- Page 1 and 2:
Law Commission of India184 th Repor
- Page 3 and 4:
3colleges for prescribing standards
- Page 5 and 6:
5CONTENTSPAGESCh. I Introductory 1-
- Page 7 and 8:
7suggestions, while some others opp
- Page 9 and 10:
9in as much as it did not formulate
- Page 11 and 12:
11Conference of Heads of Legal Educ
- Page 13 and 14:
13subjects are: the respective role
- Page 15 and 16:
15recommendations. The Commission w
- Page 17 and 18:
17considering the provisions of ano
- Page 19 and 20:
19The Advocates Act, 1961 thus deal
- Page 21 and 22:
212.10 If the UGC Act, 1956 is expr
- Page 23 and 24:
23subject of legal education comes
- Page 25 and 26:
25“In the field of legal educatio
- Page 27 and 28:
27between the Bar Council of India
- Page 29 and 30:
29Court Judge are now in the Commit
- Page 31 and 32:
31decision cannot be taken without
- Page 33 and 34:
33In case, during the tenure of the
- Page 35 and 36:
35(4) All questions which come up b
- Page 37 and 38:
37Education Committee and who are i
- Page 39 and 40:
39the absence of a consensus, the m
- Page 41 and 42:
414.7 It must be noted that standar
- Page 43 and 44:
434.10 As to the co-ordination betw
- Page 45 and 46:
45In the Karnataka High Court Judgm
- Page 47 and 48:
47the proposals for the consultatio
- Page 49 and 50:
49(a) two law teachers in office fr
- Page 51 and 52:
51aspects and we propose to lay emp
- Page 53 and 54:
535.6 Rule 9(1) lists 6 subjects fo
- Page 55 and 56:
55skill to identify the administrat
- Page 57 and 58:
57(6) preparing for negotiation, co
- Page 59 and 60:
59technologies which require corres
- Page 61 and 62:
61education and laying standards in
- Page 63 and 64:
63years, the number of civil matter
- Page 65 and 66:
65formulated may be adopted by the
- Page 67 and 68:
67Procedure, even though they have
- Page 69 and 70:
69Chapter VIIAdjunct Teachers from
- Page 71 and 72:
71“And there is no need to fit sq
- Page 73 and 74:
73“The adjunct teachers teach the
- Page 75 and 76:
75High Court or Supreme Court or be
- Page 77 and 78:
77students who will go to the Bar o
- Page 79 and 80:
79Inspections:8.4 As per section 7(
- Page 81 and 82: 81India, when it wields powers, is
- Page 83 and 84: 83one where the college is proposed
- Page 85 and 86: 85(The existing section 7A should b
- Page 87 and 88: 877C. (1) Where there is a differen
- Page 89 and 90: 89(vii) The following clause be add
- Page 91 and 92: 919.3 Whatever be the percentage of
- Page 93 and 94: 939.10 Prof. Myron Moskovitz of the
- Page 95 and 96: 95malpractices. We are only referri
- Page 97 and 98: 97get acquainted with several pract
- Page 99 and 100: 99Chapter XEducation on Legal Educa
- Page 101 and 102: 10110.3 Several of the above Commit
- Page 103 and 104: 103colleges located in cities and d
- Page 105 and 106: 105Chapter XIDerecognition of Unive
- Page 107 and 108: 107Chapter XIITraining and Apprenti
- Page 109 and 110: 109The court held that once the rel
- Page 111 and 112: 111include problem method, moot cou
- Page 114 and 115: 114advocates as well as the requisi
- Page 116 and 117: 116senior counsel in these big citi
- Page 118 and 119: 11812.17 There is a strong view tha
- Page 120 and 121: 120graduates are proposed to be rec
- Page 122 and 123: 122Chapter XIIIDisqualification of
- Page 124 and 125: 12413.4 Therefore, we are of the em
- Page 126 and 127: 1264) Clause (b) of subsection (2)
- Page 128 and 129: 128Advocates Act, 1961 for providin
- Page 130 and 131: 130prescribe higher standards.(para
- Page 134 and 135: 13430) Section 7(1) (i) to be amend