<strong>in</strong>g450g per week – double <strong>the</strong>consumption level of today.Red meat-eaters were alsodelighted with <strong>the</strong> arrival ofMcDonald’s <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1974,with Burger K<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g threeyears later. As with previous newcha<strong>in</strong> open<strong>in</strong>gs, London wastargeted for market entry. Toge<strong>the</strong>rwith Pizza Hut also mak<strong>in</strong>g itsdebut, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal element ofeat<strong>in</strong>g out was be<strong>in</strong>gstreng<strong>the</strong>ned.The 1970s also saw <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troductionof equal pay for women and bettereducation regard<strong>in</strong>g contraception,result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more females enjoy<strong>in</strong>gimproved career prospects. Theenhanced spend<strong>in</strong>g power, andreduced time for at-home mealpreparation, would become an<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market growth dynamic.Indeed, Figure 2.1, highlights howfemale employment has <strong>in</strong>creasedstrongly s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> early 1970s, ris<strong>in</strong>gby 4.3 million or 49% over <strong>the</strong> 1972-2008 period.Fig. 2.1 GROWTH IN FEMALE EMPLOYMENT AND SHARE OF TOTALEMPLOYEES NUMBERS. <strong>UK</strong> 1972-200837.1%37.1%9,107197238.5% 40.1% 41.7% 43.1% 44.9% 45.5% 45.7%9,5371976Note: Includes part- and full-time employmentSource: Allegra Strategic Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong>10,052 10,124 11,247 11,478 11,868 12,573 13,080 13,5491980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004Share of total %45.9%46.0%2008Female Employment <strong>in</strong> 000s23 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


1980s –New faster food fashions• Period of strongeconomic growth andris<strong>in</strong>g materialism• Emergence of moresophisticatedsandwiches – both fromMarks and Spencer andfirst Pret A Mangerstore open<strong>in</strong>g• Rapidly expand<strong>in</strong>g fastfood segmentThe 1980s split op<strong>in</strong>ion – to some itwas a decade of greed andconspicuous consumption, too<strong>the</strong>rs, it was a period ofentrepreneurship and possibility. Agrow<strong>in</strong>g divide certa<strong>in</strong>ly emergedbetween <strong>the</strong> rich and poor, withbetter off families pay<strong>in</strong>g less taxand enjoy<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>gabundance of new food options –<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g nouvelle cuis<strong>in</strong>e.What is clear is that <strong>the</strong> eightiesmarked a period when several keysocietal trends that we recognisetoday became evident – not least<strong>the</strong> emergence of work<strong>in</strong>g women,fall<strong>in</strong>g household sizes and <strong>the</strong>ris<strong>in</strong>g importance of convenienceand healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g. These factorscontributed to <strong>the</strong> 1980s be<strong>in</strong>gcharacterised by two th<strong>in</strong>gs – <strong>the</strong>microwave and <strong>the</strong> sandwich.More specifically, Marks andSpencer began sell<strong>in</strong>g its popularsandwiches and Prawn &Mayonnaise was quicklyestablished as <strong>the</strong> best seller.Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>spiration, small and<strong>in</strong>dependent bakers sought somecompetitive protection from <strong>the</strong>burgeon<strong>in</strong>g supermarket multiplesand started offer<strong>in</strong>g more preparedoptions to appeal to <strong>the</strong> grow<strong>in</strong>gtake away market. Greggsexpanded its store portfolio, whilePret A Manger opened for bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>in</strong> 1986. The fast food operatorsalso moved to embrace healthierdevelopments. Wimpy was <strong>the</strong>first to <strong>in</strong>troduce a vegetarianoption with its Spicy Beanburger,while McDonald’s became <strong>the</strong> firstcha<strong>in</strong> to provide nutritional<strong>in</strong>formation for <strong>the</strong> benefit ofconsumers.In terms of lead<strong>in</strong>g restaurantbrands, back <strong>in</strong> 1983, <strong>the</strong> largestcha<strong>in</strong> was operated by Little Chef,with over 310 outlets. This wasfollowed by Berni Steak Housesand Cavalier Steak Bars, as Britons’love affair with red meat endured.However, by <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> decade,Little Chef was usurped byMcDonald’s, with its grow<strong>in</strong>gcoverage of Great Brita<strong>in</strong> nudg<strong>in</strong>git towards <strong>the</strong> 400 mark.Competition <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fast food sectorwas also streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g, both from<strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of new productsand entrants. Chicken nuggets andmeal options for kids were addedto menus, with new competitorsemerg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of Dom<strong>in</strong>o’s,Taco Bell and Wendy’s. In addition,and at <strong>the</strong> lower end of <strong>the</strong>cul<strong>in</strong>ary spectrum, kebab shopswere given a huge fillip bycomedian Harry Enfield’s ‘Stavros’character.While not all new players were toprove successful, <strong>the</strong> ground wasbe<strong>in</strong>g prepared for a new breed ofeat<strong>in</strong>g out genre – one thatcomb<strong>in</strong>ed fast convenience with amore sophisticated, yet casual<strong>in</strong>formality.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 24


1990s – The emergenceof ‘Fast Casual’ d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g• Ris<strong>in</strong>g social mobility,household wealth andliv<strong>in</strong>g standards• Proliferation and<strong>in</strong>ternationalisation offast casual and quickservice d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g concepts• Emergence of gastropubsegmentThe 1980s may have paved <strong>the</strong> way,but <strong>the</strong> 1990s represented agenu<strong>in</strong>e step change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>evolution of <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> market. Excit<strong>in</strong>g new brandedconcepts emerged, and tried andtrusted brands expanded <strong>the</strong>irreach significantly. In <strong>the</strong> process,eat<strong>in</strong>g out became a more rout<strong>in</strong>epart of many more lives.In particular, <strong>the</strong> value mid-marketrestaurant sector grewexponentially dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1990s.Appeal<strong>in</strong>g to a large segment ofconsumers look<strong>in</strong>g for someth<strong>in</strong>gstylish yet safe, PizzaExpress wasjo<strong>in</strong>ed by a raft of pizza & pastabrands, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Ask, Carluccio’s,Strada and Zizzi. Open<strong>in</strong>g up newfrontiers was <strong>the</strong> emergence of <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>novative yet accessible,Wagamama, which debuted <strong>in</strong>1992. Offer<strong>in</strong>g non-specific‘Oriental’ food at affordable pricesand with open kitchen practices,this was an excit<strong>in</strong>g new additionto <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal scene. And <strong>the</strong>same could be said for YO! Sushi.Open<strong>in</strong>g its first outlet <strong>in</strong> 1997, YO!Sushi brought Japanese-<strong>in</strong>spirednew food and restaurant practicesto <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>.Without question, consumers weredevelop<strong>in</strong>g more sophisticatedtaste buds and demand<strong>in</strong>g spicierfood. In 1992, South African-based,but Portuguese-<strong>in</strong>spired, Nando’sbegan capitalis<strong>in</strong>g on this throughits flame-grilled peri-peri chickenranges. Nando’s also helped tocreate a new space <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formalmarket with its pay first, but tableservedapproach.The upward trajectory of all th<strong>in</strong>gsAsian boosted <strong>the</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g of a raftof <strong>in</strong>dependent Thai restaurantsand <strong>the</strong> popularity of Indian food<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s helped to raise <strong>the</strong>profile of Chicken Tikka Masala tofavoured national dish status.Pubs also caught <strong>the</strong> Asian bug,expand<strong>in</strong>g menu options and, <strong>in</strong> anumber of cases, sub-contract<strong>in</strong>gout kitchens and convert<strong>in</strong>g entirefood assortments over to Thaicuis<strong>in</strong>e. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> pub sectorgrew strongly dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> mid-late1990s on <strong>the</strong> back of a burgeon<strong>in</strong>gcater<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>ess. Several smallerpub cha<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>in</strong>dependentsraised <strong>the</strong> bar on <strong>the</strong>ir foodstandards by jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pubrestaurantmovement – with <strong>the</strong>term ‘gastro-pubs’ be<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>troduced to describe moreupmarket establishments.Concentrat<strong>in</strong>g on higher footfallurban areas, were a couple of newentrants to <strong>the</strong> sandwich sector.Eat and Subway both opened <strong>in</strong>1996 and offered healthieralternatives with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> market –but to different target audiences.Tak<strong>in</strong>g more than a little<strong>in</strong>spiration from Pret A Manger, Eatwas also aimed at office workers.By contrast, US-based Subwayoffered more youthful appeal and<strong>in</strong>troduced a customised sandwichproposition to <strong>the</strong> market via itsfranchise-based bus<strong>in</strong>ess model.Also help<strong>in</strong>g to consolidate <strong>the</strong>more affordable end of <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>formal market were a number ofnotable developments with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>coffee shop sector. Starbucksarrived <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> via its acquisitionof <strong>the</strong> Seattle Coffee Company <strong>in</strong>1998, while <strong>the</strong> emerg<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>essdevelopment possibilities did notgo unnoticed by several o<strong>the</strong>rsizeable operators. Whitbreadacquired Costa Coffee <strong>in</strong> 1995,Nestlé opened its first Café Nestlé<strong>in</strong> 1997 and McDonald’s purchased<strong>the</strong> Aroma cha<strong>in</strong> two years later.This emerg<strong>in</strong>g market segmentwas certa<strong>in</strong>ly stirr<strong>in</strong>g, but fewwould have predicted <strong>the</strong>phenomenal growth that wouldoccur <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> new Millennium.25 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


2000s – Café culturetakes centre stage• Rapid expansion ofbranded coffee shopsand <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glypervasive café culture• Emergence of healthierquick service cha<strong>in</strong>sand a new‘premiumised’ sector• End of decade recessionre<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> consumerspend<strong>in</strong>g and marketexpansionIn many ways, it is odd to talkabout <strong>the</strong> noughties as <strong>the</strong> time of<strong>the</strong> coffee shop as this concept hasexisted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong> a generic caféformat for much of <strong>the</strong> previouscentury. Moreover, even on a moretightly def<strong>in</strong>ed basis as a venuespecialis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> roast and groundcoffee, <strong>the</strong>re was over 1,000branded coffee shops by 2000.However, this is to ignore both <strong>the</strong>huge growth this market segmentwould go on to achieve and also itsprofound impact on <strong>the</strong> broaderInformal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market.Market leaders, Costa Coffee andStarbucks, both now operate over700 units alone, and <strong>the</strong>re will bewell over 4,000 branded coffeeshops by 2010. This growth hasbeen facilitated by coffee shopsexpand<strong>in</strong>g across <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>, and <strong>in</strong>many ways, usurp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> pub asBritons’ preferred ‘third space’. Inaddition to <strong>the</strong>ir core stores, <strong>the</strong>lead<strong>in</strong>g coffee cha<strong>in</strong>s have openedconcessions <strong>in</strong> book stores, gardencentres, department stores andsupermarkets, and developedexpress kiosks to trade fromsmaller footpr<strong>in</strong>ts at travel hubs.Not to be out-done, a host of nonspecialistoperators have explored<strong>the</strong>ir own ways to capitalise onconsumers’ grow<strong>in</strong>g demand forcoffee. Marks and Spencerlaunched its Café Revive concept <strong>in</strong>2000 and is now <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>’s fourthlargest café operator. Petrolforecourt specialist, BP, hasdeveloped a cha<strong>in</strong> of over 200 WildBean Cafés, while motorwayservices area operator, WelcomeBreak, has successfully <strong>in</strong>troducedits own Coffee Primo brand. Inaddition, many pub cha<strong>in</strong>s arefight<strong>in</strong>g back by streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>ir speciality coffee offers, notleast JD We<strong>the</strong>rspoon through itstie-up with Lavazza, and GreeneK<strong>in</strong>g with Coffee Republic.An important po<strong>in</strong>t that manynon-specialist operators arelearn<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g coffeecha<strong>in</strong>s is that it is not just about<strong>the</strong> coffee. The branded cha<strong>in</strong>shave prospered becausefundamentally <strong>the</strong>y are sell<strong>in</strong>g an‘experience’ that consumers buy<strong>in</strong>to. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>the</strong>relax<strong>in</strong>g atmosphere, a carefullydesigned <strong>in</strong>-store environmentand, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly, free newspapersand Wi-Fi, offer a proposition thatsimply cannot be re-created athome and this has been a keydriver beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> strong Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market growth ofrecent years.Work<strong>in</strong>g alongside <strong>the</strong> marketgrowth dynamic provided by <strong>the</strong>rise of café culture, has been <strong>the</strong>substantial expansion of brandedconcepts. The <strong>UK</strong> store portfoliosof Greggs, McDonald’s and Subwayall passed <strong>the</strong> 1,000 mark dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> noughties and have by nomeans reached saturation po<strong>in</strong>ts.Provid<strong>in</strong>g a useful <strong>in</strong>dicator of <strong>the</strong>scale and importance of <strong>the</strong>branded cha<strong>in</strong>s is <strong>the</strong> fact thattoday, to be a Top 10 operatorwith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market, a m<strong>in</strong>imum estate size of500 outlets is required. As recentlyas <strong>the</strong> early 1980s, 50 would havebeen sufficient.At <strong>the</strong> same time, it has not allbeen pla<strong>in</strong> sail<strong>in</strong>g for brandedoperators. A number of playershave come and gone, ei<strong>the</strong>rthrough closure ortakeover/conversion of underperform<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>esses. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>2000s, examples with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cafésector <strong>in</strong>clude Benjy’s, Madison’sand <strong>the</strong> phas<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong> Baker’sOven brand. Previously, and with<strong>in</strong>quick service restaurants, Arby’s,Happy Eater, Pizzaland, Taco Belland Wendy’s have closed down.Indeed, it would be mislead<strong>in</strong>g tosuggest that <strong>the</strong> noughties havejust been about <strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>gbrands. Food culture hasdeveloped appreciably and a hostof green shoots have emerged,many supported by savvymarket<strong>in</strong>g and an eagerness to tap<strong>in</strong>to a variety of established andemerg<strong>in</strong>g consumer trends. Saladbar concepts, Chop’d and Tossed,are target<strong>in</strong>g convenience-drivenconsumers look<strong>in</strong>g for healthyoptions delivered with personality.This can also be said of Leon andSnog.>>><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 26


Certa<strong>in</strong>ly prior to <strong>the</strong> recession,premiumisation was driv<strong>in</strong>gmarg<strong>in</strong>s and putt<strong>in</strong>g smiles onoperators across <strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g outsector. It helped <strong>the</strong> developmentof several more <strong>in</strong>dulgent bakeryledconcepts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Baker &Spice, Le Pa<strong>in</strong> Quotidien and Pr<strong>in</strong>ci.Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>se bus<strong>in</strong>essescomprise retail andfoodservice functions. The samealso applies to upmarket eaterie,Ottolenghi, and to earlier pioneer,Carluccio’s.Also significant is that grow<strong>in</strong>gnumber of operators are offer<strong>in</strong>gconsumers <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly differentpropositions across <strong>the</strong> daypartsvia extensive daily open<strong>in</strong>g hours.Indeed, while <strong>the</strong> noughties havebeen characterised by boom<strong>in</strong>gcafé culture, <strong>the</strong>y are also verymuch about <strong>the</strong> emergence of a24/7 society. Consumers arebecom<strong>in</strong>g ever more switched onand demand<strong>in</strong>g much more on<strong>the</strong>ir own terms – and this is animportant marker for how <strong>the</strong>market will evolve go<strong>in</strong>g forward.Case study 1More Mobile Consumers<strong>UK</strong> residents havebecome <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glymobile over <strong>the</strong> past 50yearsThis is evident <strong>in</strong> greater carownership and access to cars,more people on <strong>the</strong> road andspend<strong>in</strong>g more time travell<strong>in</strong>g,and greater numbers ofcommuters. All of <strong>the</strong>se factorshave been beneficial and helpedsupport <strong>the</strong> rise of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market. This isthrough:• Provid<strong>in</strong>g greater access forconsumers to a wider choice ofeat<strong>in</strong>g out establishmentsFig. 2.2 PERCENTAGE OF ADULTS WITH FULL CAR DRIVING LICENCE,<strong>UK</strong> 1975-200648% 57% 69% 72%1975/1976 1985/1986 1995/1996 2005/2006Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Department for Transport, <strong>2009</strong>Fig. 2.3 BILLIONS OF KILOMETRES TRAVELED BY BRITONS WITHINGREAT BRITAIN, 1971-2007• Increas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> opportunities foroperators to tap <strong>in</strong>to more outof home meal occasions• Stimulat<strong>in</strong>g demand forproducts designed for ‘graz<strong>in</strong>gon <strong>the</strong> hoof’ and ‘dashboardd<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’, and boost<strong>in</strong>g use ofdrive-thrusParticularly across <strong>the</strong> 1970s and1980s, <strong>the</strong> proportion of adultswith a full car driv<strong>in</strong>g licence<strong>in</strong>creased strongly, and nowstands at just over 7 out of every10 adults. Unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, carownership has also <strong>in</strong>creased, andnow averages 1.14 cars per <strong>UK</strong>household.419 495 681 7651971 1981 1991 2001Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS Social Trends, <strong>2009</strong>In addition, <strong>the</strong>re has beensignificant growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> numberand length of journeys be<strong>in</strong>gundertaken by Britons over <strong>the</strong>past 40 years. The Office ofNational Statistics reports a nighon doubl<strong>in</strong>g of kilometrestravelled with<strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> over <strong>the</strong>81720071971-2007 period. Grow<strong>in</strong>gemployment and commut<strong>in</strong>g hascontributed strongly to this, andit is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that <strong>the</strong>average <strong>UK</strong> commuter nowspends <strong>the</strong> equivalent of 26work<strong>in</strong>g days a year commut<strong>in</strong>g.(Work Wise)27 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Case study 2<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out developmentfocus on CoventryCoventry is a relativelytraditional city <strong>in</strong>‘Middle England’ with apopulation of just over300,000.While <strong>the</strong> profile of its populationhas taken on a greater Asiancomposition, over <strong>the</strong> past 40years it has not seen significantpopulation growth and, as such,provides a useful m<strong>in</strong>i case studyfor more closely explor<strong>in</strong>g how<strong>the</strong> assortment of its variouseat<strong>in</strong>g out establishments haschanged. Us<strong>in</strong>g data sourcedpurely from Yellow Pages, it is<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to see how varioussub-categories have grown (oro<strong>the</strong>rwise), s<strong>in</strong>ce 1978. Keyf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>clude:• Significantly greater presenceand diversity <strong>in</strong> takeaways andrestaurants• Growth <strong>in</strong> cafés and sandwichshops• Halv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> numbers of fish &chip shops and pubs• Emergence of branded cha<strong>in</strong>sWhile it is predom<strong>in</strong>antly outside<strong>the</strong> out of home scope of thisInformal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market, <strong>the</strong>strongest growth has occurredwith takeaway food shops,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g various ethnic, pizza andkebab outlets. Significant growthhas also taken place with<strong>in</strong>restaurants, with this <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gcontributions from both brandedcha<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>in</strong>dependents. Indeed,it is <strong>in</strong>sightful to see <strong>the</strong>substantial segmentation of sub-Table. 2.1 GROWTH IN NUMBER OF EATING ESTABLISHMENTSBY TYPE, COVENTRY, 1978–2008Type of Establishment1978 1988 1998 2008Cafés & Sandwich ShopsFish & Chip ShopsPublic HousesRestaurantsTakeaway Food ShopsTOTALSource: Yellow Pagescategories employed with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>restaurant section of <strong>the</strong> 2008Yellow Pages. This now <strong>in</strong>cludes:American, African, Armenian,Austrian, Bangladeshi, Belgian,Caribbean, French, Greek, Indian,Indonesian, Irish, Japanese,Korean, Kurdish, Lebanese,Malaysian, Mediterranean,Mexican, Middle Eastern,Mongolian, Moroccan, Nepalese,Polish, Portuguese, Russian,Scottish, Spanish, Thai, Turkishand Vietnamese.Cafés & sandwich bars showparticularly strong growth over<strong>the</strong> past decade, which is verymuch <strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with <strong>the</strong> rise ofcafé culture <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong> general.This segment is also <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gfrom some of <strong>the</strong> names of subcategoriesthat have been used.Back <strong>in</strong> 1978, this <strong>in</strong>cluded snackbars, ice cream parlours and milkbars, descriptions that havelargely disappeared s<strong>in</strong>ce. Newersub-categories have emerged <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> form of <strong>in</strong>ternet cafés andpottery & ceramic cafés.Unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, fish & chip shopshave lost out to <strong>the</strong> substantial436125659274462463227936347029522191071245316431127144168534Growth1978-200821-30-1298514188growth <strong>in</strong> competition fromo<strong>the</strong>r takeaways and restaurants.The o<strong>the</strong>r major loser <strong>in</strong> thisanalysis has been public houses.Aga<strong>in</strong>, this is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with wider<strong>UK</strong> trends, but <strong>the</strong> magnitude of<strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e with<strong>in</strong> Coventry willhave been greater ow<strong>in</strong>g to itsCity status, and a heavier skewtowards smaller, beverage-ledestablishments.The expansion <strong>in</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g outestablishments has also served tochange <strong>the</strong> retail landscape ofCoventry’s central shopp<strong>in</strong>g areasand suburban shop parades. Theretail/foodservice mix hasevolved to <strong>in</strong>clude a muchstronger and higher qualityeat<strong>in</strong>g out provision, comparedwith <strong>the</strong> more pub dom<strong>in</strong>atedmarket back <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1970s. Andwith many non-food retailersstruggl<strong>in</strong>g and clos<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>expanded foodservice offer ishelp<strong>in</strong>g to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> footfall andreduce <strong>the</strong> number of vacantunits. Certa<strong>in</strong>ly, with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> morecentral and higher rental areas,<strong>the</strong>re is a stronger foodservicepresence, but this is focusedaround lead<strong>in</strong>g brands.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 28


Case study 3Timel<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>UK</strong> Open<strong>in</strong>gsfrom Selected Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> BrandsThe orig<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>the</strong>modern day Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market canbe traced back to <strong>the</strong>1960s. Pioneers,Kentucky FriedChicken andPizzaExpress,<strong>in</strong>troduced new eat<strong>in</strong>gideas and paved <strong>the</strong>way for a host of newrestaurant concepts.The pace and varietyof open<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>creased<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1990s and thismomentum andburgeon<strong>in</strong>gheterogeneity has beencarried through <strong>in</strong>to<strong>the</strong> new millenium.Fig. 2.3 TIMELINE: THE <strong>UK</strong> DEBUTS OF SELECTED INFORMAL EATINGOUT BRANDS, 1960s-2000s1960sNew socialfreedoms andpioneer<strong>in</strong>geat<strong>in</strong>g outconcepts def<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>formal orig<strong>in</strong>s1965KentuckyFried Chicken1970sDifficulteconomic timesand more focuson eat<strong>in</strong>g athome than out1971Costa Coffee1973Pizza Hut1974McDonald’s1980sNew fast foodfashions,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gburgers, readymeals &sandwiches1980Wendy’s1985Dom<strong>in</strong>o’s1990sThe emergenceof fast casuald<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g withmany excit<strong>in</strong>gnew players1992Wagamama1992Nando’s1995Eat1996Subway1997YO! Sushi1998Giraffe2000sRise of caféculture andbirth of manynew healthier,niche andpremiumbrands2001Apostrophe2001GourmetBurger Kitchen2004Chop’d2004Leon2005Canteen2005Sacred2005Tossed1965Pizza Express1977Burger K<strong>in</strong>g1986Pret A Manger1998Starbucks2008Jamie’s Italian1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s2000sSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Companies, <strong>2009</strong>29 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 30


Chapter 3ConsumerInsightIn This Chapter• Key motivations andprimary occasionsfor eat<strong>in</strong>g out• <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out behaviour– when, where andhow often• The popularity ofdifferentestablishments• Key <strong>in</strong>fluences whenchoos<strong>in</strong>g somewhereto eat out• Spend patterns andaffordability• Chang<strong>in</strong>g eat<strong>in</strong>g outhabits amongstBritons• The trend <strong>in</strong>snack<strong>in</strong>g versuseat<strong>in</strong>g structuredmeals• Case studies acrossdifferent regions andage brackets,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gDiaries• <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>next 12 months• Some 148 million meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> home everyweek <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>• On average, this equates to 1 <strong>in</strong>every 9 meals. Significantvariation lies around this figure– 16% of <strong>the</strong> British public eatfive meals or more out of <strong>the</strong>home every week, and 19% eatno more than one meal afortnight• Most people (81%) view eat<strong>in</strong>gout as a treat. However, peopleare not just eat<strong>in</strong>g out onspecial occasions. A highpercentage are do<strong>in</strong>g so forsocial reasons, to spend timewith <strong>the</strong>ir friends and family• London is <strong>the</strong> <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>Capital of <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> – Londoners,on average, eat three mealsaway from home every week.People from Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irelandeat out <strong>the</strong> least, eat<strong>in</strong>g onaverage less than two mealsout of <strong>the</strong> home• Lunch is k<strong>in</strong>g! 43% of people eatlunch out of <strong>the</strong> home at leastonce a week• Coffee shops and sandwich barsare <strong>the</strong> favourite weeklydest<strong>in</strong>ation – 34% of consumersvisit one at least once a week• Local pubs are hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>irown – rumours of ext<strong>in</strong>ctionare grossly exaggerated. Thepub is particularly popular withyoung adults and <strong>the</strong> over 65s.KEY POINTSThis illustrates <strong>the</strong> sentimentthat <strong>the</strong> pub holds with <strong>UK</strong>citizens across <strong>the</strong> board• Quality and taste of food, aboveprice, is <strong>the</strong> key determ<strong>in</strong>ant forconsumers look<strong>in</strong>g for valuewhen eat<strong>in</strong>g out• People have been re<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir eat<strong>in</strong>g out – 35% of peopleare eat<strong>in</strong>g out less than <strong>the</strong>yhave been <strong>in</strong> recent yearscompared with just 10% whoare do<strong>in</strong>g so more often• There is a mixed response as towhe<strong>the</strong>r eat<strong>in</strong>g out has becomemore or less affordable <strong>in</strong>recent years – consumers err on<strong>the</strong> side of believ<strong>in</strong>g eat<strong>in</strong>g outto be less affordable but thiscan be attributed directly to <strong>the</strong>recession and <strong>the</strong> impact it hashad on consumer confidence• Lower priced establishmentsare currently prov<strong>in</strong>g popular –74% of diary keepers ate out<strong>in</strong> establishments where <strong>the</strong>price of <strong>the</strong>ir meal / snack wasunder £5• The year ahead will be animprovement on <strong>the</strong> last 12months but will rema<strong>in</strong> adifficult environment for <strong>the</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g out market. 20% ofpeople claim <strong>the</strong>y will be eat<strong>in</strong>gout less over <strong>the</strong> year aheadcompared with half thisproportion expect<strong>in</strong>g to beeat<strong>in</strong>g out more31 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Key Motivations andPrimary Occasions for <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>For many, eat<strong>in</strong>g out isan <strong>in</strong>tegral part of <strong>the</strong>irlifestyle. This is a directeffect of a multitude offactors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g moremobile lifestyles, <strong>the</strong>ever-widen<strong>in</strong>g availabilityof food, <strong>the</strong> social benefitsof eat<strong>in</strong>g out and a desireto broaden palates.Fig. 3.1 EATING OUT AS A TREAT - I regard eat<strong>in</strong>g out as a treatPercent of RespondentsWhile <strong>the</strong>se factors arecontribut<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> long-termunderly<strong>in</strong>g trend of eat<strong>in</strong>g out,people cont<strong>in</strong>ue to see <strong>the</strong>occasion as a treat.“Go<strong>in</strong>g out for foodis a treat, I only goout to eat differentth<strong>in</strong>gs that I don'thave at home.”Female16-24, Peterborough29% 52% 9% 9%AgreeStronglyAgree Nei<strong>the</strong>r DisagreeSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>1%DisagreeStrongly“It's a treat becauseit breaks <strong>the</strong>monotony of cook<strong>in</strong>gfor <strong>the</strong> day.”Male35-39, LeicesterIn support of <strong>the</strong> notion thateat<strong>in</strong>g out is a treat, consumersheavily disagreed with <strong>the</strong> notionthat a busy lifestyle forced <strong>the</strong>m toeat out frequently. 81% of peopledisagreed that <strong>the</strong>y ate out veryoften because of a busy lifestyleand 78% disagreed to some extentthat <strong>the</strong>y rarely had time to cookproper meals at home.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 32


The motivation beh<strong>in</strong>d consumersgo<strong>in</strong>g out to eat is closely l<strong>in</strong>ked to<strong>the</strong> notion of it be<strong>in</strong>g a treat and asa key part of <strong>the</strong>ir social lives. Themost common reasons given by<strong>in</strong>dividuals for eat<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong>home were d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g out with friends(21%), or family (20%) and go<strong>in</strong>gout for a special occasion (21%).Fig. 3.2 ATTITUDINAL STATEMENTSPercent of Respondents78%81%9%12%I rarely have timeto cook propermeals at home8%11%I eat out veryoften because ofmy busy lifestyleDisagree Nei<strong>the</strong>r AgreeSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research,<strong>2009</strong>Fig. 3.3 PRIMARY REASON FOR LAST EATING OUT OCCASIONPercent of Respondents21%D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>Out</strong> withFriends21% 20% 12% 7% 6% 4% 4%Treat/CelebrationD<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>Out</strong> withFamilyD<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<strong>Out</strong> withPartnerSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Meal withShopp<strong>in</strong>gMealwithLeisureQuickMeal-on-<strong>the</strong>-MoveRout<strong>in</strong>eMeal3%BreakfromWork1% 1%Boardroommeet<strong>in</strong>gO<strong>the</strong>r33 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> BehaviourIn <strong>the</strong> last 12 months,35% of consumers havereduced <strong>the</strong> extent towhich <strong>the</strong>y are eat<strong>in</strong>gout. 55% are eat<strong>in</strong>g out<strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong>y were 12months ago and 10% areeat<strong>in</strong>g out more.Consumers are also re-consider<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>ir choice of outlet, with 32% ofpeople visit<strong>in</strong>g places charg<strong>in</strong>g £10-£15 per head less over <strong>the</strong> last yearand 41% of people reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>irvisits to establishments charg<strong>in</strong>gmore than £15 per head.When <strong>in</strong>dividuals are eat<strong>in</strong>g out:Lunch is <strong>the</strong> meal occasion eaten out of <strong>the</strong> home most often – 42% ofpeople eat lunch out of <strong>the</strong> home at least once a week. Comparatively,31% eat d<strong>in</strong>ner out of <strong>the</strong> home once a week and 8% breakfast. Thegreatest percentage of people – 79% – seldom or never eat breakfast outof <strong>the</strong> home.Fig. 3.5 FREQUENCY OF MEAL OCCASIONS OUT OF HOMEHow often do you eat out?Percent of Respondents79%12%16%8%18%78%Fig. 3.4 CHANGES IN EATING HABITSIN THE LAST 12 MONTHSConcern<strong>in</strong>g your generaleat<strong>in</strong>g habits over <strong>the</strong> lastyear, do you eat out of homemore or less?(Percent of Respondents)17%13%22%21%35%7%3%3%8%42%31%7%5%3%6%BreakfastLunchD<strong>in</strong>ner/Even<strong>in</strong>gMealLate Night/SupperNever Less than once a month One meal per month55%One meal per fortnightAt least one meal per weekSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>10%Eat out of homeLess Same MoreSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 34


Lunch is consumed out of <strong>the</strong>home by 24% of <strong>UK</strong> adults at leasttwice a week – this figure would beconsiderably higher if packedlunches were accounted for. Thisproportion compares with 13% ofeat<strong>in</strong>g d<strong>in</strong>ner out twice a week ormore.Fig. 3.6 LUNCH VS. DINNER – COMPARISON OF OUT OF HOMECONSUMPTION BY MORE FREQUENT PARTICIPANTSHow often would you eat out?Percent of RespondentsLunchD<strong>in</strong>nerOn average, 1 <strong>in</strong> 9 meals are eatenout of <strong>the</strong> home every week.However, this encompasses a hugeamount of variation. Some peopleare eat<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong> home on afairly irregular basis – for example,16% eat lunch out less than once amonth. O<strong>the</strong>rs will eat five or moremeals a week out of <strong>the</strong> home. Anestimated 10 million people <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong>, or 16%, eat five or more mealsout of <strong>the</strong> home every week.Lunch dom<strong>in</strong>ates, largely because asizeable number of workers are outof <strong>the</strong> home dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir lunchhour every day. Not all of <strong>the</strong>seworkers will be buy<strong>in</strong>g lunch everyday, however – 57% typically br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> a packed lunch at least one day aweek, equat<strong>in</strong>g to approximately 17million people. The workplacecanteen is <strong>the</strong> second mostpopular choice with 24% of peopleeat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir lunch <strong>the</strong>re.The most popular even<strong>in</strong>gs foreat<strong>in</strong>g d<strong>in</strong>ner out of <strong>the</strong> home areFriday and Saturday nights. Fridaynight is more popular with youngerage groups and Saturday night amore favoured even<strong>in</strong>g for <strong>the</strong>early thirties to middle aged (seeCase Study 2).9% 1% 15% 12% 18% 18% 13% 21%5+ Meals per week 2-4 Meals per week One meal per week One meal onceper fortnightSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Table 3.1 FREQUENCY OF <strong>UK</strong> CONSUMERS EATING OUT OF HOME BYMEAL OCCASIONRANK MEAL OCCASION1234LUNCHDINNERBREAKFASTLATE NIGHT SUPPERSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>AVERAGE NUMBER OF MEALS EATEN OUTPER MONTHTable 3.2 TOP 10 LUNCH CHOICES AMONGST THE <strong>UK</strong> WORKING POPULATIONPercent of RespondentsRANK WORKING LUNCH12345=6=689104.92.80.90.6BRING IN PACKED LUNCHEAT IN CANTEEN/CAFÉGO TO CAFÉ/SANDWICH BARWORK AT HOMEBUY FROM SHOP/SUPERMARKETGO TO RESTAURANTGO TO A FAST FOOD OUTLET1 DON’T NORMALLY HAVE LUNCH AT WORKI GO HOME FOR LUNCHI GO TO THE PUBPERCENTAGE57.4%23.5%18.9%11.9%7.8%4.4%4.4%4.0%2.7%2.4%Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>35 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Where <strong>in</strong>dividuals are eat<strong>in</strong>g out:The most frequently visited establishments, i.e. customers visit<strong>in</strong>gat least once a week, comprise: coffee shops/cafés/sandwich bars (34%of consumers); <strong>the</strong> workplace (17%); general restaurants (16%) and fastfood outlets (15%).Fig. 3.7 FREQUENCY OF EATING OUTHOW OFTEN DO YOU EAT OUT IN THE FOLLOWING ESTABLISHMENTS?Percent of Respondents19%22%25%47%50%79%89%22%23%11%17%26%17%16%26%16%14%13%34%12%15%11%15%14%15%8%14%1%2%1%17%2%2%1%6%GeneralrestaurantsPub restaurantsCoffeeshops/cafés/sandwich barsFast food outletsDepartmentstore/supermarketcafésWorkplace/college café/canteenFacilities <strong>in</strong>fitness andleisure centresSeldom or never Once every 2-3 months Once per month Once per fortnight At least once per weekSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Table. 3.3 FREQUENCY OF ESTABLISHMENT VISITS PER WEEKRANK ESTABLISHMENT TYPEAV. FREQUENCY OF VISITS PER MONTH123=4=456COFFEE SHOP/CAFÉS/SANDWICH BARS 2.0GENERAL RESTAURANTS (BRANDED AND INDEPENDENT) 1.4PUB RESTAURANTS1.3FAST FOOD OUTLETS1.1WORKPLACE/COLLEGE CAFÉ/CANTEEN 1.1DEPARTMENT STORE/SUPERMARKET CAFÉ 1.0FACILITIES IN FITNESS & LEISURE CENTRES 0.3Table 3.3 supports what isexpressed <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.7 byrepresent<strong>in</strong>g how frequently <strong>the</strong>average adult will visit certa<strong>in</strong>establishments – for example,people will visit a coffeeshop/sandwich bar, on average,twice a month and will visit a fastfood cha<strong>in</strong> on average once amonth. By contrast, a café <strong>in</strong> adepartment store or supermarketis typically visited only once amonth.8Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 36


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Consumer TypologiesConsumers vary significantly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> frequency of<strong>the</strong>ir out of home eat<strong>in</strong>g patterns – from <strong>the</strong> veryregular d<strong>in</strong>ers to those eat<strong>in</strong>g out more rarely.Table 3.4 categorises and describes some of <strong>the</strong>key characteristics of different usage segments.Table 3.4 CONSUMER TYPOLOGIES BY EATING OUT FREQUENCY5 MEALS ORMORE PER WEEK(16%)2-5 MEALSPER WEEK(22%)1-2 MEALSPER WEEK(23%)ONCE A WEEK -ONCE AFORTNIGHT (20%)ONCE AFORTNIGHT ORLESS (19%)GENDERMale, 18-24Female, 25-34Female, 35-44Female, 55-64Female, 65+AFFLUENCEAbove averageaffluenceAverage affluenceAverage affluenceAverage affluenceBelow averageaffluenceEATING OUTCHANGES IN THELAST 12 MONTHSEat out moreEat out moreEat out lessEat out lessEat out lessEATING OUTCHANGES IN THENEXT 12 MONTHSEat out moreEat out lessEat out lessEat out lessEat out lessEATING OUT IS ATREAT65% agree75% agree84% agree88% agree90% agreePOPULARESTABLISHMENTSVisits all ma<strong>in</strong>establishment typesCoffee shops, cafés,supermarket cafés,fast food outlets,general restaurants(ma<strong>in</strong>ly<strong>in</strong>dependents)General restaurants,local pubsCoffee shops, localpubs, generalrestaurants(<strong>in</strong>dependentsma<strong>in</strong>ly)General restaurants(brands ma<strong>in</strong>ly), pubrestaurantsCOMMONREASONS FORDINING OUTBreak from work,everyday meal, quickmeal on <strong>the</strong> move,d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with friendsBreak from work,rout<strong>in</strong>e mealD<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with partner,d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with friendsSpecial occasion,d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with family,d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with friendsSpecial occasion,d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g with familyDINING OUTCOMPANION(S)Self, friendsSelf, friendsPartner, familyPartner, familyFamilyREASONS FORVISITING CERTAINESTABLISHMENTSBeen <strong>the</strong>re before,food quality/taste,attentive serviceFood quality/taste,wide variety of foodoptions, good valueon food and dr<strong>in</strong>k,good review <strong>in</strong>newspaperConvenient location,food quality/taste,pleasantenvironment, cleanrestaurant, quickserviceBeen <strong>the</strong>re before,organic/Fairtradefood, locally sourcedfood, wide variety offood options,pleasantenvironmentGood value on foodand dr<strong>in</strong>k, healthyfood options, familyfriendly, quickservice,recommended byfriend/family, specialoffersSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>37 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


The Popularity ofEstablishmentsCoffee shops, cafés andsandwich bars dom<strong>in</strong>ate<strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> frequencycustomers visit <strong>the</strong>m.General restaurants andpubs are also popularchoices with <strong>in</strong>dividuals.When respondents were askedwhich establishments <strong>the</strong>y havevisited <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last three months, <strong>the</strong>local pub and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependentrestaurants came out top with <strong>the</strong>greatest share. 52% of respondentshave visited <strong>the</strong>ir local pub, 44% an<strong>in</strong>dependent restaurant, and 32%an <strong>in</strong>dependent café.The strong visit<strong>in</strong>g numbers forpubs can be attributed to <strong>the</strong> sheernumber of pub outlets. Allegra’sresearch has <strong>in</strong>dicated that <strong>the</strong> pubhas sentiment with both youngadults (18-24), and <strong>the</strong> oldergeneration (65 and over). The pubis popular at different times of <strong>the</strong>day for <strong>the</strong>se age groups, with <strong>the</strong>young adults preferr<strong>in</strong>g to visitpubs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g and olderadults dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> day. Pubs havesuffered <strong>in</strong> recent years with anumber of outlets clos<strong>in</strong>g.However, <strong>the</strong>y are clearlysomewhere which can successfullyattract all age groups and allclasses toge<strong>the</strong>r and close <strong>the</strong>bridge between <strong>the</strong>m. The choiceand quality of food <strong>in</strong> pubs hasbeen ris<strong>in</strong>g for several years and<strong>the</strong> Smok<strong>in</strong>g Ban <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>2007 fur<strong>the</strong>r fuelled <strong>the</strong> need forpubs to serve food. As a result, <strong>the</strong>pub has become a competitor tomany <strong>in</strong>dependent restaurants.Table. 3.5 POPULARITY OF ESTABLISHMENTSWhich eat<strong>in</strong>g out establishments have you visited <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 3 months?Percent of RespondentsRANK123456=7=791011=12=12=12=12NAME OF ESTABLISHMENTLOCAL PUBOTHER INDEPENDENT RESTAURANTSINDEPENDENT CAFÉMCDONALD’SINDEPENDENT CHINESE RESTAURANTINDEPENDENT INDIAN RESTAURANTINDEPENDENT ITALIAN RESTAURANTCOSTA COFFEESTARBUCKSKFCMARKS AND SPENCER (INCL.CAFÉ)PIZZA HUTBURGER KINGSUBWAYCAFFÈ NEROSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Of <strong>the</strong> foodservice brands,McDonald’s emerges as <strong>the</strong> mostpopular establishment with 30% ofpeople hav<strong>in</strong>g visited one <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>last three months. Costa Coffeeand Starbucks come second andthird <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> mostpopular branded cha<strong>in</strong>s visited by<strong>UK</strong> adults.PERCENTAGE52%44%32%30%28%26%18%18%15%13%9%8%8%8%8%“We generally like tovisit <strong>the</strong> pub, have ameal and meetfriends everyweek.”Male45-49, Leicester<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 38


Key InfluencesQuality and taste of food,above price, is <strong>the</strong> keydeterm<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> valueequation – it is cited as<strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g reason forchoos<strong>in</strong>g a place to eatout.Cleanl<strong>in</strong>ess is considered to benearly as fundamental as foodquality with 71% of peoplereport<strong>in</strong>g it as an important aspectto consider when choos<strong>in</strong>gsomewhere to eat out.Whilst good value for food anddr<strong>in</strong>ks came out as highlyimportant amongst many<strong>in</strong>dividuals (38%),cheap/<strong>in</strong>expensive food did notrank highly as a key factor <strong>in</strong>determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g where to eat out.This <strong>in</strong>dicates that whileconsumers expect value for money– someth<strong>in</strong>g which has become ahuge priority s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> economicdownturn – <strong>the</strong>y are not look<strong>in</strong>g forcheap food. Many would associatecheap food with poor quality.Table. 3.6 IMPORTANT ASPECTS WHEN CHOOSING SOMEWHERE TO EAT OUTWhich of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g are important when choos<strong>in</strong>g a place to eat out?Percent of RespondentsRANK123456789=10=1012=13=1315IMPORTANT ASPECTFOOD QUALITY/TASTEFOOD SAFETY/CLEANLINESSNICE ENVIRON./PLEASANT ATMOSPHEREGOOD VALUE FOR FOOD & DRINKSATTENTIVE SERVICEBEEN THERE BEFORE/PREV. EXPERIENCEFAMILY FRIENDLYCONVENIENT LOCATIONWIDE VARIETY OF FOOD OPTIONSHEALTHY FOOD OPTIONSRECOMMENDATIONS BY FRIENDS/RELATIVESQUICK SERVICEFOOD SOURCED LOCALLYCHEAP/INEXPENSIVE PRICESPROMOTION/SPECIAL OFFER/DISCOUNTSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>PERCENTAGE73%71%41%38%30%23%21%20%19%18%18%14%11%11%9%Spend Patternsaround <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>The highest spend by <strong>in</strong>dividuals on <strong>the</strong>ir last eat<strong>in</strong>gout occasion was for a bus<strong>in</strong>ess meet<strong>in</strong>g, with anaverage of £26.31 spent on a meal per person, thoughthis level of spend falls outside <strong>the</strong> scope of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market.Follow<strong>in</strong>g a bus<strong>in</strong>ess meet<strong>in</strong>g, d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g out with a partner also had a highaverage price tag, with spend per person of £15.80. By contrast, quickmeals on-<strong>the</strong>-move had <strong>the</strong> lowest associated spend, at £5.43.39 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Fig. 3.8 AVERAGE SPEND BY TYPE OF OCCASION£26.32£15.80 £14.80 £13.43 £11.75 £11.57 £9.48 £6.77£6.27 £5.89 £5.43Bus<strong>in</strong>essMeet<strong>in</strong>gD<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Out</strong>withPartnerD<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Out</strong>withFriendsTreat/CelebrationD<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>Out</strong>withFamilyMeal withLeisureO<strong>the</strong>rBreakfrom WorkMeal withShopp<strong>in</strong>gRout<strong>in</strong>eMealQuickMeal/On<strong>the</strong>-MoveSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>The Affordability of <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>The largest proportion ofpeople consider eat<strong>in</strong>gout to be less affordablethan eat<strong>in</strong>g at home.Fig. 3.9 HOW DO YOU THINK THE COST OF EATING OUT VERSUS EATING ATHOME HAS CHANGED IN RECENT YEARS?Percent of RespondentsHowever, this po<strong>in</strong>t of view is byno means unanimous. 30% ofrespondents believe that eat<strong>in</strong>gout is now more affordablecompared with eat<strong>in</strong>g at homethan it has been <strong>in</strong> recent yearsand 30% believe <strong>the</strong>re has beenno change.When respondents are dividedbetween those who have beenaffected by <strong>the</strong> credit crunch andthose who have not, <strong>the</strong>re is adisparity <strong>in</strong> views. Unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly,48% of people who have beenaffected by <strong>the</strong> credit crunch f<strong>in</strong>deat<strong>in</strong>g out less affordable thaneat<strong>in</strong>g at home while 35% ofpeople who have not beenaffected by <strong>the</strong> credit crunch hold<strong>the</strong> same view.30% 30% 40%<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out is now moreaffordableNo changeSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out is now lessaffordable“It's cheaper to eat <strong>in</strong> but it doesn't makeme eat out less. Sometimes I'm too lazyto cook.” Female, 16-24, Peterborough“It's more expensive to eat out but it's atreat, so we don't m<strong>in</strong>d.”Female, 50-54, Leicester<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 40


It is clear that, despite <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> number of discounts andpromotions on offer, people are stillf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g it expensive to eat out. Thereality is that eat<strong>in</strong>g out is nowrelatively cheaper, <strong>in</strong> part as a resultof <strong>the</strong>se extensive offers and due tooperators squeez<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir marg<strong>in</strong>s<strong>in</strong> order to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> footfall.However, with <strong>in</strong>dividuals’ reduceddisposable <strong>in</strong>comes or perceiveddim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g spend<strong>in</strong>g power due to<strong>the</strong> recession, and need to becautious, people are deem<strong>in</strong>g itmore expensive to eat out.Fig. 3.10 HOW DO YOU THINK THECOST OF EATING OUTVERSUS EATING AT HOMEHAS CHANGED IN RECENTYEARS?Percent of Respondents –Analysis by Impact ofCredit Crunch48%35%25%34%27%Affected by creditcrunch31%Not affected bycredit crunchLess affordable No change More affordableSource:Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>41 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> HabitsAffordability is not <strong>the</strong> only determ<strong>in</strong>ant of peopleeat<strong>in</strong>g out. Factors such as convenience,socialis<strong>in</strong>g and experiment<strong>in</strong>g with new food andcuis<strong>in</strong>e types all come <strong>in</strong>to play <strong>in</strong> driv<strong>in</strong>g peopleto eat out of <strong>the</strong> home.“I cook at homeabout twice aweek, I eat out <strong>the</strong>rest of <strong>the</strong> time asI am lazy.”Female16-24, CroydonFig. 3.11 CHANGES IN EATING HABITS IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS.Concern<strong>in</strong>g your general eat<strong>in</strong>g habits over <strong>the</strong> last year, do you...?Percent of Respondents7%34%35%22%32%21%24%33%61%52%55%59%59%65%64%59%32%14%10%18%9%15%12%9%Cook fromscratchUse ready mealsat homeEat takeawaymeals at homeVisit cafés andcoffee shopsvisit fast foodoutletsEat at pubrestaurantsVisit generalrestaurantsUse drivethroughfacilitiesLess Same MoreSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>“I went to a localCh<strong>in</strong>ese. I hadnever been <strong>the</strong>reand wanted to trya new th<strong>in</strong>g.”Female35-39, BlackpoolThe general trend, as illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 3.11 is that people are cook<strong>in</strong>gfrom scratch more than <strong>the</strong>y have been previously (32%) and eat<strong>in</strong>gready meals (34%) and takeaways less (35%). The trend for coffee shopsis still strong, with 18% of people go<strong>in</strong>g to coffee shops more than <strong>the</strong>ywere a year ago and 15% of people eat<strong>in</strong>g more at pubs than <strong>the</strong>y were12 months ago.Despite <strong>the</strong>se trends <strong>in</strong> establishments, and as noted <strong>in</strong> Chapter 1,<strong>in</strong>dividuals over <strong>the</strong> last 12 months have eaten out less across <strong>the</strong> board.This is due to less disposable <strong>in</strong>come and/or fears over <strong>the</strong>ir job security.Aside from this, however, Figure 3.11 shows some <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g patterns <strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g behaviours which are emerg<strong>in</strong>g..<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 42


• People are cook<strong>in</strong>g fromscratch more than <strong>the</strong>yhave been previously:- Many people have moved to cutback <strong>the</strong>ir eat<strong>in</strong>g out habits <strong>in</strong>light of economic concerns. Ra<strong>the</strong>rthan downgrade to restaurantsprovid<strong>in</strong>g a lower qualityexperience, many consumers arechoos<strong>in</strong>g to cook more at homewhere <strong>the</strong>y have control over <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>gredients <strong>the</strong>y use- People are becom<strong>in</strong>g moreadventurous with <strong>the</strong>ir food. The‘foodie’ culture has swept <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong><strong>in</strong> recent years – this, comb<strong>in</strong>edwith <strong>the</strong> trend to eat at friends’houses, encourages <strong>in</strong>dividuals tostay <strong>in</strong> and re-create <strong>the</strong>restaurant feel at home with <strong>the</strong>irfriends- Healthy eaters are better able tocontrol what <strong>the</strong>y eat whencook<strong>in</strong>g at home. For example,restaurants frequently use highlevels of saturated fat such asbutter <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir cook<strong>in</strong>g which canbe avoided when prepar<strong>in</strong>g mealsat home“We prefer to cookhealthier goods athome than go<strong>in</strong>gout and spend<strong>in</strong>gso much, sometimesfor low qualityfoods.”Female35-39, Peterborough“My eat<strong>in</strong>g habitshave changeddramatically asI cook more now.”Female25-29, Peterborough• 34% of people are eat<strong>in</strong>gready meals less and35% are eat<strong>in</strong>g fewertakeaway meals athome. This po<strong>in</strong>t ispartly tied <strong>in</strong> with <strong>the</strong>desire to cook morefrom scratch at homebut <strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>rfactors <strong>in</strong>volved. Readymeals are commonlyregarded as high <strong>in</strong> saltand saturated fat. With<strong>the</strong> healthy eat<strong>in</strong>gphenomenon now firmly<strong>in</strong> place and with littlesign of wan<strong>in</strong>g, readymeals are often seen asan unhealthy option.• The popularity of coffeeshops and cafés has notfaltered. 77% of peopleare eat<strong>in</strong>g at coffeeshops and cafés ei<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong> same or more than<strong>the</strong>y were a year ago.The coffee shop acts asa social hub wherepeople can meet friends,hold bus<strong>in</strong>ess meet<strong>in</strong>gsor simply relax.43 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Snack<strong>in</strong>g and Meal OccasionsFig. 3.12 SNACKING BEHAVIOUR - HOW MANY SNACKS ON A TYPICAL DAYWOULD YOU HAVE?Percent of RespondentsAccord<strong>in</strong>g to Allegra’sresearch, structured mealoccasions are not be<strong>in</strong>greplaced by regularsnack<strong>in</strong>g.55% 17% 2% 26%55% of people have just 1-2 snacksper day and only 2% have morethan five. This suggests thatBritons are eat<strong>in</strong>g snacks <strong>in</strong>between <strong>the</strong>ir full meals, but not<strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>the</strong>m. People are alsonot skipp<strong>in</strong>g many meals – over <strong>the</strong>two week D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Diaries, only 6%of meals were skipped.1-2 snacks 3-4 snacks 5+ snacks None, I don’tsnackSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Fig. 3.13 STRUCTURED MEAL OCCASIONS VERSUS SNACKING<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Diaries:Percentage of entries for different meal occasions23% 5% 24% 8%24%9%BreakfastMid-morn<strong>in</strong>gsnackLunchMidafternoonsnackD<strong>in</strong>nerLate nightsnackSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 44


Case study 1Regionality DifferencePerhaps unsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly,London is <strong>the</strong> <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> Capital of <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>.With 621 people for everyrestaurant <strong>in</strong> London, it has <strong>the</strong>greatest provision of food outlets.At <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r end of <strong>the</strong> scale, <strong>the</strong>North East has <strong>the</strong> greatestnumber of people per restaurant– 1,209. The most recent datareleased by <strong>the</strong> ONS on hotels’and restaurants’ contribution toGross Value Added (GVA) byregion <strong>in</strong> 2006, also puts Londonat <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> regional list. (ABI,ONS, 2006).In terms of spend by region onlast reported eat<strong>in</strong>g out occasion,Scotland tops <strong>the</strong> rank<strong>in</strong>g. Onaverage, Scots spend £13.91 eachon eat<strong>in</strong>g out a week, whereasfrugal consumers from Wales and<strong>the</strong> North East of England spendonly £10.92 and £10.62respectively. London’s rank<strong>in</strong>g isnot as high as might be expected.This reflects <strong>the</strong> significantlygreater use of cafés and sandwichbars dur<strong>in</strong>g lunchtimes.Table. 3.7 AVERAGE SPEND PER PERSON ON THE LAST MEAL OCCASIONBY REGIONRANK123456789101112Table. 3.8 AVERAGE SPEND PER PERSON ON THE LAST MEAL OCCASIONBY REGIONRANK123456789101112REGIONLONDONNORTHERN IRELANDSOUTH WESTSCOTLANDSOUTH EASTEASTWALESYORKS & HUMBERSIDENORTH WESTWEST MIDLANDSEAST MIDLANDSNORTH EASTSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, <strong>2009</strong>REGIONSCOTLANDSOUTH WESTNORTHERN IRELANDEAST OF ENGLANDSOUTH EASTLONDONEAST MIDLANDSYORKSHIRENORTH WESTWEST MIDLANDSWALESNORTH EASTNO. OFRESTAURANTSAND CAFÉS12,3301,9955,4955,4058,6255,5302,8504,4956,0154,5653,6652,115POPULATION(000)7,6531,7425,1465,1178,2455,6022,9665,1336,8905,3904,3612,557POPULATIONPERRESTAURANTAVERAGE SPEND PER PERSON£13.91£13.49£12.76£12.61£12.58£12.39£12.37£12.33£11.38£11.13£10.92£10.626218919379479561,0131,0411,1421,1451,1811,1901,209Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>45 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Fig. 3.14 PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE EATING LUNCH OUT OF THE HOME AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK BY REGIONPercent of Respondents49%48% 46% 45% 43% 42% 41% 41%41% 40% 39%37%LondonNor<strong>the</strong>rnIrelandNorthEastSouthWestYorkshireEastMidlandsWalesNorthWestSouthEastScotlandEast ofEnglandWestMidlandsSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>London has <strong>the</strong> greatestlunchtime eat<strong>in</strong>g out activity. As<strong>the</strong> capital, <strong>the</strong> number of workers<strong>in</strong> London exceeds any o<strong>the</strong>r citywith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>. It is largely <strong>the</strong>work<strong>in</strong>g population’s lunchtimeactivity which accounts for <strong>the</strong>high number of lunches eaten outof <strong>the</strong> home over <strong>the</strong> course of aweek. The West Midlands has <strong>the</strong>lowest out of home lunchtimeactivity with 37% of people hav<strong>in</strong>glunch out at least once a week.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out as a social occasion ispopular <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> even<strong>in</strong>g. Aga<strong>in</strong>,London comes out on top with <strong>the</strong>greatest frequency of d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>even<strong>in</strong>g. Perhaps surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, only19% of people <strong>in</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Irelandeat d<strong>in</strong>ner out of <strong>the</strong> home atleast once a week. This lies <strong>in</strong>stark contrast with <strong>the</strong> relativelyhigh number of people <strong>in</strong>Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Ireland who eat lunchout of <strong>the</strong> home at least once aweek. People from <strong>the</strong> WestMidlands have <strong>the</strong> exact oppositebehaviour; consum<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> fewestlunches – but nearly <strong>the</strong> greatestnumber of d<strong>in</strong>ners – out of <strong>the</strong>home.Fig. 3.15 PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE EATING DINNER OUT OF THE HOME AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK BY REGIONPercent of Respondents39%38% 32% 32% 32% 30% 29% 28%28% 27% 25%19%LondonWestMidlandsWalesNorthEastEastMidlandsNorthWestEast ofEnglandSouthEastSouthWestScotlandYorkshireNor<strong>the</strong>rnIrelandSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 46


Case study 1Regionality Difference cont<strong>in</strong>uedTable. 3.9 EATING OUT TRENDS ACROSS REGIONSREGIONFREQUENCYAVERAGESPEND PERPERSON ONLAST EATINGOUT OCCASIONPREFERREDOUTLETSATTITUDES,OPINIONS ANDBEHAVIOUREASTMIDLANDS11% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£12.37Visit local pubsand fast foodcha<strong>in</strong>s frequentlyProportionately,eat <strong>the</strong> mosttakeaway mealsDisagree that eat<strong>in</strong>g outestablishments mustdisplay nutritional<strong>in</strong>formationEAST OFENGLAND11% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£12.61Coffee shops,generalrestaurants(brands and<strong>in</strong>dependents) arevisited frequentlyPrimary reason for eat<strong>in</strong>gout is to celebrate a specialoccasionStrongly believe that more<strong>in</strong>formation on healthyeat<strong>in</strong>g would encourage<strong>the</strong>m to eat more healthilyHave cut back <strong>the</strong>ir visits<strong>the</strong> most to places charg<strong>in</strong>gless than £5 per headLONDONEat out of <strong>the</strong> home<strong>the</strong> most – 15% of allmeals are eaten out of<strong>the</strong> home every weekEat breakfast out of <strong>the</strong>home <strong>the</strong> most often –14% of Londoners eatbreakfast out at leastonce a weekEat d<strong>in</strong>ner out of <strong>the</strong>home <strong>the</strong> most – 39%eat d<strong>in</strong>ner out at leastonce a week£12.39Fast food andgeneralrestaurants aremost regularlyvisitedestablishmentsMost concerned tha<strong>the</strong>althy food should beoffered <strong>in</strong> restaurantsMost confident abouteat<strong>in</strong>g out more <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next12 monthsNORTH EAST11% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£10.62Visit coffee shops,fast food outlets,supermarket cafés<strong>the</strong> mostHighest number who arecook<strong>in</strong>g from scratch moreHighest percentage ofpeople agree <strong>the</strong>re aren’tenough healthy options atrestaurantsMost strongly <strong>in</strong> favour ofcalorie labell<strong>in</strong>gMost believe eat<strong>in</strong>g out isnow more affordable than itwas a year agoHave tightened <strong>the</strong>ir belts<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> recession. 40% arevisit<strong>in</strong>g places which charge£10-£15 less and 57% arevisit<strong>in</strong>g restaurants whichcharge over £15 less47 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


REGIONFREQUENCYAVERAGESPEND PERPERSON ONLAST EATINGOUT OCCASIONPREFERREDOUTLETSATTITUDES,OPINIONS ANDBEHAVIOURNORTHERNIRELAND9% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery weekEat lunch out <strong>the</strong> most– 66% of people eatlunch out at least oncea fortnightEat d<strong>in</strong>ner out <strong>the</strong> least– 17% eat d<strong>in</strong>ner out atleast once a week£12.76Frequent coffeeshops <strong>the</strong> mostHave cut back onvisit<strong>in</strong>g fast foodcha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> last yearMost concerned abouthav<strong>in</strong>g food which issourced locallyStrongly regard eat<strong>in</strong>g outas a treatReceived <strong>the</strong> best customerservice on <strong>the</strong>ir last eat<strong>in</strong>gout occasionNORTH WEST11% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£11.38Majority say that<strong>the</strong>y seldom oralmost never visitfast foodestablishmentsTaste of food is <strong>the</strong> mostimportant to this regionWhen choos<strong>in</strong>g a d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gdest<strong>in</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong>y valueconvenient location <strong>the</strong>most, are <strong>the</strong> most likelyregion to takerecommendations fromfriends and are mostswayed by good reviews <strong>in</strong>newspapersSCOTLAND13% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£13.91Visit coffee shopsand fast foodoutlets <strong>the</strong> mostoftenWorkers most likely to eat <strong>in</strong>work canteenLeast worried about healthyeat<strong>in</strong>g when eat<strong>in</strong>g out of<strong>the</strong> homeSOUTH EAST11% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£12.58Highest numberto have visited akebab shop <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>last three monthsAlongside Yorkshire and <strong>the</strong>North East, <strong>the</strong>y most preferattentive over fast serviceSOUTH WEST11% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£13.49Most likely to goout to friends’houses to eatThe most popular reason for<strong>the</strong>ir eat<strong>in</strong>g out was to takea break from workWALES13% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery week£10.92Visit pubrestaurants <strong>the</strong>most with 39%visit<strong>in</strong>g a pub atleast once afortnightWorkers most likely to br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> a packed lunchMore likely to recall <strong>the</strong>quality of customerexperience at <strong>the</strong>ir d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gestablishment as poor orvery poor, compared to anyo<strong>the</strong>r region<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out <strong>in</strong> restaurantscharg<strong>in</strong>g under £5 far more<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 48


Case study 1Regionality Difference cont<strong>in</strong>uedTable. 3.9 EATING OUT TRENDS ACROSS REGIONS - cont<strong>in</strong>uedREGIONFREQUENCYAVERAGESPEND PERPERSON ONLAST EATINGOUT OCCASIONPREFERREDOUTLETSATTITUDES,OPINIONS ANDBEHAVIOURWESTMIDLANDS13% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery weekEat a late night supper<strong>the</strong> most – 10% do so atleast once a weekEat lunch out <strong>the</strong> least– 37% eat lunch out atleast once a week£11.13The mostfrequent fast foodvisitors – 38% visitan outlet at leastonce a fortnightPlace food quality higher on<strong>the</strong> agenda when choos<strong>in</strong>ga restaurant than any o<strong>the</strong>rregionRegion most affected by <strong>the</strong>credit crunchYORKSHIRE10% of all meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeevery weekEat breakfast out <strong>the</strong>least – 2.8% eatbreakfast out at leastonce a weekEat a late night snack<strong>the</strong> least frequently –3% eat a late nightsnack at least once aweek£12.33Has <strong>the</strong> lowestproportion of highfrequency fastfood visitorsWould most preferrestaurants to support localsuppliers over any o<strong>the</strong>rethical <strong>in</strong>itiativeMost concerned that <strong>the</strong>yreceive attentive customerservice over speed of serviceSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>49 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Fig. 3.16 EATING OUT TRENDS – REGIONAL HIGHLIGHTSScots are <strong>the</strong> least worriedabout healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g wheneat<strong>in</strong>g out of <strong>the</strong> homeThe Nor<strong>the</strong>rnIrish are <strong>the</strong>most avid coffeeshop users –58% visit one atleast once aweek. They alsoeat lunch out <strong>the</strong>most and d<strong>in</strong>nerout <strong>the</strong> leastPeople <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> NorthEast have tightened<strong>the</strong>ir belts <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>recession. 40% arevisit<strong>in</strong>g places whichcharge £10-£15 lessand 57% are visit<strong>in</strong>grestaurants whichcharge over £15 lessPeople from <strong>the</strong>North West <strong>the</strong> leastvisit fast foodestablishmentsPeople fromYorkshire aremore concernedwith receiv<strong>in</strong>gattentivecustomer servicethan <strong>the</strong>y are fastservice. They eatout less than anyo<strong>the</strong>r region with<strong>the</strong> exception ofNor<strong>the</strong>rn Irelandwho eat out <strong>the</strong>leastMost likely to go out tofriends’ houses to eatThe Welsh visit pubrestaurants <strong>the</strong> mostwith 39% visit<strong>in</strong>g a pubat least once a fortnightMost frequent fast foodusers are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> WestMidlands - 38% visit afast food outlet at leastonce a fortnightProportionately,people from <strong>the</strong>East of Englandeat <strong>the</strong> mosttakeaway mealsThe South East has <strong>the</strong>highest number of people tohave visited a kebab shop <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> last three monthsPeople from<strong>the</strong> East ofEnglandhave cutback <strong>the</strong>irvisits toplacescharg<strong>in</strong>gless than £5Londoners eat out<strong>the</strong> most – 15% of<strong>the</strong>ir meals areeaten out of <strong>the</strong>home every week.Londoners arealso <strong>the</strong> mostlikely to eatbreakfast out of<strong>the</strong> homeSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 50


Case study 2Age differencesYoung adults aged18-24 have <strong>the</strong> greatestvisit<strong>in</strong>g frequency ofeat<strong>in</strong>g outestablishments of anyage group.The two most populardest<strong>in</strong>ations for <strong>the</strong> young arecoffee shops and sandwich bars,of which 46% of 18-24 year oldsvisited at least once a week, andfast food establishments, whichare visited by 34% at least once aweek. The pub is <strong>the</strong> mostpopular choice with older agegroups. 78% of respondentsaged 55-64 have visited a pub <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> last three months.Fig. 3.17 FAST FOOD ESTABLISHMENT USERS BY AGE. How often do you eatout <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g establishments?Percent of Respondents – Analysis by Fast Food Restaurantand Age17%8%18%25%34%18-2426%14%23%15%22%33%15%22%12%17%45%16%15%10%15%65%11%9%8%8%79%6%8%3%4%25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+Seldom or never Once every 2-3 months Once per monthOnce per fortnightAt least once per weekSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>51 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Table. 3.10 DIFFERENTIALS IN AGE PROFILESYOUNG &ADVENTUROUS18-24YOUNGERMIDDLE AGED25-34OLDERMIDDLE AGED25-34SENIOR& ELDERLY55-65+They have <strong>the</strong> greatesteat<strong>in</strong>g out frequencyCoffee shops/sandwichbars is most populardest<strong>in</strong>ationThe younger generation useready meals more thano<strong>the</strong>r age groupsThey use ready meals morethan o<strong>the</strong>r groupsThey look for food which ischeaperThey have busier lifestylesand less time to cook athomeFriday night is a popularnight to eat outThis age group eat out lessthan <strong>the</strong> young &adventurous but more than<strong>the</strong> retired-elderlyThey d<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurants <strong>the</strong> mostTheir most preferred weeklydest<strong>in</strong>ation is <strong>the</strong> coffeeshop/sandwich barThis group cook fromscratch <strong>the</strong> mostUnsurpris<strong>in</strong>gly, this groupcare most that <strong>the</strong>establishments are familyfriendly<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out on Saturdaynight is more popular withthis age group than eat<strong>in</strong>gout on a Friday nightThey share many of <strong>the</strong>same attributes as <strong>the</strong>25-34sThey are <strong>the</strong> least likely tod<strong>in</strong>e at pub restaurants<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> at a convenientlocation is more importantto this age group than <strong>the</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r age groups, but lessimportant than it is to <strong>the</strong>senior generationThey are more concernedthat healthy food optionsare availableWorkers with<strong>in</strong> this agegroup tend to take a packedlunch for <strong>the</strong>ir lunch dur<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>ir work<strong>in</strong>g dayThey eat out <strong>the</strong> leastPubs are <strong>the</strong> most populardest<strong>in</strong>ation with this groupMature adults are look<strong>in</strong>gfor better value as opposedto <strong>in</strong>expensive foodcompared with <strong>the</strong> youngThey eat out more for lunchand less for d<strong>in</strong>ner<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> habits have changed<strong>the</strong> least <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last 12monthsThey also expect to eat outto <strong>the</strong> same degree <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>next 12 months - far moreso than o<strong>the</strong>r groupsSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>The average spend by age groupclearly illustrates who are <strong>the</strong>biggest spenders. The 45-54 yearolds who are of work<strong>in</strong>g age, oftenwithout dependent children andarguably with <strong>the</strong> most expensivetastes, spend <strong>the</strong> greatest amount.Contrary to this, 18-24 year olds,many of whom are students or <strong>in</strong>low paid jobs, spend <strong>the</strong> leastamount on food when <strong>the</strong>y eat out.Fig. 3.18 AVERAGE SPEND PER PERSON BY AGE RANGE£8.97 £11.77 £12.23 £14.1618-24 25-34 35-44 45-54£13.0055-64£12.4065+Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 52


Case study 3D<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g diaries45 <strong>in</strong>dividuals acrossage groups, sociodemographicsandregions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>were asked to fill <strong>in</strong> a14 day diarydocument<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ireat<strong>in</strong>g patternsthroughout <strong>the</strong> day,both <strong>in</strong> and out of <strong>the</strong>home.These diaries have provided<strong>in</strong>sight not only <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong>frequency with which people eatout of <strong>the</strong> home but also on<strong>the</strong>ir overall eat<strong>in</strong>g patterns, forexample on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y aresnack<strong>in</strong>g more, ra<strong>the</strong>r thaneat<strong>in</strong>g structured meals.Questions were also asked to<strong>the</strong> diary keepers about <strong>the</strong>experiences <strong>the</strong>y had when <strong>the</strong>yate out of <strong>the</strong> home, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g,how much money <strong>the</strong>y spent,whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y had a good overallexperience, and whe<strong>the</strong>r or not<strong>the</strong>y would return.Table. 3.11 SNAPSHOT OF DINING DIARY10/06/<strong>2009</strong> 18:00-20:00Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9MEAL OCCASIONDINNEREATING AT HOME/EATING OUT OF HOMEATE OUT OF HOMEFOOD TYPE CONSUMED ON OCCASIONMEAT DISH - SALADDRINK TYPE CONSUMED ON OCCASIONJUICEPERSONS PRESENTWITH ADULT FAMILY MEMBERSWITH FRIENDS’ CHILDRENWITH FRIENDSHOUSEHOLD ROOM LOCATIONNO ANSWERIN FRONT OF TV?NO ANSWERSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>53 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Of <strong>the</strong> meals eaten out of <strong>the</strong> homeby <strong>the</strong> diary keepers, 74% cost £0-£5,11% cost £5-£10 and 8% cost £10-£15.Only 8% of meals eaten out of <strong>the</strong>home cost <strong>the</strong> diary keepers morethan £15 per person. This highlights<strong>the</strong> trend <strong>in</strong> purchas<strong>in</strong>g lowerpriced meals.The diary keepers noted what <strong>the</strong>yenjoyed most and least about <strong>the</strong>irvisits – good food, good companyand quick service were all cited as<strong>the</strong> best aspects for consumers.This tallies with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r streamsof research which cited food qualityas <strong>the</strong> most important factor whenchoos<strong>in</strong>g somewhere to eat out.(See table 3.6).With regards to diary keepers’ worstaspects, 61% said <strong>the</strong>re was no badaspect to <strong>the</strong>ir visits. This highnumber illustrates that <strong>the</strong> majorityof <strong>in</strong>dividuals were satisfied with<strong>the</strong>ir experience overall. Key issuesfor consumers <strong>in</strong>cluded slow service(a concern for 7% of people), and anFig. 3.20 DINING DIARIES: TOTAL AMOUNT SPENT ON DIFFERENTEATING OUT OCCASIONSPercent of Respondents74% 11% 8% 8%£0-£5 £5-£10 £10-£15 £15 andoverSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>overly expensive meal, noted by 6%.Poor quality food came relatively fardown on <strong>the</strong> list. This may bebecause people are cautious <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>irchoice of restaurant, only visit<strong>in</strong>gplaces where <strong>the</strong>y have heard orknow <strong>the</strong> food to be good quality.Table. 3.12 EATING DIARY: BEST AND WORST ASPECT OF VISIT WHEN EATING OUTRANK BEST ASPECT OF THE VISITWORST ASPECT OF THE VISIT12345678910GOOD FOODGOOD COMPANYQUICK SERVICECHEAP/INEXPENSIVENOTHINGIT WAS A TREATNICE ATMOSPHERE/PLEASANT ENVIRONMENTOTHERFAMILY TIMEFOOD THAT I DON’T HAVE AT HOMENOTHINGSLOW SERVICETOO EXPENSIVELACK OF FOOD CHOICERUSHED/BUSYPOOR ATMOSPHEREPOOR QUALITY FOODTOO NOISYLACK OF CLEANLINESSUNFRIENDLY STAFFSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 54


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Next 12 Months(Fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>formation can be found <strong>in</strong> Chapter 5 – The Future of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Market)To fully understandconsumers’ futureattitudes towards eat<strong>in</strong>gout, it is useful tocompare how people’shabits have changed <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> last 12 months withhow <strong>the</strong>y are set tochange <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next year:Fig. 3.21 EATING OUT IN THE NEXT 12 MONTHSDo you th<strong>in</strong>k you will be eat<strong>in</strong>g out more or less <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 12 months?Percent of Respondents• 55% of people currently say <strong>the</strong>yeat out about <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong>ydid 12 months ago. This compareswith 70% of people who say <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> next year <strong>the</strong>y will eat outabout <strong>the</strong> same amount as <strong>the</strong>ydo today• 35% of people said <strong>the</strong>y arecurrently eat<strong>in</strong>g out less nowthan <strong>the</strong>y were 12 months ago.This compares with 20% ofpeople who claim <strong>the</strong>y will eatout less <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next year than<strong>the</strong>y do todayThe figures highlight that, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>next year, <strong>the</strong> majority of peopleanticipate <strong>the</strong>y will be eat<strong>in</strong>g outat <strong>the</strong> same frequency as <strong>the</strong>y dotoday. A higher number (20%)anticipate that <strong>the</strong>y will be eat<strong>in</strong>gout less, and 10% hope to eat outmore. If contrasted with people’sattitudes today towards eat<strong>in</strong>g out,a relatively positive picture ispa<strong>in</strong>ted for <strong>the</strong> speedy recovery of<strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g out market postrecession, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> worstis over.10% 70% 20%More <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next12 monthsAbout <strong>the</strong> sameSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>“We will be eat<strong>in</strong>gout less <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nextyear unlessf<strong>in</strong>ances improve.”Female16-24, LeicesterThere are three additional factorswhich will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to imp<strong>in</strong>ge onconsumers’ propensities to eat out<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> short to medium term:• Individuals will be plagued withlow consumer confidence forsome time yet and a changedmentality about how <strong>the</strong>y shouldbe spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir money – thismentality could be irrecoverableLess <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next12 months• The rise of healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong>awareness of healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g.Britons are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge that,if <strong>the</strong>y cook from home, <strong>the</strong>y areable to better control what <strong>the</strong>yconsume and monitor <strong>the</strong>ircalorie, fat and salt <strong>in</strong>take. Moreoperators will respond to thistrend and improve <strong>the</strong> number ofhealthy options <strong>the</strong>y offer• The grow<strong>in</strong>g dom<strong>in</strong>ance ofsupermarkets. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>recession, many supermarketshave <strong>in</strong>troduced d<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong> rangeswhich enable consumers torecreate <strong>the</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g outexperience, but for far less money55 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 56


The Rise of Healthier <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong>‘‘<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> more healthily is a goal for society at large and moreprogressive operators will benefit from <strong>the</strong> enhancedcustomer feedback <strong>the</strong> greater provision of nutritional<strong>in</strong>formation will generate.’’John HutsonChief Executive, JD We<strong>the</strong>rspoonLooked at s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>emergence of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market, <strong>the</strong>rise of healthier eat<strong>in</strong>g is<strong>in</strong> part a response to <strong>the</strong>success that <strong>the</strong> food<strong>in</strong>dustry has achieved <strong>in</strong>mak<strong>in</strong>g different types offood products widelyavailable to moreconsumers on moreeat<strong>in</strong>g occasions.marks a return to some of <strong>the</strong>more positive aspects of eat<strong>in</strong>gbehaviours 50 years ago. Healthyeat<strong>in</strong>g is a crucially importantlong-term trend. It stands as oneof <strong>the</strong> few genu<strong>in</strong>e consumer‘megatrends’ and is cont<strong>in</strong>uallybe<strong>in</strong>g shaped by a plethora ofconsumer, corporate, Government,media and societal <strong>in</strong>fluences asFigure 4.2 shows.With<strong>in</strong> Allegra’s most recent Top ofM<strong>in</strong>d survey of Food & BeverageIndustry leaders carried out <strong>in</strong> Q42008, healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g was identifiedas <strong>the</strong> most important noneconomictrend affect<strong>in</strong>gconsumer behaviour. It was secondonly to greater price consciousness,although after <strong>the</strong> recession,healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g has <strong>the</strong> potential torega<strong>in</strong> primary status. As one<strong>in</strong>dustry executive remarked:‘‘It istimeless’’.From <strong>the</strong> austerity and limitedchoice that existed at <strong>the</strong>beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> 1960s, <strong>the</strong>re isnow a vast abundance of food andbeverage options available 24-7.The gradual emergence of manymore diet, low fat and healthyoptions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> retail environmenthas met <strong>the</strong> demand for healthyeat<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>creased consumerawareness of <strong>the</strong> issue.While <strong>the</strong> noughties are an age of‘unprecedented plenty’, so <strong>the</strong>y arealso a time of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyknowledgeable and demand<strong>in</strong>gconsumers, with greaterrecognition of <strong>the</strong> truism that ‘weare what we eat’. This is driv<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g ‘food culture’ anddemand for more natural and lessprocessed food. Indeed, <strong>in</strong> manyways, <strong>the</strong> rise of healthier eat<strong>in</strong>gand more discipl<strong>in</strong>ed consumptionTable 4.2 INDUSTRY LEADER VIEWS ON MOST IMPORTANT CONSUMERTRENDS AFFECTING <strong>UK</strong> FOOD & BEVERAGE SECTOR, TOP 10 RANKINGQ4 2008 VS. Q4 2007CONSUMER TRENDPRICE CONSCIOUSNESSHEALTHY EATINGSQUEEZE ON HOUSEHOLD BUDGETSMORE DEMANDING CONSUMERSCONVENIENCERISING COST OF LIVINGMORE KNOWLEDGEABLE CONSUMERSBUSIER LIFESTYLESLOCAL PROVENANCEGROWING ‘FOOD CULTURE’Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Top of M<strong>in</strong>d Survey, <strong>2009</strong>2008123456789102007121N/A132151053959 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Fig. 4.1 KEY INFLUENCES DRIVING THE GROWING IMPORTANCE OF HEALTHY EATINGMEDIA INFLUENCES• Increas<strong>in</strong>g healthcoverage• Availability of<strong>in</strong>formation• Evolv<strong>in</strong>g cookeryprogrammes• Celebrity <strong>in</strong>fluencesSOCIETAL INFLUENCES• Chang<strong>in</strong>g lifestyle habits• Grow<strong>in</strong>g concern over obesity• Greater health consciousness• Wider well-be<strong>in</strong>g awarenessCONSUMERINFLUENCES• Increased demand• Grow<strong>in</strong>g knowledge• Ris<strong>in</strong>g expectations• Greater <strong>in</strong>formationavailabilityCORPORATEINFLUENCES• New productopportunities• Market<strong>in</strong>g messages• CSR <strong>in</strong>itiatives• CompetitivedifferentiationSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>GROWINGIMPORTANCE OFHEALTHY EATINGGOVERNMENTINFLUENCES• Increased labell<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>formation• Product contenttargets and advertis<strong>in</strong>grestrictions• Healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>itiatives• Focus on schoold<strong>in</strong>nersHealthier <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> HabitsGovernment and <strong>in</strong>dustry<strong>in</strong>itiatives to promotehealthy eat<strong>in</strong>g,particularly <strong>the</strong> 5-a-dayprogramme, appear tohave generated tractionwith consumers.This is impact<strong>in</strong>g out-of-homeconsumption patterns – nearly halfsay <strong>the</strong>y have made changes towhat <strong>the</strong>y eat out of home. Closeto 1 <strong>in</strong> 4 adults claim to have<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>take of fruit andvegetables over <strong>the</strong> past 12months. Lower consumption ofhigher fat products also emergedas a popular response.Just over half of adults (52%) havenot made any changes to <strong>the</strong>health<strong>in</strong>ess of what <strong>the</strong>y consumewhen eat<strong>in</strong>g out. Allegra’s detailedcustomer research highlights anumber of factors as to why thisproportion rema<strong>in</strong>s so high:• <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out for many rema<strong>in</strong>s atreat and an <strong>in</strong>dulgence• Consumers are not prepared tocompromise on taste and do notbelieve <strong>the</strong>y will receive <strong>the</strong> samelevel of pleasure from healthierproducts• For some, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> perceptionthat healthier eat<strong>in</strong>g is moreexpensive• A proportion of people are fed upwith be<strong>in</strong>g lectured to abou<strong>the</strong>althy eat<strong>in</strong>g• Food nutrition is poorlyunderstood by consumers who,for <strong>the</strong> most part, are not easilyable to develop a greaterunderstand<strong>in</strong>g• Lack of nutritional <strong>in</strong>formationavailable on which to base a more<strong>in</strong>formed menu choice• There is a strong core ofconsumers who are not <strong>in</strong>terested<strong>in</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir eat<strong>in</strong>g habitsAs one <strong>in</strong>terviewee noted:“I eat very healthilyat home. Go<strong>in</strong>g outis more of a treatso taste is <strong>the</strong> mostimportant th<strong>in</strong>g.There is noth<strong>in</strong>gwrong with<strong>in</strong>dulg<strong>in</strong>g once<strong>in</strong> a while!”Female30-34, Peterborough<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 60


Fig. 4.3 AGREEMENT WITH WHETHERCHANGES HAVE BEEN TOEAT MORE HEALTHILY WHENEATING OUTWhen eat<strong>in</strong>g out of homeover <strong>the</strong> last 12 months,have you made a consciousdecision to eat morehealthily?Percentage of Respondents48% 52%YesNoSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis,Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Fig. 4.4 CHANGES MADE WHEN EATING OUT REGARDING HEALTHY EATINGWhen eat<strong>in</strong>g out of home, what changes have you made concern<strong>in</strong>g healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last12 months? Percentage of Respondents23%Eaten morefruit & veg.19% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 8%Reduced fatReducedsugar/sweetsDrunk morewaterEaten lessfast foodEatensmallerportionsReduced saltReducedcalorie<strong>in</strong>take8% 6%ReducedcarbohydratesDrunk lessalcoholSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>61 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Table 4.3 KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF HEALTHY EATING CONSUMER TYPOLOGY BY SEGMENTPREDOMINANTCHARACTERISTICSDISCIPLINEDEATERSHEALTHYEATINGPRAGMATISTSINDULGENT-LEDADVENTURERSHEALTHYEATINGREJECTERSGENDER, AGEAND HOUSEHOLDFemale; Age skewtowards olderadultsFemale; 25-44 yearsand with kidsMale; 18-24 yearsMale; bias to 18-24or 65+ years oldAFFLUENCE ANDSOCIO-ECONOMICSAverage profile, butslight skew to D/EsAbove averageaffluenceNo dist<strong>in</strong>ct biasBelow averageaffluence levelsEATINGPREFERENCESAvoids fast food,little snack<strong>in</strong>g andreduc<strong>in</strong>g takeawayconsumption<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> out is atreat, more cook<strong>in</strong>gfrom scratch andpacked lunchesFrequently on-<strong>the</strong>moveand enjoyssnack<strong>in</strong>g, fast foodand even<strong>in</strong>g mealsLikes fast food,takeaways, snacksand late nighteat<strong>in</strong>gFAVOURED EATINGOUT VENUESLikes <strong>in</strong>dependentcafés and local pub,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thosewith carveryLikes coffee shopsand cafésWide repertoire<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurants, fastfood units andpubsLikes fast foodcha<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>in</strong>expensivepubs and Ch<strong>in</strong>esetakeawaysHEALTHY EATINGATTITUDESHave reduced fat,carbohydrate andsalt <strong>in</strong>take, highestagreement thatnot enoughhealthy optionsand strongenthusiasm forcalorie labell<strong>in</strong>gAgree that<strong>in</strong>sufficient choiceof healthy eat<strong>in</strong>goptions exists andpreference towards<strong>in</strong>troduction ofcalorie labell<strong>in</strong>gDo not subscribe to<strong>the</strong> view that<strong>in</strong>sufficient healthyoptions areavailable, butbalance of op<strong>in</strong>ion<strong>in</strong> favour of calorielabell<strong>in</strong>gM<strong>in</strong>imal changesto dietary habits,strong preferencefor taste overhealth and lowestdesire to see calorielabell<strong>in</strong>gSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>63 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Healthy <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong>by DaypartIt is a recognised eat<strong>in</strong>gout trend that people eatmore healthily at <strong>the</strong>start of <strong>the</strong> week, butthat this changes tobecome more <strong>in</strong>dulgenceledas <strong>the</strong> weekprogresses.It is also <strong>the</strong> case that eat<strong>in</strong>g out ismore health-oriented dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>first part of <strong>the</strong> day, and becomesdist<strong>in</strong>ctively less so dur<strong>in</strong>g even<strong>in</strong>gand at night.Analysis of consumers’ eat<strong>in</strong>g outbehaviours found that, on average,only on 38% of eat<strong>in</strong>g occasionswas a conscious decision made tochoose a more healthy option. Thisproportion was highest for a midmorn<strong>in</strong>gsnack at 55%, but lowest,at 14%, for a late night snack.Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, while consumersmight make an effort to ea<strong>the</strong>althier breakfasts at home, thisis less evident when <strong>the</strong>y are on<strong>the</strong> go.Table 4.4 PROPORTIONS OF CONSUMERS MAKING A CONSCIOUS DECISIONTO CHOOSE A HEALTHY OPTION WHEN EATING OUT BY DAYPARTMEAL OCCASIONBREAKFASTMID-MORNING SNACKLUNCHMID-AFTERNOON SNACKDINNERLATE-NIGHT SNACKOVERALL AVERAGESource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>YESto HealthyOption34%55%48%25%22%14%38%NOto HealthyOption66%45%52%75%78%86%62%<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 64


The Future of Healthy <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong>Healthier eat<strong>in</strong>g is a longtermtrend and one that,particularly with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g out sector, looksset to grow <strong>in</strong> importance.Consumer awareness of <strong>the</strong> caloriesconta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> different productoptions is go<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease withcalorie labell<strong>in</strong>g. As consumers are<strong>in</strong>fluenced by healthy eat<strong>in</strong>gcampaigns and <strong>the</strong> actions ofgovernment and NGOs so <strong>the</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g out market will need tocont<strong>in</strong>ue to <strong>in</strong>novate and adapt <strong>in</strong>order to keep pace with customerdemand and an <strong>in</strong>creased level ofawareness of what <strong>the</strong>ir foodconta<strong>in</strong>s. In <strong>the</strong> short term, <strong>the</strong>response <strong>in</strong>volves develop<strong>in</strong>g andreformulat<strong>in</strong>g food and dr<strong>in</strong>k thatare lower <strong>in</strong> salt, sugar and fat, and<strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to enable moreconsumers to make better <strong>in</strong>formedproduct choices. Ultimately,consumers will have to make subtlechanges to <strong>the</strong>ir palates and tasteexpectation.Because healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g is one of <strong>the</strong>mega trends impact<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>in</strong>dustry, suppliers andoperators who fail to respond andimprove <strong>the</strong> health<strong>in</strong>ess of <strong>the</strong>irproducts and menu offers will loseout as <strong>the</strong> competitive bar is raised.New product and <strong>in</strong>gredient<strong>in</strong>novation will be catalysed asoperators <strong>in</strong>troduce a wider rangeof healthier options. In some cases,product and portion sizes may beamended to meet reduced caloriecount targets.The <strong>in</strong>dustry executive researchshows that <strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r moredetailed healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g trends thatare possible:• Families mov<strong>in</strong>g away fromestablishments, which <strong>the</strong>y do notperceive to offer a suitablybalanced rangeTable 4.5 A SEGMENTATION OF FUTURE CONSUMER APPROACHES TOHEALTHIER EATINGFOCUSBALANCESLOWPOSITIVESUSTAINABLESource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>• Younger females are among <strong>the</strong>most conscious of what <strong>the</strong>yconsume and are most likely toswitch <strong>the</strong>ir purchas<strong>in</strong>g patterns• Sales of products that consumersdo not currently recognise asbe<strong>in</strong>g highly calorific are likely tobe impacted• More manual worker groups mayconsume products offer<strong>in</strong>g highercalorie counts per unit cost• Increased order<strong>in</strong>g of one or twocourses ra<strong>the</strong>r than three, and ofshared dishesClearly def<strong>in</strong>ed perspective on healthand healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g:• Customised eat<strong>in</strong>g based on foods with a direct benefit• Obsessive knowledge of own food consumption• Rejection of unhealthy foodsModeration and discipl<strong>in</strong>e, and negotiat<strong>in</strong>gextremes:• Calorie <strong>in</strong>take and expenditure held <strong>in</strong> check• Indulgent foods comb<strong>in</strong>ed with more healthy foods• Portion size discipl<strong>in</strong>eValue process of food growth and preparation:• Incl<strong>in</strong>ation to rest and relax more• Belief <strong>in</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g from scratch and slow cook<strong>in</strong>g processes• Use of quality <strong>in</strong>gredients that are fresh and seasonalIdea that positive eat<strong>in</strong>g leads to apositive life:• Healthy body healthy m<strong>in</strong>d• <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> experience as important as eat<strong>in</strong>g itself• Focus on what to eat <strong>in</strong>stead of what not to eatConsumers desire to preserve way of liv<strong>in</strong>g:• Embrace concept of planetary health• Good for me – human susta<strong>in</strong>ability• Belief <strong>in</strong> locally grown and communal productsAdditionally, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> genu<strong>in</strong>eprospect of growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> numberof consumers who fall with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>‘Discipl<strong>in</strong>ed Eaters’ and ‘Healthy<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Pragmatist’ categories.However, over <strong>the</strong> longer term,<strong>the</strong>re is expected to be fur<strong>the</strong>rsegmentation of <strong>the</strong> healthy eat<strong>in</strong>gadvocates, with new and subtlydifferent consumer sub-groupsformed as <strong>the</strong>y embrace morepersonalised lifestyle and wellbe<strong>in</strong>gorientations. These are summarisedunder <strong>the</strong> head<strong>in</strong>gs of: Focus,balance, slow, positive andsusta<strong>in</strong>able.65 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


The Rise <strong>in</strong> Importance of ProvenanceTable. 4.6 KEY PROVENANCE CAMPAIGNSMedia Interest <strong>in</strong> ProvenanceKEYCOMPONENTSBUYINGBRITISH‘Buy<strong>in</strong>g British’ is <strong>the</strong>campaign to encourageBritish consumers tobuy Britishproductsover foreignalternativesFAIRTRADEFairtrade products aimto help producers <strong>in</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g countriesand promotesusta<strong>in</strong>abilityORGANIC‘Organic’ refers to foodgrown without artificialfertilisers or pesticidesand <strong>in</strong> a way thatemphasises croprotation andmak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>most ofnaturalfertilisersRAINFORESTALLIANCERa<strong>in</strong>forest Allianceworks to conservebiodiversity and ensuresusta<strong>in</strong>able livelihoods,by transform<strong>in</strong>g landusepractices, bus<strong>in</strong>esspractices and consumerbehaviourSEASONALPRODUCTSSeasonal food refers to<strong>the</strong> time of <strong>the</strong> yearwhen given food type isat its peak ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terms ofharvest orits flavour -and typicallybothABOUT• ‘Buy<strong>in</strong>g British’ is a relatively recent, but fast grow<strong>in</strong>g phenomenon amongstoperators and consumers alike. People buy British to support <strong>the</strong> localeconomy, as well as reduce concern over food miles• Brita<strong>in</strong>’s lead<strong>in</strong>g supermarkets have taken steps to <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>UK</strong>sourc<strong>in</strong>g, particularly for meat products• The ‘Red Tractor’ logo is now commonly found on products, provid<strong>in</strong>gassurance that food has been sourced from high quality British producers• In September <strong>2009</strong> <strong>the</strong> annual British Food fortnight will aga<strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g thistopic to <strong>the</strong> forefront, highlight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> diversity and quality of <strong>UK</strong> produce• 2008 <strong>UK</strong> Fairtrade sales totalled £700 million, up to 43% from 2007(fairtrade.org)• Grow<strong>in</strong>g demand for Fairtrade can be attributed to <strong>the</strong> rise of <strong>the</strong> ethicalconsumer• Greater consumer education and awareness of <strong>the</strong> benefits of Fairtrade toThird World producers has led to a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> demand for suchproducts• The recession has not stopped people from buy<strong>in</strong>g Fairtrade produce - anestimated quarter of British consumers purchased Fairtrade products <strong>in</strong>January <strong>2009</strong> (IGD - Shopper Trends, <strong>2009</strong>)• Follow<strong>in</strong>g more than a decade of susta<strong>in</strong>ed growth <strong>in</strong> this area, <strong>the</strong>economic downturn has resulted <strong>in</strong> slow<strong>in</strong>g demand for organic products• Accord<strong>in</strong>g to The Soil Association’s Organic Market Report <strong>2009</strong>, sales oforganic food grew by only 1.7% from 2007 to 2008, compared with a 22%<strong>in</strong>crease from 2005 to 2006• Dairy products and fresh fruit and vegetables are <strong>the</strong> most heavilypurchased organic products, account<strong>in</strong>g for 30% and 26% of organicspend<strong>in</strong>g respectively <strong>in</strong> 2008• It appears that organic products are perceived to be expensive ra<strong>the</strong>r thanma<strong>in</strong>stream items - consumers are not conv<strong>in</strong>ced about <strong>the</strong> product benefitsand are unwill<strong>in</strong>g to pay <strong>the</strong> organic premium <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> current climate• Established <strong>in</strong> 1986, Ra<strong>in</strong>forest Alliance now rivals The Fairtrade Foundationand o<strong>the</strong>r such established bodies. Ra<strong>in</strong>forest Alliance ensures farmers’benefit f<strong>in</strong>ancially but offers cheaper prices on coffee and no licens<strong>in</strong>g fee touse <strong>the</strong>ir logo (unlike The Fairtrade Foundation which charges a 2% fee basedon <strong>the</strong> wholesale coffee price)• For this reason, it is popular choice with <strong>the</strong> large food and beverage brandswant<strong>in</strong>g to tap <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ethical market• Companies already aligned with <strong>the</strong> Ra<strong>in</strong>forest Alliance <strong>in</strong>clude Kenco CoffeeCompany, Costa Coffee, Lavazza and McDonald’s - susta<strong>in</strong>ability is a hot topicand companies who are found lagg<strong>in</strong>g on susta<strong>in</strong>ability could facedifficulties <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> long term• Ra<strong>in</strong>forest Alliance cont<strong>in</strong>ues to grow worldwide - it is active <strong>in</strong> more than60 countries and now covers 2.6m coffee farms. This number is doubl<strong>in</strong>gevery year• Brands switch to Ra<strong>in</strong>forest Alliance certified coffee are experienc<strong>in</strong>g a 5-10%<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> sales <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> months follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir conversion; McDonald’s whoswitched to Ra<strong>in</strong>forest Alliance coffee <strong>in</strong> 2007 saw a 24% sales jump• <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> ‘<strong>in</strong>-season’ is ga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g popularity and is a grow<strong>in</strong>g trend on restaurantmenus• In 2008 celebrity chef, Gordon Ramsey, called for legislation to banrestaurants from putt<strong>in</strong>g out-of-season produce on <strong>the</strong>ir menus• The Eat Seasonably campaign, launched <strong>in</strong> May <strong>2009</strong>, aims to promote fruitand vegetables at <strong>the</strong>ir seasonable best and reconnect people with <strong>the</strong> food<strong>the</strong>y are eat<strong>in</strong>g. It is supported by Defra Secretary of State Hilary Benn and<strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>’s major supermarkets• Seasonal products present a potential market opportunity for restauranteursand retailers - Burgerville, a fast food operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> US, serves onlyseasonal food options sourced locally. O<strong>the</strong>rs could follow this exampleResearch clearlyhighlights thatconsumers are keen toknow more about <strong>the</strong>orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong>ir food.78% of respondents agreed that fastfood and takeaway outlets shouldprovide more of this <strong>in</strong>formation.Amidst this ris<strong>in</strong>g concern, somespecific trends and campaigns havesprung up, which are outl<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>Table 4.7.Of <strong>the</strong>se, Fairtrade and organic areperhaps <strong>the</strong> most established, andwhilst <strong>the</strong> trend for Fairtrade foodhas rema<strong>in</strong>ed robust, demand fororganic has waned. Organicproduce has suffered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> midst of<strong>the</strong> economic downturn as peopleare unwill<strong>in</strong>g to pay <strong>the</strong> premiumtypically charged as <strong>the</strong>y do not feelorganic food offers value for money.‘Buy<strong>in</strong>g British’ is a trend which hasga<strong>in</strong>ed momentum recently andhas become a key aspect of demandfrom consumers. Equally,seasonality has <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>popularity with consumers andwith operators respond<strong>in</strong>g to thiswith more frequent changes <strong>in</strong>menus. The number of farmers’markets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> has drastically<strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last five years.There are now around 800 farmers’markets <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> today, comparedwith 450, five years ago.“It's important toknow what <strong>the</strong>y aresell<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> fast foodcha<strong>in</strong>s. They mostlysell cheap food soI'm worried aboutwhat I am eat<strong>in</strong>g.”Female30-34, PeterboroughSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 66


Consumers typically hold <strong>the</strong> viewthat food which is highly priced isderived from a better source. Asexpressed earlier, <strong>the</strong> view amongstconsumers is that high provenancefoods are higher quality and, <strong>in</strong> turn,will have a price to match. As food<strong>in</strong> fast food operators and takeawayoutlets is <strong>in</strong>expensive, <strong>the</strong>re is moreconcern from consumers that it hasderived from poor quality orig<strong>in</strong>s.Fig. 4.6 CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDESTOWARDS THE ORIGIN OFFOODMore <strong>in</strong>formation should be madeavailable about <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of foodbought from fast food andtakeaway outletsDisagree 9%Nei<strong>the</strong>r 13%Agree 78%Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>Whilst consumers want more<strong>in</strong>formation provided about <strong>the</strong>orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong>ir food, <strong>the</strong>y also wantto eat food which is sourced from<strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>. 58% of people prefer to eatfood which is sourced from <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> –a demand which is partly be<strong>in</strong>gdriven by <strong>the</strong> recent attention oversupport for British farmers andproduce, as well as consumerpreference for <strong>the</strong> freshest food.Fig. 4.7 CONSUMERS’ ATTITUDESTOWARDS PROVENANCEI prefer eat<strong>in</strong>g at establishmentswhere I know <strong>the</strong> food is sourcedfrom <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>Disagree 20%Nei<strong>the</strong>r 21%Agree 59%“<strong>UK</strong> sourced food ismore expensiveand I don't want topay more just for<strong>UK</strong> labelled food.”Female30-34, Cardiffexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>exerci tation ullaexerci tation ulla“I prefer eat<strong>in</strong>gfood sourced from<strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong> order tosupport localsuppliers.”Male35-39, Cardiff“For healthreasons, I wouldwant to know <strong>the</strong>orig<strong>in</strong> of my food.”Male16-24, Blackpoolexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ulla“As long as <strong>the</strong>food looks andtastes good, I don'tcare where itcomes from.”Female16-24, Blackpoolexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaexerci tation ullaResearch has also <strong>in</strong>dicated that it isthose <strong>in</strong> lower socio-economicgroups who are more concernedthat <strong>the</strong>ir food is sourced from <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong>. These groups may be moreeager to support <strong>the</strong>ir localsuppliers dur<strong>in</strong>g periods ofeconomic downturn. They may alsobe consum<strong>in</strong>g foods which aretypically less expensive and,<strong>the</strong>refore, have more concerns over<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of such produce.67 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Fig.4.8 ATTITUDES ABOUT <strong>UK</strong> PRODUCE BY SOCIO-ECONOMICSI prefer eat<strong>in</strong>g at establishments where I know <strong>the</strong> food is sourced from <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>22%23%22%23%18%17%19%18%In addition to lower socioeconomicgroups, it is also <strong>the</strong> oldergenerations who care more that<strong>the</strong>ir food is of British orig<strong>in</strong>. 68% ofpeople aged 55 and older agreedthat <strong>the</strong>y prefer to eat <strong>in</strong>establishments where <strong>the</strong> food issourced from <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>, comparedwith 47% of 18-24 year olds. Thereare likely to be two key reasons forthis: An <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> ‘buy<strong>in</strong>g British’could be associated with atraditional set of values morecommonly associated with <strong>the</strong>older age groups. Those liv<strong>in</strong>g onpensions may also be attracted tomore keenly priced foods, and areconscious about <strong>the</strong> quality andorig<strong>in</strong>s of <strong>the</strong>se products.56%55%65%63%A/BC1C2D/EDisagree Nei<strong>the</strong>r AgreeSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong>Fig. 4.9 ATTITUDES ABOUT <strong>UK</strong> PRODUCE BY AGEI prefer eat<strong>in</strong>g at establishments where I know <strong>the</strong> food is sourcedfrom <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>30%27%22%19%14%16%23%23%26?%23%20%15%47%18-2450% 52% 58% 67% 69%25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+Disagree Nei<strong>the</strong>r Agree Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Consumer Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 68


Industry Views on Local Sourc<strong>in</strong>gFigure 4.10 clearly<strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>in</strong>concern amongst seniorexecutives <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>foodservice <strong>in</strong>dustry forus<strong>in</strong>g local suppliers just<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> last year.Industry leaders want to meet <strong>the</strong>demands of <strong>the</strong>ir consumers, whoare look<strong>in</strong>g to ‘do <strong>the</strong> right th<strong>in</strong>g’and who are concerned with betterquality and more seasonalproducts. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>recession has, <strong>in</strong> part, had apositive effect, with <strong>in</strong>dustry andconsumers alike want<strong>in</strong>g tosupport local suppliers when timesare more difficult. However, someoperators are deterred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>current economic downturn as<strong>the</strong>re is a significant cost <strong>in</strong>curred<strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g quality assured foods.“Provenance is<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyimportant to ourconsumers – and Iwould say that agood many actuallynow expect it as agiven, but at noextra cost.”Julia HatcherCategory Manager –Foodservice, Sa<strong>in</strong>sbury’sFig. 4.10 RESTAURANTS SHOULD USE LOCAL SUPPLIERS WHEREVERPOSSIBLE58% 64% 19% 24% 23% 12%Agree Nei<strong>the</strong>r DisagreeSource: Allegra Strategies Research & Analysis <strong>2009</strong>“Provenance hasbeen a growtharea. However, wehave seen evidenceof reducedenthusiasm for thistrend as <strong>the</strong>recession hasprogressed.”Stephen CliffordMarket<strong>in</strong>g Controller, BrakesAs mentioned at <strong>the</strong> start of <strong>the</strong>chapter, a substantial 67% ofrestaurant senior executives and<strong>in</strong>dividual restaurantowner/operators believe thatoffer<strong>in</strong>g locally sourced products willbe <strong>the</strong> biggest trend affect<strong>in</strong>gmenus <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next three to five years.When asked how <strong>the</strong>y sawrestaurant menus chang<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>next three to five years, <strong>in</strong>dustryleaders responded as follows:“More freshness,provenance andimprovement <strong>in</strong>quality.”Ben BartlettFood Development Manager,Scottish & Newcastle PubEnterprises“Seasonality andprovenance ofproduce will behighlighted.”Will SmithManag<strong>in</strong>g Director, ArbutusRestaurant2008<strong>2009</strong>69 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


“More focus onlighter, healthier<strong>in</strong>gredients; itemprovenancebecom<strong>in</strong>g explicit <strong>in</strong>more dishdescriptions;stronger flavoursand globalspic<strong>in</strong>g.”Commercial ManagerLead<strong>in</strong>g Restaurant GroupLocal sourc<strong>in</strong>g is currently a highprofile trend and a key part of aris<strong>in</strong>g ‘food culture’; none<strong>the</strong>less, it isright to question whe<strong>the</strong>r this trendis susta<strong>in</strong>able, or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>terestmay wane <strong>in</strong> a similar fashion toorganics. Concerns exist around <strong>the</strong>extent that operators and <strong>the</strong>ircustomers will pay <strong>the</strong> pricepremium frequently placed on foodswith specific orig<strong>in</strong> and qualityassurance and also about <strong>the</strong> supplycapacities of many smaller scalesuppliers. As far as local sourc<strong>in</strong>g isconcerned, many <strong>in</strong>dependents have<strong>in</strong>sufficient knowledge of suppliers,and are concerned with red tapeand health & safety issues.A food safety program, <strong>the</strong> ‘Safe andLocal Supplier Approval’ scheme, hasbeen developed by several bodies<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> British RetailConsortium, and is designed tomake it easier for local retailers tostock more locally sourced food. Thescheme enables retailers to sourcemore food directly from smallsuppliers, while help<strong>in</strong>g to m<strong>in</strong>imise<strong>the</strong> costs associated with foodsafety checks.With many <strong>in</strong>dustry leaderspredict<strong>in</strong>g that ‘localness’ willsignificantly impact menus <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>next five years, <strong>the</strong>y clearly see localsourc<strong>in</strong>g as a long-term trend. Theimportance of food provenance isfur<strong>the</strong>r supported by its l<strong>in</strong>ks wi<strong>the</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g well and general well-be<strong>in</strong>g –po<strong>in</strong>ts that will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to befuelled by media coverage andcelebrity chefs’ campaigns aroundBritish and seasonal produce. Thesigns are that local sourc<strong>in</strong>g couldbecome an even more <strong>in</strong>fluentialtrend with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 70


Case studyPret A MangerLong known for itsattitude to freshlyprepared food,Pret A Manger isat <strong>the</strong> forefront ofdevelopments onsusta<strong>in</strong>able sourc<strong>in</strong>gand quality assurance.A number of its<strong>in</strong>itiatives arehighlighted below:Sourc<strong>in</strong>gORIGIN OF PRODUCTS• Sources British products and local products where possible, e.g.English apple juice and Wiltshire-cured ham• Only uses Open Barn chickens• Only uses organic milk• All eggs are free-range• All products are au<strong>the</strong>ntic – provides consumers with full details of<strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of products, for example, Fairtrade fruit from <strong>the</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>esSUSTAINABILITY• Bluef<strong>in</strong> tuna is no longer on <strong>the</strong> menu until supply from susta<strong>in</strong>ablefisheries can be guaranteedQualityQUALITY ASSURANCE SCHEMES• Strong adherence to quality assurance schemesPork is British Farm AssuredSalmon is Mar<strong>in</strong>e Stewardship Council certifiedFRESHNESS• Fresh <strong>in</strong>gredients are delivered daily• Products are made fresh <strong>in</strong> store each day and leftovers are given tocharity• Shelf life of coffee beans is limited to two weeks to ensure freshnessand, <strong>in</strong> a unique <strong>in</strong>itiative, unused beans are compostedSupply Cha<strong>in</strong>• Thorough knowledge of product orig<strong>in</strong>, farm<strong>in</strong>g practises, rear<strong>in</strong>g,harvest<strong>in</strong>g, production and delivery71 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Chapter 5The Future of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketIn This Chapter• Short-termexpectations• The recession andits legacy• Medium-long termbus<strong>in</strong>essimperatives• Up and com<strong>in</strong>gbrandsThe views andperspectivesdeveloped <strong>in</strong> thischapter are derivedfrom a number ofsources, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gdetailed <strong>in</strong>terviewswith 25 lead<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>dustry executives,surveys with seniormanagers of over 80restaurant cha<strong>in</strong>s andover 100 <strong>in</strong>dependentoperators. In addition,<strong>the</strong> analysis is<strong>in</strong>formed by keyf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs fromAllegra’s consumerresearch <strong>in</strong>sightsand from extensivedesk research.• After an envisaged 0.5%contraction <strong>in</strong> <strong>2009</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market is forecast tosee a modest recovery <strong>in</strong> 2010with growth of 0.5%-1.0%. Ris<strong>in</strong>gunemployment will rema<strong>in</strong> aconcern and a barrier to astronger pick-up• The recession will lead to a last<strong>in</strong>glegacy of enhanced valueconsciousness by consumers – as<strong>the</strong>y become more demand<strong>in</strong>gabout <strong>the</strong>ir eat<strong>in</strong>g out, withhigher expectations of <strong>the</strong> qualityof <strong>the</strong>ir food and of <strong>the</strong> perceivedvalue for money• Established underly<strong>in</strong>g trends ofris<strong>in</strong>g affluence, grow<strong>in</strong>g mobilityand ‘more youthful’ olderconsumers will support strongergrowth <strong>in</strong> eat<strong>in</strong>g out over <strong>the</strong>medium-long term. Follow<strong>in</strong>g anOlympics boost <strong>in</strong> 2012, <strong>the</strong>market is forecast to reach£47.5bn by 2014, with a CAGR*of 3.4%• Foodservice will play a greaterrole <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> re<strong>in</strong>vigoration of <strong>the</strong>High Street as a more leisureorienteddest<strong>in</strong>ation – but <strong>the</strong>pace of this will be set bylandlords’ soften<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> rentalexpectations• The future of <strong>in</strong>formal eat<strong>in</strong>g outlies with a more specialised andsegmented marketplace, withoperators better deliver<strong>in</strong>g on<strong>the</strong>ir core competencies andextend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir po<strong>in</strong>ts ofdifference• Foodservice w<strong>in</strong>ners will be thosecompanies better equipped to tap<strong>in</strong>to consumers’ ris<strong>in</strong>g demand forKEY POINTSbetter value, healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g,convenience, au<strong>the</strong>nticity, localsourc<strong>in</strong>g and added-experience• Growth prospects are anticipatedmost strongly <strong>in</strong> fast casual,healthier, Oriental, British and hotfood-to-go• The poorly differentiated middleground will become a riskierposition<strong>in</strong>g for generalistoperators try<strong>in</strong>g to cover toomany cuis<strong>in</strong>e types• There may be fewer pubs <strong>in</strong>prospect but <strong>the</strong>y will <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>the</strong>ir share of <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> market simply becausedevelop<strong>in</strong>g food sales is critical to<strong>the</strong>ir survival• The market structure will changewith <strong>the</strong> emergence of a far moreconsolidated eat<strong>in</strong>g out market,with fewer <strong>in</strong>dependents andsmaller cha<strong>in</strong>s, and a strongerpresence of branded cha<strong>in</strong>s• Greater daypart target<strong>in</strong>g can beexpected, as well as <strong>the</strong> blurr<strong>in</strong>gof foodservice and food retail<strong>in</strong>g –as operators and retailers seek tocapture a greater share of <strong>the</strong>irexist<strong>in</strong>g customers’ spend<strong>in</strong>g andunlock new sales opportunities• Build<strong>in</strong>g stronger customerloyalty will become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyimportant and result <strong>in</strong> moresophisticated schemes, <strong>in</strong> asimilar ve<strong>in</strong> to those <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> retailsector, that better rewardcustomers and create strongerdialogue and relationships*Note: CAGR = Compound AnnualGrowth Rate73 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


An Introduction‘‘The next 5-10 years will be very different to <strong>the</strong> last, asconsumers will become more value conscious and operatorsfocus on ways to improve <strong>the</strong>ir value equations. However,scope to achieve this via cutt<strong>in</strong>g prices will be limited – andwithout loyal customers, much harder still.’’Alastair FairgrieveChief Insight Officer - Europe, <strong>McDonald's</strong>One of <strong>the</strong> most logicalplaces to start whenexplor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> futureprospects of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market iswith <strong>the</strong> past, andidentify<strong>in</strong>g underly<strong>in</strong>glong-term trends.This is all <strong>the</strong> more appeal<strong>in</strong>gwhen it offers reassurance andcomfort <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of ris<strong>in</strong>gprosperity and disposable <strong>in</strong>come,<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g mobility and grow<strong>in</strong>geat<strong>in</strong>g out activity and spend<strong>in</strong>g.The clearly established trend is forconsumers to spend a greateramount of <strong>the</strong>ir total food &beverage expenditure away from<strong>the</strong> home – and this has by nomeans reached a mature phase.But, while <strong>the</strong> medium-long termoutlook is positive, what of <strong>the</strong>short-term, and <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong>recession? And also, how might<strong>the</strong> recession leave a last<strong>in</strong>glegacy?<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 74


Short-Term ExpectationsTable 5.1 ANNUAL GROWTH IN GDP, UNEMPLOYMENT, AVERAGE EARNINGS, INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET AND FOODRETAIL SALES 2004-2010FMARKET INDICATOR - ANNUAL GROWTH20042005200620072008<strong>2009</strong>F2010FGDP3.2%1.7%2.7%3.0%0.7%-3.5%-0.1%UNEMPLOYMENT RATE - YEARLY AVERAGE4.8%4.9%5.6%5.5%5.8%8.2%9.4%AVERAGE EARNINGS4.4%4.8%3.2%4.2%3.6%1.3%1.7%INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET6.3%3.8%3.8%8.3%4.0%-0.5%0.5%-1.0%RETAIL SALES GROWTH IN FOOD STORES4.0%3.2%3.6%4.2%5.8%2.0%2.0%-3.0%Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, ONS, Item Club, CBI, <strong>2009</strong>The scale of <strong>the</strong> currentrecession is evidentacross several bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>in</strong>dicators, not least GDP,which is predicted to fallstrongly this year. Theannual growth forecast of–3.5% would be <strong>the</strong>weakest for over 50years.Despite some expectations thatoutput will stabilise by <strong>the</strong> yearend and that a modest recoverywill beg<strong>in</strong> next spr<strong>in</strong>g, a majorconcern lies with ris<strong>in</strong>gunemployment. It is forecast that900,000 jobs will be lost this year,with ano<strong>the</strong>r 500,000 to go <strong>in</strong>2010, when unemployment willexceed 3 million. This willexacerbate worries about jobsecurity and impact <strong>the</strong> growth <strong>in</strong>average earn<strong>in</strong>gs. In turn, it willweaken confidence levels and hitconsumer spend<strong>in</strong>g, particularly onmore discretionary items.However, expenditure onhousehold necessities, not leastfood and dr<strong>in</strong>k, is expected torema<strong>in</strong> more robust – and this willcont<strong>in</strong>ue to support growth <strong>in</strong>retail sales with<strong>in</strong> food stores.Factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumer researchf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> greater balance ofadults are more likely to be eat<strong>in</strong>gout less <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> next 12 months, andit is difficult to be optimistic about<strong>the</strong> near term prospects for growth<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market.Indeed, a decl<strong>in</strong>e of 0.5% is forecastfor <strong>2009</strong>. A slightly strongeroutcome is predicted for 2010, butthis is likely to be skewed towards<strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> year. This is<strong>in</strong> keep<strong>in</strong>g with Allegra’s survey ofRestaurant Leaders, with <strong>the</strong>largest proportion of seniorexecutives expect<strong>in</strong>g a recovery <strong>in</strong>12-18 months from April/May <strong>2009</strong>.Fig. 5.1 <strong>UK</strong> RESTAURANT LEADERS’ EXPECTATIONS OF THE TIMING OFMARKET RECOVERYQUICK RECOVERY0% 7% 38% 41%With<strong>in</strong> 3months3-6months6-12monthsSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Industry Interviews, <strong>2009</strong>12-18monthsSLOW RECOVERY14%18-24months1%More than24 months75 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


‘Challeng<strong>in</strong>g’ is a commonly usedterm to describe <strong>the</strong> currenttrad<strong>in</strong>g environment, and for goodreason, given <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>gprospect of weak demand and costbase pressures on food, energy andstaff<strong>in</strong>g. And this will lead tocasualties across <strong>the</strong> entirefoodservice market. Manyoperators are at risk of enter<strong>in</strong>g adownward spiral of cutt<strong>in</strong>g prices(and corners), weaken<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>irvalue propositions, los<strong>in</strong>g sales andhav<strong>in</strong>g to cut marg<strong>in</strong>s fur<strong>the</strong>r, butnot without potentially criticallyunderm<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g core brand values.“The eat<strong>in</strong>g outmarket appears tobe behav<strong>in</strong>g verydifferently <strong>in</strong> thisrecession to <strong>the</strong>previous downturn<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1990s.Previously, volumestook a nosedive asmarg<strong>in</strong>s were held– this time it seemsthat marg<strong>in</strong>s arebe<strong>in</strong>g compressedas operators fightto hold onto volumeand share.”Adam Mart<strong>in</strong>Market<strong>in</strong>g Director,Mitchells & Butlers“The big losers <strong>in</strong>this recession willfall <strong>in</strong>to two camps:firstly, those lessable to, or not seento, provide value formoney; andsecondly, those thattoo aggressivelyplay <strong>the</strong> price card,underm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong>irbrand values andfall foul of it.”David MannManag<strong>in</strong>g Director, PhilpottsNever<strong>the</strong>less, despite all <strong>the</strong>aforementioned reasons to be lessthan cheerful, <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t should notbe overlooked that this is a ‘patchy’recession. A number ofhouseholders, particularly those ontracker mortgages and/or thosewith secure jobs, are actuallyconsiderably better off than <strong>the</strong>ywere 12-18 months ago. Theymight not be consum<strong>in</strong>gconspicuously, but <strong>the</strong>y arecont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to eat out of <strong>the</strong> homeand benefit<strong>in</strong>g from a number ofspecial offer deals and promotions.In addition, recessions presentconsiderable opportunities to anumber of operators – not leastthose with value at <strong>the</strong> heart of<strong>the</strong>ir offers and those with trustedbrands. Consumer consciousnessaround value has been elevated andpeople are now far more demand<strong>in</strong>gabout want<strong>in</strong>g more for less.In recessions, consumers becomemore risk averse and gravitate to<strong>the</strong> brands <strong>the</strong>y know and trust.Stronger brands will also benefitfrom:• Greater availability of newdevelopment sites on morefavourable terms <strong>in</strong> a fall<strong>in</strong>gproperty market• Greater relative access to capitalto fund store refurbishment andsite acquisition• Better conditions for <strong>the</strong>recruitment and retention ofhigher calibre staff• Opportunities to capture marketshare ga<strong>in</strong>s from weaker cha<strong>in</strong>s,which are less able to <strong>in</strong>vest <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong>ir propositions, and from <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>evitable market casualties“I th<strong>in</strong>k thosecompanies that arecont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to<strong>in</strong>novate and <strong>in</strong>vestdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>recession will be<strong>the</strong> ones whoaccelerate out of it.In my personalop<strong>in</strong>ion, both Costaand McDonald’scome to m<strong>in</strong>d.”Malcolm PlowsTrad<strong>in</strong>g Director - On Premises,Coca-Cola Enterprises<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 76


Recessionary Legacy –Susta<strong>in</strong>ed or Not?Industry executivesbroadly fall <strong>in</strong>to twocamps about whe<strong>the</strong>rthis recession will havea last<strong>in</strong>g impact.On one hand, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> view that<strong>the</strong>re is a certa<strong>in</strong> amount ofjump<strong>in</strong>g on a recessionarybandwagon, and that is has to beborne <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that economicactivity is cyclical and thatconsumers are fickle. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r,<strong>the</strong>re is <strong>the</strong> expectation that weare on <strong>the</strong> cusp of a genu<strong>in</strong>eturn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t, one that will see <strong>the</strong>susta<strong>in</strong>ed re-appraisal byconsumers of how <strong>the</strong>y trade offquality aga<strong>in</strong>st price and developan enhanced understand<strong>in</strong>g ofwhat good value for money meansto <strong>the</strong>m. Significantly, <strong>the</strong> majorityof <strong>in</strong>terviewees were <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> lattercamp and argued that <strong>the</strong>re will bemore thrift<strong>in</strong>ess – on <strong>the</strong> part ofconsumers and clients – <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>future.“The recession willsee a last<strong>in</strong>g legacyof consumersbecom<strong>in</strong>g moreselective with <strong>the</strong>irspend<strong>in</strong>g and wiserwith how and what<strong>the</strong>y buy.”Steven FosterHead of Retail Categories,Manchester Airports Group<strong>UK</strong> adults are re-apprais<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>irspend<strong>in</strong>g patterns and <strong>the</strong>re are anumber of reasons for believ<strong>in</strong>gthat <strong>the</strong> recessionary legacy isgo<strong>in</strong>g to have a susta<strong>in</strong>ed impact:• This recession, perhaps unlikeprevious market downturns, hasnot just largely affected BlueCollar workers <strong>in</strong> more traditional<strong>in</strong>dustries outside <strong>the</strong> South East.It is hav<strong>in</strong>g a far more ubiquitousimpact• There will be on-go<strong>in</strong>g mediumterm concerns around ris<strong>in</strong>gunemployment and job security• The depleted state of <strong>the</strong> nation’sf<strong>in</strong>ances, with <strong>the</strong> prospect of taxrises and/or governmentspend<strong>in</strong>g cuts, are such thatdisposable <strong>in</strong>come growth isexpected to be rema<strong>in</strong> subduedand lag beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> post-recessionpick up <strong>in</strong> GDP• Corporate hospitality budgetsand expense accounts have beencut back and it will be highlyunlikely that companies willreturn to <strong>the</strong> profligacy of <strong>the</strong>past• Consumers have becomeaccustomed to cherry pick<strong>in</strong>gspecial offers, us<strong>in</strong>g vouchers (viaboth <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ted media andonl<strong>in</strong>e) and promotional deals –and wean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m off this isgo<strong>in</strong>g to prove difficult• The recession has encouragedconsumers to make greater useof onl<strong>in</strong>e tools and aids, such asprice comparison websites,review guides and blogs, to helpmake better-<strong>in</strong>formed buy<strong>in</strong>gdecisions. This activity is onlygo<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>crease and is help<strong>in</strong>gto stimulate value-led th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g• Many consumers who werepreviously <strong>in</strong>frequent visitors tolower price bracket operators maywell have been more thanpleasantly surprised by <strong>the</strong> valueand satisfaction <strong>the</strong>y havederived – not least from thosevenues offer<strong>in</strong>g free additionalservices such as Wi-Fi,newspapers and beverage refills• More fundamentally, <strong>the</strong>recession is boost<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rise ofmore demand<strong>in</strong>g consumers,who want more from a host ofsuppliers on <strong>the</strong>ir own terms.This is not just about ‘anytime,any place, anywhere’, but also<strong>in</strong>cludes how much <strong>the</strong>y areprepared to payIn short, <strong>the</strong> recession issharpen<strong>in</strong>g consumers’ valueexpectations and <strong>the</strong>y expectoperators to respond. The futurelies with consumers shap<strong>in</strong>gbus<strong>in</strong>esses, not <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r wayround. The recession has merelyaccelerated <strong>the</strong> timeframe for this.77 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Medium-Long TermBus<strong>in</strong>ess ImperativesWith ever moredemand<strong>in</strong>g consumers,<strong>the</strong> corporate responselies with operators add<strong>in</strong>gmore value to <strong>the</strong>customer visit.Most noticeably, foodservicecompanies will be go<strong>in</strong>g ‘back tobasics’ and focus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> on <strong>the</strong>ircore competencies and po<strong>in</strong>ts ofdifference. This will result <strong>in</strong>grow<strong>in</strong>g segmentation andspecialisation, a more competitivemarketplace and require muchgreater levels of customer <strong>in</strong>sightand dialogue to build loyalty. Theseaspects of <strong>the</strong> future shape of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market areeach worth comment<strong>in</strong>g upon:GROWING SPECIALISATIONAND SEGMENTATIONIt is a common feature of marketsthat, as <strong>the</strong>y mature, <strong>the</strong>y becomemore specialised and segmented,as operators carve out nicheconcepts and look to exploitsmaller pockets of demand <strong>in</strong> amore saturated market. This isalready happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> many areasof <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market.Examples <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>the</strong> growth ofmore types of South East Asiancuis<strong>in</strong>e, such as with Bal<strong>in</strong>ese,Malaysian and Thai; and <strong>the</strong><strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> premium burgerconcepts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> GourmetBurger Kitchen, Byron and Nando’s.This trend has much fur<strong>the</strong>r scopeto be developed, both <strong>in</strong> cuis<strong>in</strong>etypes and exploit<strong>in</strong>g gaps <strong>in</strong>prevail<strong>in</strong>g price architectures. Indue course, <strong>the</strong>re will be a strongerboost from premium product<strong>in</strong>novation, but <strong>the</strong> real impetus at<strong>the</strong> moment lies with grow<strong>in</strong>gconsumer demand for locallysourced products and ‘au<strong>the</strong>nticity’.This has partly orig<strong>in</strong>ated from <strong>the</strong>rise of food culture and Britonsbecom<strong>in</strong>g more travelled, whichhas generated a desire for moregenu<strong>in</strong>e eat<strong>in</strong>g out experiences. Ithas led to <strong>the</strong> launch of severalsmaller concepts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Jamie’sItalian, P<strong>in</strong>g Pong and Sacred (seeCase Study 2).Grow<strong>in</strong>g specialisation will alsoserve to weaken <strong>the</strong> hand of <strong>the</strong>generalist providers. This <strong>in</strong>cludesseveral pub cha<strong>in</strong>s, which arerespond<strong>in</strong>g with more aggressivespecial promotions and offer<strong>in</strong>ghighly competitive prices. There is<strong>in</strong>evitably a marg<strong>in</strong> implicationthat not all operators will be ableto offset through higher volume.Toge<strong>the</strong>r with brand perceptiondamage, it is questionable how farthis strategy is susta<strong>in</strong>able over <strong>the</strong>medium-long term. Develop<strong>in</strong>gadditional compell<strong>in</strong>g reasons tovisit – and return – are essential.MORE COMPETITIONThe good news for companies <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> sector is that, over <strong>the</strong>medium-long term, <strong>the</strong>re isforecast to be more mealsconsumed out of <strong>the</strong> home. Thebad news is that it is go<strong>in</strong>g to be amore competitive marketplace.This latter po<strong>in</strong>t, however, needsclarification on two fronts.Firstly, <strong>the</strong>re will not necessarily bemore competitor outlets. As with<strong>the</strong> natural market maturityprocess, it will migrate towards aless fragmented, moreconsolidated market structure.Larger foodservice brands benefitfrom significantly higher levels ofconsumer trust and recognitionthan many smaller and<strong>in</strong>dependent operators, and will betougher to trade aga<strong>in</strong>st. However,<strong>the</strong> same levels of scale economiesdo not exist with<strong>in</strong> foodservicecompared with food retail, hence<strong>the</strong> level of dom<strong>in</strong>ance enjoyed by<strong>the</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g supermarket cha<strong>in</strong>swill not be replicated with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g out market.Secondly, it is also not necessarily<strong>the</strong> case that <strong>the</strong>re will besignificantly more bus<strong>in</strong>esses.Larger bus<strong>in</strong>esses benefit fromgreater fund<strong>in</strong>g and buy<strong>in</strong>g power,and this will fur<strong>the</strong>r driveconsolidation <strong>in</strong> ownership. Therestaurant sector already has asubstantial number of multi-brandoperators (for example, <strong>the</strong>Gondola Group with ASK, Byron,PizzaExpress and Zizzi; and <strong>the</strong>Restaurant Group with Blubeckers,Chiquito, Frankie & Benny’s andGarfunkel’s) and more of <strong>the</strong>se arelikely to come as weaker cha<strong>in</strong>s areacquired and new specialisedconcepts developed.These larger brand stables will beunder <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g pressure,however, to be more transparentabout <strong>the</strong>ir various bus<strong>in</strong>esspractices and corporateresponsibilities. People will becomemore <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>essesbeh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> food outlets. This ispart of <strong>the</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g process ofconsumers becom<strong>in</strong>g better<strong>in</strong>formed and more discern<strong>in</strong>g, butwill also reflect greater adoption ofmore values-led agendas.Currently, <strong>in</strong> many multiple retailbrand foodservice companies, thislevel of disclosure is relativelymodest and will need moreattention.<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 78


New restaurant outlets are likely tofill many of <strong>the</strong> retail voids be<strong>in</strong>gcreated on <strong>the</strong> High Street. HighStreets are go<strong>in</strong>g to have tobecome more leisure-oriented tosusta<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir vitality – and astronger foodservice presence hasan important role to play <strong>in</strong> thisrevitalisation. Indeed, moreprogressive plann<strong>in</strong>g authoritieswill already be revis<strong>in</strong>g land useallocations and categorisations tofacilitate this re<strong>in</strong>vigoration. Moreimportantly, this process will alsorequire more accommodat<strong>in</strong>glandlords. Foodservice operatorswill colonise more of <strong>the</strong> HighStreet, and provide an antidote toclaims of grow<strong>in</strong>g homogeneity,but <strong>the</strong> pace very much dependson <strong>the</strong> rate at which landlords’expectations on rents are reviseddownwards.GREATER CUSTOMERINSIGHTCompared with <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>’s foodretailers, foodservice operatorsrema<strong>in</strong> relatively primitive. Manyare still not supported by good tilland management <strong>in</strong>formationsystems to provide valuable realtime <strong>in</strong>sight on sales trends andreaction to specific pric<strong>in</strong>g andpromotional activities. A largernumber do not operate any form ofsophisticated (i.e. smart card)loyalty/reward scheme. Theseprovide more detailed <strong>in</strong>formationabout <strong>in</strong>dividual consumers’buy<strong>in</strong>g habits and enable operatorsto develop better-<strong>in</strong>formedrelationships with <strong>the</strong>ir customers.The recession may well be serv<strong>in</strong>gto curtail <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> non day-today,bus<strong>in</strong>ess-critical <strong>in</strong>itiatives, butthis is go<strong>in</strong>g to be an area where<strong>the</strong> competitive bar is be<strong>in</strong>g raisedas operators search for ways to havedialogues with <strong>the</strong>ir customers andcapture greater feedback to buildloyalty. Traditional foodserviceth<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g about loyalty holds that itis <strong>the</strong> result of hav<strong>in</strong>g a greatproduct, served well <strong>in</strong> attractivesurround<strong>in</strong>gs. This is not go<strong>in</strong>g togo away, but will be re<strong>in</strong>forced byschemes that help operators tobetter know <strong>the</strong>ir customers andwhich help <strong>the</strong>m feel special aboutus<strong>in</strong>g that particular operator.The developments and benefitsthat Starbucks has <strong>in</strong>troduced withits card, and YO! Sushi with its YO!Love Club are good cases <strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t.With greater competition, <strong>the</strong> battlefor customer loyalty is only go<strong>in</strong>g toheat up and <strong>the</strong>re will be greaterfocus on ensur<strong>in</strong>g consumers feelrecognised and valued.79 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Medium-Long TermExpectationsResearch undertakenwith senior executivesacross <strong>the</strong> restaurant<strong>in</strong>dustry, as well as withowners and managers of<strong>UK</strong> <strong>in</strong>dependentrestaurants, reveal thatfast casual d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g isexpected to register <strong>the</strong>highest growth over <strong>the</strong>next three to five years.Healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g ranges and Britishand South-East Asian cuis<strong>in</strong>es arealso seen as hav<strong>in</strong>g significantgrowth potential.“Fast-casual is aconvenient, easyway to go out andhave good foodwithout feel<strong>in</strong>gformal, and <strong>the</strong>n toalso be able to goand do o<strong>the</strong>rth<strong>in</strong>gs.”Group Market<strong>in</strong>gManagerBar and Restaurant GroupTable 5.2 CUISINE TYPES EXPECTED TO GROW THE FASTEST OVER THE NEXT3-5 YEARSAlso identified with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> researchwere <strong>the</strong> restaurant bus<strong>in</strong>essmodels expected to grow <strong>the</strong>fastest over <strong>the</strong> next three to fiveyears. Fast casual d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, fast foodand pub food concepts are viewedas <strong>the</strong> most promis<strong>in</strong>g futuregrowth formats. The high rat<strong>in</strong>gfor fast casual reflects its multifacetedcomposition, <strong>in</strong>formalstrengths, relative affordability and<strong>in</strong>novative operator base. Fast foodbenefits from grow<strong>in</strong>g demand forgood value, hot food concepts andan expansion hungry set of lead<strong>in</strong>goperators. Pub restaurants aresupported on <strong>the</strong> back offavourable consumer sentimentand <strong>the</strong> reality that without astrong food offer, bus<strong>in</strong>esslongevity is limited.RANK CUISINE TYPE12345678910FAST CASUAL DININGHEALTHY EATING CONCEPTSBRITISH CUISINESOUTH EAST ASIAN E.G. THAI, NOODLE ETC.GASTRO PUBSINDEPENDENT RESTAURANTSPUB/BAR RESTAURANTSFASTFOODBISTROSLOCAL/TRADITIONAL FOODE.G. GOURMET BURGERS & CHICKEN, PASTA,PIZZA, NON-SPECIFIC ORIENTAL ETC.Allegra Strategies Analysis, Industry Research, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 80


Fig. 5.2 RESTAURANT BUSINESS MODELS EXPECTED TO GROW THE FASTEST OVER THE NEXT 3-5 YEARSPercent of Respondents64%Fast casuald<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g13% 11% 8% 2% 1% 1% 0%Fast foodPubrestaurantGastro pub F<strong>in</strong>e d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Brasseries O<strong>the</strong>r Hotel d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, Industry Research, <strong>2009</strong>Based on a comb<strong>in</strong>ation ofeconomic forecasts, pastperformance and <strong>in</strong>dustryexecutive <strong>in</strong>terviews, Allegra hasproduced a five year growthforecast for <strong>the</strong> Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> market. A market value of£47.5bn is predicted by 2014, whichequates to a CAGR (CompoundAnnual Growth Rate) of 3.4%. Inpart due to <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uation of arelatively low <strong>in</strong>flationary outlook,this growth rate is expected to be<strong>the</strong> lowest over <strong>the</strong> past 25 years.Never<strong>the</strong>less, this market growth isforecast to generate an estimated<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> employment with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>sector of between 3%-5%.Table 5.3 INFORMAL EATING OUT MARKET GROWTH, 1999-2014F1999 2004 <strong>2009</strong>F 2014FMARKET VALUE (£BN)£24.7 £33.3 £40.3 £47.5CAGR - PREVIOUS 5 YR. PERIOD* 7.0% 6.2% 3.8% 3.4%*Note: i.e. 1994 - 1999, 1999 - 2004 etc. Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>81 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Summary of Short and Long TermExpectations by Market SegmentThe follow<strong>in</strong>g analysisreviews <strong>the</strong> prospects ofeach Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market segment over <strong>the</strong>short- and long-term.There will, of course, be differenceswith each segment <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong>abilities of different operators tocapitalise on more specific growthopportunities, and this will play akey role <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g segmentalw<strong>in</strong>ners and losers.INFORMAL RESTAURANTS• Short-Term Prospects- Fur<strong>the</strong>r fall-out of <strong>in</strong>dependentrestaurants and weaker cha<strong>in</strong>s asa result of <strong>the</strong> economic decl<strong>in</strong>e –particularly those fail<strong>in</strong>g toprovide value for money and/orgood quality food- Marg<strong>in</strong>s will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to besqueezed as <strong>the</strong> ‘consumerdiscount junkie’ forces <strong>the</strong>m tokeep up promotions anddiscounts- More experience will be ga<strong>in</strong>edaround <strong>the</strong>ir management ofpromotions – operators will bemore knowledgeable about whichtactics are better able to drivefootfall, repeat custom and higherspend – more profitably thano<strong>the</strong>rs- Stronger justification of pricepo<strong>in</strong>ts and communication ofvalue messages• Long-Term Prospects- There is a positive long-termoutlook, with stronger expansionopportunities beyond <strong>the</strong>South East- There will be an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>variety of cuis<strong>in</strong>e types withgreater specialisation- Ris<strong>in</strong>g demand for convenience,good value and provenance by <strong>the</strong>British public all play to <strong>the</strong>strengths of <strong>in</strong>formal resta-urants– particularly well-executedbrands- Stronger growth to be seen <strong>in</strong>some exist<strong>in</strong>g operators such asCarluccio’s, YO! Sushi andWagamama, as well as anemergence of new brands- There will be more consolidatedownership <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> emergent newbrands- Some brands <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middlemarket, with no previousrecessionary experience, no strongdifferentiation and who are poorlymanaged, will fall out of <strong>the</strong>market- Operators will need to provideclear po<strong>in</strong>ts of difference as wellas someth<strong>in</strong>g which is not readilyavailable to people at home- Restaurants become more flexiblewith <strong>the</strong>ir offer at different daypartoccasionsFAST FOOD AND TAKEAWAY• Short-Term Prospects- Favourable takeaway prospectsover <strong>the</strong> next 18 months asconsumers rema<strong>in</strong> price consciousand cont<strong>in</strong>ue d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> more- Physical expansion opportunitiesfor <strong>the</strong> fast food brands with <strong>the</strong>benefit of more advantageousproperty deals- Ensur<strong>in</strong>g newer customers areattracted and reta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> fastfood cha<strong>in</strong>s will offer consumersupgraded environments andd<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g experiences• Long-Term Prospects- Fast food and takeaway will haveto work hard not to fall out offavour given <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>in</strong> healthyeat<strong>in</strong>g and concern over foodorig<strong>in</strong> – operators will have tobecome more transparent <strong>in</strong> orderto appease consumers of <strong>the</strong>irconcerns- Pace of growth <strong>in</strong> direct and<strong>in</strong>direct competition (e.g. ris<strong>in</strong>gsupermarket competition) isexpected to exceed demand,mak<strong>in</strong>g life harder for takeawayoperators- Fast food cha<strong>in</strong>s will have todeliver a broader value for moneyproposition- New forms of healthy fast food<strong>in</strong>dependents and cha<strong>in</strong>s willemerge, with operators like Leonalready lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> way- The provision of drive-thrus will<strong>in</strong>creaseCOFFEE SHOPS/SANDWICHBARS/CAFÉS• Short-Term Prospects- Short dips <strong>in</strong> comparable storesales growth due to <strong>the</strong> economicand footfall decl<strong>in</strong>es- Scal<strong>in</strong>g back of physical expansion- Some of <strong>the</strong> upper end deli andsandwich bars will have to lowerprices to rema<strong>in</strong> competitive as<strong>the</strong> bar is raised by mass marketoperators<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 82


Summary of Short and Long TermExpectations by Market Segment- The coffee shop operators willstart to offer more promotionaldeals for customers• Long-Term Prospects- Favourable prospects with ongo<strong>in</strong>gtrends to urban café cultureand growth <strong>in</strong> branded foodconcepts expected to cont<strong>in</strong>ue forat least <strong>the</strong> next five years- There will be a greater blurr<strong>in</strong>gbetween coffee shops andsandwich bars <strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>storeenvironment and experience- Coffee shops will look to extend<strong>the</strong>ir daypart offer<strong>in</strong>g- Stronger expansion <strong>in</strong>to smallertowns and larger centre <strong>in</strong>-fillwith smaller formatsRETAIL GRAB & GO ANDCAFÉS• Short-Term Prospects- Supermarkets will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to farewell dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> recession, withconsumers opt<strong>in</strong>g forsupermarkets’ meal deals as partof <strong>in</strong>creased promotional activity- Higher end product developmentwill be on hold as supermarketsfocus on volumes and price-ledactivity ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>in</strong>novation- Greater Focus on entry price po<strong>in</strong>tranges• Long-Term Prospects- More impactful grab & godisplays with bettermerchandis<strong>in</strong>g, position<strong>in</strong>g andsignage- The variety and packag<strong>in</strong>g of grab& go food will develop fur<strong>the</strong>r83 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>- An <strong>in</strong>creased number ofconvenience stores wi<strong>the</strong>nhanced grab & go ranges- Grab & go sections to align closelywith local catchment areas- D<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong> ranges to become a longstand<strong>in</strong>gfeature – set to see<strong>in</strong>creased choice and wideravailability- Stronger presence of harddiscounters <strong>in</strong>to grab & go market- Development of retail cafés <strong>in</strong>tofree-stand<strong>in</strong>g café concepts torema<strong>in</strong> a low priority ow<strong>in</strong>g togreater marg<strong>in</strong> confidence <strong>in</strong> coreretail formatsPUBS• Short-Term Prospects- Difficulties on wet sales withpeople choos<strong>in</strong>g to dr<strong>in</strong>k at homera<strong>the</strong>r than out of home – lead<strong>in</strong>gto fur<strong>the</strong>r closures and churn ofpubs across different operators- The number of pubs sell<strong>in</strong>g foodwill <strong>in</strong>crease, mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>m acheaper alternative to d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g atrestaurants- More aggressive price-ledpropositions to drive footfall- Greater communication of pumpprices to portray stronger valuemessage on alcohol- Favourable summer wea<strong>the</strong>roffsets impact from weaksport<strong>in</strong>g calendar• Long-Term Prospects- Pubs cont<strong>in</strong>ue to struggle todevelop core alcohol sales andgreater efforts made to sell awider range of beverages- Greater re-position<strong>in</strong>g to offer afoodservice fit to rival <strong>in</strong>formalrestaurants- There will be more segmentationwith different tiers with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> pubsector – some pubs expected tobecome restaurants- Greater use of loyalty schemes toencourage more regular visits- There will be more effort made bypubs on improv<strong>in</strong>g outdoor areasWORKPLACE• Short-Term Prospects- Fur<strong>the</strong>r decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> footfall with<strong>in</strong>creased unemployment- Impact from greater numbersbr<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a packed lunch to savemoney- There will be greater promotionalusage- Increased focus on healthy eat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>itiatives• Long-Term Prospects- Greater challenges <strong>in</strong> costeffectively deliver<strong>in</strong>g greaterchoice and customised solutions- Caterers will be more m<strong>in</strong>dfulabout what is happen<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong>High Street and become morecommercial, though unlikely <strong>the</strong>rewill be a strong presence ofbrands- Greater consolidation – big playersas well as niche high serviceplayers will rema<strong>in</strong>- Increased focus by contractcaterers on widen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir servicepropositions


LEISURE• Short-Term Prospects- Reduced footfall throughrecession has negatively impactedfoodservice with<strong>in</strong> smaller leisurevenues, but ‘staycation’ factorbenefits larger dest<strong>in</strong>ations- Theme park operators offer<strong>in</strong>gpoor value for money to lose out- Greater use of promotionalactivity to be employed• Long-Term Prospects- Favourable prospects forfoodservice with<strong>in</strong> leisure sectorswith strong grey market appeal- Greater focus on offer<strong>in</strong>g fresherand healthier product choice- The discern<strong>in</strong>g consumer expects<strong>the</strong> same choice as <strong>the</strong>y would on<strong>the</strong> High Street, lead<strong>in</strong>g to agreater presence of brands andmore variety for consumers- Leisure demand boost expectedfrom London Olympics and itssport<strong>in</strong>g legacyTRAVEL• Short-Term Prospects- Performance is heavily l<strong>in</strong>ked tofootfall and will rema<strong>in</strong> underpressure- More competitive prices andspecial offers- Better quality vend<strong>in</strong>g to be seenacross all travel streams• Long-Term Prospects- More mobile units and standalonekiosks which take up lessfloorspace will be used aspassenger numbers <strong>in</strong>crease- There will be a greater brandedpresence with<strong>in</strong> stations, airportsand motorway service areas- The greater provision of<strong>in</strong>formation for travellers <strong>in</strong>airports and tra<strong>in</strong> stations willreduce prevail<strong>in</strong>g stress levels andboost spend<strong>in</strong>g- Benefits from upgrades to d<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gand seat<strong>in</strong>g areas with<strong>in</strong> travelsites<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 84


Case study 1Established and Emerg<strong>in</strong>g Consumerand Societal Trends Shap<strong>in</strong>g Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>There are two ma<strong>in</strong>drivers affect<strong>in</strong>gdemand with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market – consumertrends and societal<strong>in</strong>fluences. These twotrends divide <strong>in</strong>to thosethat are establishedand those that areemerg<strong>in</strong>g.In terms of consumer trends,value consciousness is arelatively new phenomenon thathas emerged from <strong>the</strong> currenteconomic downturn. While <strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong> economy will be <strong>in</strong> recessionfor a f<strong>in</strong>ite period of time, valueconsciousness is expected tohave a last<strong>in</strong>g effect and onewhich operators will have toadapt to – not least <strong>in</strong> terms ofdo<strong>in</strong>g more to justify <strong>the</strong>irprices.Au<strong>the</strong>nticity can be def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>terms of desire for greatertransparency and sensitivityfrom <strong>the</strong> operator, not least <strong>in</strong>terms of <strong>the</strong> sourc<strong>in</strong>g,seasonality and preparation ofproduct. This translates <strong>in</strong>tomore <strong>in</strong>formation be<strong>in</strong>g requiredabout <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> of <strong>the</strong>ir<strong>in</strong>gredients, a desire for productswhich are sourced locally, as wellas greater transparency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>actual mak<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> food, withmany restaurants now prepar<strong>in</strong>gand/or cook<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> food <strong>in</strong> frontof customers to help to createan enhanced atmosphere.Fig. 5.3 KEY CONSUMER ANDSOCIETAL TRENDS SHAPINGTHE EATING OUT MARKETESTABLISHEDCONSUMERTRENDS• Healthy <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong>• Convenience• More Demand<strong>in</strong>gESTABLISHEDSOCIETALINFLUENCES• Age<strong>in</strong>gDemographics• FamilyFragmentation• Ris<strong>in</strong>g ObesitySource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>The third key emerg<strong>in</strong>g consumertrend affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market is experience.Consumers no longer just eatwith <strong>the</strong>ir eyes and with <strong>the</strong>irstomachs – <strong>the</strong>y also want to be<strong>in</strong> an environment suited to <strong>the</strong>irneeds and which offers <strong>the</strong>msometh<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>y cannot create athome or elsewhere. For example,if <strong>the</strong>y are look<strong>in</strong>g for somewhereto read a book, <strong>the</strong>y want to beable to sit <strong>in</strong> a comfortableenvironment; if <strong>the</strong>y are look<strong>in</strong>gfor somewhere to eat andconsume alcoholic dr<strong>in</strong>ks, <strong>the</strong>ymight be look<strong>in</strong>g for a fun, livelyatmosphere. It is <strong>the</strong>seexperiences that will contributeto <strong>the</strong> overall satisfaction level of<strong>the</strong> customer.EMERGINGCONSUMER TRENDS• ValueConsciousness• Au<strong>the</strong>nticity &Local Sourc<strong>in</strong>g• Experience-ledEVOLVINGINFORMALEATING OUTMARKETEMERGING SOCIALINFLUENCES• Grow<strong>in</strong>g Ethnicity• Decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g Levelsof Trust• More Onl<strong>in</strong>eSocietal <strong>in</strong>fluences too arecontribut<strong>in</strong>g to changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>marketplace. The grow<strong>in</strong>gethnicity of <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> population islead<strong>in</strong>g to a far greater variety ofcuis<strong>in</strong>e types. Improvedtechnology is lead<strong>in</strong>g todevelopments <strong>in</strong> order<strong>in</strong>g foodand mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> search, book<strong>in</strong>gand order<strong>in</strong>g process moreconvenient for <strong>the</strong> customer –and it will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to do so.Consumers are also los<strong>in</strong>gconfidence <strong>in</strong> a number oforganisations and authorityfigures, and this is encourag<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong>m to be more selective andwary about where <strong>the</strong>y place<strong>the</strong>ir trust. This is creat<strong>in</strong>gopportunities for operators ableto capitalise on corporateresponsibilities.85 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


Case study 2Upcom<strong>in</strong>g Brandswith<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketBranded cha<strong>in</strong>s arego<strong>in</strong>g to take a greaterpresence with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market.The mega-trends present <strong>in</strong>today’s society are driv<strong>in</strong>gopportunities for new,<strong>in</strong>novative concepts to appearon <strong>the</strong> High Street. Listed hereare a small number of operatorsthat have entered <strong>the</strong> market <strong>in</strong>recent years and that offer aunique sell<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t.Jamie’s ItalianJamie’s Italian offers au<strong>the</strong>ntic, affordable, good quality Italianfood. <strong>UK</strong> customers, of vary<strong>in</strong>g affluence, are able to enjoy‘celebrity chef cook<strong>in</strong>g’ on <strong>the</strong> High Street.LeonLeon is a quirky brand that has a differentiatedidentity. It offers healthy and wholesome food, onlycook<strong>in</strong>g with seasonal <strong>in</strong>gredients. Taste is not compromised.P<strong>in</strong>g PongP<strong>in</strong>g pong offers light healthy, good tast<strong>in</strong>g Asian food <strong>in</strong> an<strong>in</strong>formal environment – it also offers unique and au<strong>the</strong>ntic teasand cocktails.SacredSacred has brought <strong>the</strong> New Zealand café experience to Londongiv<strong>in</strong>g consumers gourmet coffee, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Flat Whites, herbaltea and good food.TossedHealthy food is at <strong>the</strong> heart of Tossed which providesfresh salads which are made-to-order, giv<strong>in</strong>gconsumers choice, great tast<strong>in</strong>g food and sizeable portions.VapianoVapiano is a new and entirely modern concept <strong>in</strong> fast casual,offer<strong>in</strong>g made-to-order pizzas, pasta and salads along with a fullservice bar.Source: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong><strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong> 86


Case study 3Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketScenario Envisag<strong>in</strong>gThe diagram belowdescribes four differentscenarios – all of whichare speculative –around <strong>the</strong> future of <strong>the</strong>Informal <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>market.Arguably, <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> is currently <strong>in</strong> aposition where people are lessprosperous and <strong>the</strong>refore eat<strong>in</strong>gout less. As a result, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shortterm, <strong>the</strong> market is characterisedby a number of bus<strong>in</strong>ess failuresas consumers seek better valuefor money or, <strong>in</strong>deed, choose toeat <strong>in</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than out.Without question, <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> market is set to grow<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> long term and it will moveout of its current mode of‘Retrenchment andRationalisation’ towards abrighter future. With longerterm economic recovery and astrong feel-good factor, <strong>the</strong>expectation is that a goldenperiod of ‘Abundant Confidence’will return. This will becharacterised by a wider array ofcuis<strong>in</strong>e genres, growth <strong>in</strong> formattypes and <strong>in</strong>novation. However,with more ‘cocoon<strong>in</strong>g’, perhapsbrought on by greater securityconcerns and food scares, <strong>the</strong>reis <strong>the</strong> prospect of a strongerfocus on ‘Home-basedEnterta<strong>in</strong>ment’.Clearly, whilst <strong>the</strong>se scenariosare speculative, <strong>the</strong>y help tooutl<strong>in</strong>e how bus<strong>in</strong>esses need todevelop different tactics andstrategies for differentprospective market outcomes.Fig. 5.4 SUMMARY OF PROSPECTIVE EATING OUT SCENARIOSHOME-BASEDENTERTAINMENTConsumer: More traditional,Discern<strong>in</strong>g, Foodie, Likesenterta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and Values-ledMarket Implications: Polaris<strong>in</strong>gmarket, Demonstrationof food and CSR values,Growth of localised brand<strong>in</strong>gand sourc<strong>in</strong>gLESS/STATIC EATING OUTRETRENCHMENT &RATIONALISATIONConsumer: Price conscious,More self-reliance andLimited eat<strong>in</strong>g-out repertoiresMarket Implications:Depressed trad<strong>in</strong>g conditions,High bus<strong>in</strong>ess failures,Growth <strong>in</strong> franchises, Localand regional food focusSource: Allegra Strategies Analysis, <strong>2009</strong>LESS PROSPEROUS MORE PROSPEROUSABUNDANT CONFIDENCEConsumer: Pleasure-seek<strong>in</strong>g,Youthful, Choice-hungry,Customised and PamperedMarket Implications: Growth<strong>in</strong> niche and larger formats,Global cuis<strong>in</strong>e, Experience,Service-led, Brand identityand <strong>in</strong>novationMORE EATING OUTVALUE-LED EXPANSIONConsumer: VFM sensitive,Promotion and conveniencehungry, High snack<strong>in</strong>gMarket Implications: Moreconsolidation, Growth <strong>in</strong>price-led lower-middlesegment, Loyalty schemefocus, Mobile market<strong>in</strong>g87 <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>2009</strong>


BibliographyReferenced Sources:(1) Allegra Strategies, Mid-Year Market Update & <strong>UK</strong> Coffee Leader Survey, <strong>2009</strong>(2) Allegra Strategies, Senior Executive Top of M<strong>in</strong>d Survey, <strong>2009</strong>(3) Allegra Strategies, <strong>UK</strong> Restaurant Leader Survey, <strong>2009</strong>(4) British Beer & Pub Association: www.beerandpub.com(5) CIPD Recruitment Retention and Turnover Report, 2008(6) Confederation of British Industry, www.cbi.org.uk(7) Ernst & Young ITEM Club(8) Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), Family Food, 2007(9) Food Standards Agency, Eat well, be well, How we used to eatwww.eatwell.gov.uk(10) IGD, Shopper Trends, <strong>2009</strong>(11) NPD Group, CREST data, <strong>2009</strong>a. Consumer spend by IEO segment 2007-<strong>2009</strong>b. Consumer spend per visit by segment, <strong>2009</strong>c.Daypart analysis, <strong>2009</strong>d. Eaten at home/out of home market shares, <strong>2009</strong>(12) Office of National Statistics (ONS)a.ABI (Annual Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Inquiry), 2006b. Consumer Trends Q1 <strong>2009</strong>: Household f<strong>in</strong>al consumption expenditure onfood and dr<strong>in</strong>k <strong>in</strong> and out of <strong>the</strong> home 1970-present dayc.Disposable <strong>in</strong>come statistics 1970-present dayd. Labour Market Trends, 1996-present daye. <strong>UK</strong> National Accounts: Input-<strong>Out</strong>put Analysis, 2006(13) Survey, The Buzz, 2008 (Hospitality and Cater<strong>in</strong>g Recruitment specialist)www.bighospitality.co.uk(14) The Grocer Magaz<strong>in</strong>e, May <strong>2009</strong>(15) The Soil Association Organic Market Report, <strong>2009</strong>Wider Desk Research:(16) British Retail Consortium, www.brc.org.uk(17) Caterer Search, www.caterersearch.co.uk(18) An Appetite for Change, Food and Beverage 2012; Deloitte(19) Euro-Cha<strong>in</strong>s, <strong>UK</strong>, A Restaurant Cha<strong>in</strong> Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Service, 2006/07 BaseReport; Gira Foodservice(20) Family Spend<strong>in</strong>g and Family Surveys, 1997-2007; ONS(21) Foodservice and <strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong>: An Economic Survey, January 2007; Defra(22) Horizons FS Limited (Foodservice Data)(23) Just-Food www.just-food.com(24) M<strong>in</strong>tel Group (Foodservice Reports)(25) Social Trends, 2008; ONS(26) The Datamonitor Group (Foodservice Reports)(27) <strong>UK</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess: Activity, Size & Location, 2008; ONSCorporate References(28) Wide variety of foodservice operators with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> IEO market, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: BurgerK<strong>in</strong>g; Carluccio’s; Greggs; Jamie’s Italian; KFC; Leon; Marks and Spencer;McDonald’s; P<strong>in</strong>g Pong; Pizza Express; Pret A Manger; Sacred; Tossed; Vapiano;Wagamama; Whitbread Group, YO! Sushi(29) NGOs and relevant bodies and associations, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: Fairtrade, Ra<strong>in</strong>forestAlliance, Red Tractor<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong><strong>UK</strong><strong>2009</strong>A ComprehensiveAnalysis of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> MarketDisclaimerCopyright: Allegra Strategies Limited,July <strong>2009</strong>All rights reserved. Use of this report isfor <strong>in</strong>ternal corporate use byparticipants and client organisations.No part of this publication may bereproduced or stored <strong>in</strong> a retrievalsystem, <strong>in</strong> any form or by any means,electrical, mechanical, photocopy<strong>in</strong>g oro<strong>the</strong>rwise without <strong>the</strong> prior consent of<strong>the</strong> publishers.Great care has been taken to ensurethat all <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> thisreport is accurate and <strong>in</strong>corporates <strong>the</strong>latest developments <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal eat<strong>in</strong>gout trends <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> sector. However,Allegra Strategies can accept noresponsibility for any <strong>in</strong>vestmentdecision made on <strong>the</strong> basis of this<strong>in</strong>formation or for any omissions or<strong>in</strong>accuracies that may be conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>this report. This report has beenproduced <strong>in</strong> good faith and we trustthat <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs will be of significantvalue to all readers.Allegra Strategies LimitedNo 1 Northumberland Avenue,TrafalgarSquare, London WC2N 5BWTel: +44(0)20 7691 8800 Fax: +44(0)207691 8810Email: <strong>in</strong>fo@allegra.co.uk Website:www.allegra.co.ukRegistered <strong>in</strong> England No: 3645920


<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Out</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong><strong>2009</strong>A ComprehensiveAnalysis of <strong>the</strong> Informal<strong>Eat<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Out</strong> Market

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!