The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

The Legal Education - Law Commission of India The Legal Education - Law Commission of India

lawcommissionofindia.nic.in
from lawcommissionofindia.nic.in More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

605.20 The curriculum should not make the mandatory element too large butsubjects which are in need in the bulk of the courts in the mofussil, in thecivil and criminal law, must be mandatory. While subjects mostly in use inthe courts at the grass-root level must be mandatory and some new subjectscan also be made mandatory, care must be taken to give more choice to thestudents in the optional subjects.5.21 Syllabus could be structured not merely on the basis of mandatorysubjects but also on basis of “credits” as done in the National Law School.5.22 Accreditation and quality assessment of law schools must beintroduced by the UGC & BCI fastly to build up a sense of competitionbetween the different law schools. Legal education institutions are nottoday adequately subject to a rigorous system of quality assessment andaccreditation processes. The various well-known parameters forevaluating the performance of a law school must be laid down by the UGCand the BCI and annual rating must be given to each law school andpublished in the internet to enable prospective students to compete foradmission to the best law schools.5.23 If necessary, this task may be performed by the UGC and BCI bytaking the help of professional agencies who are well versed inaccreditation processes of law schools. There must also be transparencyabout the quality of the assessment.5.24 We, therefore, recommend substitution of the existing clause (h) ofsubsection (1) of section 7 which merely refers to “promotion of legal

61education and laying standards in consultation with the Universities andState Bar Councils” as follows:(a)for clause (h), the following clauses shall besubstituted, namely:-“(h) to promote legal education and lay down standardsof such education in accordance with therecommendations of the Bar Council Legal EducationCommittee arrived at in the manner specified in section10AA including, in the matter of-(i) the prescription of standards relating tocurriculum, admission of students, appointmentand qualification of teachers;(ii) the appointment of adjunct teachers from theBar and from among the retired judges;(iii) the prescription of conditions of service of thelaw teachers;(iv) the prescription of student-teacher ratio;(v) the laying down of guidelines for adoptingdifferent teaching methods;(vi) specifying the conditions as to the location oflaw colleges, infrastructure, library andmanagement;(vii) promoting excellence in legal education for thepurposes of the accreditation scheme if any,introduced by the University GrantsCommission;(viii) promoting alternative dispute resolution as asubject of academic study in the law schools forstudents;(ix) promoting continuing education on alternativedispute resolution for legal practitioners;

605.20 <strong>The</strong> curriculum should not make the mandatory element too large butsubjects which are in need in the bulk <strong>of</strong> the courts in the m<strong>of</strong>ussil, in thecivil and criminal law, must be mandatory. While subjects mostly in use inthe courts at the grass-root level must be mandatory and some new subjectscan also be made mandatory, care must be taken to give more choice to thestudents in the optional subjects.5.21 Syllabus could be structured not merely on the basis <strong>of</strong> mandatorysubjects but also on basis <strong>of</strong> “credits” as done in the National <strong>Law</strong> School.5.22 Accreditation and quality assessment <strong>of</strong> law schools must beintroduced by the UGC & BCI fastly to build up a sense <strong>of</strong> competitionbetween the different law schools. <strong>Legal</strong> education institutions are nottoday adequately subject to a rigorous system <strong>of</strong> quality assessment andaccreditation processes. <strong>The</strong> various well-known parameters forevaluating the performance <strong>of</strong> a law school must be laid down by the UGCand the BCI and annual rating must be given to each law school andpublished in the internet to enable prospective students to compete foradmission to the best law schools.5.23 If necessary, this task may be performed by the UGC and BCI bytaking the help <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional agencies who are well versed inaccreditation processes <strong>of</strong> law schools. <strong>The</strong>re must also be transparencyabout the quality <strong>of</strong> the assessment.5.24 We, therefore, recommend substitution <strong>of</strong> the existing clause (h) <strong>of</strong>subsection (1) <strong>of</strong> section 7 which merely refers to “promotion <strong>of</strong> legal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!