The Legal Education - Law Commission of India
The Legal Education - Law Commission of India The Legal Education - Law Commission of India
605.20 The curriculum should not make the mandatory element too large butsubjects which are in need in the bulk of the courts in the mofussil, in thecivil and criminal law, must be mandatory. While subjects mostly in use inthe courts at the grass-root level must be mandatory and some new subjectscan also be made mandatory, care must be taken to give more choice to thestudents in the optional subjects.5.21 Syllabus could be structured not merely on the basis of mandatorysubjects but also on basis of “credits” as done in the National Law School.5.22 Accreditation and quality assessment of law schools must beintroduced by the UGC & BCI fastly to build up a sense of competitionbetween the different law schools. Legal education institutions are nottoday adequately subject to a rigorous system of quality assessment andaccreditation processes. The various well-known parameters forevaluating the performance of a law school must be laid down by the UGCand the BCI and annual rating must be given to each law school andpublished in the internet to enable prospective students to compete foradmission to the best law schools.5.23 If necessary, this task may be performed by the UGC and BCI bytaking the help of professional agencies who are well versed inaccreditation processes of law schools. There must also be transparencyabout the quality of the assessment.5.24 We, therefore, recommend substitution of the existing clause (h) ofsubsection (1) of section 7 which merely refers to “promotion of legal
61education and laying standards in consultation with the Universities andState Bar Councils” as follows:(a)for clause (h), the following clauses shall besubstituted, namely:-“(h) to promote legal education and lay down standardsof such education in accordance with therecommendations of the Bar Council Legal EducationCommittee arrived at in the manner specified in section10AA including, in the matter of-(i) the prescription of standards relating tocurriculum, admission of students, appointmentand qualification of teachers;(ii) the appointment of adjunct teachers from theBar and from among the retired judges;(iii) the prescription of conditions of service of thelaw teachers;(iv) the prescription of student-teacher ratio;(v) the laying down of guidelines for adoptingdifferent teaching methods;(vi) specifying the conditions as to the location oflaw colleges, infrastructure, library andmanagement;(vii) promoting excellence in legal education for thepurposes of the accreditation scheme if any,introduced by the University GrantsCommission;(viii) promoting alternative dispute resolution as asubject of academic study in the law schools forstudents;(ix) promoting continuing education on alternativedispute resolution for legal practitioners;
- Page 9 and 10: 9in as much as it did not formulate
- Page 11 and 12: 11Conference of Heads of Legal Educ
- Page 13 and 14: 13subjects are: the respective role
- Page 15 and 16: 15recommendations. The Commission w
- Page 17 and 18: 17considering the provisions of ano
- Page 19 and 20: 19The Advocates Act, 1961 thus deal
- Page 21 and 22: 212.10 If the UGC Act, 1956 is expr
- Page 23 and 24: 23subject of legal education comes
- Page 25 and 26: 25“In the field of legal educatio
- Page 27 and 28: 27between the Bar Council of India
- Page 29 and 30: 29Court Judge are now in the Commit
- Page 31 and 32: 31decision cannot be taken without
- Page 33 and 34: 33In case, during the tenure of the
- Page 35 and 36: 35(4) All questions which come up b
- Page 37 and 38: 37Education Committee and who are i
- Page 39 and 40: 39the absence of a consensus, the m
- Page 41 and 42: 414.7 It must be noted that standar
- Page 43 and 44: 434.10 As to the co-ordination betw
- Page 45 and 46: 45In the Karnataka High Court Judgm
- Page 47 and 48: 47the proposals for the consultatio
- Page 49 and 50: 49(a) two law teachers in office fr
- Page 51 and 52: 51aspects and we propose to lay emp
- Page 53 and 54: 535.6 Rule 9(1) lists 6 subjects fo
- Page 55 and 56: 55skill to identify the administrat
- Page 57 and 58: 57(6) preparing for negotiation, co
- Page 59: 59technologies which require corres
- Page 63 and 64: 63years, the number of civil matter
- Page 65 and 66: 65formulated may be adopted by the
- Page 67 and 68: 67Procedure, even though they have
- Page 69 and 70: 69Chapter VIIAdjunct Teachers from
- Page 71 and 72: 71“And there is no need to fit sq
- Page 73 and 74: 73“The adjunct teachers teach the
- Page 75 and 76: 75High Court or Supreme Court or be
- Page 77 and 78: 77students who will go to the Bar o
- Page 79 and 80: 79Inspections:8.4 As per section 7(
- Page 81 and 82: 81India, when it wields powers, is
- Page 83 and 84: 83one where the college is proposed
- Page 85 and 86: 85(The existing section 7A should b
- Page 87 and 88: 877C. (1) Where there is a differen
- Page 89 and 90: 89(vii) The following clause be add
- Page 91 and 92: 919.3 Whatever be the percentage of
- Page 93 and 94: 939.10 Prof. Myron Moskovitz of the
- Page 95 and 96: 95malpractices. We are only referri
- Page 97 and 98: 97get acquainted with several pract
- Page 99 and 100: 99Chapter XEducation on Legal Educa
- Page 101 and 102: 10110.3 Several of the above Commit
- Page 103 and 104: 103colleges located in cities and d
- Page 105 and 106: 105Chapter XIDerecognition of Unive
- Page 107 and 108: 107Chapter XIITraining and Apprenti
- Page 109 and 110: 109The court held that once the rel
605.20 <strong>The</strong> curriculum should not make the mandatory element too large butsubjects which are in need in the bulk <strong>of</strong> the courts in the m<strong>of</strong>ussil, in thecivil and criminal law, must be mandatory. While subjects mostly in use inthe courts at the grass-root level must be mandatory and some new subjectscan also be made mandatory, care must be taken to give more choice to thestudents in the optional subjects.5.21 Syllabus could be structured not merely on the basis <strong>of</strong> mandatorysubjects but also on basis <strong>of</strong> “credits” as done in the National <strong>Law</strong> School.5.22 Accreditation and quality assessment <strong>of</strong> law schools must beintroduced by the UGC & BCI fastly to build up a sense <strong>of</strong> competitionbetween the different law schools. <strong>Legal</strong> education institutions are nottoday adequately subject to a rigorous system <strong>of</strong> quality assessment andaccreditation processes. <strong>The</strong> various well-known parameters forevaluating the performance <strong>of</strong> a law school must be laid down by the UGCand the BCI and annual rating must be given to each law school andpublished in the internet to enable prospective students to compete foradmission to the best law schools.5.23 If necessary, this task may be performed by the UGC and BCI bytaking the help <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional agencies who are well versed inaccreditation processes <strong>of</strong> law schools. <strong>The</strong>re must also be transparencyabout the quality <strong>of</strong> the assessment.5.24 We, therefore, recommend substitution <strong>of</strong> the existing clause (h) <strong>of</strong>subsection (1) <strong>of</strong> section 7 which merely refers to “promotion <strong>of</strong> legal