The Legal Education - Law Commission of India
The Legal Education - Law Commission of India The Legal Education - Law Commission of India
88(3) The Bar Council of India shall consider the other reports in thelight of the Report of the Task Force and take a decision inaccordance with the provisions of this Act.”(iv)Section 6 (1)(gg) should be substituted as follows:“(gg) to visit and inspect any University which confers a degree inlaw or a Department of law of a University or a law college affiliatedto a university, in accordance with the directions given under subsection(2)of section 7B;”(v)Section 7 (1) (i) should be substituted as follows:“(i) to recognize universities whose degree in law shall be aqualification for enrolment as an advocate or to de-recognise suchUniversity or to issue direction to any University to disaffiliate a lawcollege in consultation with the Bar Council Legal EducationCommittee ”(vi)A separate clause in sub-section (1) of section 7 be added to enablethe Bar Council of India to grant permission to a law department of auniversity or a law college for imparting instruction as follows:“(id) to grant permission to a law department of a University or alaw college for imparting instruction in course of study in law forenrolment as an advocate, or to withdraw such permission inconsultation with the Bar Council Legal Education Committee.
89(vii) The following clause be added in sub-section (1) of section 49:“(ak) the procedure regarding granting permission to impartinstruction to law colleges, law department of university or any otherinstitution as referred to in clause (id) of sub-section (1) of section 7and the procedure regarding withdrawal of such permission.”(viii) Section 49 (1) (d) should be substituted as follows:“(d) the standards of legal education as referred to in clause (h) ofsub-section (1) of section 7 to be observed by the universities and theLaw Colleges affiliated to the universities and the manner ofinspection of such universities and Law Colleges, as referred to insection 7B and section 7C.”
- Page 37 and 38: 37Education Committee and who are i
- Page 39 and 40: 39the absence of a consensus, the m
- Page 41 and 42: 414.7 It must be noted that standar
- Page 43 and 44: 434.10 As to the co-ordination betw
- Page 45 and 46: 45In the Karnataka High Court Judgm
- Page 47 and 48: 47the proposals for the consultatio
- Page 49 and 50: 49(a) two law teachers in office fr
- Page 51 and 52: 51aspects and we propose to lay emp
- Page 53 and 54: 535.6 Rule 9(1) lists 6 subjects fo
- Page 55 and 56: 55skill to identify the administrat
- Page 57 and 58: 57(6) preparing for negotiation, co
- Page 59 and 60: 59technologies which require corres
- Page 61 and 62: 61education and laying standards in
- Page 63 and 64: 63years, the number of civil matter
- Page 65 and 66: 65formulated may be adopted by the
- Page 67 and 68: 67Procedure, even though they have
- Page 69 and 70: 69Chapter VIIAdjunct Teachers from
- Page 71 and 72: 71“And there is no need to fit sq
- Page 73 and 74: 73“The adjunct teachers teach the
- Page 75 and 76: 75High Court or Supreme Court or be
- Page 77 and 78: 77students who will go to the Bar o
- Page 79 and 80: 79Inspections:8.4 As per section 7(
- Page 81 and 82: 81India, when it wields powers, is
- Page 83 and 84: 83one where the college is proposed
- Page 85 and 86: 85(The existing section 7A should b
- Page 87: 877C. (1) Where there is a differen
- Page 91 and 92: 919.3 Whatever be the percentage of
- Page 93 and 94: 939.10 Prof. Myron Moskovitz of the
- Page 95 and 96: 95malpractices. We are only referri
- Page 97 and 98: 97get acquainted with several pract
- Page 99 and 100: 99Chapter XEducation on Legal Educa
- Page 101 and 102: 10110.3 Several of the above Commit
- Page 103 and 104: 103colleges located in cities and d
- Page 105 and 106: 105Chapter XIDerecognition of Unive
- Page 107 and 108: 107Chapter XIITraining and Apprenti
- Page 109 and 110: 109The court held that once the rel
- Page 111 and 112: 111include problem method, moot cou
- Page 114 and 115: 114advocates as well as the requisi
- Page 116 and 117: 116senior counsel in these big citi
- Page 118 and 119: 11812.17 There is a strong view tha
- Page 120 and 121: 120graduates are proposed to be rec
- Page 122 and 123: 122Chapter XIIIDisqualification of
- Page 124 and 125: 12413.4 Therefore, we are of the em
- Page 126 and 127: 1264) Clause (b) of subsection (2)
- Page 128 and 129: 128Advocates Act, 1961 for providin
- Page 130 and 131: 130prescribe higher standards.(para
- Page 132 and 133: 132be amended.Consequently, section
- Page 134 and 135: 13430) Section 7(1) (i) to be amend
89(vii) <strong>The</strong> following clause be added in sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 49:“(ak) the procedure regarding granting permission to impartinstruction to law colleges, law department <strong>of</strong> university or any otherinstitution as referred to in clause (id) <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 7and the procedure regarding withdrawal <strong>of</strong> such permission.”(viii) Section 49 (1) (d) should be substituted as follows:“(d) the standards <strong>of</strong> legal education as referred to in clause (h) <strong>of</strong>sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 7 to be observed by the universities and the<strong>Law</strong> Colleges affiliated to the universities and the manner <strong>of</strong>inspection <strong>of</strong> such universities and <strong>Law</strong> Colleges, as referred to insection 7B and section 7C.”